Navigated total knee replacement: A meta-analysis

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 261-269

  Bauwens, Kai ^a   Matthes, Gerrit ^b   Wich, Michael ^a   Gebhard, Florian ^c   Hanson, Beate ^d   Ekkernkamp, Axel ^a   Stengel, Dirk ^a  

^a UNFALLKRANKENHAUS BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^d AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; HUMAN; INFECTION RATE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE DISEASE; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE SURGERY; META ANALYSIS; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THROMBOEMBOLISM; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33846794555     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00601     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Rampersaud YR, Pik JH, Salonen D, Farooq S. Clinical accuracy of fluoroscopic computer-assisted pedicle screw fixation: a CT analysis. Spine. 2005;30:E183-90.
2. Stöckle U, Krettek C, Pohlemann T, Messmer P. Clinical applications - pelvis. Injury. 2004;35 Suppl 1:S-A46-56.
3. 3D bei der Osteosynthese des Fersenbeins. [The clinical use of the ISO-C (3D) imaging system in calcaneus fracture surgery]. Unfallchirurg. 2006;109:112-8. German.
4. Amiot LP, Poulin F. Computed tomography-based navigation for hip, knee, and spine surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;421:77-6.
5. Wang G, Zheng G, Keppler P, Gebhard F, Staubli A, Mueller U, Schmucki D, Fluetsch S, Nolte LP. Implementation, accuracy evaluation, and preliminary clinical trial of a CT-free navigation system for high tibial opening wedge osteotomy. Comput Aided Surg. 2005;10:73-85.
6. 3D. [Intraoperative imaging with the ISO-C(SD)]. Chirurg. 2004;75:982-7. German.
7. Plaweski S, Cazal J, Rosell P, Merloz P. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using navigation: a comparative study on 60 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:542-52.
8. Sikorski JM, Chauhan S. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: do we need CAOS? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:319-23.
9. Kahler DM. Image guidance: fluoroscopic navigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;421:70-6.
10. Bach CM, Nogler M, Steingruber IE, Ogon M, Wimmer C, Gobel G, Krismer M. Scoring systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;399:184-96.
11. Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L. Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty. Results of a survey of 3600 patients from The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:339-44.
12. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557-60.
13. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629-34.
14. Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(7 Suppl 3):132-8.
15. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:682-7.
16. Böhling U, Schamberger H, Grittner U, Scholz J. Computerised and technical navigation in total knee-arthroplasty. J Orthopaed Traumatol. 2005;6:69-75.
17. Bolognesi M, Hofmann A. Computer navigation versus standard instrumentation for TKA: a single-surgeon experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:162-9.
18. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:372-7.
19. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:618-26.
20. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Pullen C, Ragone V. Computer-assisted technique versus intramedullary and extramedullary alignment systems in total knee replacement: a radiological comparison. Acta Orthop Belg. 2005;71:703-9.
21. Cossey AJ, Spriggins AJ. The use of computer-assisted surgical navigation to prevent malalignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:29-34.
22. Daubresse F, Vajeu C, Loquet J. Total knee arthroplasty with conventional or navigated technique: comparison of the learning curves in a community hospital. Acta Orthop Belg. 2005;71:710-3.
23. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:282-8.
24. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;433:152-9.
25. Hart R, Janeèek M, Chaker A, Buèek P. Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop. 2003;27:366-9.
26. Hernandez-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Garcia-Sandoval MA, Fernandez-Carreira JM, Perez-Hernandez D. Computer-assisted implant in knee endoprosthesis with a wireless system. Prospective comparative study with conventional technique [abstract]. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86 Suppl 3:227. Abstract nr O1026.
27. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Unicompartimental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;11:40-5.
28. Jenny JY, Clemens U, Kohler S, Kiefer H, Konermann W, Miehlke RK. Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: a case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:832-9.
29. Kalairajah Y, Simpson D, Cossey AJ, Verrall GM, Spriggins AJ. Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1480-2.
30. Kalairajah Y, Cossey AJ, Verrall GM, Ludbrook G, Spriggins AJ. Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted knee surgery? A prospective, randomised, clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:198-202.
31. Keene G, Simpson D, Kalairajah Y. Limb alignment in computer-assisted minimally-invasive unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:44-8.
32. Kim SJ, MacDonald M, Hernandez J, Wixson RL. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(7 Suppl 3):123-31.
33. Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kurosaka M, Muratsu H, Kuroda R, Ishimoto K, Tsujimoto K, Shiba R, Yoshiya S. Prosthetic alignment and sizing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2004)28:282-5.
