Authoritative, accountable positioning and connected, general knowing: Progressive themes in understanding transfer

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 537-547

  Greeno, James G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751550707     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls1504_4     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Battista, M. T. (1994). On Greeno's environmental/model view of conceptual domains: A spatial/geometric perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 86-93.
2. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
3. Boaler, J. (2002). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning (Rev. ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Clinchy, B. M. (1996). Connected and separate knowing: Toward a marriage of two minds. In N. R. Goldberger, J. M. Tarule, B. M. Clinchy, & M. F. Belenky (Eds.), Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by Women's ways of knowing (pp. 205-247). New York: Basic Books.
5. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399-483.
6. Ford, M. J. (2005). The game, the pieces, and the players: Generative resources from alternative portrayals of experimentation. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 449-487.
7. Gibson, J. J. (1979). An ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
8. Gibson, J. J., & Gibson, E. J. (1955). Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment. Psychological Review, 62, 32-41.
9. Goldstone, R. L., & Son, J. Y. (2005). The transfer of scientific principles using concrete and idealized simulations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 35-67.
10. Greeno, J. G. (1991). Number sense as situated knowing in a conceptual domain. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 170-218.
11. Greeno, J. G. (2003, November). A situative perspective on cognition and learning in interaction. Paper presented at the workshop Theorizing Learning Practice, University of Illinois, Urbana.
12. Katona, G. (1945). Organizing and memorizing: Studies in the psychology of learning and teaching. New York: Columbia University Press.
13. Lobato, J., & Siebert, D. (2002). Quantitative reasoning in a reconceived view of transfer. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 87-116.
14. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Sayeki, Y., Ueno, N., & Nagasaka, T. (1991). Mediation as a generative model for obtaining an area. Learning and Instruction, 1, 229-242.
16. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Making mathematics and making pasta: From cookbook procedures to really cooking. In J. G. Greeno & S. V. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 299-319). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
17. Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 129-184.
18. Tarule, J. M. (1996). Voices in dialogue: Collaborative ways of knowing. In N. R. Goldberger, J. M. Tarule, B. M. Clinchy, & M. F. Belenky (Eds.), Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by Women's ways of knowing (pp. 274-304). New York: Basic Books.
19. van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
20. Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive thinking, enlarged edition. New York: Harper & Row.
21. Woodworth, R. W., & Schlosberg, H. (1954). Experimental psychology (Rev. ed.). New York: Holt.