Structure-specific endonucleases: Guardians of fragile site stability

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 321-327

  Minocherhomji, Sheroy ^a   Hickson, Ian D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Common fragile sites; Fragile site expression; MUS81 EME1; Structure specific endonucleases

Indexed keywords

DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; EME1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; ENDONUCLEASE; MUS81 PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ANIMAL; CHROMOSOME FRAGILE SITE; DISORDERS OF DNA SYNTHESIS AND REPAIR; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETICS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME FRAGILE SITES; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPAIR-DEFICIENCY DISORDERS; DNA REPLICATION; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; ENDODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; ENDONUCLEASES; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMANS;

EID: 84899476646     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.11.007     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Debatisse M., et al. Common fragile sites: mechanisms of instability revisited. Trends Genet. 2012, 28:22-32.
2. Sfeir A., et al. Mammalian telomeres resemble fragile sites and require TRF1 for efficient replication. Cell 2009, 138:90-103.
3. Durkin S.G., Glover T.W. Chromosome fragile sites. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2007, 41:169-192.
4. Ruiz-Herrera A., et al. Conservation of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites in Papionini (Primates) species and humans. Chromosome Res. 2004, 12:683-690.
5. Ozeri-Galai E., et al. The complex basis underlying common fragile site instability in cancer. Trends Genet. 2012, 28:295-302.
6. Ozeri-Galai E., et al. Failure of origin activation in response to fork stalling leads to chromosomal instability at fragile sites. Mol. Cell 2011, 43:122-131.
7. Le Tallec B., et al. Molecular profiling of common fragile sites in human fibroblasts. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18:1421-1423.
8. Helmrich A., et al. Collisions between replication and transcription complexes cause common fragile site instability at the longest human genes. Mol. Cell 2011, 44:966-977.
9. Burrow A.A., et al. Secondary structure formation and DNA instability at fragile site FRA16B. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:2865-2877.
10. Letessier A., et al. Cell-type-specific replication initiation programs set fragility of the FRA3B fragile site. Nature 2011, 470:120-123.
11. Le Tallec B., et al. Common fragile site profiling in epithelial and erythroid cells reveals that most recurrent cancer deletions lie in fragile sites hosting large genes. Cell Rep. 2013, 4:420-428.
12. Ying S., et al. MUS81 promotes common fragile site expression. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15:1001-1007.
13. Naim V., et al. ERCC1 and MUS81-EME1 promote sister chromatid separation by processing late replication intermediates at common fragile sites during mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15:1008-1015.
14. Ciccia A., et al. Structural and functional relationships of the XPF/MUS81 family of proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2008, 77:259-287.
15. Boddy M.N., et al. Mus81-Eme1 are essential components of a Holliday junction resolvase. Cell 2001, 107:537-548.
16. Chen X-B., et al. Human Mus81-associated endonuclease cleaves Holliday junctions in vitro. Mol. Cell 2001, 8:1117-1127.
17. Ciccia A., et al. Identification and characterization of the human Mus81-Eme1 endonuclease. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:25172-25178.
18. Ciccia A., et al. Identification of FAAP24, a Fanconi anemia core complex protein that interacts with FANCM. Mol. Cell 2007, 25:331-343.
19. Fekairi S., et al. Human SLX4 is a Holliday junction resolvase subunit that binds multiple DNA repair/recombination endonucleases. Cell 2009, 138:78-89.
20. Svendsen J.M., et al. Mammalian BTBD12/SLX4 assembles a Holliday junction resolvase and is required for DNA repair. Cell 2009, 138:63-77.
21. Muñoz I.M., et al. Coordination of structure-specific nucleases by human SLX4/BTBD12 is required for DNA repair. Mol. Cell 2009, 35:116-127.
22. Hanada K., et al. The structure-specific endonuclease Mus81-Eme1 promotes conversion of interstrand DNA crosslinks into double-strands breaks. EMBO J. 2006, 25:4921-4932.
23. Andersen S.L., et al. Drosophila MUS312 and the vertebrate ortholog BTBD12 interact with DNA structure-specific endonucleases in DNA repair and recombination. Mol. Cell 2009, 35:128-135.
24. Salewsky B., et al. The nuclease hSNM1B/Apollo is linked to the Fanconi anemia pathway via its interaction with FANCP/SLX4. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2012, 21:4948-4956.
25. Rass U., et al. Mechanism of Holliday junction resolution by the human GEN1 protein. Genes Dev. 2010, 24:1559-1569.
26. Ip S.C., et al. Identification of Holliday junction resolvases from humans and yeast. Nature 2008, 456:357-361.
27. Wilson J.S., et al. Localization-dependent and -independent roles of SLX4 in regulating telomeres. Cell Rep. 2013, 4:853-860.
28. Wan B., et al. SLX4 assembles a telomere maintenance toolkit by bridging multiple endonucleases with telomeres. Cell Rep. 2013, 4:861-869.
29. Bogliolo M., et al. Mutations in ERCC4, encoding the DNA-repair endonuclease XPF, cause Fanconi anemia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 92:800-806.
