Checkpoints are blind to replication restart and recombination intermediates that result in gross chromosomal rearrangements

Nature Communications

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Mohebi, Saed ^a   Mizuno, Ken'Ichi ^a   Watson, Adam ^a   Carr, Antony M ^a   Murray, Johanne M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL ORGANELLE; CHROMOSOME; GENETIC ANALYSIS; RECOMBINATION;

ANAPHASE; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; CHROMOSOME REPLICATION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DICENTRIC CHROMOSOME; DNA DAMAGE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; S PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; DNA REPLICATION; PHYSIOLOGY; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; WESTERN BLOTTING;

BLOTTING, WESTERN; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; DNA REPLICATION; ELECTROPHORESIS, POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES;

EID: 84924069316     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7357     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Branzei, D. & Foiani, M. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 208-219 (2010).
2. Murray, J. M. & Carr, A. M. Smc5/6: a link between DNA repair and unidirectional replication? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 177-182 (2008).
3. Lambert, S., Watson, A., Sheedy, D. M., Martin, B. & Carr, A. M. Gross chromosomal rearrangements and elevated recombination at an inducible sitespecific replication fork barrier. Cell 121, 689-702 (2005).
4. Li, X. & Heyer, W. D. Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance. Cell Res. 18, 99-113 (2008).
5. Mirkin, S. M. Expandable DNA repeats and human disease. Nature 447, 932-940 (2007).
6. Burrell, R. A. et al. Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability. Nature 494, 492-496 (2013).
7. Bartkova, J. et al. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 434, 864-870 (2005).
8. Gorgoulis, V. G. et al. Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions. Nature 434, 907-913 (2005).
9. Durkin, S. G. & Glover, T. W. Chromosome fragile sites. Annu. Rev. Genet. 41, 169-192 (2007).
10. Letessier, A. et al. Cell-type-specific replication initiation programs set fragility of the FRA3B fragile site. Nature 470, 120-123 (2011).
11. Minocherhomji, S. & Hickson, I. D. Structure-specific endonucleases: guardians of fragile site stability. Trends Cell Biol. 24, 321-327 (2014).
12. Schwartz, E. K. & Heyer, W. D. Processing of joint molecule intermediates by structure-selective endonucleases during homologous recombination in eukaryotes. Chromosoma 120, 109-127 (2011).
13. Naim, V., Wilhelm, T., Debatisse, M. & Rosselli, F. ERCC1 and MUS81-EME1 promote sister chromatid separation by processing late replication intermediates at common fragile sites during mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 1008-1015 (2013).
14. Ying, S. et al. MUS81 promotes common fragile site expression. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 1001-1007 (2013).
15. Chan, K. L., Palmai-Pallag, T., Ying, S. & Hickson, I. D. Replication stress induces sister-chromatid bridging at fragile site loci in mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 753-760 (2009).
16. Chan, K. L., North, P. S. & Hickson, I. D. BLM is required for faithful chromosome segregation and its localization defines a class of ultrafine anaphase bridges. EMBO J. 26, 3397-3409 (2007).
17. Miyabe, I., Morishita, T., Hishida, T., Yonei, S. & Shinagawa, H. Rhp51-dependent recombination intermediates that do not generate checkpoint signal are accumulated in Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad60 and smc5/6 mutants after release from replication arrest. Mol. Cell Biol. 26, 343-353 (2006).
18. Ampatzidou, E., Irmisch, A., O'Connell, M. J. & Murray, J. M. Smc5/6 is required for repair at collapsed replication forks. Mol. Cell Biol. 26, 9387-9401 (2006).
19. Mizuno, K., Lambert, S., Baldacci, G., Murray, J. M. & Carr, A. M. Nearby inverted repeats fuse to generate acentric and dicentric palindromic chromosomes by a replication template exchange mechanism. Genes Dev. 23, 2876-2886 (2009).
20. Mizuno, K., Miyabe, I., Schalbetter, S. A., Carr, A. M. & Murray, J. M. Recombination-restarted replication makes inverted chromosome fusions at inverted repeats. Nature 493, 246-249 (2013).
21. Lambert, S. et al. Homologous recombination restarts blocked replication forks at the expense of genome rearrangements by template exchange. Mol. Cell 39, 346-359 (2010).
22. Watson, A. T. et al. Optimisation of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe urg1 expression system. PLoS ONE 8, e83800 (2013).
23. Ip, S. C. et al. Identification of Holliday junction resolvases from humans and yeast. Nature 456, 357-361 (2008).
24. Boddy, M. N. et al. Mus81-Eme1 are essential components of a Holliday junction resolvase. Cell 107, 537-548 (2001).
25. Gaskell, L. J., Osman, F., Gilbert, R. J. & Whitby, M. C. Mus81 cleavage of Holliday junctions: a failsafe for processing meiotic recombination intermediates? EMBO J. 26, 1891-1901 (2007).
26. Matos, J. & West, S. C. Holliday junction resolution: Regulation in space and time. DNA Repair (Amst) 19, 176-181 (2014).
27. Dehe, P. M. et al. Regulation of Mus81-Eme1 Holliday junction resolvase in response to DNA damage. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 598-603 (2013).
28. Tsang, E. et al. The extent of error-prone replication-restart by homologous recombination is controlled by Exo1 and checkpoint proteins. J. Cell Sci. 127(Pt 13): 2983-2994 (2014).
29. Tanaka, K., Boddy, M. N., Chen, X. B., McGowan, C. H. & Russell, P. Threonine-11, phosphorylated by Rad3 and atm in vitro, is required for activation of fission yeast checkpoint kinase Cds1. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 3398-3404 (2001).
30. Caspari, T., Murray, J. M. & Carr, A. M. Cdc2-cyclin B kinase activity links Crb2 and Rqh1-topoisomerase III. Genes Dev. 16, 1195-1208 (2002).
31. Huertas, P., Cortes-Ledesma, F., Sartori, A. A., Aguilera, A. & Jackson, S. P. CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination. Nature 455, 689-692 (2008).
32. Limbo, O. et al. Ctp1 is a cell-cycle-regulated protein that functions with Mre11 complex to control double-strand break repair by homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 28, 134-146 (2007).
33. Lukas, C. et al. 53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 243-253 (2011).
34. Harrigan, J. A. et al. Replication stress induces 53BP1-containing OPT domains in G1 cells. J. Cell Biol. 193, 97-108 (2011).
35. Janssen, A., van der Burg, M., Szuhai, K., Kops, G. J. & Medema, R. H. Chromosome segregation errors as a cause of DNA damage and structural chromosome aberrations. Science 333, 1895-1898 (2011).
36. Sarbajna, S., Davies, D. & West, S. C. Roles of SLX1-SLX4, MUS81-EME1, and GEN1 in avoiding genome instability and mitotic catastrophe. Genes Dev. 28, 1124-1136 (2014).
37. Brewer, B. J. & Fangman, W. L. The localization of replication origins on ARS plasmids in S. cerevisiae. Cell 51, 463-471 (1987).
38. Watson, A. T., Werler, P. & Carr, A. M. Regulation of gene expression at the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe urg1 locus. Gene 484, 75-85 (2011).
39. Walworth, N. C. & Bernards, R. rad-dependent response of the chk1-encoded protein kinase at the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 271, 353-356 (1996).
40. Lindsay, H. D. et al. S-phase-specific activation of Cds1 kinase defines a subpathway of the checkpoint response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genes Dev. 12, 382-395 (1998).