Barriers and Facilitators for Teachers' Implementation of the Curricular Component of the Boost Intervention Targeting Adolescents' Fruit and Vegetable Intake

Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2014, Pages e1-e8

  Jørgensen, Thea Suldrup ^a   Krølner, Rikke ^a   Aarestrup, Anne Kristine ^a   Tjørnhøj Thomsen, Tine ^a   Due, Pernille ^a   Rasmussen, Mette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Curriculum; Fruits and vegetables; Implementation; School

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; DENMARK; FRUIT; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LEARNING; MOTIVATION; PERCEPTION; TEACHER; TEACHING; VEGETABLE; WORKLOAD; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; DIET; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; PROCEDURES; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNIVERSITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; CURRICULUM; DIET; FACULTY; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; FOOD HABITS; FRUIT; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES; VEGETABLES;

EID: 84924255727     PISSN: 14994046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alinia S., Hels O., Tetens I. The potential association between fruit intake and body weight-a review. Obes Rev 2009, 10:639-647.
2. Woodside J.V., Young I.S., McKinley M.C. Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of cardiovascular disease. Proc Nutr Soc 2013, 72:399-406.
3. Vainio H., Weiderpass E. Fruit and vegetables in cancer prevention. Nutr Cancer 2006, 54:111-142.
4. Pedersen A.N., Fagt S., Groth M.V. Danskernes Kostvaner 2003-2008. Hovedresultater [Dietary Habits in Denmark 2003-2008: Main Results] 2010, DTU Food (Technical University of Denmark), National Food Institute, Søborg, Denmark.
5. Skolebørnsundersøgelsen 2010 [Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children 2010] 2010, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark. M. Rasmussen, P. Due (Eds.).
6. Knai C., Pomerleau J., Lock K., McKee M. Getting children to eat more fruit and vegetables: a systematic review. Prev Med 2006, 42:85-95.
7. te Velde S.J., Twisk J.W., Brug J. Tracking of fruit and vegetable consumption from adolescence into adulthood and its longitudinal association with overweight. Br J Nutr 2007, 98:431-438.
8. Van Cauwenberghe E., Maes L., Spittaels H., et al. Effectiveness of school-based interventions in Europe to promote healthy nutrition in children and adolescents: systematic review of published and "grey" literature. Br J Nutr 2010, 103:781-797.
9. Bere E., Veierod M.B., Bjelland M., Klepp K.I. Outcome and process evaluation of a Norwegian school-randomized fruit and vegetable intervention: Fruits and Vegetables Make the Marks (FVMM). Health Educ Res 2006, 21:258-267.
10. Wind M., Bjelland M., Perez-Rodrigo C., et al. Appreciation and implementation of a school-based intervention are associated with changes in fruit and vegetable intake in 10- to 13-year old schoolchildren-the Pro Children study. Health Educ Res 2008, 23:997-1007.
11. Datta J., Pettigrew M. Challenges to evaluating complex interventions: a content analysis of published papers. BMC Public Health 2013, 13:568.
12. Durlak J.A., DuPre E.P. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Commun Psychol 2008, 41:327-350.
13. Bauer K.W., Patel A., Prokop L.A., Austin S.B. Swimming upstream: faculty and staff members from urban middle schools in low-income communities describe their experience implementing nutrition and physical activity initiatives. Prev Chronic Dis 2006, 3:A37.
14. Lounsbery M.A.F., McKenzie T.L., Trost S., Smith N.J. Facilitators and barriers to adopting evidence-based physical education in elementary schools. J Phys Act Health 2011, 8:17-25.
15. Miller-Day M., Pettigrew J., Hecht M.L., Shin Y., Graham J., Krieger J. How prevention curricula are taught under real-world conditions: types of and reasons for teacher curriculum adapations. Health Educ 2013, 113:324-344.
16. Sy A., Glanz K. Factors influencing teachers' implementation of an innovative tobacco prevention curriculum for multiethnic youth: Project SPLASH. J Sch Health 2008, 78:264-273.
17. Adamo K.B., Goldfield G.S., Colapinto C.K., Grattan K.P., Harvey A., Barrowman N. Evaluating a fruit and vegetable program: in eastern Ontario schools. Can J Diet Pract Res 2013, 74:167-174.
18. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovations 2003, Free Press, New York, NY. 5th ed.
