Legal imperialism: Sovereignty and extraterritoriality in Japan, the Ottoman Empire, and China

Cambridge University Press

Volumn 9780521765916, Issue , 2010, Pages 1-237

  Kayaoğlu, Turan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925120768     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511730252     Document Type: Book

References (342)

1. David Singer and Melvin Small. National Material Capabilities Dataset. http://www.umich.edu/~cowproj/capabilities.html.
2. David J. Singer and Michael Wallace. Intergovernmental Organizations Dataset. http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/cgi/archive.prl?study=5520.
3. 1856. Protocols of Conferences Held at Paris Relative to the General Treaty of Peace. London: British Archives.
4. 1882. Foreign Relations of the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
5. 1882–1896. Tokei Nenkan [Japan's Statistical Year Book]. Tokyo: Tokeiin.
6. 1884. Further Correspondence Respecting the Revision of the Treaty between Great Britain and Japan. London: National Archives.
7. 1884. Treaties and Conventions between the Empire of Japan and Other Powers. Tokyo: The Foreign Office.
8. 1899. Treaties and Conventions between the Empire of Japan and Other Powers. Tokyo: The Foreign Office.
9. 1906. Meeting in Support of Belgian View. London Times. London: 3.
10. 1907. Joris Released. London Times. London: 3.
11. 1907. The Joris Case and the Turkish Capitulations. The American Journal of International Law. 1: 485.
12. 1922. China Year Book. Shanghai: North China Daily News & Herald.
13. 1922. Conference on the Limitation of Armament (1921–1922), Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
14. 1923. China Year Book. Shanghai: North China Daily News & Herald.
15. FRUS. Foreign Relations of the United States. Various years and volumes. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
16. 1924. “Treaty of Lausanne.” American Journal of International Law 18 (Supplement): 1–116.
17. 1924. China Year Book. Shanghai: North China Daily News & Herald.
18. 1925. China Year Book. Shanghai: North China Daily News & Herald.
19. 1926. China Year Book. Shanghai: North China Daily News & Herald.
20. 1931. The Civil Code of the Republic of China. Nanking.
21. 1937–1943. China Handbook. New York: The Macmillan Company.
22. DBFP. 1972. Documents on British Foreign Policy 1919–1939. London: Majesty's Stationary Office.
23. E 1528/1/44.1923. British Secretary's Notes of Meeting Held in Lord Curzon's Room at the Beau Rivage Hotel, Lausanne (February 4, 1923). London: National Archives.
24. Cmd. 1814. 1923. Records of Proceedings and Draft Terms of Peace. Lausanne Conference on Near Eastern Affairs 1922–1923, Lausanne. London: National Archives.
25. FO 371/10348. 1925. Memo: Outstanding Questions with Siam; Further Correspondence Respecting the Affairs of Siam, 1908; and Further Correspondence Respecting the Affairs of Siam, 1909. London: National Archives.
26. FO 371/11646. 1926. China – Abolition of Extraterritoriality. London: National Archives.
27. FO 371/11647. 1926. China – Abolition of Extraterritoriality. London: National Archives.
28. FO 371/31657. 1942. Extraterritoriality – China 1942. London: National Archives.
29. FO 371/31660. Extraterritoriality Negotiations. London: National Archives.
30. FO 371/35679. Extraterritoriality Negotiations. London: National Archives.
31. FO 676/64. Extraterritoriality. London: National Archives.
32. FO 881/4763. 1881–1882. Further Correspondence Respecting the Revision of the Treaty between Great Britain and Japan 1881–1882. London: National Archives.
33. FO 881/4778. 1883. Memorandum of Views of Her Majesty's Government of the Question of the Revision of Treaties with Japan. London: National Archives.
34. FO 881/4938. 1883. Further Correspondence Respecting the Revision of the Treaty between Great Britain and Japan, 1883. London: National Archives.
35. FO 881/5072. 1894. Further Correspondence Respecting the Revision of the Treaty between Great Britain and Japan. London: National Archives.
36. FO 881/6317.1926. Extraterritoriality Commission. London: National Archives.
37. FO 881/6488. 1893. Further Correspondence Respecting the Revision of the Treaty between Great Britain and Japan, 1893. London: National Archives.
38. FO 881/6582. 1894. Further Correspondence Respecting the Revision of the Treaty between Great Britain and Japan, 1984. London National Archives.
39. FO 881/659. 1856. Persons Enjoying British Protection in the Levant. London: National Archives.
40. FO 881/981. 1858. Report from Hornby to Earl of Malmesbury. London: National Archives.
41. FO 881/998. 1859–1861. Papers Relating to Administrative and Financial Reforms in Turkey 1859–1861. London: National Archives.
42. Prime Minister Office Files. National Archives. 1942. File Number 3740. Churchill to Roosevelt, August 9, 1942.
43. Abernethy, David B. 2000. The Dynamics of Global Dominance: European Overseas Empires, 1415– 1980. New Haven: Yale University Press.
44. Ahmad, Feroz. 2000. “Ottoman Perceptions of the Capitulations 1800–1914.” Journal of Islamic Studies 11 (1): 1-20.
45. Akyildiz, Ali. 1993. Tanzimat Dönemi Osmanli Merkez Teskilatinda Reform, 1836–1856 [Reforms in the Ottoman Central Administration During the Reorganization Period, 1836–1856]. Istanbul: Eren.
