The effect of politically salient decisions on the U.S. supreme court's agenda

Journal of Politics

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 755-772

  Baird, Vanessa A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3543139058     PISSN: 00223816     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00275.x     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Achen, Christopher H. 2000. "Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of Other Independent Variables." Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, UCLA.
2. Bachrach, Peter, and Morton S. Baratz. 1962. "Two Faces of Power." American Political Science Review 56(4): 947-52.
3. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Beth L. Leech. 1998. Basic Interests: the Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
5. Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 1995. "What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series-Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics." American Political Science Review 89(3): 634-47.
6. Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt. 1997. Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, 3rd ed. Washington: Congressional Quarterly.
7. Boucher, Robert L., and Jeffrey Segal. 1995. "Supreme Court Justices as Strategic Decision Makers." Journal of Politics 57(3): 824-37.
8. Brenner, Saul. 1979. "The New Certiorari Game." Journal of Politics 41(2): 649-55.
9. Brenner, Saul, and John F. Krol. 1989. "Strategies in Certiorari Voting on the United States Supreme Court." Journal of Politics 51(4): 828-40.
10. Caldeira, Gregory A., and John R. Wright. 1988. "Amici Curiae Before the Supreme Court: Who Participates, When and How Much?" Journal of Politics 52(3): 782-806.
11. Caldeira, Gregory A., and John R. Wright. 1990. "The Discuss List: Agenda Building in the Supreme Court." Law and Society Review 24 (3): 807-36.
12. Caplan, Lincoln. 1987. The Tenth Justice: The Solicitor General and the Rule of Law. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
13. Cook, Beverly B. 1993. "Measuring the Significance of U.S. Supreme Court Decisions." Journal of Politics 55(4): 1127-39.
14. Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
15. Downs, Anthony. 1972. "Up and Down With Ecology: The Issue Attention Cycle." The Public Interest 28 (Summer): 38-50.
16. Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
17. Epstein, Lee. 1985. Conservatives in Court. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
18. Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington: Congressional Quarterly.
19. Epstein, Lee, and Jeffery A. Segal. 2000. "Measuring Issue Salience." American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 66-83.
20. Epstein, Lee, Harold Spaeth, Jeffery Segal, and Thomas Walker. 1996. The Supreme Court Compendium: Data, Decisions, and Developments, 2nd ed. Washington: Congressional Quarterly.
21. Harvey, Andrew C. 1990. The Econometric Analysis of Time Series, 2nd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.
22. Hurwitz, Mark S. 1998. "Institutional Arrangements and Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals." 1998. Presented at the annual conference on the scientific study of judicial politics, Michigan State University.
23. King, Gary. 1988. "Statistical Models for Political Science Event Counts: Bias in Conventional Procedures and Evidence for the Exponential Poisson Regression Model." American Journal of Political Science 32(3): 838-63.
24. King, Gary. 1989. Unifying Political Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
26. Kollman, Ken. 1998. Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27. Lowi, Theodore J. 1979. The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. New York: Norton.
28. Martin, Andrew D., and Kevin M. Quinn. 2002. "Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953-1999." Political Analysis 10 (Spring): 134-53.
29. McFarland, Andrew S. 1991. "Interest Groups and Political Time: Cycles in America." British Journal of Political Science 21 (July): 257-84.
30. Mooney, Christopher Z., and Mei-Hsien Lee. 1995. "Legislative Morality in the American States: The Case of Pte-Roe Abortion Regulation Reform." American Journal of Political Science 39(3): 599-627.
31. Ostrom, Charles W. 1990. Time Series Analysis Regression Techniques, 2nd ed. London: Sage.
32. Pacelle, Richard L. 1991. The Transformation of the Supreme Court's Agenda: From the New Deal to the Reagan Administration. Boulder: Westview Press.
33. Perry, H. W. Jr. 1991. Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
34. Provine, Doris Marie. 1980. Case Selection in the United States Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Rabkin, Jeremy A. 1989. Judicial Compulsions: How Public Law Distorts Public Policy. New York: Basic Books.
36. Rosenberg, Gerald. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
38. Schubert, Glendon. 1959. Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Behavior. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
39. Spill, Rorie. 1997. Fighting with One Hand Tied Behind their Back: The Constraints of Environment and Structure on Interest Group Litigation (Lobbying). Ph.D. Dissertation, The Ohio State University.
40. Tate, C. Neal, and Torjbörn Vallinder. 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press.
41. Theil, Henri. 1965. "The Information Approach to Demand Analysis." Econometrica 33 (January): 67-87.
42. Ulmer, Sidney S. 1972. "The Decision to Grant Certiorari as an Indicator to Decision 'On the Merits'." Polity 4 (Summer): 429-47.
43. Ulmer, Sidney S. 1984. "The Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions: Conflict as a Predictive Variable." American Political Science Review 78(4): 901-11.
44. Vose, Clement E. 1959. Caucasians Only: The Supreme Court, the NAACP, and the Restrictive Covenant Cases. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45. Wasby, Stephen L. 1970. The Impact of the United States Supreme Court: Some Perspectives. Home-wood, IL.: Dorsey.
46. Wasby, Stephen L. 1976. Small Town Police and the Supreme Court. Lexington: D.C Heath.
47. Wasby, Stephen L. 1995. Race, Relations Litigation in an Age of Complexity. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.