Bringing forth mathematical concepts: signifying sensorimotor enactment in fields of promoted action

ZDM Mathematics Education

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 295-306

  Abrahamson, Dor ^a   Trninic, Dragan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925000885     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-014-0620-0     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abrahamson, D. (2009). Embodied design: Constructing means for constructing meaning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(1), 27–47. [Electronic supplementary material at http://edrl.berkeley.edu/publications/journals/ESM/Abrahamson-ESM/].
2. Abrahamson, D. (2012). Discovery reconceived: Product before process. For the Learning of Mathematics,32(1), 8–15.
3. Abrahamson, D. (2013). Toward a taxonomy of design genres: Fostering mathematical insight via perception-based and action-based experiences. In J. P. Hourcade, E. A. Miller & A. Egeland (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Annual Interaction Design and Children Conference (IDC 2013) (Vol. “Full Papers”, pp. 218–227). New York: The New School and Sesame Workshop.
4. Abrahamson, D., Lee, R. G., Negrete, A. G., & Gutiérrez, J. F. (2014). Coordinating visualizations of polysemous action: Values added for grounding proportion. ZDM - The international Journal on Mathematics Education,46(1), 79–93.
5. Abrahamson, D., & Lindgren, R. (2014, in press). Embodiment and embodied design. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Abrahamson, D., Trninic, D., Gutiérrez, J. F., Huth, J., & Lee, R. G. (2011). Hooks and shifts: A dialectical study of mediated discovery. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning,16(1), 55–85.
7. Allen, J. W. P., & Bickhard, M. H. (2013). Stepping off the pendulum: Why only an action-based approach can transcend the nativist–empiricist debate. Cognitive Development,28(2), 96–133.
8. Antle, A. N., Corness, G., & Bevans, A. (2013). Balancing justice: Exploring embodied metaphor and whole body interaction for an abstract domain. International Journal of Arts and Technology,6(4), 388–409.
9. Bamberger, J., & diSessa, A. A. (2003). Music as embodied mathematics: A study of a mutually informing affinity. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,8(2), 123–160.
10. Barsalou, L. W. (2010). Grounded cognition: past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science,2(4), 716–724.
11. Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artefacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. D. English, M. G. Bartolini Bussi, G. A. Jones, R. Lesh & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd revised ed., pp. 720–749). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Becvar Weddle, L. A., & Hollan, J. D. (2010). Scaffolding embodied practices in professional education. Mind, Culture & Activity,17(2), 119–148.
13. Bernstein, N. A. (1996). Dexterity and its development. In M. L. Latash & M. T. Turvey (Eds.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
15. Churchill, E. (2014). Skill learning, parsing, and narrated enactments: Decomposing and blending action at the potter‘s wheel. (Manuscript in preparation).
16. Clancey, W. J. (2008). Scientific antecedents of situated cognition. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 11–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher,32(1), 9–13.
18. de Hevia, M. D., Izard, V., Coubart, A., Spelke, E. S., & Streri, A. (2014). Representations of space, time, and number in neonates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,111(13), 4809–4813.
19. Edelman, G. M. (1987). Neural Darwinism: Theory of neuronal group selection. New York: Basic Books.
20. Ernest, P. (2006). Reflections on theories of learning. ZDM - The international Journal on Mathematics Education,38(1), 3–7.
21. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
22. Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology,22(3–4), 455–479.
23. Ginsburg, C. (2010). The intelligence of moving bodies: A somatic view of life and its consequences. Santa Fe: AWAREing Press.
24. Howison, M., Trninic, D., Reinholz, D., & Abrahamson, D. (2011). The Mathematical Imagery Trainer: From embodied interaction to conceptual learning. In G. Fitzpatrick, C. Gutwin, B. Begole, W. A. Kellogg & D. Tan (Eds.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of The Association for Computer Machinery Special Interest Group on Computer Human Interaction: “Human Factors in Computing Systems” (CHI 2011), Vancouver, May 7–12, 2011 (Vol. “Full Papers”, pp. 1989–1998). New York: ACM Press.
25. Hutchins, E. (2014). The cultural ecosystem of human cognition. Philosophical Psychology,27(1), 34–49.
