A six-step protocol to systematic process evaluation of multicomponent cluster-randomised health promoting interventions illustrated by the Boost study

Evaluation and Program Planning

Volumn 46, Issue , 2014, Pages 58-71

  Aarestrup, Anne Kristine ^a   Jørgensen, Thea Suldrup ^a   Due, Pernille ^a   Krølner, Rikke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Adolescent; Dietary; Multicomponent intervention; Process evaluation; School

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENCE; ASSESSMENT METHOD; DIET; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE; PLANNING PROCESS;

CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENMARK; FEMALE; FRUIT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MALE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCHOOL; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; VEGETABLE;

CHILD; DENMARK; FEMALE; FRUIT; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MALE; PLANNING TECHNIQUES; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGRAM EVALUATION; SCHOOLS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; VEGETABLES;

EID: 84902313458     PISSN: 01497189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Armstrong R., Waters E., Moore L., Riggs E., Cuervo L.G., Lumbiganon P., et al. Improving the reporting of public health intervention research: Advancing TREND and CONSORT. Journal of Public Health (Oxford) 2008, 30(1):103-109.
2. Baranowski T., Jago R. Understanding the mechanisms of change in children's physical activity programs. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 2005, 33(4):163-168.
3. Baranowski T., Stables G. Process evaluations of the 5-a-day projects. Health Education and Behavior 2000, 27(2):157-166.
4. Bartholomew L.K. Planning health promotion programs: An intervention mapping approach 2006, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. 2nd ed.
5. Bere E., Veierod M.B., Bjelland M., Klepp K.I. Outcome and process evaluation of a Norwegian school-randomized fruit and vegetable intervention: Fruits and Vegetables Make the Marks (FVMM). Health Education Research 2006, 21(2):258-267.
6. Blanchette L., Brug J. Determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among 6-12-year-old children and effective interventions to increase consumption. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 2005, 18(6):431-443.
7. Bouck M.S., St Onge R., He M., Beynon C., Lemieux S., Khoshaba L., et al. Northern Fruit and Vegetable Pilot Program: A process evaluation. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research 2011, 72(1):14-22.
8. Carroll C., Patterson M., Wood S., Booth A., Rick J., Balain S. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science 2007, 2:40.
9. Christian M.S., Evans C.E., Ransley J.K., Greenwood D.C., Thomas J.D., Cade J.E. Process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial of a school-based fruit and vegetable intervention: Project Tomato. Public Health Nutrition 2012, 15(3):459-465.
10. Conley-Tyler M. A fundamental choice: Internal or external evaluation?. EJA 2012, 4:3-11.
11. CONSORT. (2012). Retrieved from. http://www.consort-statement.org/.
12. Dane A.V., Schneider B.H. Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control?. Clinical Psychology Review 1998, 18(1):23-45.
13. Durlak J.A. Why program implementation is important. Program implementation in preventive trials 1998, The Haworth Press. J.A. Durlak, J.R. Ferrari (Eds.).
14. Durlak J.A., DuPre E.P. Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology 2008, 41(3-4):327-350.
15. Dusenbury L., Brannigan R., Falco M., Hansen W.B. A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research 2003, 18:237-256.
16. Evans C.E., Christian M.S., Cleghorn C.L., Greenwood D.C., Cade J.E. Systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions to improve daily fruit and vegetable intake in children aged 5 to 12 y. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2012, 96(4):889-901.
17. Finch H., Lewis J. Focus groups. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers 2003, 170-198. SAGE Publications. J. Ritchie, J. Lewis (Eds.).
18. French S.A., Stables G. Environmental interventions to promote vegetable and fruit consumption among youth in school settings. Preventive Medicine 2003, 37(6 Pt 1):593L 610.
19. Fuller D., Potvin L. Context by treatment interactions as the primary object of study in cluster randomized controlled trials of population health interventions. International Journal of Public Health 2012, 57(3):633-636.
20. Hasson H. Systematic evaluation of implementation fidelity of complex interventions in health and social care. Implementation Science 2010, 5:67.
