The Halo effect and technology licensing: The influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions

Management Science

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 478-496

  Sine, Wesley David ^a   Shane, Scott ^a   Di Gregorio, Dante ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

Licensing; Prestige; Status; Technology

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING RESEARCH; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; SOCIAL ASPECTS; TECHNOLOGY;

HALO EFFECT; LICENSING; TECHNOLOGY LICENSING;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EID: 0043205027     PISSN: 00251909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.478.14416     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adams, J. 1990. Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth. J. Political Econom. 98 673-702.
2. Allen, F. 1984. Reputation and product quality. RAND J. Econom. 15(3) 305-327.
3. Allison, P. D., P. D. Long, 1990. Departmental effects on scientific productivity. Amer. Soc. Rev. 55(4) 469-478.
4. Arrow, K. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. R. Nelson, ed. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
5. Asch, S. 1940. Studies in the principles of judgments and attitudes II: Determination of judgments by group and by ego standards. J. Soc. Psych. 12 433-465.
6. Association of University Technology Managers. 1999. AUTM Licensing Survey. Association of University Technology Managers, Norwalk, CT.
7. Benjamin, B., J. Podolny. 1999. Status, quality and social order in the California wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44 563-589.
8. Bradach, J. L., R. G. Eccles. 1989. Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Ann. Rev. Soc. 15 97-118.
9. Bray, M., J. Lee, 2000. University revenues from technology transfer: Licensing fees vs. equity positions. J. Bus. Venturing 15 385-392.
10. Crane, D. 1965. Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of productivity and recognition. Amer. Soc. Rev. 30(5) 699-714.
11. Diggle, P. L., K. Y. Liang, S. L. Zeger. 1994. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford University Press, New York.
12. Etzkowitz, H. 1998. The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Res. Policy 27 823-833.
13. Feldman, M., I. Feller, J. Bercovitz, R. Burton, 2002. Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American universities. Management Sci. 48(1) 105-121.
14. Golub, G. H., C. F. Van Loan, 1989. Matrix Computations. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
15. Gourman, J. 1991. The Gourman Report. National Education Standards, Northridge, CA.
16. ____. 1994. The Gourman Report. National Education Standards, Northridge, CA.
17. ____. 1997. The Gourman Report. National Education Standards, Northridge, CA.
18. Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Soc. 91 481-510.
19. Hecker, D. 1999. High technology employment: A broader view. Monthly Labor Rev. 122(6) 18-30.
20. Henderson, R., A. Jaffe, M. Trajtenberg. 1998. Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. Rev. Econom. Statist. 65 119-127.
21. Hovland, C., I. Janis, H. Kelly. 1953. Communication and Persuasion. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
22. Jaffe, A. 1989. Real effects of academic research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(5) 957-970.
23. Lewin, K. 1935. Dynamic Theory of Personality. McGraw-Hill, New York.
24. Liang, K., S. Zeger. 1986. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73(1) 13-22.
25. Mansfield, E.1998. Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings. Res. Policy 26 773-776
26. Merton, R. 1968. The Matthew effect in science. Science 159 56-63.
27. Minnis, M. S. 1953. Cleavage in women's organizations: A reflection of the social structure of a city. Amer. Soc. Rev. 18(1) 47-53.
28. Mowery, D. C., R. R. Nelson, B. N. Sampat, A. A. Ziedonis. 2001. The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980. Res. Policy 30(1) 99-119.
29. National Research Council. 1995. Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States Continuity and Change. National Academy of Sciences, Washington D.C.
30. Parsons, T. 1951. Essays in Sociological Theory. The Free Press, Glencoe, IL.
31. Parlett, B. N., D. S. Scott. 1979. The Lanczos algorithm with selective orthogonalization. Math. Comput. 33(145) 217-238
32. Perrow, C. 1961. Organizational prestige: Some functions and dysfunctions. Amer. J. Soc. 66(4)335-341.
33. Podolny, J. 1993. A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Soc. 98(4) 829-872.
34. ____. 1994. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39 458-483.
35. ____, T. Stuart. 1995. A role-based ecology of technological change. Amer. J. Soc. 100 1224-1260.
36. Powell, W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Res. Organ. Behavior 12 295-336.
37. Rosenberg, N., R. Nelson. 1994. American universities and technical advance in industry. Res. Policy 23 323-348.
38. Saville, D., G. R. Wood. 1991. Statistical Methods: The Geometric Approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
39. Shankar, O., E. Yuchtman-Yaar. 1997. Reputation, image, prestige, and goodwill: An interdisciplinary approach to organizational standing. Human Relations 50 1361-1381.
40. Shrum, W., R. Wuthnow. 1998. Reputational status of organizations in technical systems. Amer. J. Soc. 93(4) 882-912.
41. StataCorp. 1999. Stata Statistical Software: Release 6.0. Stata Corporation, College Station, TX.
42. Stuart, T. 1998. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43 668-698.
43. Tallman, S., O. Shenkar. 1996. A decision-making model of international cooperative venture formation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 69 91-113.
44. U.S. News & World Report. 1991-1998. America's Best Colleges. U.S. News & World Report, Washington D.C.
45. Weigelt, K., C. Camerer. 1998. Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications. Strategic Management J. 9(5) 443-454.
46. White, H. 1981. Where do markets come from? Amer. J. Soc. 87 517-547.
47. Wilson, R. 1985. Reputations in games and markets. A. Roth, ed. Game Theoretic Models of Bargaining. Cambridge University Press, New York, 65-84.
48. Young, R. C., O. F. Larson. 1965. The contribution of voluntary organizations to community structure. Amer. J. Soc. 71(2) 178-186.