46. Alderson, Kai and Andrew Hurrell, Eds. 2000. Hedley Bull on International Society. New York: St. Martin’ s Press.
47. Alexandrowicz, C. H. 1962. “Doctrinal Aspects of the Universality of the Law of Nations.” British Yearbook of International Law 37: 506-515.
48. Alexandrowicz, C. H. 1967. An Introduction to the History of the Law of Nations in the East Indies (16th, 17th and 18th Centuries). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
49. Alexandrowicz, C. H. 1969. “New and Original States: The Issue of Reversion to Sovereignty.” International Affairs 45 (3): 465-480.
50. Allain, Jean. 2004. “Orientalism and International Law: The Middle East as the Underclass of the International Legal Order.” Leiden Journal of International Law 17 (2): 391-404.
51. Anderson, Perry. 1979. Lineages of the Absolutist State. New York: Verso.
52. Anghie, Antony. 1999. “Finding the Peripheries: Sovereignty and Colonialism in Nineteenth-Century International Law. ” Harvard International Law Journal 40 (1): 1-71.
53. Anghie, Antony. 2005. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Ashley, Richard K. 1984. “The Poverty of Neorealism. ” International Organization 38 (2): 225-286.
55. Ashley, Richard K. 1989. “Untying the Sovereign State: Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique. ” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 17: 227-262.
56. Austin, John. 1832. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. [Reprint Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2000.]
57. Badie, Bertrand. 2000. The Imported State: The Westernization of the Political Order. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
58. Baldwin, David A. 1979. “Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends Versus Old Tendencies. ” World Politics 31 (2): 161-193.
59. Bardakçi, Murat. 1999. “1905’ te idama mahkûm edip serbest birakmistik” [In 1905, We Sentenced Him to Death and then Released Him]. Hurriyet Daily. March 14, 1999. p. 9.
60. Bartelson, Jens. 1995. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Barzel, Yoram. 2002. A Theory of the State: Economic Rights, Legal Rights, and the Scope of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Baumgart, Winfried. 1981. The Peace of Paris, 1856: Studies in War, Diplomacy, and Peacemaking. Santa Barbara, CA: Clio Press.
63. Baxter, R. R. 1958. “Criminal Jurisdiction in the NATO Status of Forces Agreement. ” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 7: 72-81.
64. Beasley, G. W. 1989. “Meiji Political Institutions” in Marius B. Jansen (Ed.), The Cambridge History of Japan, Vol. 5: The Nineteenth Century. 618–673.
65. Beaulac, Stéphane. 2003. “Emer de Vattel and the Externalization of Sovereignty. ” Journal of the History of International Law 5 (2): 237-292.
66. Beaulac, Stéphane. 2004. “The Westphalian Model in Defi ning International Law: Challenging the Myth. ” Australian Journal of Legal History 8 (2): 181-213.
67. Beckler, Richard W. and Matthew H. Kirtland. 2003. “Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Antitrust Law. ” Texas International Law Journal 38: 12-25.
68. Bederman, David J. 2001. International Law Frameworks. New York: Foundation Press.
69. Bentham, Jeremy. 1970. Of Laws in General. London: The Athlone Press.
70. Benton, Lauren. 2002. Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71. Berkes, Niyazi. 1998. Development of Secularism in Turkey. New York: Routledge.
72. Bickers, Robert A. 1999. Britain in China: Community Culture and Colonialism, 1900–1949. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
73. Biersteker, Thomas J. 2002. “State, Sovereignty and Territory, ” in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Rise, and Beth A. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of International Relations: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 155–176.
74. Blaney, David L. and Naeem Inayatullah. 2002. “The Westphalian Deferral. ” International Studies Review 2 (2): 1-28.
75. Bloch, Marc. 1961. Feudal Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
76. Borg, Dorothy. 1947. American Policy and the Chinese Revolution, 1925–1928. New York: American Institute of Pacifi c Relations.
77. Bozkurt, Gülnihal. 1989. Gayrimüslim Osmanli Vatandaslarinin Hukuki Durumu [Legal Position of Non-Muslim Ottoman Citizens]. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.
78. Bozkurt, Gülnihal. 1998. Azinlik Imtiyazlari-Kapütülasyonlardan Tek Hukuk Sistemine Geçis [from Minority Privileges and Capitulations to Uniform Legal System]. Ankara: Atatürk Arastirma Merkezi.
79. Braude, Benjamin and Bernard Lewis, Eds. 1982. Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire: The Functioning of a Plural Society. New York: Holmes & Meier.
80. Bull, Hedley and Adam Watson. 1984. The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
81. Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society. New York: Columbia University Press.
82. Bull, Hedley. 1979. “Natural Law and International Relations. ” British Journal of International Studies 5 (2): 171-181.
83. Bull, Hedley. 1996. “International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach, ” in J. A. Vasquez (Ed.), Classics of International Relations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall: 76–81.
84. Buzan, Barry. 1993. “From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School. ” International Organization 47: 327-352.
85. Buzan, Barry, Charles Jones, and Richard Little. 1993. The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism. New York: Columbia University Press.
86. Calder, Kent E. 2007. Embattled Garrisons. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
87. Callahan, William A. 2004. “Nationalising International Theory: Race, Class, and the English School. ” Global Society 18 (4): 305-323.
88. Campbell, David. 1992. Writing Security. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
89. Chan, K. Chan. 1977. “The Abrogation of British Extraterritoriality in China, 1942-1943.” Modern Asian Studies 11: 257-291.
