Candidate strategies and electoral competition in the Russian federation: Democracy without foundation

Candidate Strategies and Electoral Competition in the Russian Federation: Democracy Without Foundation

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-251

  Smyth, Regina ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922947215     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511510397     Document Type: Book

References (209)

1. Aldrich, John. Why Parties? Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
2. Alexander, Gerard. “Institutions, Path Dependence, and Democratic Consolidation,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 13, 3, 2001: 249–270.
3. Almond, Gabriel A., and Sidney Verba. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, an Analytic Study. Boston: Little, Brown, 1965.
4. Ames, Barry. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2001.
5. Ansolabehere, Stephen, James M. Snyder, Jr., and Charles Stewart III. “Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote: Using Redistricting to Measure the Incumbency Advantage,” American Journal of Political Science, 44, 1, 2000: 17–34.
6. Bahry, Donna, Cynthia Boaz, and Stacy Burnett Gordon. “Tolerance, Transition and Support for Civil Liberties in Russia,” Comparative Political Studies, 30 August 1997: 484–510.
7. Bianco, William, and John Aldrich. “A Game-Theoretic Model of Party Affiliation of Candidates and Office-Holders,” Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 16, 2, 1992: 103–115.
8. Black, Gordon S. “A Theory of Political Ambition: Career Choices and the Role of Structural Incentives,” American Political Science Review, 66, 1, March 1972: 144–159.
9. Brader, Ted, and Joshua A. Tucker. “The Emergence of Mass Partisanship in Russia, 1993–96,” American Journal of Political Science, 45, 1, January 2001: 69–83.
10. Brader, Ted, and Joshua A. Tucker. “It’s Nothing Personal? The Appeal of Party Leaders and the Development of Partisanship in Russia,” unpublished manuscript.
11. Bratton, Michael. “Deciphering Africa’s Divergent Transitions,” Political Science Quarterly, 112, 1, 1997: 67–93.
12. Buckley, Cynthia, and Regina Smyth. “The Ties That Bind: The Importance of RegionintheConstructionofSocial and Political Citizenship,” in Blair Ruble and Nancy Popson, eds., Fragmented Spaces: Russian Regions in Transition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.
13. Bunce, Valerie. “Rethinking Recent Democratization,” World Politics, 55, 2, 2003: 147–192.
14. Bunce, Valerie. “Comparative Democratization: Big and Bounded Generalizations,” Comparative Political Studies, 33, 6–7, August–September 2000: 703–734.
15. Bunce, Valerie. “Regional Differences in Democratization: The East Versus the South,” Post-Soviet Affairs, 14, 3, July–September 1998: 187–211.
16. Bunce, Valerie. “Should Transitologists Be Grounded?” Slavic Review, 54, 1, Spring 1994: 111–127.
17. Bunce, Valerie, and Maria Csanadi. “Uncertainty in the Transition: Post-Communism in Hungary,” European Politics and Society, 7, 2, 1993: 240–275.
18. Cain, Bruce E., JohnA. Ferejohn, and MorrisP. Fiorina. “The Constituency Service Basis of the Personal Vote for U.S. Representatives and British Members of Parliament,” American Political Science Review, 78, 1, 1984: 110–125.
19. Calvo, Enesto, Abal Medina, and Juan Manuel. “Institutional Gamblers: Majoritar-ian Representation, Electoral Uncertainty, and the Coalitional Costs of Mexico’s Hybrid Electoral System,” Electoral Studies, 21, 3, September 2002: 453–471.
20. Canon, David T. Actors, Athletes, and Astronauts: Political Amateurs in the United States Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.
21. Carey, John M., and Matthew Soberg Shugart. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas,” Electoral Studies, 14, 4, December 1995: 417–439.
22. Carothers, Thomas. “The End of the Transition Paradigm,” Journal of Democracy, 13, 1, January 2002: 5–21.
23. Cheibub, Jose Antonio. “Minority Governments, Deadlock Situations, and the Survival of Presidential Democracies,” Comparative Political Studies, 35, 3, April 2002: 284–312.
24. Clark, Elizabeth Spiro. “Why Elections Matter,” Washington Quarterly, 23, 3, 2000: 27–40.
25. Clem, R. “Urban-Rural Voting Differences in Russian Elections, 1995–1996: A Rayon Level Analysis,” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics, 38, 7, 1997: 379–395.
