A visual learning design representation to facilitate dissemination and reuse of innovative pedagogical strategies in university teaching

Handbook of Visual Languages for Instructional Design: Theories and Practices

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 380-393

  Agostinho, Shirley ^a   Harper, Barry ^a   Oliver, Ron ^b   Hedberg, John G ^c   Wills, Sandra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^b EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871003795     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-729-4.ch019     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. rd Annual Conference of the Astralasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Who's Learning? Whose Technology? (pp. 3-7). Sydney: Sydney University Press.
2. th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 29-38). Auckland, New Zealand. UNITEC Institute of Technology.
3. Alexander, S., & McKenzie, J. (1998). An evaluation of information technology projects for university learning. CAUT, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
4. AUTC Project (2002). Information and communication technologies and their role in flexible learning final report. Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://www.autc.gov.au/projects/completed/comp_projects_ICT_flex_learning.htm
5. Bennett, S. J. (2005). Online support for collaborative authentic activities. In C. Howard, J. Boettcher, L. Justice, K. Schenk, P. Rogers, & G. Berg (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance learning Vol I-IV (pp. 1412-1416). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.
6. Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., & Lockyer, L. (2005, July 4-6). Reusable learning designs in university education. In The Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET 2005) (pp. 102-106). Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
7. Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., Lockyer, L., & Harper, B. (2006). Supporting university teachers create pedagogically sound learning environments using learning designs and learning objects. IADIS International Journal on WWW/Internet, 4(1), 16-26. Retrieved July 10, 2006, from http://www.iadis.org/ijwi/
8. st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 116-122). Perth, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/bennett.html
9. Botturi, L., Derntl, M., Boot, E., & Figl, K. (2006). A classification framework for educational modeling languages in instructional design. In The Proceedings of IEEE ICALT 2006 (pp. 1216-1220). Kerkrade, The Netherlands.
10. Boud, D. & Prosser, M. (2002). Appraising new technologies for learning: A framework for development. Educational Media International, 39(3-4), 237-245.
11. th International Conference (pp. 1328-1335). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
12. Cunningham, S. (1998). Technology and delivery: Assessing the impact of new media on "borderless" education. Australian Universities' Review, 41(1), 10-13.
13. Dijkstra, S., Collis, B., & Eseryel, D. (1999). Instructional design for tele-learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 10(2), 3-18.
14. Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82-101.
15. th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2005) (pp. 266-270). Kaohsiung, Taiwan. IEEE Computer Society.
16. Herrington, J. & Oliver, R. (2002). Description of online teaching and learning (Edith Cowan University Online Unit IMM4141 in Graduate Certificate in Online Learning). Retrieved September 19, 2006, from http://www.learningdesigns.uow.edu.au/exemplars/info/LD20/index.html
17. Hicks, O. (2004). Composite report on projects funded through the Australian universities teaching committee 2000-2003. Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://www.autc.gov.au/projects/completed/comp_projects_proj_funded_autc_2000-2003.htm
18. Ip, A., & Naidu, S. (2001). Experienced-based pedagogical designs for e-learning. Educational Technology: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 41(5),53-58.
19. Jonassen, D., H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85.
20. McAndrew, P., Goodyear, P., & Dalziel, J. (2006). Patterns, designs and activities: Unifying descriptions of learning structures. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2(2/3), 216-242.
21. Nicoll, K. (1998). "Fixing" the "Facts": Flexible learning as policy invention. Higher Education Research and Development, 17(3), 291-304.
22. Oliver, R. (1999). Exploring strategies for online teaching and learning. Distance Education, 20(2), 240-254.
23. Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (2000). Using situated learning as a design strategy for Web-based learning. In B. Abbey (Ed.), Instructional and cognitive impacts of Web-based education (pp. 178-191). Hershey PA: Idea Group Publishing.
24. Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (2001). Teaching and learning online: A beginner's guide to e-learning and e-teaching in higher education. Edith Cowan University: Western Australia.
25. Oliver, R. & Herrington, J. (2002). Explore, describe, apply: A problem focused learning design. Retrieved September 19, 2006, from http://www.learningdesigns.uow.edu.au/guides/info/G4/index.htm
26. Oliver, R., Harper, B., Hedberg, J., Wills, S., & Agostinho, S. (2002). Formalizing the description of learning designs. In A. Goody, J. Herrington, & M. Northcote (Eds.), Quality conversations: Research and development in higher education, (Volume 25, pp. 496-504). Jamison, ACT: HERDSA.
27. Oliver, R., Harper, B., Wills, S. Agostinho, S. & Hedberg, J. (2007). Describing ICT-based learning designs that promote quality learning outcomes. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for the digital age: Designing and delivering e-learning (pp. 64-80). Routledge.
28. Pedagogy case study templates. (2006). Retrieved September 19, 2006, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearning_pedagogy/elp_templates.aspx
29. Richards, G., & Knight, C. (2005, 26 January). UNFOLD Learning design and representations of instructional intent. Retrieved April 5, 2005, from http://www.unfold-project.net:8085/UNFOLD/about_folder/events/online/griff/paper/
30. Waters, S. H., & Gibbons, A. S. (2004). Design languages, notation systems, and instructional technology: A case study. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 52(2), 57-68.
31. Wills, S. & McDougall, A. (2006, December). Facilitating uptake of online role play: Learning objects versus learning designs. In The Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 889-892). Sydney: Sydney University Press.
32. Tsichritzis, D. (1999). Reengineering the university. Communications of the ACM, 42(6), 93-100.