90. Chang, Richard T. 1984. The Justice of the Western Consular Courts in Nineteenth-Century Japan. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
91. Chang, Seung Wha. 1992-1993. “Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Antitrust Laws to Other Pacifi c Countries. ” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 16: 295-320.
92. Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1998. “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. ” World Politics 50 (2): 324-348.
93. Chen, Jianfu. 1999. Chinese Law: Towards an Understanding of Chinese Law, Its Nature and Development. Boston: Kluwer Law International.
94. Chien, Tuan-shãeng. 1950. The Government and Politics of China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
95. Chiu, Hungdah. 1979-1980. “The United States Status of Forces Agreement with the Republic of China. ” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 3: 67-88.
96. Churchill, Winston. 1929. The World Crisis 1918–1928: The Aftermath. New York: Charles Scribner Sons.
97. Cin, Halil and Ahmet Akgündüz. 1989. Turk Hukuk Tarihi: Kamu Hukuku [Turkish Legal History: Public Law]. Konya: Selçuk Üniversitesi Yayinlari.
98. Clark, Harry L. 1999. “Dealing with U.S. Extraterritorial Sanctions and Foreign Countermeasures. ” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 20 (1): 61-96.
99. Clifford, Nicholas R. 1991. Spoilt Children of Empire: Westerners in Shanghai and the Chinese Revolution of the 1920s. Middlebury, VT: Middlebury College Press.
100. Commission on Extraterritoriality. 1926. Report of the Commission on Extraterritoriality. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
101. Copeland, Dale C. 2003. “A Realist Critique of the English School. ” Review of International Studies 29: 427-441.
102. Cotterrell, Roger. 1989. The Politics of Jurisprudence: A Critical Introduction to Legal Philosophy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
103. Curley, Tyler. 2009. “Social Identity Theory and EU Expansion. ” International Studies Quarterly 53 (4): 647-666.
104. Dare, Philip Ned. 1975. John Bingham and Treaty Revision with Japan: 1873–1885. Lexington: University of Kentucky.
105. Deudney, Daniel. 1996. “Binding Sovereigns: Authorities, Structures, and Geopolitics in Philadelphian Systems, ” in T. J. Biersteker and C. Weber (Eds.), State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 190–239.
106. Dewey, John. 1894. “Austin’ s Theory of Sovereignty.” Political Science Quarterly 9 (1): 31-52.
107. Dixit, Avinash K. 2004. Lawlessness and Economics: Alternative Modes of Governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
108. Donnelly, Jack. 1986. “International Human Rights: A Regime Analysis. ” International Organization 40 (3): 599-642.
109. Donnelly, Jack. 1998. “Human Rights: A New Standard of Civilization? ” International Affairs 74 (1): 1-23.
110. Donnelly, Jack. 2000. Realism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
111. Doyle, Michael. 1986. Empires. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
112. Dunne, Tim. 1998. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. New York: St. Martin’ s Press.
113. Dunne, Timothy. 1995. “The Social Construction of International Society. ” The European Journal of International Relations 1 (3): 367-389.
114. Duxbury, Neil. 1995. Patterns of American Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
115. Dyck, Edward Van. 1881. Capitulations of the Ottoman Empire. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
116. Eastwood, R. A. and G. W. Keaton. 1929. The Austinian Theories of Law and Sovereignty. London: Methuen.
117. Ellickson, Robert C. 1991. Order Without Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
118. Erickson, Richard J. 1994. “Status of Forces Agreements: A Sharing of Sovereign Prerogrative. ” Air Force Law Review 37: 137-154.
119. Epstein, Mortimer. 1908. The Early History of the Levant Company. London: G. Routledge & Sons.
120. Eroglu, Hamza. 1967. Türk Devrim Tarihi [History of Turkish Revolution]. Ankara: Kardes Matbaasi.
121. Eryilmaz, Bilal. 1990. Osmanli Devletinda Gayrimüslim Tebaanin Yönetimi [Administration of Non-Muslim Subjects in the Ottoman State]. I stanbul: Risale Basin-Yayin Ltd.
122. Eryilmaz, Bilal. 1992. Osmanli Devletinde Millet Sistemi [Millet System in the Ottoman Empire]. I stanbul: Agaç Yayincilik.
123. Fairbank, John King. 1964. Trade and Diplomacy on the China Coast: The Opening of Treaty Ports 1842–1854. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
124. Fallon, Andrew D. and Theresa A. Keene. 2001. “Closing the Legal Loophole? Practical Implications of the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act of 2000.” Air Force Law Review 51: 271-292.
125. Fenwick, Charles G. 1914. “The Authority of Vattel.” The American Political Science Review 8 (3): 375-393.
126. Feuewerker, Albert. 1976. The Foreign Establishment in China. Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies.
127. Finnemore, Martha and Stephen J. Toope. 2001. “Alternatives to ‘ Legalization’: Richer Views of Law and Politics. ” International Organization 55 (3): 743-758.
128. Fishel, Wesley R. 1952. The End of Extraterritoriality in China. Berkeley: University of California Press.
129. Floor, Willem. 1983. “Change and Development in the Judicial System of Qajar Iran (1800–1925), ” in E. Bosworth and C. Hillenbrand (Eds.), Qajar Iran: Political, Social, and Cultural Change 1800–1925. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press: 113–147.
130. Foster, John Watson. 1903. American Diplomacy in the Orient. Boston, New York: Houghton, Miffl in and Company.
131. Fox, Grace Estelle. 1969. Britain and Japan, 1858–1883. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
132. Fukuyama, Francis. 2004. State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
133. Fung, Edmund S. K. 1987. “The Chinese Nationalists and the Unequal Treaties 1924-1931. ” Modern Asian Studies 21: 783-819.