21. Hoelscher D.M., Evans A., Parcel G.S., Kelder S.H. Designing effective nutrition interventions for adolescents. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2002, 102(3 Suppl.):S52-S63.
22. Hulscher M.E., Laurant M.G., Grol R.P. Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2003, 12(1):40-46.
23. Justesen L., Mik-Meyer Qualitative research methods in organisation studies 2012, Hans Reitzels Forlag, Copenhagen K.
24. Klepp K.I., Perez-Rodrigo C., de Bourdeaudhuij I., Due P.P., Elmadfa I., Haraldsdottir J., et al. Promoting fruit and vegetable consumption among European schoolchildren: Rationale, conceptualization and design of the pro children project. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 2005, 49(4):212-220.
25. Knai C., Pomerleau J., Lock K., McKee M. Getting children to eat more fruit and vegetables: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine 2006, 42(2):85-95.
26. Krølner R., Suldrup J.T., Aarestrup A.K., Hjøllund C.A., Christensen A.M., Due P. The Boost study: Design of a school- and community-based randomised trial to promote fruit and vegetable consumption among teenagers. BMC Public Health 2012, 12:191.
27. Lien N., Bjelland M., Bergh I.H., Grydeland M., Anderssen S.A., Ommundsen Y., et al. Design of a 20-month comprehensive, multicomponent school-based randomised trial to promote healthy weight development among 11-13 year olds: The HEalth In Adolescents study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 2010, 38(5 Suppl.):38-51.
28. Linnan L., Steckler A. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research: An overview. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research 2002, 1-29. Jossey-Bass. 1st ed. A. Steckler, L. Linnan (Eds.).
29. Linnet J.T. Money Can't Buy Me Hygge. Danish Middle-Class Consumption, Egalitarianism, and the Sanctity of Inner Space. Social Analysis 2011, 55(2):21-44.
30. Mason J. Mixing methods in a qualitative driven way. Qualitative Research 2006, 6(1):9-25.
31. Newell S.A., Huddy A.D., Adams J.K., Miller M., Holden L., Dietrich U.C. The tooty fruity vegie project: Changing knowledge and attitudes about fruits and vegetables. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 2004, 28(3):288-295.
32. Oldroyd J., Burns C., Lucas P., Haikerwal A., Waters E. The effectiveness of nutrition interventions on dietary outcomes by relative social disadvantage: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2008, 62(7):573-579.
33. Padgett D.K. Qualitative and mixed methods in public health 2012, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
34. Potter S.C., Schneider D., Coyle K.K., May G., Robin L., Seymour J. What works? Process evaluation of a school-based fruit and vegetable distribution program in Mississippi. Journal of School Health 2011, 81(4):202-211.
35. Resnicow K., Davis M., Smith M., Lazarus-Yaroch A., Baranowski T., Baranowski J., et al. How best to measure implementation of school health curricula: A comparison of three measures. Health Education Research 1998, 13(2):239-250.
36. Reynolds K.D., Franklin F.A., Leviton L.C., Maloy J., Harrington K.F., Yaroch A.L., et al. Methods, results, and lessons learned from process evaluation of the high 5 school-based nutrition intervention. Health Education and Behavior 2000, 27(2):177-186.
37. Roberts C., Freeman J., Samdal O., Schnohr C.W., de Looze M.E., Nic G.S., et al. The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: Methodological developments and current tensions. International Journal of Public Health 2009, 54(Suppl. 2):140-150.
38. Robinson-O'Brien R., Neumark-Sztainer D., Hannan P.J., Burgess-Champoux T., Haines J. Fruits and vegetables at home: Child and parent perceptions. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 2009, 41(5):360-364.
39. Saunders R.P., Evans M.H., Joshi P. Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: A how-to guide. Health Promotion Practice 2005, 6(2):134-147.
40. Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T., Whyte S.R. Fieldwork and participant observation. Research methods in public health 2012, 91-120. Gyldendal Akademisk, København. S. Vallgårda, L. Koch (Eds.).
41. Van A.P., Glanz K., Martens M., Brug J. Differences between parents' and adolescents' perceptions of family food rules and availability. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 2007, 39(2):84-89.
42. Wind M., Bjelland M., Perez-Rodrigo C., te Velde S.J., Hildonen C., Bere E., et al. Appreciation and implementation of a school-based intervention are associated with changes in fruit and vegetable intake in 10- to 13-year old schoolchildren-The Pro Children study. Health Education Research 2008, 23(6):997-1007.
43. Witt J.C., Elliott S.N. Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. Advances in school psychology 1985, Vol. 4:251-288. Hillsdale, New Jersey.