Robotic surgery in trauma and orthopaedics: A systematic review

Bone and Joint Journal

Volumn 97-B, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 292-299

  Karthik, K ^a   Colegate Stone, T ^a   Dasgupta, P ^b   Tavakkolizadeh, A ^a   Sinha, J ^a  

^a KING S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALGESIA; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY SYSTEM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; HEALTH CARE AVAILABILITY; HIP ARTHROSCOPY; HIP SURGERY; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; INTRAARTICULAR DRUG ADMINISTRATION; KINEMATICS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; SHOULDER ARTHROSCOPY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TRAUMATOLOGY; TREATMENT PLANNING; ARTHROPLASTY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ROBOTICS; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 84924405821     PISSN: 20494394     EISSN: 20494408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B3.35107     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Lang JE, Mannava S, Floyd AJ, et al. Robotic systems in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011; 93-B: 1296-1299.
2. Yen PL, Davies BL. Active constraint control for image-guided robotic surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2010; 224: 623-631.
3. Cobb J, Henckel J, Gomes P, et al. Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006; 88-B: 188-197.
4. Honl M, Dierk O, Gauck C, et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted and manual implantation of a primary total hip replacement. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003; 85-A: 1470-1478.
5. Schulz AP, Seide K, Queitsch C, et al. Results of total hip replacement using the Robodoc surgical assistant system: clinical outcome and evaluation of complications for 97 procedures. Int J Med Robot 2007; 3: 301-306.
6. Clark TC, Schmidt FH. Robot-assisted navigation versus computer-assisted navigation in primary total knee arthroplasty: efficiency and accuracy. ISRN Orthop 2013; 2013: 794827.
7. No authors listed. National Joint Registry: NJR StatsOnline, 2013. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/Healthcareproviders/Accessingthedata/StatsOnline/NJRStatsOnline/tabid/179/Default.aspx (date last accessed 19 November 2014).
8. No authors listed. National Joint Registry: National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland, Annual Report 2013. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/NjrCentre/Portals/0/Documents/England/Reports/9th-annual-report/NJR%209th%20Annual%20Report%202012.pdf (date last accessed 19 November 2014).
9. Lonner JH, John TK, Conditt MA. Robotic arm-assisted UKA improves tibial component alignment: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 141-146.
10. Coon TM Integrating robotic technology into the operating room. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2009; 38(2 Suppl): 7-9.
11. Pearle AD, O'Loughlin PF, Kendoff DO. Robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 230-237.
12. Plate JF, Mofidi A, Mannava S, et al. Achieving accurate ligament balancing using robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Adv Orthop 2013; 2013: 837167.
13. Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ, et al. Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with robotic and conventional techniques: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19: 1069-1076.
14. Song EK, Seon JK, Yim JH, Netravali NA, Bargar WL. Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 118-126.
15. Decking J, Theis C, Achenbach T, et al. Robotic total knee arthroplasty: the accuracy of CT-based component placement. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75: 573-579.
16. Siebert W, Mai S, Kober R, Heeckt PF. Technique and first clinical results of robotassisted total knee replacement. Knee 2002; 9: 173-180.
17. Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 464: 111-116.
18. Kim SM, Park YS, Ha CW, Lim SJ, Moon YW. Robot-assisted implantation improves the precision of component position in minimally invasive TKA. Orthopedics 2012; 35: 1334-1339.
19. Park SE, Lee CT. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional manual implantation of a primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 1054-1059.
20. Kim KT, Lee S, Kim TW, Lee JS, Boo KH. The influence of postoperative tibiofemoral alignment on the clinical results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 2012; 24: 85-90.
21. Collier MB, Engh CA Jr, McAuley JP, Engh GA. Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007; 89-A: 1306-1314.
22. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott RN. Rationale of The Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; 248: 13-14.
23. Bellamy N, Buchanan W, Goldsmith C. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient-related outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. Orthop Rheum 1988; 1: 95-108.
24. Swank ML, Alkire M, Conditt M, Lonner JH. Technology and cost-effectiveness in knee arthroplasty: computer navigation and robotics. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2009; 38(2 Suppl): 32-36.
25. Paul HA, Bargar WL, Mittlestadt B, et al. Development of a surgical robot for cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; (285): 57-66.
26. Bargar WL, Bauer A, Börner M. Primary and revision total hip replacement using the Robodoc system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 354: 82-91.
27. Kavanagh BF, Fitzgerald RH Jr Clinical and roentgenographic assessment of total hip arthroplasty: a new hip score. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; 193: 133-140.
28. Harris WH Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1969; 51: 737-755.
29. Nishihara S, Sugano N, Nishii T, et al. Comparison between hand rasping and robotic milling for stem implantation in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: 957-966.