134. Ganz, A. Harding. 1977. “German Navy in the Far East and Pacific: The Seizure of Kiatschou and After, ” in J. A. Moses and P. Kennedy (Eds.), Germany in the Pacific and Far East 1870–1914. St. Lucia, Queensland: Queensland University Press: 115–136.
135. Giddens, Anthony. 1987. The Nation-State and Violence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
136. Goldstein, Judith, Miles Kahler, Robert O. Keohane, and Anne-Marie Slaugher. 2000. “Legalization and World Politics. ” International Organization 54 (3): 385-399.
137. Giddens, Anthony. 2001. “Response to Finnemore and Toope.” International Organization 55 (3): 759-760.
138. Gönen, Yasemin Saner. 2000. “The Judicial Privileges of Foreigners in the Ottoman Empire, ” in K. Ciçek, E. Kuran, N. Göyünc, and I. Ortayli (Eds.), The Great Ottoman-Turkish Civilization. Ankara: Yeni Türkiye (III): 676–688.
139. Gong, Gerrit. 1984. The Standard of “Civilization” in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
140. Greif, Avner. 1993. “Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: The Maghribi Traders’ Coalition. ” American Economic Review 83 (3): 525-548.
141. Griswold, Whitney A. 1938. Far Eastern Policy of the United States. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
142. Gross, Leo. 1948. “The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948. ” American Journal of International Law 42 (1): 20-41.
143. Grundman, Rock. 1980. “The New Imperialism: Extraterritorial Application of United States Law. ” International Lawyer 14: 257-266.
144. Hall, Stephan. 2001. “The Persistent Spectre: Natural Law, International Order and the Limits of Legal Positivism. ” European Journal of International Law 12 (2): 269-307.
145. Hall, William Edward. 1894. Foreign Powers and Jurisdiction of the British Crown. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
146. Hanioglu, M. Sükrü. 2008. A Brief History of the Late Ottamon Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
147. Hanioglu, M. Sükrü. 2010. “Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations Theory. ” International Studies Review.
148. Hart, H. L. A. 1971. “Bentham's Of Laws in General. ” Cambrian Law Review 2: 24-34.
149. Henderson, Dan Fenno. 1968. “Law and Political Modernization in Japan, ” in R. E. Ward (Ed.), Political Development in Modern Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press: 387–456.
150. Henkin, Louis, Richard Crawford Pugh, Oscar Schachter, and Hans Smit. 1993. International Law: Cases and Materials. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
151. Hertslet, Lewis. 1845. Treaties and Conventions Between Great Britain and Foreign Powers. Volume 6. London: Henry Butterworth.
152. Hinckey, Frank E. 1906. American Consular Jurisdiction in the Orient. Washington, DC: W. H. Lowdermilk.
153. Hoare, James. 1994. Japan's Treaty Ports and Foreign Settlements: The Uninvited Guests, 1858–1899. Folkestone, Kent: Japan Library.
154. Hobbes, Thomas. 1969. The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, Ferdinand Tonnies (Ed.), 2nd ed. New York: Barnes & Noble.
155. Hobson, John M. 2000. The State and International Relations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
156. Holland, Thomas Erskine. 1898. Studies in International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
157. Hornby, Edmund. 1928. An Autobiography. Boston: Houghton Miffl in.
158. Horowitz, Richard S. 2005. “International Law and State Transformation in China, Siam, and the Ottoman Empire during the Nineteenth Century. ” Journal of World History 15 (4): 445-486.
159. Hsu, Immanuel C. Y. 1960. China's Entrance into the Family of Nations: The Diplomatic Phase 1858–1880. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
160. Huang, Philip C. 2001. Code, Custom, and Legal Practice in China: The Qing and the Republic Compared. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
161. Hurewitz, J. C. 1961. “Ottoman Diplomacy and the European State System.” The Middle East Journal XV (2): 141–152.
162. Hussain, Nasser. 2003. The Jurisprudence of Emergency: Colonialism and the Rule of Law. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
163. Inalcik, Halil. 1960. “Imtiyazat.” Encyclopaedia of Islam [3]: 1178–1195.
164. Inkle, Frank W. 1967. “The Triple Intervention: Japan’ s Lesson in the Diplomacy of Imperialism. ” Monumenta Nipponica 22 (1/2): 122-130.
165. Inönü, Ismet. 1987. Hatiralar [Memoirs]. I stanbul: Bilgi Yayinevi.
166. Iriye, Akiye. 1986. “Japanese Aggression and China's International Position 1931–1949.” Cambridge History of China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
167. Jackson, Robert H. 1990. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
168. Jackson, Robert H. 1993. “The Weight of Ideas in Decolonization: Normative Change in International Relations, ” in Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas & Foreign Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press: 111–138.
169. Janis, M. W. 1984. “Jeremy Bentham and the Fashioning of International Law.” American Journal of International Law 78: 405-418.
170. Jensen, De Lamar. 1985. “The Ottoman Turks in Sixteenth Century French Diplomacy. ” Sixteenth Century Journal 16 (4): 451-470.
171. Jansen, Marius B. 1968. “Modernization and Foreign Policy in Meiji Japan, ” in R. E. Ward (Ed.), Political Development in Modern Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press: 149–188.
172. Jansen, Marius B. 1989. “Introduction, ” in M. B. Jansen (Ed.), The Cambridge History of Japan, vol. 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1–49.
