Coordinating visualizations of polysemous action: Values added for grounding proportion

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 79-93

  Abrahamson, Dor ^a   Lee, Rosa G ^a   Negrete, Andrea G ^a   Gutiérrez, José F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893573361     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-013-0521-7     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abrahamson, D. (2012). Discovery reconceived: Product before process. For the Learning of Mathematics, 32(1), 8-15.
2. Abrahamson, D., Trninic, D., Gutiérrez, J. F., Huth, J., & Lee, R. G. (2011). Hooks and shifts: A dialectical study of mediated discovery. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 16(1), 55-85.
3. Abrahamson, D., Gutiérrez, J. F., Charoenying, T., Negrete, A. G., & Bumbacher, E. (2012). Fostering hooks and shifts: Tutorial tactics for guided mathematical discovery. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 17(1-2), 61-86. doi: 10. 1007/s10758-012-9192-7.
4. Abrahamson, D., & Wilensky, U. (2007). Learning axes and bridging tools in a technology-based design for statistics. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 12(1), 23-55.
5. Alač, M., & Hutchins, E. (2004). I see what you are saying: Action as cognition in fMRI brain mapping practice. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4(3), 629-661.
6. Arcavi, A. (1994). Symbol sense: Informal sense-making in formal mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(3), 24-35.
7. Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 215-241.
8. Arzarello, F., & Robutti, O. (2010). Multimodality in multi-representational environments. In P. Drijvers & H.-G. Wigand (Eds.), The role of handheld technology in the mathematics classroom [Special issue]. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(7), 715-731.
9. Bakker, A., & Derry, J. (2011). Lessons from inferentialism for statistics education. In K. Makar & D. Ben-Zvi (Eds.), The role of context in developing students' reasoning about informal statistical inference [Special issue]. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1&2), 5-26.
10. Barwell, R. (2009). Researchers' descriptions and the construction of mathematical thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(2), 255-269.
11. Bamberger, J., & Ziporyn, E. (1991). Getting it wrong. The World of Music: Ethnomusicology and Music Cognition, 34(3), 22-56.
12. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1985). Cognitive coping strategies and the problem of "inert knowledge". In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Current research and open questions [Research and open questions] (Vol. 2, pp. 65-80). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Clinton, K. A. (2006). Being-in-the-digital-world: How videogames engage our pre-linguistic sense-making abilities. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
14. Cobb, P., & Steffe, L. (1998). Multiplicative and divisional schemes. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 20(1), 45-61.
15. Clement, J. (2000). Analysis of clinical interviews: Foundations and model viability. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 547-589). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Confrey, J. (1998). Building mathematical structure within a conjecture driven teaching experiment on splitting In S. B. Berenson, K. R. Dawkins, M. Blanton, W. N. Coulombe, J. Kolb, K. Norwood & L. Stiff (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 39-48). Columbus: Eric Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
17. Confrey, J. (2005). The evolution of design studies as methodology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 135-151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2011). Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, B(366), 1149-1157.
19. Dreyfus, H. L. (2002). Intelligence without representation: Merleau-Ponty's critique of mental representation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1(4), 367-383.
20. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
21. Fillmore, C. J., & Atkins, B. T. S. (2000). Describing polysemy: The case of "crawl". In C. Leacock (Ed.), Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches (pp. 91-110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Foster, C. (2011). Productive ambiguity in the learning of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(2), 3-7.
23. Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119(2), 593-609.
25. Ginsburg, H. P. (1997). Entering the child's mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Godino, J. D., Font, V., Wilhelmi, M. R., & Lurduy, O. (2011). Why is the learning of elementary arithmetic concepts difficult? Semiotic tools for understanding the nature of mathematical objects. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Signifying and meaning-making in mathematical thinking, teaching, and learning: semiotic perspectives [Special issue]. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2), 247-265.
27. Goldin, G. A. (2000). A scientific perspective on structured, task-based interviews in mathematics education research. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 517-545). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Goldstone, R. L., & Barsalou, L. W. (1998). Reuniting perception and conception. Cognition, 65, 231-262.
29. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 603-633.
30. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Technology Research and Development, 30(4), 233-252.
31. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878.
32. Isaacs, E. A., & Clark, H. H. (1987). References in conversations between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116(26-37).
33. Jay, M. (1988). Scopic regimes of modernity. In H. Foster (Ed.), Vision and visuality (pp. 3-23). New York: The New Press.
34. Kaput, J., & West, M. M. (1994). Missing-value proportional reasoning problems: Factors affecting informal reasoning patterns. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 237-287). Albany: SUNY.
35. Kirsh, D. (2010). Thinking with the body. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 2864-2869). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
36. Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
37. Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Toward a theoretical framework for research. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 629-667). Charlotte,: Information Age Publishing.
38. Mamolo, A. (2010). Polysemy of symbols: Signs of ambiguity. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 7(2&3), 247-261.
39. Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 431-467.
40. Nemirovsky, R. (2011). Episodic feelings and transfer of learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 308-337.
41. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Piaget, J. (1968). Genetic epistemology (E. Duckworth, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
43. Pirie, S. E. B., & Kieren, T. E. (1994). Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterize it and how can we represent it? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 165-190.
44. Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs: A semiotic-cultural approach to students' types of generalization. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37-70.
45. Resnick, L. B. (1992). From protoquantities to operators: Building mathematical competence on a foundation of everyday knowledge. In G. Leinhardt, R. Putnam, & R. A. Hattrup (Eds.), Analysis of arithmetic for mathematics teaching (pp. 373-429). Hillsdale: LEA.
46. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. NY: Oxford University Press.
47. Roth, W.-M. (2010). Incarnation: Radicalizing the embodiment of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(2), 8-17.
48. Rowland, T. (1999). Pronouns in mathematics talk: Power, vagueness and generalisation. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(2), 19-26.
49. Schoenfeld, A. H., Smith, J. P., & Arcavi, A. (1991). Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student's evolving understanding of a complex subject matter domain. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 55-175). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
50. Sfard, A. (2002). The interplay of intimations and implementations: Generating new discourse with new symbolic tools. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2&3), 319-357.
51. Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107-149). New York: Cambridge University Press.
52. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
53. Streefland, L. (1993). The design of a mathematics course: A theoretical reflection. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25(1), 109-135.
54. Thompson, P. W. (1993). Quantitative reasoning, complexity, and additive structures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 3, 165-208.
55. Tsal, Y., & Kolbet, L. (1985). Disambiguating ambiguous figures by selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37(1-A), 25-37.
56. Vergnaud, G. (1983). Multiplicative structures. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematical concepts and processes (pp. 127-174). New York: Academic Press.