26. Colaresi, Michael, and William R. Thompson. “The Economic Development-Democratization Relationship: Does the Outside World Matter?” Comparative Political Studies, 36, 4, May 2003: 381–403.
27. Collier, David, and Steven Levitsky. “Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research,” World Politics, 49, 3, 1997: 430–451.
28. Collier, Ruth Berins. Paths Toward Democracy. The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press, 1999.
29. Colton, Timothy J. Parties, Citizens, and Democratic Consolidation in Russia. Presented at Ten Years After the Collapse of the Soviet Union: Lessons and Perspectives, 13–14 October 2000b, Princeton, NJ: unpublished manuscript.
30. Colton, Timothy J. Transitional Citizens: Voters and What Influences Them in the New Russia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000a.
31. Colton, Timothy J. “Economics and Voting in Russia,” Post-Soviet Affairs 12, 4, 1996a: 289–318..
32. Colton, Timothy J. “From the Parliamentary to the Presidential Election: Russians Get Real About Politics,” Demokratizatsiya, 4, 3, 1996b: 371–379.
33. Colton, Timothy J. “The Politics of Democratization: The Moscow Election of 1990,” Soviet Economy, 6, 4, 1990: 285–344.
34. Colton, Timothy J., and Jerry F. Hough, eds. Growing Pains: Russian Democracy and the Election of 1993. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1998.
35. Colton, Timothy J., and Michael McFaul. Popular Choice and Managed Democracy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press, 2003a.
36. Colton, Timothy J., and Michael McFaul. “Russian Democracy Under Putin,” Problems of Post-Communism, 50, 4, July/August 2003b: 12–21.
37. Colton, Timothy J., and Michael McFaul. “Reinventing Russia’s Party of Power: ‘Unity’ and the 1999 Duma Election,” Post Soviet Affairs, 16, 3, July–September 2001: 201–224.
38. Colton, Timothy, and Henry Hale. “Context and Party System Development: Voting Behavior in Russian Parliamentary Elections in Comparative Perspective.” Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Political Science Association, 3 September 2004. Chicago: unpublished manuscript.
39. Cox, Gary. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
40. Cox, Gary. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems,” American Journal of Political Science, 34, 4, November 1990: 903–935.
41. Cox, Gary. The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
42. Cox, Gary W., and Matthew McCubbins. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993.
43. Dahl, Robert. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1971.
44. Diamond, Larry. “Thinking About Hybrid Regimes,” Journal of Democracy, 13, 2, April 2002: 21–35.
45. Diamond, Larry. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.
46. Diamond, Larry. “Illusions About Consolidation,” Journal of Democracy, 7, 2, 1996: 34–51.
47. Diamond, Larry, and Richard Gunther, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.
48. DiPalma, Guiseppe. T o Craft Democracies: An Essay on Democratic Transitions. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1990.
49. Downs, Anthony. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row, 1957.
50. Duverger, Maurice. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley, 1966.
51. Easter, Gerald M.“Preference for Presidentialism: Post communist Regime Change in Russia and the NIS,” World Politics, 49, January 1997: 184–211.
52. Ekiert, Grzegorz, and Stephen Hanson. Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
53. Ekiert, Grzegorz, and Jan Kubik. “Contentious Politics in New Democracies: East Germany, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, 1989–93,” World Politics, 50, 4, July 1998: 574–581.
54. Elster, Jon, Claus Offe, and Ulrich K. Pruess. Institutional Design in Post-Communist States: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
55. Evans, Geoffrey, and Stephen Whitfield. “The Evolution of Left and Right in Post-Soviet Russia,” Europe-Asia Studies, 50, 6, September 1998: 1023–1043.
56. Evans, Geoffrey, and Stephen Whitfield “Identifying the Bases of Party Competition in Eastern Europe,” British Journal of Political Science, 23, 1993: 521–548.
57. Ferguson, Gary. IFES Russian National Survey Regional Profiles. Washington, DC: International Foundation of Electoral Systems (IFES), 1995.
58. Ferrera, Federico, and Erik S. Herron. “Going It Alone? Strategic Entry Under Mixed Electoral Rules,” 2003, unpublished manuscript. Available at http://www.ku.edu/∼herron/, accessed June 2004.
59. Fish, M. Steven. Democracy from Scratch: Opposition and Regime in the New Russian Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.
60. Fish, M. Steven. “The Advent of Multipartism in Russia, 1993–95,” Post-Soviet Affairs, 11, October 1995: 340–383.
61. Fowler, Linda. Political Ambition: Who Decides to Run for Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.
62. Frye, Timothy. “The Perils of Polarization: Economic Performance in the Post-Communist World,” World Politics, 54, 3, April 2003: 308–337.
