The importance of status in markets: A market identityperspective

Status in Management and Organizations

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 87-117

  Jensen, Michael ^a   Kim, Bo Kyung ^b   Kim, Heeyon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925632578     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511760525.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. Baker, W. E., Faulkner, R. R., and Fisher, G. A. 1998. “Hazards of the market: The continuity and dissolution of interorganizational market relationships,” American Sociological Review 63: 147-177.
2. Benjamin, B. A. and Podolny, J. M. 1999. “Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry.” Administrative Science Quarterly 44, 563-589.
3. Burris, V. 2004, “The academic caste system: Prestige hierarchies in PhD exchange networks,” American Sociological Review 69: 239-264.
4. Carroll, G. R. and Hannan, M. T. 2000, The Demography of Organizations and Industries. Princeton University Press.
5. Carroll, G. R. and Swaminathan, A. 2000, “Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the US brewing industry.” American Journal of Sociology 106: 715-762.
6. Caves, R. E. 1980. “Industrial-organization, corporate-strategy and structure” Journal of Economic Literature 18: 64-92.
7. Chen, G., Hambrick, D. C., and Pollock, T. G. 2008. “Puttin’ on the ritz: Pre-IPO enlistment of prestigious affiliates as deadline-induced remediation,” Academy of Management Journal 51: 954-975.
8. Chung, S., Singh, H., and Lee, K. 2000, “Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation.” Strategic Management Journal 21: 1-22.
9. D’Aveni, R. A. 1996. “A multiple-constituency, status-based approach to interorganizational mobility of faculty and input-output competition among top business schools,” Organization Science 7: 166-189.
10. Davis, G. F. and Greve, H. R. 1997. “Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s,” American Journal of Sociology 103: 1-37.
11. Durand, R., Rao, H., and Monin, P. 2007, “Code and conduct in French cuisine: Impact of code changes on external evaluations” Strategic Management Journal 28: 455-472.
12. Eisenhardt, K. M. and Schoonhoven, C. B. 1996. “Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms,” Organization Science 7: 136-150.
13. Geletkanycz, M. A., Boyd, K., and Finkelstein, S. 2001. “The strategic value of CEO external directorate networks: Implications for CEO compensation” Strategic Management Journal 22: 889-898.
14. Gould, R. V. 2002. “The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test.” American Journal of Sociology 107: 1143-1178.
15. Gulati, R. and Higgins, M. C. 2003. “Which ties matter? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success.” Strategic Management Journal 24: 127-144.
16. Guler, I. 2007. “Throwing good money after bad? Political and institutional influences on sequential decision making in the venture capital industry.” Administrative Science Quarterly 52: 248-285.
17. Haas, M. R. and Hansen, M. T. 2007. “Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations,” Strategic Management Journal 28: 1133-1153.
18. Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J. 1989. Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
19. Hannan, M. T., Pólos, L., and Carroll, G. R. 2007. Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies. Princeton University Press.
20. Haunschild, P. R. and Miner, A. S. 1997. “Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 472-500.
21. Higgins, M. C. and Gulati, R. 2003. “Getting off to a good start: The effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige,” Organization Science 14: 244-263.
22. Hoetker, G., Swaminathan, A., and Mitchell, W. 2007, “Modularity and the impact of buyer-supplier relationships on the survival of suppliers,” Management Science 53: 178-191.
23. Hsu, G. 2006, “Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production.” Administrative Science Quarterly 51: 420-450.
24. Hsu, G. and Hannan, M. T. 2005. “Identities, genres, and organizational forms,” Organization Science 16: 474–490.
25. Hsu, G., Hannan, M. T., and Koçak, Ö. 2009. “Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrated theory and two empirical tests.” American Sociological Review 74: 150-169.
26. Hughes, E. C. 1937. “Institutional office and the person,” American Journal of Sociology 43: 404-413.
27. Jensen, M. 2003. “The role of network resources in market entry: Commercial banks’ entry into investment banking, 1991-1997,” Administrative Science Quarterly 48: 466-497.
28. Jensen, M. 2006 “Should we stay or should we go? Accountability, status anxiety, and client defections,” Administrative Science Quarterly 51: 97-128.
29. Jensen, M. 2008 “The use of relational discrimination to manage market entry: When do social status and structural holes work against you?” Academy of Management Journal 51: 723–743.
30. Jensen, M. 2010. “Legitimizing illegitimacy: How creating market identity legitimizes illegitimate products.” Working Paper, University of Michigan.
31. Jensen, M. and Kim, B. K. 2009. “Great, Madame Butterfly again! How robust market identity shapes opera repertoires.” Working Paper, University of Michigan.