173. Jessop, Bob. 1990. State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. Cambridge: Polity Press.
174. John, Michael. 1989. Politics and Law in Late Nineteenth-Century Germany: The Origins of Civil Code. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
175. Johnston, W. Ross. 1973. Sovereignty and Protection: A Study of British Jurisdictional Imperialism in the Late Nineteenth Century. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
176. Jones, Francis Clifford. 1931. Extraterritoriality in Japan and the Diplomatic Relations Resulting in Its Abolition, 1853–1899. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
177. Jung, Youngjin and Jun-Shik Hwang. 2002-2003. “Where Does Inequality Come From? An Analysis of the Korea–United States Status of Forces Agreement. ” American University International Law Review 18: 1103-1142.
178. Jupille, Joseph and James A. Caporaso. 2009. “Domesticating Discourses: European Law, English Judges, and Political Institutions.” European Political Science Review 1 (2): 205-228.
179. Kahler, Miles. 1984. Decolonization in Britain and France: The Domestic Consequences of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
180. Kahler, Miles. 2000. “Legalization as Strategy: The Asia-Pacifi c Case.” International Organization 54 (3): 549-572.
181. Kajima, Morinosuke. 1967. The Emergence of Japan as a World Power, 1895–1925. Rutland, VT: C. E. Tuttle Co.
182. Kamikawa, Hikomatsu. 1958. Japan-American Diplomatic Relations in the Meiji-Taisho Era. Tokyo: Pan-Pacific Press.
183. Kasaba, Reat. 1988. The Ottoman Empire and World Economy: The Nineteenth Century. Albany: SUNY Press.
184. Kayaoglu, Turan. 2005. “Sovereignty, State-Building, and the Abolition of Extraterritoriality.” Unpublished dissertation. University of Washington: Seattle.
185. Kayaoglu, Turan. 2007. “The Extension of Westphalian Sovereignty: State-Building and the Abolition of Extraterritoriality.” International Studies Quarterly. (51) 3: 649-676.
186. Keeton, G. W. 1969. The Development of Extraterritoriality in China. New York: Howard Fertig.
187. Kennedy, David. 1997. “International Law and the Nineteenth Century: History of an Illusion. ” Quinnipiac Law Review 99: 112-113.
188. Kennedy, Paul M. 1977. “Germany and the Samoan Tridominium, 1889– 1898: A Study in Frustrated Imperialism, ” in J. A. Moses and P. M. Kennedy (Eds.), Germany in the Pacific and Far East, 1870–1914. St. Lucia, Queensland: Queensland University Press: 88–114.
189. Kennedy, Paul M. 1986. The Rise and Fall of British Naval Mastery. London: Ash field Press.
190. Kennedy, Paul M. 1987. The Rise and Fall of Great Powers. New York: Random House.
191. Keohane, Robert O. 1986. Neorealism and Its Critiques. New York: Columbia University Press.
192. Kim, Marie S. H. 2009. “Customary Law and Colonial Jurisprudence in Korea. ” American Journal of Comparative Law 57 (1): 205-247.
193. Kim, Won-Ki. 2003. “The Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Antitrust Law and Its Adoption in Korea. ” Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law 7: 386-411.
194. Kingsbury, Benedict. 2002. “Legal Positivism as Normative Politics: International Society, Balance of Power and Lassa Oppenheim’ s Positive International Law. ” European Journal of International Law 13 (2): 401-436.
195. Kocabasoglu, Uygur. 2004. Majestelerinin Konsoloslari [Majesty's Consuls]. Istanbul: Iletisim.
196. Koskenniemi, Martti. 1989. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Helsinki: Finnish Lawyers’ Publishing.
197. Koskenniemi, Martti. 2004. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
198. Krasner, Stephan D. 1978. Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
199. Krasner, Stephan D. 1984. “Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics. ” Comparative Politics 16 (2): 223-246.
200. Krasner, Stephan D. 1985. Structural Conflict: The Third World against Global Liberalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
201. Krasner, Stephan D. 1989. “Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective, ” in J. A. Caporaso (Ed.), The Elusive State: International and Comparative Perspectives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage: 69–96.
202. Krasner, Stephan D. 1993. “Westphalia and All That, ” in Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press: 235–264.
203. Krasner, Stephan D. 1995. “Compromising Westphalia.” International Security 20 (3): 115-151.
204. Krasner, Stephan D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
205. Krasner, Stephan D. 2001. “Organized Hypocrisy in Nineteenth-Century East Asia.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacifi c 1: 173-197.
206. Krasner, Stephan D. 2004. “Sharing Sovereignty: New Institutions for Collapsed and Failing States. ” International Security 29 (2): 85-120.
207. Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1986. “Of Systems, Boundaries, and Territoriality: An Inquiry into the Formation of the State-System. ” World Politics 39: 27-52.
208. Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1995. “Sovereignty as ‘Dominium’: Is There a Right to Humanitarian Intervention?” in M. Mastanduno and G. Lyons (Eds.), Beyond Westphalia: National Sovereignty and Humanitarian Intervention. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press: 21–42.
209. Lachs, Manfred. 1987. The Teacher in International Law. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
210. Lane-Poole, Stanley and F. Victor Dickins. 1894. The Life of Sir Harry Parkes, K.C.B., G.C.M.G., Sometime Her Majesty's Minister to China & Japan. London, New York: Macmillan.