63. Frye, Timothy. “A Politics of Institutional Choice: Post-Communist Presidencies,” Comparative Political Studies, 30, 5, October 1997: 523–552.
64. Geddes, Barbara. “A Game Theoretic Model of Reform in Latin American Democracies,” American Political Science Review, 85, 1991: 371–392.
65. Gelman, Vladimir, and Grigorii V. Golosov. “Regional Party System Formation in Russia: The Deviant Case of Sverdlovsk Oblast,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 14, 1–2, March–June 1998: 31–62.
66. Gibson, James L. “Social Networks, Civil Society, and the Prospects for Consolidating Russia’s Democratic Transition,” American Journal of Political Science, 45, 1, 2001: 51–68.
67. Golosov, Grigory V. “From Adygeya to Yaroslavl: Factors of Party Development in the Regions of Russia, 1995–1998,” Europe-Asia Studies, 51, 8, 1999a: 1333–1365.
68. Golosov, Grigory V. “History Reports Itself: How the Fatherland – All Russia Alhance is Nothing New, Russian Election Watch, 2 September 1999b: 14–15.
69. Grzymala-Bussa Anna. “Political Competition and the Politicization of the State in East Central Europe,” Comparative Political Studies, 36, 10, December 2003: 1123–1147.
70. Grzymala-Bussa Anna. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Successor Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
71. Grzymala-Busse Anna, and Abby Innes. “Great Expectations: TheEU and Domestic Political Competition in East Central Europe,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 1, 2003: 64–73.
72. Gunther, Richard. “Electoral Laws, Party Systems and Elites: The Case of Spain,” American Political Science Review, 89, 3, 1989: 835–858.
73. Hale, Henry. Elections, Parties and Democratization in Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
74. Hale, Henry. “Why Not Parties? Supply and Demand on Russia’s Electoral Market,” Comparative Politics, forthcoming.
75. Hale, Henry. “Will Elections Erode Russia’s Democracy?”Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 24, 1, 2000: 123–131.
76. Hanson, Stephen E. “Instrumental Democracy: The End of Ideology and the Decline of Russian Political Parties,” in V. Hesli and W. Reisinger, eds., Elections, Parties and the Future of Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004: 163–185.
77. Hanson, Stephen E. “Ideology, Uncertainty, and the Rise of Anti-System Parties in Post-Communist Russia,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 14, March–June 1998: 98–127.
78. Hanson, Stephen E. “The Leninist Legacy and Institutional Change,” Comparative Political Studies, July 1995: 306–314.
79. Haspel, Moshe, Thomas Remington, and Steven Smith. “Electoral Institutions and Party Cohesion in the Russian Duma,” Journal of Politics, 60, 2, 1998: 417–439.
80. Herron, E. S. “Mixed Electoral Rules and Party Strategies: Responses to Incentives by Ukraine’s Rukh and Russia’s Yabloko,” Party Politics, 8, 6, 2002: 719–734.
81. Hewett, Ed A. “Perestroyka and the Congress of People’s Deputies,” Soviet Economy, 5, 1, 1989: 47–69.
82. Higley, John and Richard Gunther, eds. Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe. Cambridge, UK, and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
83. Hinich, Melvin J., and Michael C. Munger. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1994.
84. Hough, Jerry F., Evelyn Davidheiser, and Susan Goodrich Lehman. The 1996 Russian Presidential Election. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1996.
85. Huntington, Samuel. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.
86. Huntington, Samuel. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1968.
87. Ishiyama, John T. “Candidate Recruitment and the Development of Russian Political Parties, 1993–1999”, Party Politics, 7, 2001: 387–412.
88. Ishiyama, John T. “Candidate Recruitment, Party Organization and the Communist Successor Parties: The Cases of the MSzP, the KPRF and the LDDP,” Europe Asia Studies, 52, 5, 2000: 875–896.
89. Ishiyama, John T. “Political Parties and Candidate Recruitment in Post-Soviet Russian Politics,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 15, 4, 1999: 41–69.
90. Ishiyama, John T. “Electoral Systems Experimentation in the New Eastern Europe: The Single Transferable Vote and the Additional Member System in Estonia and Hungary,” East European Quarterly, 29, 1996: 486–507.
91. Ishiyama, John T. “Founding Elections and the Development of Transitional Parties: The Cases of Estonia and Latvia, 1990–1992,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 26, 1993: 277–299.
