Robot-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 230-237

  Pearle, Andrew D ^a   O'Loughlin, Padhraig F ^a   Kendoff, Daniel O ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

Author keywords

haptic guidance system; medial osteoarthritis; robot assisted; uniknee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCISION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; ROBOTICS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 74249123007     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.09.024     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Berger R.A., Meneghini R.M., Jacobs J.J., et al. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 875 (2005) 999
2. Berger R.A., Nedeff D.D., Barden R.M., et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367 (1999) 50
3. 2002 US markets for reconstructive devices 2002 (2003), Millenium Research Group, Toronto (Ontario, Canada)
4. Dalury D.F., and Dennis D.A. Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440 (2005) 77
5. Fisher D.A., Watts M., and Davis K.E. Implant position in knee surgery: a comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 187 Suppl 1 (2003) 2
6. Hamilton W.G., Collier M.B., Tarabee E., et al. Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 216 Suppl 2 (2006) 98
7. Keene G., Simpson D., and Kalairajah Y. Limb alignment in computer-assisted minimally-invasive unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 881 (2006) 44
8. Ridgeway S.R., McAuley J.P., Ammeen D.J., et al. The effect of alignment of the knee on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 843 (2002) 351
9. Collier M.B., Engh Jr. C.A., McAuley J.P., et al. Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 896 (2007) 1306
10. Hernigou P., and Deschamps G. Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423 (2004) 161
11. Hernigou P., and Deschamps G. Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A3 (2004) 506
12. Eickmann T.H., Collier M.B., Sukezaki F., et al. Survival of medial unicondylar arthroplasties placed by one surgeon 1984-1998. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452 (2006) 143
13. Register S.K.A. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: Annual Report 2006. Available at: (2005). http://www.knee.nko.se/english/online/uploadedFiles/107_SKAR2006_Eng/v2.pdf
14. Emerson R.H., and Head W.C. Failure mechanisms of unicompartmental knee replacement: the impact of changes in operative technique and component design. Semin Arthroplasty 21 (1991) 23
15. Emerson Jr. R.H., and Higgins L.L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 901 (2008) 118
16. Jenny J.Y., and Boeri C. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 111 (2003) 40
17. Mariani E.M., Bourne M.H., Jackson R.T., et al. Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 226 Suppl 2 (2007) 81
18. Jenny J.Y., Ciobanu E., and Boeri C. The rationale for navigated minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 463 (2007) 58
19. Siebert W., Mai S., Kober R., et al. Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. Knee 93 (2002) 173
20. Honl M., Dierk O., Gauck C., et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted and manual implantation of a primary total hip replacement. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A8 (2003) 1470
21. Siebel T., and Kafer W. Clinical outcome following robotic assisted versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a controlled and prospective study of seventy-one patients. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1434 (2005) 391
22. Cobb J., Henckel J., Gomes P., et al. Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system. J Bone Joint Surg Br 882 (2006) 188
23. Cobb J.P., Kannan V., Brust K., et al. Navigation reduces the learning curve in resurfacing total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 463 (2007) 90
24. Davies B.L., Rodriguez y Baena F.M., Barrett A.R., et al. Robotic control in knee joint replacement surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2211 (2007) 71
25. Rodriguez F., Harris S., Jakopec M., et al. Robotic clinical trials of uni-condylar arthroplasty. Int J Med Robot 14 (2005) 20
26. Assor M., and Aubaniac J.M. Influence of rotatory malposition of femoral implant in failure of unicompartimental medial knee prosthesis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 925 (2006) 473
27. Rees J.L., Price A.J., Beard D.J., et al. Minimally invasive oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: functional results at 1 year and the effect of surgical inexperience. Knee 115 (2004) 363