19. Han S.S., Weiss B. Sustainability of teacher implementation of school-based mental health programs. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2005, 33:665-679.
20. Martens M., van Assema P., Paulussen T., Schaalma H., Brug J. Krachtvoer: process evaluation of a Dutch programme for lower vocational schools to promote healthful diet. Health Educ Res 2006, 21:695-704.
21. Franks A., Kelder S.H., Dino G.A., et al. School-based programs: lessons learned from CATCH, Planet Health, and Not-On-Tobacco. Prev Chronic Dis 2007, 4:A33.
22. Krølner R., Suldrup Jørgensen T., Aarestrup A.K., Hjøllund Christiansen A., Christensen A.M., Due P. The Boost study: design of a school- and community-based randomised trial to promote fruit and vegetable consumption among teenagers. BMC Public Health 2012, 12:191.
23. Aarestrup A.K., Jørgensen T.S., Due P., Krølner R. A six-step protocol to systematic process evaluation of multicomponent cluster-randomised health promoting interventions illustrated by the Boost study. Eval Program Plann 2014, 46C:58-71.
24. Aarestrup A.K., Krølner R., Jørgensen T.S., Evans A., Due P., Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T. Implementing a free school-based fruit and vegetable programme: barriers and facilitators experienced by pupils, teachers and produce suppliers in the Boost study. BMC Public Health 2014, 14:146.
25. Krølner R., Rasmussen M., Brug J., Klepp K.I., Wind M., Due P. Determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among children and adolescents: a review of the literature. Part II: qualitative studies. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011, 8:112.
26. Rasmussen M., Krølner R., Klepp K.I., et al. Determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among children and adolescents: a review of the literature. Part I: quantitative studies. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2006, 3:22.
27. Klepp K.I., Perez-Rodrigo C., De Bourdeaudhuij I., et al. Promoting fruit and vegetable consumption among European schoolchildren: rationale, conceptualization and design of the pro children project. Ann Nutr Metab 2005, 49:212-220.
28. te Velde S.J., Brug J., Wind M., et al. Effects of a comprehensive fruit- and vegetable-promoting school-based intervention in three European countries: the Pro Children Study. Br J Nutr 2008, 99:893-903.
29. Danish Ministry of Education. The Folkeskole. The "Folkeskole" is the Danish municipal primary and lower secondary school. Accessed July 4, 2014. http://eng.uvm.dk/~/media/UVM/Filer/English/Fact%20sheets/080101_fact_sheet_the_folkeskole.ashx.
30. Patton M.Q. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods 2002, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 3rd ed.
31. Merriam S.B. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation 2009, John Wiley and Sons, San Francisco, CA.
32. Clarke A.E. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn 2005, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
33. Creswell J.W. Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches 2009, Sage, London, UK.
34. Cho H., Nadow M.Z. Understanding barriers to implementing quality lunch and nutrition education. J Commun Health 2004, 29:421-435.
35. Wang D., Stewart D. The implementation and effectiveness of school-based nutrition promotion programmes using a health-promoting schools approach: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 2012, 31:1-19.
36. Samdal O., Rowling L. Introduction. The Implementation of Health Promoting Schools: Exploring the Theories of What, Why and How 2013, 3-13. Routledge, New York, NY. O. Samdal, L. Rowling (Eds.).
37. Fixsen D.L. Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature 2005, University of South Florida Press, Tampa, FL.
38. Danish Union of Teachers. Accessed July 4, 2014. http://www.dlf.org/media/42616/EngelskPjece1.pdf.
39. The Danish Evaluation Institute. Undervisningsmidler i Folkeskolen: Undersøgelse af Hvordan Lærerne Vælger og Bruger Undervisningsmidler. [Teaching Materials in the Folkeskole: A Study on Teachers' Choice and Use of Teaching Materials]. Copenhagen, Denmark: The Danish Evaluation Institute; 2009.
40. Resnicow K., Davis M., Smith M., et al. How best to measure implementation of school health curricula: a comparison of three measures. Health Educ Res 1998, 13:239-250.
41. Conley-Tyler M. A fundamental choice: internal or external evaluation?. Evaluation Journal of Australasia 2005, 4:3-11.