92. Ishiyama, J. T., and R. Kennedy. “Superpresidentialism and Political Party Development in Russia, Ukraine, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan,” Europe-Asia Studies, 53, 8, December 2001: 1177–1199.
93. Ishiyama, John T., and Sahar Shafqat. “Party Identity Change in Post-Communist Politics: The Cases of the Successor Parties in Hungary, Poland and Russia,” Communist and Post communist Studies, 33, 4, 2000: 439–455.
94. Johnston, R. J., and C. J. Pattie. “Campaigning and Split-Ticket Voting in New Electoral Systems: The First MMP Elections in New Zealand, Scotland and Wales,” Electoral Studies, 21, 4, December 2002, 583–600.
95. Jones Luong, Pauline. Institutional Change and Political Continuity in Post-Soviet Central Asia: Power, Perceptions, and Pacts. Cambridge, UK, and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
96. Jowitt, Kenneth. “Dizzy with Democracy,” Problems of Post-Communism, 43, 1, January/February 1996: 3–8.
97. Karl, Terry Lynn. “The Hybrid Regimes of Central America,” Journal of Democracy, 6, 3, July 1995: 72–87.
98. Karl, Terry Lynn, and Phillipe Schmitter. “What Democracy Is… and Is Not,” Journal of Democracy, 2, 3, Summer 1991: 75–89.
99. Katz, Richard. Democracy and Elections. London: Oxford University Press, 1997.
100. Key, V. O. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf, 1949.
101. Kingdon, John W. Candidates for Office: Beliefs and Strategies. New York: Random House, 1968.
102. Kitschelt, Herbert. “Linkages Between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Politics,” Comparative Political Studies, 33, 6/7, August/September 2000: 845–879.
103. Kitschelt, Herbert. The Logics of Party Formation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989.
104. Kitschelt, Herbert, et al. Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Interparty Collaboration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
105. Kitschelt, Herbert, and Regina Smyth. “Programmatic Party Cohesion in Emerging Post communist Democracies: Russia in Comparative Context,” Comparative Political Studies, 35, 10, December 2002: 1228–1256.
106. Kopstein, Jeffrey, and David Reilly. “Geographic Diffusion and the Transformation of the Post-Communist World,” World Politics, 53, 2000: 1–37.
107. Kovalev, V. “The Quasi-Party System in the Regions: The Case of the Republic of Komi and the Overall Situation in Russia,” Russian Politics and Law, 39, 2, December 2001: 45–64.
108. Kubicek, Paul. “Delegative Democracy in Russia and Ukraine,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 27, 4, 1994: 443–461.
109. Levitsky, Stephen L., and Lucan A. Way. “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism,” Journal of Democracy, 13, 2, April 2002: 51–65.
110. Levitsky, Stephen L., and Lucan A. Way. “Autocracy by Democratic Rules: The Dynamics of Competitive Authoritarianism in the Post–Cold War Era,” October 2002, unpublished manuscript.
111. Lijphart, Arend. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1995.
112. Lijphart, Arend, and Beverley Crawford, eds. Liberalization and Leninist Legacies: Comparative Perspectives on Democratic Transitions. Berkeley, CA: International and Area Studies, 1997.
113. Lijphart, Arend, and Carlos Waisman, Institutional Design in New Democracies. Boulder, CO: West view Press, 1996.
114. Linz, Juan. “The Perils of Presidentialism,” Journal of Democracy, 1, Winter 1990: 51–69.
115. Linz, Juan, and Alfred Stephan. Problems in Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
116. Linz, Juan J., and Arturo Valenzuela, eds. The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.
117. Lipset, Seymour Martin. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy,” American Political Science Review, 53, 1, 1959: 69–105.
118. Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Stein Rokkan. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction,” in Seymour Martin Lip set and Stein Rokkan, eds., Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross National Perspectives. New York: Free Press, 1967, pp. 1–64.
119. Mainwaring, Scott. “Electoral Volatility in Brazil,” Party Politics, 4, 1998: 523–546.
120. Mainwaring, Scott “Presidentialism, Multi partism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination,” Comparative Political Studies, 26, 2, 1993: 198–228.
121. Mainwaring, Scott “Politicians, Parties, and Electoral Systems: Brazil in Comparative Perspective,” Comparative Politics, 24, 1, October 1991: 21–44.
