Robotic total knee arthroplasty: The accuracy of CT-based component placement

Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica

Volumn 75, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 573-579

  Decking, Jens ^a   Theis, Christoph ^a   Achenbach, Tobias ^a   Roth, Edgar ^a   Nafe, Bernhard ^a   Eckardt, Anke ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANKLE; ARTICLE; BONE SCREW; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR HEAD; HUMAN; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; ROBOTICS; SOFT TISSUE; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ARTHRITIS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; LEG; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE CARE; ROBOTICS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 7044272695     PISSN: 00016470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016470410001448     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barrack R L, Schrader T, Bertot A J, Wolfe M W, Myers L. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001; (392): 46-55.
2. Berger R A, Crossett L S, Jacobs J J, Rubash H E. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1998; (356): 144-53.
3. Fadda M, Marcacci M, Toksvig-Larsen S, Wang T, Meneghello R. Improving accuracy of bone resections using robotics tool holder and a high speed milling cutting tool. J Med Eng Technol 1998; 22: 280-4.
4. Figgie H E 3rd, Goldberg V M, Heiple K G, Moller H S, 3rd, Gordon N H. The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1986; 68: 1035-40.
5. Hofmann A A, Bachus K N, Wyatt R W. Effect of the tibial cut on subsidence following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1991; (269): 63-9.
6. Insall J N, Ranawat C S, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1976; 58: 754-65.
7. Jeffery R S, Morris R W, Denham R A. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1991; 73: 709-14.
8. Jenny J Y, Boeri C. Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation. Comput Aided Surg 2001; 6: 217-20.
9. Laskin R S. Instrumentation pitfalls: You just can't go on autopilot! J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 18-22.
10. Mielke R K, Clemens U, Jens J H, Kershally S. Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation - preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2001; 139: 109-16.
11. Nizard R. Computer assisted surgery for total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 2002; 68: 215-30.
12. Olcott C W, Scott R D. The Ranawat Award. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1999; (367): 39-42.
13. Piazza S J, Delp S L, Stulberg S D, Stern S H. Posterior tilting of the tibial component decreases femoral rollback in posterior-substituting knee replacement: a computer simulation study. J Orthop Res 1998; 16: 264-70.
14. Plaskos C, Hodgson A J, Inkpen K, McGraw R W. Bone cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 698-705.
15. Ritter M A, Faris P M, Keating E M, Meding J B. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 1994; (299): 153-6.
16. Ryd L, Lindstrand A, Stenstrom A, Selvik G. Porous coated anatomic tricompartmental tibial component: The relationship between prosthetic position and micromotion. Clin Orthop 1990; (251): 189-97.
17. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2001; 87: 18-28.
18. Siebert W, Mai S, Kober R, Heeckt P F. Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. Knee 2002; 9: 173-80.
19. Singerman R, Dean J C, Pagan H D, Goldberg V M. Decreased posterior tibial slope increases strain in the posterior cruciate ligament following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11: 99-103.
20. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2003; 85: 830-5.
21. Teter K E, Bregman D, Colwell C W, Jr. The efficacy of intramedullary femoral alignment in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 1995a; (321): 117-21.
22. Teter K E, Bregman D, Colwell C W, Jr. Accuracy of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment cutting systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1995b; (321): 106-10
23. Van Ham G, Denis K, Vander Sloten J, Van Audekercke R, Van der Perre G, De Schutter J, Aertbelien E, Demey S, Bellemans J. Machining and accuracy studies for a tibial knee implant using a force-controlled robot. Comput Aided Surg 1998; 3: 123-33.
24. Wasielewski R C, Galante J O, Leighty R M, Natarajan R N, Rosenberg A G. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1994; (299): 31-43.