Critical Practice Analysis of Special Education Policy: An RTI Example

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 116-124

  Thorius, Kathleen A King ^a   Maxcy, Brendan D ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

critical theory; disproportionality; policy; response to intervention

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925438278     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: 15384756     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741932514550812     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Albrecht S. F.,Skiba R.,Losen D.,Chung C.,Middelberg L.Federal policy on disproportionality in special education: Is it moving us forward?.Journal of Disability Policy Studies. 2012;23:14-25
2. Artiles A. J.Toward an interdisciplinary understanding of educational equity and difference: The case of the racialization of ability.Educational Researcher. 2011;40:431-445
3. Bahr M. W.,Fuchs D.,Stecker P. M.,Fuchs L. S.Are teachers’ perceptions of difficult-to-teach students racially biased?.School Psychology Review. 1991;20:599-608
4. Ball S.Policy sociology and critical social research: A personal review of recent education policy and policy research.British Educational Research Journal. 1997;23:257-274
5. Blanchett W.Disproportionate representation of African American students in special education: Acknowledging the role of White privilege and racism.Educational Researcher. 2006;35:24-28
6. BoumanS. (2010). Response-to-Intervention in California public schools: Has it helped address disproportional placement rates for students with learning disabilities? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (ProQuest document ID: 2076080451)
7. Bradley R.,Danielson L.,Hallahan D.Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2002:
8. Braun A.,Maguire M.,Ball S. J.Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning.Journal of Educational Policy. 2010;25:547-560
9. Brown K.Teachers as language-policy actors: Contending with the erasure of lesser-used languages in schools.Anthropology & Education Quarterly. 2010;41:298-314
10. Burns M. K.,Peters R.,Noell G. H.Using performance feedback to enhance implementation fidelity of the problem-solving team process.Journal of School Psychology. 2008;46:537-550
11. Busch T. W.,Reschly A. L.Progress monitoring in reading using curriculum-based measurement in a Response-to-Intervention model.Assessment for Effective Intervention. 2007;32:223-230
12. Cartledge G.,Singh A.,Gibson L.Practical behavior-management techniques to close the accessibility gap for students who are culturally and linguistically diverse.Preventing School Failure. 2008;52 (3): 29-38
13. Christenson S. L.,Decker D. M.,Triezenberg H. L.,Ysseldyke J. E.,Reschly A.Consequences of high-stakes assessment for students with and without disabilities.Educational Policy. 2007;21:662-690
14. Delpit L.Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: New Press; 2006:
15. Minority students in special and gifted education. Donovan M. S.Cross C. T., ed. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002:
16. Dunn L. M.Special education for the mildly retarded: Is much of it justifiable?.Exceptional Children. 1968;35:5-21
17. Ferguson D. L.,Kozleski E. B.,Smith A.Transforming general and special education in urban schools: Effective education for learners with exceptionalities. Ferguson D. L.Kozleski E. B.Smith A. F.Obiakor C.Utley A.Rotatori A., ed. London, England: Elsevier Science; 2003:43-74.
18. Rethinking special education for a new century. Finn C. E.Rotherham A. J.Hokanson C. R.Finn C. E.Rotherham A. J.Hokanson C. R., ed. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation and the Progressive Policy Institute; 2001:259-288.
19. Fuchs D.,Mock D.,Morgan P. L.,Young C. L.Responsiveness to intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. 2003;18:157-171
20. Fullan M.Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2007:
21. GlowackiH. L. (2013). Illinois elementary principals’ perceptions of the teacher evaluation process of special education teachers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
22. Greeno J. G.,Collins A. M.,Resnick L. B.Handbook of educational psychology. Berliner D.Calfee R., ed. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1996:15-46.
23. Haager D. E.,Klingner J. E.,Vaughn S. E.Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 2007:
24. Hartlep N. D.,Ellis A. L.Using standards and high-stakes testing for students: Exploiting power with critical pedagogy. Gorlewski J.Porfilio B.Gorlewski D., ed. New York, NY: Peter Lang; 2012:87-108.
25. Heimens S.Education policy, practice, and power.Educational Policy. 2011;23:767-795
26. Heller K. A.,Holtzman W. H.,Messick S.Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1982:
27. Hodgson A.,Edward S.,Gregerson M.Riding the waves of policy? The case of basic skills in adult and community learning in England.Journal of Vocational Education & Training. 2007;59:213-229
28. Hosp J. L.,Reschly D. J.Referral rates for intervention or assessment a meta-analysis of racial differences.The Journal of Special Education. 2003;37:67-80
29. . 1997;:
30. . 2004;:
31. Itkonen T.Stories of hope and decline: Interest group effectiveness in national special education policy.Educational Policy. 2009;23:43-65
32. Keogh B. K.Narrowing the gap between policy and practice.Exceptional Children. 1990;57:186-190