30. Merle d'Aubigné R. Numerical classification of the function of the hip. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1990; 76: 371-374 (In French).
31. Nakamura N, Sugano N, Nishii T, Kakimoto A, Miki H. A comparison between robotic-assisted and manual implantation of cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 1072-1081.
32. Hananouchi T, Sugano N, Nishii T, et al. Effect of robotic milling on periprosthetic bone remodeling. J Orthop Res 2007; 25: 1062-1069.
33. Nishihara S, Sugano N, Nishii T, et al. Clinical accuracy evaluation of femoral canal preparation using the ROBODOC system. J Orthop Sci 2004; 9: 452-461.
34. Siebel T, Käfer W. [Clinical outcome following robotic assisted versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a controlled and prospective study of seventy-one patients]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2005; 143: 391-398. (Article in German).
35. Lim SJ, Kim SM, Lim BH, Moon YW, Park YS. Comparison of manual rasping and robotic milling for short metaphyseal-fitting stem implantation in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. Comput Aided Surg 2013; 18: 33-40.
36. Hagio K, Sugano N, Takashina M, et al. Effectiveness of the ROBODOC system in preventing intraoperative pulmonary embolism. Acta Orthop Scand 2003; 74: 264-269.
37. Burman MS Arthroscopy or the direct visualization of joints: an experimental cadaver study. 1931. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 390: 5-9.
38. Masjedi M, Tan WL, Jaskaranjit S, et al. Use of robotic technology in cam femoroacetabular impingement corrective surgery. Int J Med Robot 2013; 9: 23-28.
39. Kather J, Hagen ME, Morel P, et al. Robotic hip arthroscopy in human anatomy. Int J Med Robot 2010; 6: 301-305.
40. Wiewiorski M, Valderrabano V, Kretzschmar M, et al. CT-guided robotically-assisted infiltration of foot and ankle joints. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2009; 18: 291-296.
41. Bozkurt M, Apaydin N, Işik C, et al. Robotic arthroscopic surgery: a new challenge in arthroscopic surgery Part-I: Robotic shoulder arthroscopy; a cadaveric feasibility study. Int J Med Robot 2011; 7: 496-500.
42. Sukovich W, Brink-Danan S, Hardenbrook M. Miniature robotic guidance for pedicle screw placement in posterior spinal fusion: early clinical experience with the SpineAssist. Int J Med Robot 2006; 2: 114-122.
43. Devito DP, Kaplan L, Dietl R, et al. Clinical acceptance and accuracy assessment of spinal implants guided with SpineAssist surgical robot: retrospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: 2109-2115.
44. Barzilay Y, Liebergall M, Fridlander A, Knoller N. Miniature robotic guidance for spine surgery-introduction of a novel system and analysis of challenges encountered during the clinical development phase at two spine centres. Int J Med Robot 2006; 2: 146-153.
45. Togawa D, Kayanja MM, Reinhardt MK, et al. Bone-mounted miniature robotic guidance for pedicle screw and translaminar facet screw placement: part 2-Evaluation of system accuracy. Neurosurgery 2007; 60(2 Suppl 1): ONS129-ONS139.
46. Lieberman IH, Hardenbrook MA, Wang JC, Guyer RD. Assessment of pedicle screw placement accuracy, procedure time, and radiation exposure using a miniature robotic guidance system. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012; 25: 241-248.
47. Kantelhardt SR, Martinez R, Baerwinkel S, et al. Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J 2011; 20: 860-868.
48. Hu X, Ohnmeiss DD, Lieberman IH. Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement: lessons learned from the first 102 patients. Eur Spine J 2013; 22: 661-666.
49. Pechlivanis I, Kiriyanthan G, Engelhardt M, et al. Percutaneous placement of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine using a bone mounted miniature robotic system: first experiences and accuracy of screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 392-398.
50. Schizas C, Thein E, Kwiatkowski B, Kulik G. Pedicle screw insertion: robotic assistance versus conventional C-arm fluoroscopy. Acta Orthop Belg 2012; 78: 240-245.
51. Rasmus M. Preliminary clinical results with the MRI-compatible guiding system INNOMOTION. Int J CAR S 2007; 2: 138-145.
52. Garcia P, Rosen J, Kapoor C, et al. Trauma Pod: a semi-automated telerobotic surgical system. Int J Med Robot 2009; 5: 136-146.
53. Oszwald M, Westphal R, Klepzig D, et al. Robotized access to the medullary cavity for intramedullary nailing of the femur. Technol Health Care 2010; 18: 173-180.
54. Lei H, Sheng L, Manyi W, Junqiang W, Wenyong L. A biplanar robot navigation system for the distal locking of intramedullary nails. Int J Med Robot 2010; 6: 61-65.
55. Hung SS, Lee MY. Functional assessment of a surgical robot for reduction of lower limb fractures. Int J Med Robot 2010; 6: 413-421.
56. Garcia JC Jr, Lebailly F, Mantovani G, et al. Telerobotic manipulation of the brachial plexus. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28: 491-494.
57. Mantovani G, Liverneaux P, Garcia JC Jr, et al. Endoscopic exploration and repair of brachial plexus with telerobotic manipulation: a cadaver trial. J Neurosurg 2011; 115: 659-664.
58. Paul S, McCulloch P, Sedrakyan A. Robotic surgery: revisiting "no innovation without evaluation". BMJ 2013; 346: 1573.
59. Roche M, O'Loughlin PF, Kendoff D, Musahl V, Pearle AD. Robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: preoperative planning and surgical technique. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2009; 38(2 Suppl): 10-15.
60. Hazarika S, Baird E, Palan J. British Orthopaedic Trainees Association: BOTA positional statement on the use of simulation in surgical training in trauma and orthopaedics, 2013. http://www.bota.org.uk/uploads/post-02291-BOTA
61. Di Giulio E, Fregonese D, Casetti T, et al. Training with a computer-based simulator achieves basic manual skills required for upper endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 196-200.