A critical practice analysis of response to intervention appropriation in an Urban School

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 287-299

  King Thorius, Kathleen A ^a   Maxcy, Brendan D ^a   Macey, Erin ^b   Cox, Adrienne ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical theory; Policy; Response to intervention

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902179619     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: 15384756     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741932514522100     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Artiles, A. J. (2005, November). RTI for all: Reflections on sociocultural questions and challenges. Lecture presented at the Commemoration of P.L. 94-142, Loyola Marymount University. Los Angeles, CA.
2. Artiles, A. J., Bal, A., & Thorius, K. A. K. (2010). Back to the future: A critique of Response to Intervention’s social justice views. Theory Into Practice, 49, 250-257. doi:10.1080/00405841.2010.510447
3. Artiles, A. J., & Kozleski, E. B. (2010). What counts as response and intervention in RTI? A sociocultural analysis. Psicothema, 22, 949-954.
4. Artiles, A. J., Thorius, K. A., Bal, A., Waitoller, F., Neal, R., & Hernandez-Saca, D. (2011). Beyond culture as group traits: Future learning disabilities ontology, epistemology, and Inquiry on research knowledge use. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 34, 167-179. doi:10.1177/0731948711417552
5. Ball, S. (1997). Policy sociology and critical social research: A personal review of recent education policy and policy research. British Educational Research Journal, 23, 257-274. doi:10.1080/0141192970230302
6. Bouman, S. (2010). Response-to-intervention in California public schools: Has it helped address disproportional placement rates for students with learning disabilities? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA.
7. Bourdieu, P. (2008). The forms of capital. In N. W. Biggart (Ed.), Readings in economic sociology (pp. 280-291). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
8. Brown, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. J. (2010). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25, 547-560. doi:10.1080/02680931003698544
9. Bruce, C. (2007). Questions arising about emergence, data collection, and its interaction with analysis in a grounded theory study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6, 51-60.
10. Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research. New York, NY: Routledge.
11. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13. Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 30-37. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x
14. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Stecker, P. M. (2010). The “blurring” of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children, 76, 301-323.
15. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157-171. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00072
16. Hartlep, N. D., & Ellis, A. L. (2012). Just what is Response to Intervention and what’s it doing in a nice field like education? A critical race theory examination of RTI. In J. Gorlewski, B. Porfilio, & D. Gorlewski (Eds.), Using standards and highstakes testing for students: Exploiting power with critical pedagogy (pp. 87-108). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
17. Hodgson, A., Edward, S., & Gregerson, M. (2007). Riding the waves of policy? The case of basic skills in adult and community learning in England. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 59, 213-229. doi:10.1080/13636820701342913
18. Hughes, C., & Dexter, D. D. (2008). Field studies of RTI programs (RTI Action Network Web: National Center for Learning Disabilities). Retrieved from http://www.rtinetwork.org/learn/research/field-studies-rti-programs Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
19. Kozleski, E. B., & Huber, J. J. (2010). Systemic change for RTI: Key shifts in practice. Theory Into Practice, 49, 258-264. doi:10.1080/00405841.2010.510696
20. LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (1999). Analyzing and interpreting ethnographic data. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
21. Levinson, B., & Sutton, M. (2001). Introduction: Policy as/in practice— A sociocultural approach to the study of educational policy. In M. Sutton & B. Levinson (Eds.), Policy as practice: Towards a comparative sociocultural analysis of educational policy (pp. 1-22). Westport. CT: Ablex Publishing.
22. Levinson, B., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power: Theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Educational Policy, 23, 767-795. doi:10.1177/0895904808320676
23. Maxcy, B. D. (2011). The politics of priorities in turbulent times: Policy logics, faces of power and reform possibilities. Peabody Journal of Education, 86, 252-271. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2011.578974
24. McDermott, R., & Raley, J. (2008). The tell-tale body: The constitution of disability in schools. In W. Ayers, T. Quinn, & D. Stoval (Eds.), Handbook of social justice in education (pp. 431-445). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. McKinney, E., Bartholomew, C., & Gray, L. (2010). RTI and SWPBIS: Confronting the problem of disproportionality. NASP Communiqué, 38(6), 26-29.
26. Morris, E. W. (2005). “Tuck in that shirt!” Race, class, gender, and discipline in an urban school. Sociological Perspectives, 48, 25-48.
27. Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13-22.
28. Oakes, J., Welner, K., Yonezawa, S., & Allen, R. L. (2005). Norms and politics of equity-minded change: Researching the “zone of mediation.” In M. Fullan (Ed.), Fundamental change: International handbook of educational change (pp. 282-305). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
29. Raible, J., & Irizarry, J. (2010). Redirecting the teacher’s gaze: Youth surveillance, teacher education, and the school-to-prison pipeline. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1196-1203.
30. Rice, J. K., & Malen, B. (2010). School reconstitution as a reform strategy: A synopsis of the evidence. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
31. Scribner, J. P., Sawyer, K., Watson, S., & Myers, V. (2007). Teacher teams and distributed leadership: A study of group discourse and collaboration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43, 67-100. doi:10.1177/0013161X06293631
32. Sloan, K. (2005). Playing to the logic of the Texas accountability system: How focusing on “ratings”—not children—undermines quality and equity. In A. Valenzuela (Ed.), Leaving children behind: How “Texas-style” accountability fails Latino youth (pp. 153-178). Albany: State University of New York.
33. Sullivan, A. L., & Artiles, A. J. (2011). Theorizing racial inequity in special education: Applying structural theory to disproportionality. Urban Education, 46, 1526-1552. doi:10.1177/0042085911416014
34. Thorius, K. A. K., & Maxcy, B. D. (2012, April). A critical practice framework for examination of special education policy appropriation in local contexts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Vancouver, Canada.
35. Thorius, K. A. K., & Scribner, S. M. P. (2013). Teacher learning in urban schools. In E. B. Kozleski & K. A. K. Thorius (Eds.). Ability, equity, and culture: Sustaining inclusive urban education reform (pp. 134-150). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
36. Thorius, K. A. K., & Sullivan, A. L. (2013). Interrogating instruction and intervention in RTI research with students identified as English language learners. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 29, 64-88.
37. Trainor, A., & Bal, A. (2012). Development and preliminary analysis of a rubric for culturally responsive research. The Journal of Special Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0022466912436397
38. Trainor, A. A., & Leko, M. (2014). Qualitative special education research: Purpose, rigor, and contribution. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 263-266. doi:10.1177/0741932514536996
39. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137-146. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00070.
40. Welner, K. G. (2001). Legal rights, local wrongs: When community control collides with educational equity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.