34. Mielke RK, Clemens U, Jens JH, Kershally S. Navigation in der Knieendoprothetik- vorläufige klinische Erfahrungen und prospektiv vergleichende Studie gegenüber konventioneller Implantationstechnik. [Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implanta*tion - preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation techniques]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2001;139:109-16. German.
35. Oberst M, Bertsch C, Würstlin S, Holz U. CT-Analyse der Beinachse nach konventioneller vs. navigierter Knieendoprothese. Erste Ergebnisse einer kontrollierten, prospektiven und randomisierten Studie. [CT analysis of leg alignment after conventional vs. navigated knee prosthesis implantation. Initial results of a controlled, prospective, and randomized study]. Unfallchirurg. 2003;106:941-8. German.
36. Perlick L, Bäthis H, Tingart M, Perlick C, Grifka J. Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty: CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:464-70.
37. Perlick L, Bäthis H, Lerch K, Luring C, Tingart M, Grifka J. Der navigations-gestützte bicondyläre Oberflächenersatz bei der sekundären Gonarthrose des RA-Patienten im Vergleich zur konventionellen Implantationstechnik. [Navigated implantation of total knee endoprostheses in secondary knee osteoarthritis of rheumatoid arthritis patients as compared to conventional technique]. Z Rheumatol. 2004;63:140-6. German.
38. Perlick L, Bäthis H, Tingart M, Perlick C, Luring C, Grifka J. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement with a nonimage-based navigation system. Int Orthop. 2004;28:193-7.
39. Perlick L, Bäthis H, Perlick C, Luring C, Tingart M, Grifka J. Revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of postoperative leg alignment after computer-assisted implantation versus the conventional technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13:167-73.
40. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P. Mise en place des prothèses totales du genou assistée par ordinateur: comparaison avec la technique conventionelle. Résultats d'une etude prospective randomisée de 50 cas. [Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective, randomized study]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001;87:18-28. French.
41. Seon JK, Song EK. Functional impact of navigation-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2005;28(10 Suppl):s1251-4.
42. Skowronski J, Bielecki M, Hermanowicz K, Skowroñski R. The radiological outcomes of total knee arthroplasty using computer assisted navigation ORTHO-PILOT. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2005;70:5-8.
43. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:830-5.
44. Stöckl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:180-6.
45. Victor J, Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:131-9.
46. Zorman D, Etuin P, Jennart H, Scipioni D, Devos S. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: comparative results in a preliminary series of 72 cases. Acta Orthop Belg. 2005;71:696-702.
47. Rand JA, Coventry MB. Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;232:168-73.
48. Hvid I, Nielsen S. Total condylar knee arthroplasty. Prosthetic component positioning and radiolucent lines. Acta Orthop Scand. 1984;55:160-5.
49. Werner FW, Ayers DC, Maletsky LP, Rullkoetter PJ. The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. J Biomech. 2005;38:349-55.
50. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:26-34.
51. Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, Warth LC. Computer-assisted surgery: a wine before its time: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(4 Suppl 1):27-8.
52. Dong H, Buxton M. Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology, a Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22:191-202.
53. Windhagen H, Thorey F, Ostermeier S, Emmerich J, Wirth CJ, Stukenborg-Colsman C. Das Navigatonzept. Prozessoptimierung in der navigierten Knieendoprothetik. [Navigator concept. Optimizing the procedure for navigated total knee arthroplasty). Orthopäde. 2005;34:1125-30. German.
54. Klein GR, Austin MS, Smith EB, Hozack WJ. Total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation in patients with deformities of the femur and tibia. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:284-8.
55. Wang JW, Wang CJ. Total knee arthroplasty for arthritis of the knee with extra-articular deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1769-74.
56. Lonner JH, Siliski JM, Lotke PA. Simultaneous femoral osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty for treatment of osteoarthritis associated with severe extra-articular deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:342-8.
57. Attfield SF, Wilton TJ, Pratt DJ, Sambatakakis A. Soft-tissue balance and recovery of proprioception after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:540-5.
58. Asano H, Hoshino A, Wilton TJ. Soft-tissue tension total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:558-61.
59. Griffin FM, Insall JN, Scuderi GR. Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:970-3.
60. Soares HP, Daniels S, Kumar A, Clarke M, Scott C, Swann S, Djulbegovic B; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. BMJ. 2004;328:22-4.
61. Wager E, Middleton P. Effects of technical editing in biomedical journals: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287:2821-4.
62. Honl M, Dierk O, Gauck C, Carrero V, Lampe F, Dries S, Quante M, Schwieger K, Hille E, Morlock MM. Comparison of robotic-assisted and manual implantation of a primary total hip replacement. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1470-8.