211. Langer, William L. 1951. The Diplomacy of Imperialism 1890–1902. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
212. Leue, W. H.-J. 1992. “Legal Expansion in the Age of Companies, ” in W. J. Mommsen and J. A. De Moor (Eds.), European Expansion and Law: The Encounter of European and Indigenous Law in 19th-and 20th-Century Africa and Asia. Oxford: Berg: 129–158.
213. Lewis, Bernard. 1968. The Emergence of Modern Turkey. London: Oxford University Press.
214. Lieberson, Stanley. 1992. “Small N's and Big Conclusions: An Examination of the Reasoning in Comparative Studies Based on a Small Number of Cases. ” Social Forces 70 (2): 307-320.
215. Lieberson, Stanley. 1994. “More on the Uneasy Case for Using Mill-Type Methods in Small-N Comparative Studies.” Social Forces 72: 1225-1237.
216. Liebesny, Herbert I. 1955. “The Development of Western Judicial Privileges, ” in M. Khadduri and H. J. Liebesny (Eds.), Law in the Middle East, Washington, DC: The Middle East Institute: 309–334.
217. Liptak, Adam. 2004. “Who Would Try Civilians from U.S.? No One in Iraq.” New York Times. May 26, 2004: A11.
218. Little, Richard. 1995. “Neorealism and the English School: A Methodological, Ontological, and Theoretical Reassessment. ” European Journal of International Relations 1: 1–21.
219. Liu, Shih Shun. 1925. Extraterritoriality: Its Rise and Its Decline. New York: Columbia University Press.
220. Louis, Roger. 1971. British Strategy in the Far East, 1919–1939. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
221. Lynn, Martin. 1999. “British Policy, Trade and Informal Empire in the Mid-Nineteenth Century, ” in A. Porter (Ed.), The Oxford History of the British Empire: The Nineteenth Century (III). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 101–121.
222. Lytle, Courtney G. 1997. “A Hegemonic Interpretation of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Antitrust: From American Banana to Hartford Fire. ” Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 24 (4): 41–76.
223. Macfie, Alexander Lyon, 2000. Orientalism: A Reader. New York: New York University Press.
224. Mackinnon, Donald M. 1966. “Natural Law, ” in Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wight (Eds.), Diplomatic Investigations. London: George Allen & Unwin: 74–88.
225. Majeed, J. 1990. “James Mill's ‘The History of British India’ and Utilitarianism as a Rhetoric of Reform. ” Modern Asian Studies 24 (2): 209-224.
226. Marder, Arthur Jacob. 1940. The Anatomy of British Sea Power: A History of British Naval Policy in the Pre-Dreadnought Era, 1880–1905. New York: A. A. Knopf.
227. MacDonald, Paul. 2004. “Networks of Domination: Social Ties and Imperial Rule in International Politics, ” unpublished manuscript.
228. Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.
229. Memorandum. 1922. The Capitulations: Memorandum Submitted on Behalf of the Non-Offi cial British Community in Constantinople. London: Page & Thomas Ltd.
230. Merryman, John Henry. 1969. The Civil Law Tradition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
231. Midgley, E. B. F. 1975. The Natural Law and the Theory of International Relations. New York: Barnes & Noble.
232. Milton, Philip. 1982. “David Hume and the Eighteenth-Century Conception of Natural Law. ” Legal Studies 2 (1): 14-34.
233. Mitzen, Jennifer. 2005. “Reading Habermas in Anarchy. ” American Political Science Review 99 (3): 401-417.
234. Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000. “The Origins of Human Rights Regimes. ” International Organization 54 (2): 217-252.
235. Moulder, Frances. 1977. Japan, China and the Modern World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
236. Murphy, Alexander B. 1996. “The Sovereign State System as Political- Territorial Ideal, ” in T. J. Biersteker and C. Weber (Eds.), State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 81–120.
237. Nicolson, Harold. 1974 [1934]. Curzon: The Last Phase 1919–1925. New York: Howard Fertig.
238. Nish, Ian. 1968. The Story of Japan. London: Faber.
239. Nish, Ian. 1998. The Iwakura Mission to America and Europe. London: Routledge.
240. Norman, Adam B. 1995-1996. “The Rape Controversy: Is a Revision of the Status of Forces Agreement with Japan Necessary?” Indiana International and Comparative Law Review 6 (3): 717-740.
241. North, Douglass C. and Robert Thomas. 1973. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
242. North, Douglass C. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
243. North, Douglass Cecil. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
244. Nussbaum, Arthur. 1954. A Concise History of the Law of Nations. New York: Macmillan.
245. Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 1998. The Republican Legacy in International Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
246. Oppenheim, Lassa. 1908. “The Science of International Law: Its Task and Method. ” The American Journal of International Law 2 (2): 313-356.
247. Ornsby, Robert. 1884. Memoirs of James Robert Hope-Scott of Abbotsford, 2nd edition. London: J. Murray.
248. Orücü, Esin. 1992. “The Impact of European Law on the Ottoman Empire and Turkey, ” in W. J. Mommsen and J. A. D. Moor (Eds.), European Expansion and Law: The Encounter of European and Indigenous Law in 19th and 20th Century Africa and Asia. New York: BERG.
249. Osiander, Andreas. 2001. “Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth. ” International Organization 55 (2): 251-288.
250. Paine, S. C. M. 2003. The Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895: Perceptions, Power, and Primacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
251. Parrish, Austen L. 2009. “Reclaiming International Law from Extraterritoriality. ” Minnesota Law Review. 93: 101-161.
