Erratum: Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability (Nature (2013) 494 (492-496) DOI: 10.1038/nature11935);Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability

Nature

Volumn 494, Issue 7438, 2013, Pages 492-496

  Burrell, Rebecca A ^a   McClelland, Sarah E ^a   Endesfelder, David ^a,b   Groth, Petra ^c   Weller, Marie Christine ^c   Shaikh, Nadeem ^a   Domingo, Enric ^d   Kanu, Nnennaya ^a   Dewhurst, Sally M ^a   Gronroos, Eva ^a   Chew, Su Kit ^a,e   Rowan, Andrew J ^a   Schenk, Arne ^b   Sheffer, Michal ^f   Howell, Michael ^a   Kschischo, Maik ^b   Behrens, Axel ^a   Helleday, Thomas ^c   Bartek, Jiri ^g,h   Tomlinson, Ian P ^d   Swanton, Charles ^a,e   more..

^a IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES KOBLENZ   (Germany)

^c KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^f WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^g DANISH CANCER SOCIETY RESEARCH CENTER   (Denmark)

^h PALACKÝ UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NUCLEOSIDE;

CANCER; CELL ORGANELLE; CHROMOSOME; GENE EXPRESSION; HETEROGENEITY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; TUMOR;

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CANCER CELL; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOME 18Q; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; COLORECTAL CANCER; DNA DAMAGE; DNA DAMAGE CHECKPOINT; DNA REPLICATION; GENE DOSAGE; GENE SILENCING; HETEROZYGOSITY LOSS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENE;

EID: 84874362586     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature12369     Document Type: Erratum

References (39)

1. Gerlinger, M. et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 883-892 (2012).
2. Ding, L. et al. Clonal evolution in relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia revealed by whole-genome sequencing. Nature 481, 506-510 (2012).
3. Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W. & Vogelstein, B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature 396, 643-649 (1998).
4. McGranahan, N., Burrell, R. A., Endesfelder, D., Novelli, M. R. & Swanton, C. Cancer chromosomal instability: therapeutic and diagnostic challenges. EMBO Rep. 13, 528-538 (2012).
5. Bester, A. C. et al. Nucleotide deficiency promotes genomic instability in early stages of cancer development. Cell 145, 435-446 (2011).
6. Thompson, S. L. & Compton, D. A. Chromosomes and cancer cells. Chromosome Res. 19, 433-444 (2011).
7. Janssen, A., van der Burg, M., Szuhai, K., Kops, G. J. & Medema, R. H. Chromosome segregation errors as a cause of DNA damage and structural chromosome aberrations. Science 333, 1895-1898 (2011).
8. Crasta, K. et al. DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis. Nature 482, 53-58 (2012).
9. Pampalona, J., Soler, D., Genesca, A. & Tusell, L. Whole chromosome loss is promoted by telomere dysfunction in primary cells. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 49, 368-378 (2010).
10. Ichijima, Y. et al. DNA lesions induced by replication stress trigger mitotic aberration and tetraploidy development. PLoS ONE 5, e8821 (2010).
11. Thompson, S. L. & Compton, D. A. Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 180, 665-672 (2008).
12. Gisselsson, D. Classification of chromosome segregation errors in cancer. Chromosoma 117, 511-519 (2008).
13. Bartkova, J. et al.DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 434, 864-870 (2005).
14. Tort, F. et al. Retinoblastoma pathway defects show differential ability to activate the constitutive DNA damage response in human tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 66, 10258-10263 (2006).
15. Lukas, C. et al. 53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress. Nature Cell Biol. 13, 243-253 (2011).
16. Chan, K. L., Palmai-Pallag, T., Ying, S. & Hickson, I. D. Replication stress induces sister-chromatid bridging at fragile site loci in mitosis. Nature Cell Biol. 11, 753-760 (2009).
17. Kawabata, T. et al. Stalled fork rescue via dormant replication origins in unchallenged S phase promotes proper chromosome segregation and tumor suppression. Mol. Cell 41, 543-553 (2011).
18. Harrigan, J. A. et al. Replication stress induces 53BP1-containing OPT domains in G1 cells. J. Cell Biol. 193, 97-108 (2011).
19. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 487, 330-337 (2012).
20. Bunz, F. et al. Targeted inactivation of p53 in human cells does not result in aneuploidy. Cancer Res. 62, 1129-1133 (2002).
21. Halazonetis, T. D., Gorgoulis, V. G. & Bartek, J. An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science 319, 1352-1355 (2008).
22. Rowan, A. et al. Refining molecular analysis in the pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 3, 1115-1123 (2005).
23. Pasello, G. et al.DNA copy number alterations correlate with survival of esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. Mod. Pathol. 22, 58-65 (2009).
24. Yatsuoka, T. et al. Association of poor prognosis with loss of12q,17p, and18q, and concordant loss of 6q/17p and 12q/18q in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 95, 2080-2085 (2000).
25. Sigoillot, F. D. et al. A bioinformatics method identifies prominent off-targeted transcripts in RNAi screens. Nature Methods 9, 363-366 (2012).
26. Dereli-Oz, A., Versini, G. & Halazonetis, T. D. Studies of genomic copy number changes in human cancers reveal signatures of DNA replication stress. Mol. Oncol. 5, 308-314 (2011).
27. Chan, K. L. & Hickson, I. D. On the origins of ultra-fine anaphase bridges. Cell Cycle 8, 3065-3066 (2009).
28. Lee, A. J. et al. Chromosomal instability confers intrinsic multidrug resistance. Cancer Res. 71, 1858-1870 (2011).
29. Cesare, A. J. et al. Spontaneous occurrence of telomeric DNA damage response in the absence of chromosome fusions. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 1244-1251 (2009).
30. Groth, P. et al. Methylated DNA causes a physical block to replication forks independently of damage signalling, O6-methylguanine or DNA single-strand breaks and results in DNA damage. J. Mol. Biol. 402, 70-82 (2010).
31. Greenman, C. D. et al. PICNIC: an algorithmto predict absolute allelic copy number variation with microarray cancer data. Biostatistics 11, 164-175 (2010).
32. Popova, T. et al. Genome Alteration Print (GAP): a tool to visualize and mine complex cancer genomic profiles obtained by SNP arrays. Genome Biol. 10, R128 (2009).
33. Chin, S. F. et al. High-resolution aCGH and expression profiling identifies a novel genomic subtype of ER negative breast cancer. Genome Biol. 8, R215 (2007).
34. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Stat. Soc. 57, 289-300 (1995).
35. Beroukhim, R. et al. Assessing the significance of chromosomal aberrations in cancer: methodology and application to glioma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 20007-20012 (2007).
36. Storey, J. D. & Siegmund, D. Approximate P-values for local sequence alignments: numerical studies. J. Comput. Biol. 8, 549-556 (2001).
37. Durinck, S. et al. BioMart and Bioconductor: a powerful link between biological databases and microarray data analysis. Bioinformatics 21, 3439-3440 (2005).
38. Thirlwell, C. et al. Clonality assessment and clonal ordering of individual neoplastic crypts shows polyclonality of colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 138, 1441-1454 (2010).
39. Leedham, S. J. et al. Clonality, foundermutations, and field cancerization in human ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasia. Gastroenterology 136, 542-550 (2009).