Expanding the chronotopes of schooling for the promotion of students’ agency

Identity, Community, and Learning Lives in the Digital Age

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 107-125

  Rajala, Antti ^a   Hilppö, Jaakko ^a   Lipponen, Lasse ^a   Kumpulainen, Kristiina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925649565     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139026239.009     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (M. Holquist, Ed., C. Emerson, & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (Vern W. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
3. Bloome, D., Beierle, M., Grigorenko, M., & Goldman, S. (2009). Learning over time: Uses of intercontextuality, collective memories, and classroom chronotopes in the construction of learning opportunities in a ninth-grade language arts classroom. Language and Education, 23(4), 313–34.
4. Brown, R., & Renshaw, P. (2000). Collective argumentation: A sociocultural approach to reframing classroom teaching and learning. In H. Cowie & G. van der Aalsvoort (Eds.), Social interaction in learning and instruction: The meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge (pp 52–66). Amsterdam: Pergamon Press.
5. Brown, R., & Renshaw, P. (2006). Positioning students as actors and authors: A chronotopic analysis of collaborative learning activities. Mind, Culture and Activity, 13(3), 247–59.
6. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Daniels, H. (2008). Pedagogy. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp 307–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Edwards, A., & D’Arcy, C. (2004). Relational agency and disposition in sociocultural accounts of learning to teach. Educational Review, 56, 147–55.
9. Edwards, A., & Mackenzie, L. (2005). Steps towards participation: The social support of learning trajectories. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 24(4), 287–302.
10. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? The American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.
11. Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
12. Engestrom, Y. (2008a). Putting Vygotsky to work. The change laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp 363–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Engestrom, Y. (2008b). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Engestrom, Y., Engestrom, R., & Suntio, A. (2002). Can a school community learn to master its own future? An activity theoretical study of expansive learning among middle school teachers. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century. Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp 211–24). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
15. Engestrom, Y., Puonti, A., & Seppanen, L. (2003). Spatial and temporal expansion of the object as a challenge for reorganizing work. In D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi, & D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp 151–86). London: Sharpe.
16. Engle, R. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(5), 451–98.
17. Engle, R., & Conant, F. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinaryengagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 339–483.
18. Engle, R., Nguyen, P., & Mendelson, A. (2011). The influence of framing on transfer: Initial evidence from a tutoring experiment. Instructional Science, 39, 603–28.
19. Fischer, G. (2011). Understanding, fostering, and supporting cultures of participation. ACM Interactions, XVIII(3), 42–53. Retrieved from http://l3d.cs.colorado.edu/~gerhard/papers/2011/interactions-coverstory.pdf
20. Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classroom. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
21. Greeno, J. (2006). Authoritative, accountable positioning and connected, general knowing: Progressive themes in understanding transfer. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 537–47.
22. Gresalfi, M., Martin, T., Hand, V., & Greeno, J. (2009). Constructing competence: An analysis of student participation in the activity systems of mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 49–70.
23. Hakkarainen, K., Ritella, G., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2011, July). Epistemic mediation, chronotope, and expansive knowledge practices. Poster presentation at the 9th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Hong Kong.
24. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Hubbard, L., Mehan, H., & Stein, M. K. (2006). Reform as learning: School reform, organizational culture, and community politics in San Diego. New York: Routledge.
26. Kumpulainen, K., Krokfors, L., Lipponen, L., Tissari, V., Hilppo, J., & Rajala, A. (2010). Learning bridges: Toward participatory learning environments. Helsinki: CICERO Learning, University of Helsinki.
27. Kumpulainen, K., & Lipponen, L. (in press). The dialogic construction of agency in classroom communities. In B. Ligorio & M. Cesar (Eds.), The interplays between dialogical learning and dialogical self. Greenwich CT: Information Age Publishing.
28. Kumpulainen, K., & Lipponen, L. (2010). Productive interaction as agentic participation in dialogic inquiry. In C. Howe & K. Littleton (Eds.), Educational dialogues (pp 48–63). London: Taylor & Francis.
29. Kumpulainen, K., Vasama, S., & Kangassalo, M. (2003). The intertextuality of children’s explanations in a technology-enriched early years science classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 793–805.
30. Leander, K. (2002). Polycontextual construction zones: Mapping the expansion of schooled space and identity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(3), 211–37.
31. Lemke, J. (2004, April). Learning across multiple places and their chronotope. Paper presented at AERA 2004 Symposium, San Diego. Retrieved October 31, 2011, from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jaylemke/papers/aera_2004.htm
32. Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2011). Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 812–19.
33. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. National Institute for Health and Welfare. (2011). School health promotion study. Helsinki: Author. Retrieved October 31, 2011, from http://info.stakes.fi/kouluterveyskysely/EN/index.htm
35. OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do – student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. I). Paris: Author. Retrieved December 22, 2011, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264091450-en
36. Rainio, A. (2008). From resistance to involvement: Examining agency and control in a playworld activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity 15(2), 115–40.
37. Rainio, A. (2010). Lionhearts of the playworld: An ethnographic case study of the development of agency in play pedagogy. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Institute of Behavioural Sciences.
38. Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D., & Losito, B. (2010). ICCS 2009 international report: Civic knowledge, attitudes, and engagement among lower-secondary school students in 38 countries. Amsterdam: IEA.
39. Scott, P., Mortimer, E., & Aguiar, O. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605–31.
40. Stetsenko, A. (2008). From relational ontology to transformative activist stance on development and learning: Expanding Vygotsky’s (CHAT) project. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 471–91.
41. Thomson, P., & Hall, C. (2008). Opportunities missed and/or thwarted? ‘Funds of knowledge’ meet the English national curriculum. Curriculum Journal, 19(2), 87–103.
42. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1997). Tinkering toward Utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Vadeboncoeur, J. (2005). The difference that time and space make: An analysis of institutional and narrative landscapes. In L. Stevens & J. Vadeboncoeur (Eds.), Re/constructing ‘the adolescent’: Sign, symbol, and body (pp 123–52). New York: Peter Lang.