26. Hutto, D. D. (2013). Radically enactive cognition in our grasp. In Z. Radman (Ed.), The hand: An organ of the mind (pp. 227–252). Cambridge: MIT Press.
27. Ingold, T. (2011). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling, and skill (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
28. Kelso, J. A. S., & Engstrøm, D. A. (2006). The complementary nature. Cambridge: MIT Press.
29. Kieren, T. E., Pirie, S. E. B., & Gordon Calvert, L. (1999). Growing minds, growing mathematical understanding: Mathematical understanding, abstraction and interaction. In L. Burton (Ed.), Learning mathematics, from hierarchies to networks (pp. 209–231). London: Falmer Press.
30. Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science,18(4), 513–549.
31. Lundblad, I., Elert, J., & Gerdle, B. (1999). Randomized controlled trial of physiotherapy and Feldenkrais interventions in female workers with neck-shoulder complaints. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation,9(3), 179–194.
32. Maheux, J.-F., & Proulx, J. (2015). Doing|Mathematics: Analyzing data with/in an enactivist-inspired approach. ZDM - The international Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(2) (this issue) (pii:ZDMI-D-14-00004).
33. Maturana, H. (1987). Everything said is said by an observer. In W. Thompson (Ed.), Gaia: A way of knowing (pp. 65–82). Hudson: Lindisfarne Press.
34. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1992). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala Publications.
35. Melser, D. (2004). The act of thinking. Cambridge: MIT Press.
36. Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning cultures and computers. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
37. Pirie, S. E. B., & Kieren, T. E. (1994). Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterize it and how can we represent it? Educational Studies in Mathematics,26, 165–190.
38. Reed, E. S., & Bril, B. (1996). The primacy of action in development. In M. L. Latash & M. T. Turvey (Eds.), Dexterity and its development (pp. 431–451). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Roth, W.-M., & Thom, J. S. (2009). Bodily experience and mathematical conceptions: From classical views to a phenomenological reconceptualization. Educational Studies in Mathematics,70(2), 175–189.
40. Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligences with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher,20(3), 2–9.
41. Schoenfeld, A. H., Smith, J. P., & Arcavi, A. (1991). Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student’s evolving understanding of a complex subject matter domain. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 55–175). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
42. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
43. Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2006). Distributed learning and mutual adaptation. Pragmatics & Cognition,14(2), 313–332.
44. Siegler, R. S. (2006). Microgenetic analyses of learning. In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., Vol. 2, Cognition, perception, and language, pp. 464–510). Hoboken: Wiley.
45. Sinclair, N., de Freitas, E., & Ferrara, F. (2013). Virtual encounters: The murky and furtive world of mathematical inventiveness. ZDM - The international Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(2), 239–252.
46. Sriraman, B., & Lesh, R. (2007). Leaders in mathematical thinking & learning—a conversation with Zoltan P. Dienes. Mathematical Thinking and Learning,9(1), 59–75.
47. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge: MIT Press.
48. Trninic, D., & Abrahamson, D. (2013). Embodied interaction as designed mediation of conceptual performance. In D. Martinovic, V. Freiman, & Z. Karadag (Eds.), Visual mathematics and cyberlearning (Mathematics education in digital era) (Vol. 1, pp. 119–139). New York: Springer.
49. Varela, F. J. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
50. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
51. Vérillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education,10(1), 77–101.
52. von Glasersfeld, E. (1983). Learning as constructive activity. In J. C. Bergeron & N. Herscovics (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of the North American Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 41–69). Montreal: PME-NA.
53. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1930).
54. Wilensky, U. (1991). Abstract meditations on the concrete and concrete implications for mathematics education. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 193–204). Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.