122. Mainwaring, Scott, and Timothy Scully, Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1995.
123. Mainwaring, Scott, and Matthew Soberg Shugart, Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997a.
124. Mainwaring, Scott, and Matthew Soberg Shugart. “Juan Linz, Presidentialism, and Democracy: A Critical Appraisal,” Comparative Politics, 29, 4, July 1997b: 449–472.
125. Mayhew, David R. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974.
126. McAllister, Ian, and Stephen White. “The Mixed Member Electoral System in Russia.” Paper available at: http://www.russiavotes.org/.
127. McFaul, Michael. “The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship, Non cooperative Transitions in the Post communist World,” World Politics, 54, 2, 2002: 212–244.
128. McFaul, Michael. Russia’s Unfinished Revolution: Political Change from Gorbachev to Putin. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001.
129. McFaul, Michael. “Russia’s 1999 Parliamentary Elections: Party Consolidation and Fragmentation,” Demokratizatsiya, 8, 1, 2000: 5–23.
130. McFaul, Michael. “The Perils of a Protracted Transition,” Journal of Democracy, 10, 2, 1999: 4–18.
131. McFaul, Michael. Russia’s 1996 Presidential Election: The End of Polarized Politics. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, Stanford University, 1998a.
132. McFaul, Michael. “Uncertainty, Institutional Design and Path Dependency During Transitions: Cases from Russia,” 1998b: unpublished manuscript.
133. McFaul, Michael. “Russian Electoral Politics After Transition: Regional and National Assessments,” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics, 38, 9, 1997: 507–549.
134. McFaul, Michael. “Russia Between Elections: The Vanishing Center,” Journal of Democracy, 7, 2, 1996a: 90–104.
135. McFaul, Michael. “Russia’s 1996 Presidential Elections,” Post-Soviet Affairs, 12, 4, 1996b: 318–350.
136. McFaul, Michael. “State Power, Institutional Change, and the Politics of Privatization in Russia,” World Politics, 47, 2, January 1995: 210–243.
137. McFaul, Michael. “Russia’s Choice: The Perils of Revolutionary Democracy,” in Timothy J. Colton and Jerry F. Hough, eds., Growing Pains: Russian Democracy and the Election of 1999. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1993.
138. McFaul, Michael, Nikolai Petrov, and Andrei Ryabov, Elizabeth Reisch. Primer on Russia’s 1999 Duma Elections. Moscow, Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Carnegie Moscow Center, 1999.
139. Michels, Robert. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Gloucester, MA: P. Smith, 1978.
140. Miller, Arthur H., Gwyn Erb, and Vicki L. Hesli. “Emerging Party Systems in Post-Soviet Societies: Fact or Fiction?” Journal of Politics, 62, 2, 2000: 455–490.
141. Miller, Arthur H. and T. F. Klobucar. “The Development of Party Identification in Post-Soviet Societies,” American Journal of Political Science, 44, 4, 2001: 667–686.
142. Moser, Robert G. Unexpected Outcomes: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Representation in Russia. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2001.
143. Moser, Robert G. “Independents and Party Formation: Elite Partisanship as an Intervening Variable in Russian Politics,” Comparative Political Studies, 37, 2, 1999: 147–166.
144. Motyl, Alexander. “Structural Constraints and Starting Points: The Logic of Systemic Change in Ukraine and Russia,” Comparative Politics, 29, 4, July 1997: 433–447.
145. Munck, Gerardo, and Carol Skalnik Leff. “Modes of Transition and Democratization: South America and Eastern Europe in Comparative Perspective,” Comparative Politics, 29, 1997: 343–362.
146. Myagkov, Mikhail, and Peter Ordeshook. “The Trail of Votes in Russia’s 1999 Duma and 2000 Presidential Elections,” Communist and Postcommunist Studies, 34, 3, 2001: 353–370.
147. Myagkov, M., P. Ordeshook, and A. Sobyanin. “The Russian Electorate, 1991– 1996,” Post-Soviet Affairs, 13, 2, 1997: 134–166.
148. Norris, Pippa. “Legislative Recruitment,” in Lawrence Le Duc, Richard G. Niemi, and Pippa Norris, eds., Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective. Thousand Oaks, NJ: Sage Publications, 1996.
149. Oates, Sarah. Forthcoming. Tuning Out Democracy: Television and Elections in Russia.. “The 1999 Russian Duma Elections,” Problems of Post-Communism, 47, 3, 2000: 3–14.
150. O’Donnell, Guillermo. “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies,” Journal of Democracy, 9, 1998: 112–126.