32. Jensen, M. and Kim, B. K. 2010 “The real Oscar curse: The negative consequences of position status shifts.” Working Paper, University of Michigan.
33. Jensen, M. and Roy, A. 2008. “Staging exchange partner choices: When do status and reputation matter?” Academy of Management Journal 51: 495-516.
34. Kennedy, M. T. 2008. “Getting counted: Markets, media, and reality.” American Sociological Review 73: 270-295.
35. Kim, B. K. and Jensen, M. 2010. “It is not just what you have, but how you present it: How subcategorization affects opera market identity.” Working Paper, University of Michigan.
36. Linton, R. 1936. The Study of Man. New York: D. Appleton-Century Co.
37. McKendrick, D. G. and Carroll, G. R. 2001. “On the genesis of organizational forms: Evidence from the market for disk arrays” Organization Science 12: 661-682.
38. McKendrick, D. G., Jaffee, J., Carroll, G. R., and Khessina, O. M. 2003 “In the bud? Disk array producers as a (possibly) emergent organizational form” Administrative Science Quarterly 48: 60-93.
39. Merton, R. K. 1957. Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
40. Phillips, D. J. and Zuckerman, E. W. 2001 “Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets” American Journal of Sociology 107: 379-429.
41. Podolny, J. M. 1993. “A status-based model of market competition.” American Journal of Sociology 98: 829-872.
42. Podolny, J. M. 1994. “Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange” Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 458-483.
43. Podolny, J. M. 2001. “Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market.” American Journal of Sociology 107: 33-60.
44. Podolny, J. M.2005. Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition. Princeton University Press.
45. Podolny, J. M. and Phillips5 D. J. 1996. “The dynamics of organizational status” Industrial and Corporate Change 5: 453-471.
46. Podolny, J. M. and Scott Morton, F. M. 1999. “Social status, entry and predation: The case of British shipping cartels 1879-1929,” Journal of Industrial Economics 47: 41-67.
47. Podolny, J. M. and Stuart, T. E. 1995. “A role-based ecology of technological change,” American Journal of Sociology 100: 1224-1260.
48. Podolny, J. M., Stuart, T. E., and Hannan, M. T. 1996. “Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984-1991,” American Journal of Sociology 102: 659-689.
49. Porter, M. E. 1979. “The structure within industries and companies’ performance,” The Review of Economics and Statistics 61: 214-227.
50. Rao, H. 2009. Market Rebels: How Activists Make or Break Radical Innovations. Princeton University Press.
51. Rao, H, Monin, P., and Durand, R. 2003. “Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy,” American Journal of Sociology 108: 795-843.
52. Rao, H, Monin, P., and Durand, R. 2005. “Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy.” American Sociological Review 70: 968-991.
53. Rhee, M. and Haunschild, P. R. 2006. “The liability of good reputation: A study of product recalls in the US automobile industry.” Organization Science 17: 101-117.
54. Rosenkopf, L. and Padula, G. 2008. “Investigating the microstructure of network evolution: Alliance formation in the mobile communications industry,” Organization Science 19: 669-687.
55. Ruef, M. 2000, “The emergence of organizational forms: A community ecology approach,” American Journal of Sociology 106: 658-714.
56. Sanders, W. and Tuschke, A. 2007. “The adoption of institutionally contested organizational practices: The emergence of stock option pay in Germany,” Academy of Management Journal 50: 33-56.
57. Shapiro, C. 1983. “Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 98: 659-680.
58. Sine, W. D., Shane, S., and Di Gregorio, D. 2003. “The halo effect and technology licensing: The influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions,” Management Science 49: 478-496.
59. Sorokin, P. A. 1959. Social and Cultural Mobility. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
60. Spence, M. 1974. Market Signaling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61. Stuart, T. E. 1998. “Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry,” Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 668-698.
62. Stuart, T. E. 2000. “Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry.” Strategic Management Journal 21: 791-811.
63. Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., and Hybels, R. C. 1999. “Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures” Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 315-349.
64. Uzzi, B. and Lancaster, R. 2004. “Embeddedness and price formation in the corporate law market” American Sociological Review 69: 319-344.
65. Washington, M. and Zajac i E. J. 2005. “Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence.” Academy of Management Journal 48: 282-296.
66. Weber, M. 1968. Economy and Sociology: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Translated and edited by G. Roth and C. Wittich. New York: Bedminister Press.
67. Wilson R. 1985. “Reputations in games and markets,” in A. E. Roth (ed.), Game-theoretic Models of Bargaining. Cambridge University Press, pp. 27-62.
68. Zuckerman, E. W. 1999. “The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount” American Journal of Sociology 104: 1398-1438.