30. Kim Y., et al. Mutations of the SLX4 gene in Fanconi anemia. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:142-146.
31. Landwehr R., et al. Mutation analysis of the SLX4/FANCP gene in hereditary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011, 130:1021-1028.
32. McPherson J.P., et al. Involvement of mammalian Mus81 in genome integrity and tumor suppression. Science 2004, 304:1822-1826.
33. Dendouga N., et al. Disruption of murine Mus81 increases genomic instability and DNA damage sensitivity but does not promote tumorigenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25:7569-7579.
34. Wechsler T., et al. Aberrant chromosome morphology in human cells defective for Holliday junction resolution. Nature 2011, 471:642-646.
35. Wyatt H.D., et al. Coordinated actions of SLX1-SLX4 and MUS81-EME1 for Holliday junction resolution in human cells. Mol. Cell 2013, 52:234-247.
36. Castor D., et al. Cooperative control of Holliday junction resolution and DNA repair by the SLX1 and MUS81-EME1 nucleases. Mol. Cell 2013, 52:221-233.
37. Garner E., et al. Human GEN1 and the SLX4-Associated nucleases MUS81 and SLX1 are essential for the resolution of replication-induced Holliday junctions. Cell Rep. 2013, 5:207-215.
38. Chu W.K., Hickson I.D. RecQ helicases: multifunctional genome caretakers. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009, 9:644-654.
39. Zakharyevich K., et al. Delineation of joint molecule resolution pathways in meiosis identifies a crossover-specific resolvase. Cell 2012, 149:334-347.
40. Zhang R., et al. BLM helicase facilitates Mus81 endonuclease activity in human cells. Cancer Res. 2005, 65:2526-2531.
41. De Muyt A., et al. BLM helicase ortholog Sgs1 is a central regulator of meiotic recombination intermediate metabolism. Mol. Cell 2012, 46:43-53.
42. Kaliraman V., et al. Functional overlap between Sgs1-Top3 and the Mms4-Mus81 endonuclease. Genes Dev. 2001, 15:2730-2740.
43. Froget B., et al. Cleavage of stalled forks by fission yeast Mus81/Eme1 in absence of DNA replication checkpoint. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19:445-456.
44. Gallo-Fernández M., et al. Cell cycle-dependent regulation of the nuclease activity of Mus81-Eme1/Mms4. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:8325-8335.
45. Regairaz M., et al. Mus81-mediated DNA cleavage resolves replication forks stalled by topoisomerase I-DNA complexes. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 195:739-749.
46. Hanada K., et al. The structure-specific endonuclease Mus81 contributes to replication restart by generating double-strand DNA breaks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007, 14:1096-1104.
47. Dehé P-M., et al. Regulation of Mus81-Eme1 Holliday junction resolvase in response to DNA damage. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:598-603.
48. Matos J., et al. Cell-cycle kinases coordinate the resolution of recombination intermediates with chromosome segregation. Cell Rep. 2013, 4:76-86.
49. Matos J., et al. Regulatory control of the resolution of DNA recombination intermediates during meiosis and mitosis. Cell 2011, 147:158-172.
50. Chan K.L., et al. Replication stress induces sister-chromatid bridging at fragile site loci in mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:753-760.
51. Chan K-L., et al. BLM is required for faithful chromosome segregation and its localization defines a class of ultrafine anaphase bridges. EMBO J. 2007, 26:3397-3409.
52. Yamamoto K.N., et al. Involvement of SLX4 in interstrand cross-link repair is regulated by the Fanconi anemia pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:6492-6496.
53. Biebricher A., et al. PICH: a DNA translocase specially adapted for processing anaphase bridge DNA. Mol. Cell 2013, 51:691-701.
54. Baumann C., et al. PICH, a centromere-associated SNF2 family ATPase, is regulated by Plk1 and required for the spindle checkpoint. Cell 2007, 128:101-114.
55. Kaulich M., et al. On the regulation, function, and localization of the DNA-dependent ATPase PICH. Chromosoma 2012, 121:395-408.
56. Chan K.L., Hickson I.D. New insights into the formation and resolution of ultra-fine anaphase bridges. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 22:906-912.
57. Crasta K., et al. DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis. Nature 2012, 482:53-58.
58. Holland A.J., Cleveland D.W. Chromoanagenesis and cancer: mechanisms and consequences of localized, complex chromosomal rearrangements. Nat. Med. 2012, 18:1630-1638.
59. Lukas C., et al. 53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:243-253.
60. Pellicioli A., Muzi-Falconi M. A blooming resolvase at chromosomal fragile sites. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15:883-885.
61. Ashton T.M., et al. Pathways for Holliday junction processing during homologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011, 31:1921-1933.
62. Mankouri H.W., Hickson I.D. The RecQ helicase-topoisomerase III-Rmi1 complex: a DNA structure-specific 'dissolvasome'?. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2007, 32:538-546.
63. Wu L., Hickson I.D. The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination. Nature 2003, 426:870-874.
64. Pirzio L.M., et al. Werner syndrome helicase activity is essential in maintaining fragile site stability. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 180:305-314.
65. Mankouri H.W., et al. How unfinished business from S-phase affects mitosis and beyond. EMBO J. 2013, 32:2661-2671.