Results of total hip replacement using the Robodoc surgical assistant system: Clinical outcome and evaluation of complications for 97 procedures

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 301-306

  Schulz, Arndt P ^a   Seide, Klaus ^a   Queitsch, Christian ^a   Von Haugwitz, Andrea ^b   Meiners, Jan ^a   Kienast, Benjamin ^a   Tarabolsi, Mohamad ^c   Kammal, Michael ^a   Jürgens, Christian ^a  

^a BG Trauma Hospital Hamburg   (Germany)

^b GP Surgery   (Germany)

^c HELMUT SCHMIDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Outcome; Robotic; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

HIP PROSTHESES; ORTHOPEDICS; ROBOTIC SURGERY;

CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL OUTCOME; FOLLOW UP; HIP REPLACEMENTS; MILLING ROBOTS; OUTCOME; RESEARCH CENTER; ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEMS; TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY; UP PERIOD;

ARTHROPLASTY;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EDUCATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; ROBOTICS; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CLINICAL TRIAL; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; INFECTION; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT INSTABILITY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 38949109350     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.161     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Paul HA, Bargar WL, Mittlestadt B, et al. Development of a surgical robot for cemendess total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; 285: 57-66.
2. Borner M, Bauer A, Lahmer A. [Computer-assisted robotics in hip endoprosthesis implantation]. Unfallchirurg 1997; 100(8): 640-645.
3. Birke A, Reichel H, Hein W, et al. [Robodoc - a path into the future of hip endoprosthetics or an investment error?]. Z Orthop Grenzgeb 2000; 138(5): 395-401.
4. Mantwill F, Schulz A, Faber A, et al. Robotic systems in total hip arthroplasty - is the time ripe for a new approach? Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2005; 1(4): 8-19.
5. Nishihara S, Sugano N, Nishii T, et al. Clinical accuracy evaluation of femoral canal preparation using the Robodoc system. J Orthop Sci 2004; 9(5): 452-461.
6. Nogler M, Krismer M, Haid C, et al. Excessive heat generation during cutting of cement in the Robodoc hip-revision procedure. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72(6): 595-599.
7. Nogler M, Maurer H, Wimmer C, et al. Knee pain caused by a fiducial marker in the medial femoral condyle: a clinical and anatomic study of 20 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72(5): 477-480.
8. Nogler M, Wimmer C, Lass-Florl C, et al. Contamination risk of the surgical team through Robodoc's high-speed cutter. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 387: 225-231.
9. Schrader P. [Consequence of evidence-based medicine and individual case appraisal of the Robodoc method for the MDK, and the malpractice management of insurance funds and the principles of managing innovations]. Gesundheitswesen 2005; 67(6): 389-395.
10. Englehardt R. [German patients as experimental rabbits. Spiegel Magazine reports on implantation of hip endoprostheses with Robodoc]. Z Orthop Grenzgeb 2003; 141(1): 21.
11. Lamb C. 'Robodoc' creator sells assets to Irvine company. Sacramento Business Journal 13 July 2007.
12. Nishihara S, Sugano N, Nishii T, et al. Comparison between hand rasping and robotic milling for stem implantation in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21(7): 957-966.
13. Nishihara S, Sugano N, Nishii T, et al. Comparison of the fit and fill between the anatomic hip femoral component and the VerSys Taper femoral component using virtual implantation on the Orthodoc workstation. J Orthop Sci 2003; 8(3): 352-360.
14. Honl M, Dierk O, Gauck C, et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted and manual implantation of a primary total hip replacement. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85(A8): 1470-1478.
15. Bach CM, Winter P, Nogler M, et al. No functional impairment after Robodoc total hip arthroplasty: gait analysis in 25 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2002; 73(4): 386-391.
16. Schrader P. [Technique evaluation for orthopaedic use of Robodoc]. Z Orthop Grenzgeb 2005; 143(3): 329-336.
17. Spencer EH. The Robodoc clinical trial: a robotic assistant for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Nurs 1996; 15(1): 9-14.
18. Bauer R, Kerschbaumer F, Poisel S, Oberthaler W. The transgluteal approach to the hip joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1979; 95(1-2): 47-49.
19. Product description: Robodoc/Orthodoc. Integrated Surgical Systems, Sacramento, CA 95834, USA, 1997.
20. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. 'Modes of failure' of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979; 141: 17-27.
21. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1976; 121: 20-32.
22. D'Aubigne RM, Postel M. Function al results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1954; 36(A3): 451-475.
23. Brooker AE, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973; 55A: 1629-1632.
24. Schulz AP, Meiners J, Mantwill F, et al. Roboter in der Endoprothetik - Leben Totgesagte länger? Robotergestützte minimalinvasive Endoprothetik - das RomEo Projekt. Focus MUL 2006; 23(4): 182-187.
25. Giannikas KA, Din R, Sadiq S, Dunningham TH. Medium-term results of the ABG II total hip arthroplasty in young patients. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17(2): 184-188.
26. Perka C, Paul C, Matziolis G. [Factors influencing peri-operative morbidity and mortality in primary hip arthroplasty]. Orthopade 2004; 33(6): 715-720.
27. Sharkey PF, Shastri S, Teloken MA, et al. Relationship between surgical volume and early outcomes of total hip arthroplasty: do results continue to get better? J Arthroplasty 2004; 19(6): 694-699.
28. Borner M, Bauer A, Lahmer A. [Computer-guided robot-assisted hip endoprosthesis]. Orthopade 1997; 26(3): 251-257.
29. Bargar WL, Bauer A, Borner M. Primary and revision total hip replacement using the Robodoc system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 354: 82-91.
30. Rogers A, Kulkarni R, Downes EM. The ABG II hydroxyapatite-coated hip prosthesis: 100 consecutive operations with average 6-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18(5): 619-625.
31. Tonino AJ, Rahmy AI. The hydroxyapatite-ABG II hip system: 5- to 7-year results from an international multicentre study. The International ABG II Study Group. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15(3): 274-282.
32. Barber TC, Roger DJ, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ. Early outcome of total hip arthroplasty using the direct lateral vs the posterior surgical approach. Orthopedics 1996; 19(10): 873-875.
33. Pai VS. Significance of the Trendelenburg test in total hip arthroplasty. Influence of lateral approaches. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11(2): 174-179.
34. Pai VS. A comparison of three lateral approaches in primary total hip replacement. Int Orthop 1997; 21(6): 393-398.
35. Jolles BM, Bogoch ER. Surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty: direct lateral or posterior? J Rheumatol 2004; 31(9): 1790-1796.
36. Jolles BM, Bogoch ER. Posterior vs. lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 1: CD003828.
37. Theis JC, Ball C. Medium-term results of cementiess hydroxyapatite-coated primary total hip arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological review. J Orthop Surg (HongKong) 2003; 11(2): 159-165.
38. Garcia Araujo C, Fernandez Gonzalez J, Tonino A. Rheumatoid arthritis and hydroxyapatite-coated hip prostheses: five-year results. International ABG II Study Group. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13(6): 660-667.
39. Rahmy AI, Gosens T, Blake GM, et al. Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and pre-operative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss. Osteoporosis Int 2004; 15(4): 281-289.
40. Theis JC, Beadel G. Changes in proximal femoral bone mineral density around a hydroxyapatite-coated hip joint arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (HongKong) 2003; 11(1): 48-52.
41. Glas PY, Bejui-Hugues J, Carret JP. [Total hip arthroplasty after treatment of acetabular fracture]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2005; 91(2): 124-131.
42. Harwin SF. Trochanteric heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty performed using a direct lateral approach. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20(4): 467-472.