252. Perez, Louis G. 1999. Japan Comes of Age: Mutsu Munemitsu and the Revision of the Unequal Treaties. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
253. Philpott, Daniel. 2001. Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
254. Pitts, Jennifer. 2003. “Legislator of the World? A Reading of Bentham on Colonies. ” Political Theory 31 (2): 200-234.
255. Platt, Demond Christopher Martin. 1971. The Cinderalla Service: British Consuls Since 1825. London: Longman.
256. Poggi, Gianfranco. 1978. The Development of the Modern State: A Sociological Introduction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
257. Poggi, Gianfranco. 1990. The State: Its Nature, Development and Prospects. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
258. Polat, Necati. 2000. “Three Contemporaries: The International, Bentham, and De Sade. ” Social Text 18 (4): 1-23.
259. Pollard, Robert Thomas. 1933. China's Foreign Relations, 1917–1931. New York: Macmillan.
260. Pound, Roscoe. 1954-1955. “The Chinese Civil Code in Action. ” Tulane Law Review 29: 227-422.
261. Putman, Tonya L. 2009. “Courts Without Borders: Domestic Sources of U.S. Extraterritoriality in Regulatory Sphere.” International Organization 63(3): 459–490.
262. Quan, Lau-king. 1939. China's Relations with the League of Nations. Hong Kong: The Asiatic Litho Printing Press.
263. Ramseyer, J. Mark and Frances McCall Rosenbluth. 1995. The Politics of Oligarchy: Institutional Choice in Imperial Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
264. Raustiala, Kal. 2009. Does the Constitution Follow the Flag? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
265. Reus-Smit, Christian. 1999. Moral Purpose of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
266. Reus-Smit, Christian. 2002. “Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School. ” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4 (3): 487-509.
267. Ruggie, John G. 1983. “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis. ” World Politics 35 (2): 261-285.
268. Ruggie, John Gerard. 1993. “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations. ” International Organizations 47: 139-174.
269. Rumble, Wilfrid E. 2005. Doing Austin Justice: The Reception of John Austin's Philosophy of Law in Nineteenth-Century England. London: Continuum.
270. Ruskola, Teemu. 2002. “Legal Orientalism. ” Michigan Law Review 101 (1): 179-234.
271. Ruskola, Teemu. 2005. “Canton Is Not Boston: The Invention of American Imperial Sovereignty, ” American Quarterly 57: 859.
272. Ruskola, Teemu. 2008. “Colonialism Without Colonies: On the Extraterritorial Jurisprudence of the U.S. Court for China. ” Law & Contemporary Problems 71: 217–242.
273. Ryosuke, Ishii. 1958. Japanese Legislation in the Meiji Era. Tokyo: Pan- Pacific Press.
274. Said, Edward. 1979. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
275. Sanders, C. T. 2000. America's Overseas Garrisons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
276. Savolainen, Jukka. 1994. “The Rationality of Drawing Big Conclusions Based on Small Samples: In Defense of Mill's Methods.” Social Forces 72: 1217-1224.
277. Schmidhauser, John R. 1997. “The European Origins of Legal Imperialism and Its Legacy in Legal Education in Former Colonial Regions.” International Political Science Review 18 (3): 337-351.
278. Schmitt, Glenn R. 2001-2002. “Closing the Gap in Criminal Jurisdiction over Civilians Accompanying the Armed Forces Abroad.” Catholic University Law Review 51: 55-134.
279. Scott, David. 2008. China and the International System, 1840–1849. Albany: SUNY Press.
280. Scully, Eileen. P. 2001. Bargaining with the State from Afar: American Citizenship in Treaty Port China, 1844–1942. New York: Columbia University Press.
281. Shapiro, Martin M. 1981. Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
282. Shaw, Malcolm N. 2002. International Law, 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
283. Siebold, Baron Alexander von. 1901. Japan's Accession to the Comity of Nations. London: K. Paul, Trench, and Trubner & Co.
284. Silberman, Bernard S. 1993. Cages of Reason: The Rise of the Rational State in France, Japan, the United States, and Great Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
285. Simpson, Gerry. 2004. Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
286. Singer, David. 1996. “The Incomplete Theorist: Insight without Evidence, ” in J. A. Vasquez (Ed.), Classics of International Relations, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall: 82–90.
287. Singer, Pater Warren. 2004. “War, Profi ts, and the Vacuum of Law: Privatized Military Firms and International Law. ” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 42 (2): 520–550.
288. Snyder, Jack. 1991. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
289. Sonyel, Salahi R. 1975. Turkish Diplomacy 1918–1923: Mustafa Kemal and the Turkish National Movement. London: Sage Publications.
290. Soosa, Nasim M. 1931. “The Legal Interpretation of the Abrogation of the Turkish Capitulations. ” Dakota Law Review 3 (7): 335-364.
291. Sousa, Nasim. 1933. The Capitulatory Regime of Turkey: Its History, Origin, and Nature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
292. Soyeshima, Taneomi. 1910. “Japan's Foreign Relations, ” in S. Okuma (Ed.) Fifty Years of New Japan. London: Smith, Elder & Co.: 93–121.
293. Spagnolo, John P. 1991. “Portents of Empire in Britain's Ottoman Jurisdiction. ” Middle Eastern Studies 27 (2): 256-282.
294. Spence, Jonathan. D. 1990. The Search for Modern China. New York: W. W. Norton.
295. Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
296. Stivachtis, Yannis A. 1998. The Enlargement of International Society: Culture Versus Anarchy and Greece's Entry into International Society. London: Macmillan Press.
