Alternatives to "legalization": Richer views of law and politics

International Organization

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 743-758

  Finnemore, Martha ^a   Toope, Stephen J ^b,c  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035598074     PISSN: 00208183     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/00208180152507614     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abbott, Kenneth W., and Duncan Snidal. 2000. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization 54 (3):421-56.
2. Abbott, Kenneth W., Robert O. Keohane, Andrew Moravcsik, Anne-Marie Slaughter, and Duncan Snidal. 2000. The Concept of Legalization. International Organization 54 (3):401-19.
3. Barnett, Michael, and Martha Finnemore. 1999. The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization 53 (4):699-732.
4. Biersteker, Thomas J., and Cynthia Weber, eds. 1996. State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bowett, Derek W. 1958. Self Defence in International Law. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
6. Brunnée, Jutta. 1993. Toward Effective International Environmental Law: Trends and Developments. In Law and Process in Environmental Management, edited by Steven A. Kennett, 217-36. Calgary, Alberta: Canadian Institute of Resources Law.
7. Brunnée, Jutta, and Stephen J. Toope. 1997. Environmental Security and Freshwater Resources: Ecosystem Regime Building. American Journal of International Law 91:26-59.
8. _. 2000. International Law and Constructivism: Elements of an Interactional Theory of International Law. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 39:19-74.
9. Byers, Michael. 1999. Custom, Power, and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Chinkin, Christine M. 1989. The Challenge of Soft-Law: Development and Change in International Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 38:850-66.
11. Finnemore, Martha. 2000. Are Legal Norms Distinctive? NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 32 (3):699-705.
12. Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887-917.
13. Franck, Thomas M. 1990. The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Fuller, Lon L. 1969. The Morality of Law. Rev. ed. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
15. Glenn, H. Patrick. 2000. Legal Traditions of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Goldsmith, J. L., and E. A. Posner. 1999. A Theory of Customary International Law. University of Chicago Law Review 66: 1113-77.
17. Goldstein, Judith, and Lisa L. Martin. 2000. Legalization, Trade Liberalization, and Domestic Politics: A Cautionary Note. International Organization 54 (3):603-32.
18. Hillgenberg, H. 1999. A Fresh Look at Soft Law. European Journal of International Law 10:499-515.
19. Hurrell, Andrew. 2000. Conclusion: International Law and the Changing Constitution of International Society. In The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law, edited by Michael Byers, 327-46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Kahler, Miles. 2000a. Legalization as Strategy: The Asia-Pacific Case. International Organization 54 (3):549-71.
21. _. 2000b. Conclusion: The Causes and Consequences of Legalization. International Organization 54 (3):661-83.
22. Kennedy, David. 1997. New Approaches to Comparative Law: Comparativism and International Governance. Utah Law Review 2:545-637.
23. Keohane, Robert O., Andrew Moravcsik, and Anne-Marie Slaughter. 2000. Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational. International Organization 54 (3):457-88.
24. Kingsbury, Benedict. 1998. The Concept of Compliance as a Function of Competing Conceptions of International Law. Michigan Journal of International Law 19:345.
25. Koh, Harold. 1997. Why Do Nations Obey International Law? Yale Law Journal 106:2599-2659.
26. Lasswell, Harold D., and Myres S. McDougal. 1971. Criteria for a Theory About Law. Southern California Law Review 44:362.
27. Lauterpacht, Hersch. 1947. Recognition in International Law. London: Cambridge University Press.
28. Lowe, Vaughan. 2000. The Politics of Law-Making: Are the Method and Character of Norm Creation Changing? In The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law, edited by Michael Byers, 207-26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Lutz, Ellen L., and Kathryn Sikkink. 2000. International Human Rights Law and Practice in Latin America. International Organization 54 (3):633-59.
30. Macdonald, Roderick A. 1998. Metaphors of Multiplicity: Civil Society, Regimes, and Legal Pluralism. Arizona Journal of Comparative and International Law 15:69-91.
31. Postema, Gerald J. 1991. On the Moral Presence of Our Past. McGill Law Journal 36:1153.
32. _. 1994. Implicit Law. Law and Philosophy 13:361.
33. Ragazzi, M. 1997. The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Reisman, Michael. 1992. The View from the New Haven School of International Law. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 86:118.
35. Simmons, Beth A. 2000. The Legalization of International Monetary Affairs. International Organization 54 (3):573-602.
36. Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1995. International Law in a World of Liberal States. European Journal of International Law 6:503-38.
37. Toope, Stephen J. 2000. Emerging Patterns of Governance and International Law. In The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law, edited by Michael Byers, 91-108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Verdross, Alfred, and Heribert Franz Koeck. 1983. Natural Law: The Tradition of Universal Reason and Authority. In The Structure and Process of International Law, edited by R. Macdonald and D. M. Johnston, 17-50. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
39. Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.
40. Wang, Hongying. 2000. Weak States, Strong Networks: The Institutional Dynamics of Foreign Direct Investment in China. New York: Oxford University Press.