33. Koutsoftas A. D.,Harmon M. T.,Gray S.The effect of tier 2 intervention for phonemic awareness in a response-to-intervention model in low-income preschool classrooms.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 2009;40:116-130
34. Koyama J.Principals, power, and policy: Enacting “Supplemental Education Services.”.Anthropology & Education Quarterly. 2011;42:20-36
35. Kozleski E. B.,Smith A.The complexities of systems change in creating equity for students with disabilities in urban schools.Urban Education. 2009;44:427-451
36. Levinson B. A. U.,Sutton M.Policy as practice: Towards a comparative sociocultural analysis of educational policy. Sutton M.Levinson B., ed. Westport, CT: Ablex; 2001:1-22.
37. Levinson B. A. U.,Sutton M.,Winstead T.Education policy as a practice of power: Theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options.Educational Policy. 2009;23:767-795
38. Losen D. J.,Orfield G.Racial inequity in special education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press; 2002:
39. Lyon G. R.,Fletcher J. M.,Shaywitz S. E.,Shaywitz B. A.,Torgesen J. K.,Wood F. B.,.. Olson R. K.Rethinking special education for a new century. Finn C. E.Rotherham R. A. J.Hokanson C. R., ed. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation and Progressive Policy Institute; 2001:259-287.
40. Marshall C.,Patterson J.Confounded policies: Implementing SBM and special education policy reforms.Educational Policy. 2002;16:351-386
41. Mayrowetz D.Instructional practice in the context of converging policies: Teaching mathematics in inclusive elementary classrooms in the standards reform era.Educational Policy. 2009;23:554-588
42. McCaffrey D. F.Do value-added methods level the playing field for teachers? What we know series: Value-added methods and applications. Washington, DC: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 2010:
43. McIntosh A. S.,Graves A.,Gersten R.The effects of response to intervention on literacy development in multiple-language settings.Learning Disability Quarterly. 2007;30:197-212
44. National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems. (2005). Cultural considerations and challenges in response-to-intervention models: An NCCRESt position statement. Retrieved from http://www.nccrest.org/publications/position_statements.html
45. Oakes J.,Welner K.,Yonezawa S.,Allen R. L.Fundamental change: International handbook of educational change. Fullan M., ed. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2005:282-305.
46. Orosco M. J.,Klingner J.One school’s implementation of RTI with English language learners: “Referring into RTI.”.Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2010;43:269-288
47. Pinkus S.Bridging the gap between policy and practice: Adopting a strategic vision for partnership working in special education.British Journal of Special Education. 2005;32:184-187
48. Podell D.,Soodak L.Teacher efficacy and bias in special education referrals.Journal of Educational Research. 1993;86:247-253
49. Creating opportunity schools: A bold plan to transform Indianapolis Public Schools. Indianapolis, IN: The Mind Trust; 2011:
50. Shinn M. R.Identifying students at risk, monitoring performance and determining eligibility within Response to Intervention: Research on educational need and benefit from academic intervention.School Psychology Review. 2007;36:601-617
51. Skiba R. J.,Simmons A. B.,Ritter S.,Gibb A. C.,Rausch M. K.,Cuadrado J.,Chung C. G.Achieving equity in special education: History, status, and current challenges.Exceptional Children. 2008;74:264-288
52. Spillane J.,Reiser B.,Reimer T.Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing policy implementation research.Review of Educational Research. 2002;72:387-431
53. Stillman J.Teacher learning in an era of high-stakes accountability: Productive tension and critical professional practice.Teachers College Record. 2011;113:133-180
54. Sullivan A. L.,Artiles A. J.Theorizing racial inequity in special education: Applying structural inequity theory to disproportionality.Urban Education. 2011;46:1526-1552
55. Thorius K. A. K.,Maxcy B. D.,Macey E.,Cox A.A critical practice analysis of response to intervention appropriation in an urban school.Remedial and Special Education. 2014;35:287-299
56. Thorius K. A. K.,Stephenson J.Disproportionality in education and special education: A guide to creating more equitable learning environments. Noltemeyer A. L.Mcloughlin C., ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 2012:25-44.
57. VanDerHeyden A. M.,Witt J. C.,Gilbertson D.A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a Response to Intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education.Journal of School Psychology. 2007;45:225-256
58. VanDerHeyden A. M.,Witt J. C.,Naquin G.The development and validation of a process for screening and referrals to special education.School Psychology Review. 2003;32:204-227
59. Vaughn S.,Fuchs L. S.Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. 2003;18:137-146
60. Wallace M.Coping with multiple innovations in schools: An exploratory study.School Organisation. 1991;11:187-209
61. Weikart L. A.Segregated placement patterns of students with disabilities in three states.Educational Policy. 1998;12:432-448
62. Welner K. G.Legal rights, local wrongs: When community control collides with educational equity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 2001:
63. Young M.Multifocal educational policy research: Toward a method for enhancing traditional educational policy studies.American Educational Research Journal. 1999;36:677-714