Robotic Arm-assisted UKA Improves Tibial Component Alignment: A Pilot Study

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 468, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 141-146

  Lonner, Jess H ^a   John, Thomas K ^b   Conditt, Michael A ^c  

^a PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b ALBERT EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c MAKO Surgical Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANALYTICAL ERROR; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTICS; TIBIA; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

EID: 73449087324     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0977-5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. KR Berend AV Lombardi Jr JB Adams 2007 Obesity, young age, patellofemoral disease, and anterior knee pain: identifying the unicondylar arthroplasty patient in the United States Orthopedics. 30 Suppl 19 23 17549861
2. KR Berend AV Lombardi Jr TH Mallory JB Adams KL Groseth 2005 Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity Clin Orthop Relat Res. 435 171 180
3. T Borus T Thornhill 2008 Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 16 9 18 18180388
4. J Cobb J Henckel P Gomes S Harris M Jakopec F Rodriguez A Barrett B Davies 2006 Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br. 88 188 197 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28%2FksFyitg%3D%3D 16434522
5. MB Collier TH Eickmann F Sukezaki JP McAuley GA Engh 2006 Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty J Arthroplasty. 21 Suppl 108 115 10.1016/j.arth.2006. 04.012 16950071 (Pubitemid 44293248)
6. DA Fisher M Watts KE Davis 2003 Implant position in knee surgery: a comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty. 18 Suppl 2 8 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00291-2 14560403 (Pubitemid 37259658)
7. WG Hamilton MB Collier E Tarabee JP McAuley CA Engh Jr GA Engh 2006 Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty. 21 Suppl 98 107 10.1016/j.arth.2006.05.010 16950070 (Pubitemid 44293256)
8. P Hernigou G Deschamps 2004 Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res. 423 161 165 10.1097/01.blo.0000128285.90459.12 15232443
9. P Hernigou G Deschamps 2004 Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am. 86 506 511 14996875
10. G Keene D Simpson Y Kalairajah 2006 Limb alignment in computer-assisted minimally-invasive unicompartmental knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br. 88 44 48 10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.16266 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MnnslejtQ%3D%3D 16365119 (Pubitemid 43125312)
11. SC Kozinn RD Scott 1989 Unicondylar knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am. 71 145 150 1:STN:280:DyaL1M7gvFansw%3D%3D 2643607
12. DL Riddle WA Jiranek FJ McGlynn 2008 Yearly incidence of unicompartmental arthroplasty in the United States J Arthroplasty. 23 408 412 10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.012 18358380
13. RK Sinha 2009 Outcomes of robotic arm assisted unicompartmental arthroplasty Am J Orthop. 38 Suppl 20 22 19340379
14. ML Swank M Alkire M Conditt JH Lonner 2009 Technology and cost effectiveness in knee arthroplasty: computer navigation and robotics Am J Orthop. 38 Suppl 32 36 19340382
15. J Swienckowski BJ Page 1989 Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Use of the L-cut and comparison with the tibial inset method Clin Orthop Relat Res. 239 161 167 2912616