297. Stokes, Eric. 1959. The English Utilitarians and India. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
298. Strang, David. 1996. “Contested Sovereignty: The Social Construction of Colonial Imperialism, ” in Thomas J. Biersteker and Cynthia Weber (Eds.), State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 22–49.
299. Strayer, Joseph R. 1973. On the Medieval Origins of the Modern State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
300. Suganami, Hidemi. 1984. “Japan's Entry into International Society, ” in H. Bull and A. Watson (Eds.), The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 185–200.
301. Suzuki, Shogo. 2009. Civilization and Empire: China and Japan's Encounter with European International Society. New York: Routledge.
302. Taylor, Veronica. 1997. “Beyond Legal Orientalism, ” in Veronica Taylor (Ed.), Asian Laws Through Australian Eyes. Sydney: Law Book: 47–64.
303. Teschke, Benno. 2003. The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations. London: Verso.
304. Thomson, Janice E. 1995. “State Sovereignty in International Relations: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Empirical Research. ” International Studies Quarterly 39 (2): 213-233.
305. Thomson, Janice. 1994. Mercenaries, Pirates & Sovereigns: State- Building and Extraterritorial Violence in Early Modern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
306. Tilly, Charles. 1975. “Reflections on the History of European State-Making, ” in Charles Tilly (Ed.), The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press: 3–83.
307. Tilly, Charles. 1992. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. Cambridge: Blackwell.
308. Trotter, Ann 1996. British Documents on Foreign Affairs: Reports and Papers from the Foreign Office Confidential Print. Series E. Asia, 1914–1939. Volume 30, China, November 1925–June 1929. Bethesda: University Publications of America.
309. Tung, William L. 1970. China and the Foreign Powers: The Impact of and Reaction to Unequal Treaties. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications.
310. Varghese, Tracy P. 2001-2002. “The WTO's Shrimp-Turtle Decisions: The Extraterritorial Enforcement of U.S. Environmental Policy Via Unilateral Trade Embargoes. ” The Environmental Lawyer 5: 421-455.
311. Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
312. Walker, Thomas Alfred. 1893. The Science of International Law. London: C. J. Clay and Sons.
313. Wallace, Michael and J. David Singer. 1970. “Intergovernmental Organization in the Global System, 1815–1964: A Quantitative Description. ” International Organization 24: 239-287.
314. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1979. The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
315. Ward, Robert Edward and Dankwart A. Rustow. 1964. Political Modernization in Japan and Turkey. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
316. Warg, Paul A. 1958. Missionaries, Chinese, and Diplomacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
317. Watson, Adam. 1984. “European International Society and Its Expansion, ” in H. Bull and A. Watson (Eds.) The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 13–32.
318. Watson, Adam. 1987. “Hedley Bull, States Systems and International Society.” Review of International Studies, 13: 147-155.
319. Watson, Adam. 1992. The Evolution of International Society. New York: Routledge.
320. Weber, Cynthia. 1995. Stimulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State and Symbolic Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
321. Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society [Volume 2]. Berkeley: University of California Press.
322. Wendt, Alexander and Daniel Friedheim. 1996. “Hierarchy under Anarchy: Informal Empires and the East German State, ” in T. J. Biersteker and C. Weber (Eds.), State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 240–277.
323. Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
324. Westlake, John. 1894. Chapters on the Principles of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
325. Westney, D. Eleanor. 1987. Imitation and Innovation: The Transfer of Western Organized Patterns to Meiji Japan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
326. Wight, Martin. 1966. “Western Values in International Relations, ” in Herbert Butterfi eld and Martin Wight (Eds.), Diplomatic Investigations. London: George Allen & Unwin: 89–131.
327. Wight, Martin. 1977. Systems of States. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
328. Wight, Martin. 1991. International Theory. New York: Holmes & Meier.
329. Williams, William A. 1988. The Tragedy of American Diplomacy. New York: Norton.
330. Wong, Dong. 2005. China's Unequal Treaties. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
331. Wood, Alfred Cecil. 1935. A History of the Levant Company. London: Oxford University Press.
332. Wood, Hugh McKinnon. 1943. “The Treaty of Paris and Turkey's Status in International Law.” American Journal of International Law 37 (2): 262-274.
333. Wright, Quincy. 1939. The Existing Legal Situation as It Relates to the Confl ict in the Far East. New York: Institute of Pacifi c Relations.
334. Yamawaki, Haruki. 1904. Japan in the Beginning of the 20th Century. London: Murray.
335. Yildiz, Hakki Dursun. 1992. 150 Yilinda Tanzimat [The 150th Anniversary of the Reorganization]. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basimevi.
336. Yoshihara, Kunio. 1994. Japanese Economic Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
337. Yuichi, Inouye. 2000. “From Unequal Treaty to the Anglo-Japanese Alliance, 1867–1902, ” in I. N. Y. Kibata (Ed.), The History of Anglo-Japanese Relations (Vol. 1). London: Macmillan.
338. Yurdusev, Ali Nuri. 2003. Ottoman Diplomacy. New York: Palgrave.
339. Zhang, Yongjin. 1991. “China's Entry into International Society: Beyond the Standard of ‘Civilization.’” Review of International Studies 17: 3-16.
340. Zhang, Yongjin. 1991. China in the International System, 1918–20: The Middle Kingdom at the Periphery. New York: St. Martin’ s Press.
341. Zubaida, Sami. 2003. Law and Power in the Islamic World. New York: I. B. Tauris.
342. Zurcher, Erik J. 1993. Turkey: A Modern History. New York: I. B. Tauris.