151. Moser, Robert G. “Illusions About Consolidation,” Journal of Democracy, 7, 2, April 1996: 34–51.
152. Moser, Robert G. “Delegative Democracy,” Journal of Democracy, 5, January 1994: 55–69.
153. O’Donnell, Guillermo, and Philippe Schmitter. Transitions from Authoritarian: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.
154. Ordeshook, Peter C. “Institutions and Incentives,” Journal of Democracy, 6, 2, April 1995: 46–60.
155. Ostrow, Joel M. “Conflict-Management in Russia’s Federal Institutions,” Post Soviet Affairs, 18, 1, January 2002: 49–70.
156. Ostrow, Joel M. Comparing Post-Soviet Legislatures: A Theory of Institutional Design and Political Conflict. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 2000.
157. Panebianco, Angelo. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
158. Piattoni, Simona,. Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation: The European Experience in Historical and Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
159. Popkin, Samuel L. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
160. Project on Political Transformation and the Electoral Process in Post-Communist Europe, University of Essex, 2003.
161. Przeworski, Adam. Democracy and the Market. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
162. Przeworski, Adam. “Some Problems in the Study of Transition to Democracy,” chapter 2 in Guillermo O’Donnell, Phillippe C. Schmitter, and Lawrence Whitehead, eds., Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.
163. Przeworski, Adam, Michael E. Alvarez, Jose Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World 1950– 1990. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
164. Przeworski, Adam, and Fernando Limongi. “Modernization: Theories and Facts,” World Politics, 49, 2, 1997: 155–183.
165. Przeworski, Adam, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
166. Rae, Douglas W. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1967.
167. Randall, Vicky, and Lars Svasand. “Political Parties and Democratic Consolidation in Africa,” Democratization, 9, 3, Autumn 2002: 5–29.
168. Ratiani, Natalia, and Olga Tropkina. “Senators May Be Elected Soon: The Federation Council Is on the Threshold of Crucial Reforms,” Izvestiya, June 22, 2004.
169. Reisinger, William M., Arthur H. Miller, and Vicki L. Hesli. “Ideological Division and Party-building Prospect in Post-Soviet Russia,” in Matthew Wyman, Stephen White, and Sarah Oates, Elections and Voters in Post-Communist Russia. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 1999: 136–166.
170. Stephen White, and Sarah Oates. “Political Norms in Rural Russia: Evidence from Public Attitudes,” Europe-Asia Studies, 47, 6, 1995a: 1025–42.
171. Stephen White, and Sarah Oates. “Public Behavior and Political Change in Post-Communist Societies,” Journal of Politics, 57, 4, November 1995b: 941–970.
172. Reisinger, William, Arthur H. Miller, Vicki L. Hesli, and Kristen Maher. “Political Values in Russia, Ukraine and Lithuania: Sources and Implications for Democracy,” British Journal of Political Science, 24, 2, April 1994: 183–223.
173. Remington, Thomas F. The Russian Parliament: Institutional Evolution in a Transitional Regime, 1989–1999. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001a.
174. Remington, Thomas F. “Putin and the Duma,” Post-Soviet Affairs, 17, 4, December 2001b: 285–308.
175. Remington, Thomas F., and Steven S. Smith. “Theories of Legislative Institutions and the Organization of the Russian Duma,” American Journal of Political Science, 42, 2, 1998: 545–572.
176. Remington, Thomas F. “Political Goals, Institutional Context, and the Choice of an Electoral System: The Russian Parliamentary Election Law,” American Journal of Political Science, 40, 1996: 1253–1279.
177. Riker, William. “The Two-Party System and Duverger’s Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science,” American Political Science Review, 74, 4, December 1982: 753–766.
178. Robinson, Neil. “Classifying Russia’s Party System: The Problem of ‘Relevance’ in a Time of Uncertainty,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 14, 1–2, March–June 1998: 159–178.
179. Rohde, David W. “Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of Members of the United States House of Representatives,” American Journal of Political Science, 23, 1, February 1979: 1–26.
180. Rose, Richard, William Mishler, and Christian Haerpfer. Democracy and Its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.
181. Rose, Richard and Neil Munro. Elections Without Order. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
182. Samuels, David J., and Matthew Soberg Shugart. “Presidentialism, Elections and Representation,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15, 1, January 2003: 33–60.
183. Schattschneider, E. E. Party Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1942.
184. Schedler, Andreas. “Taking Uncertainty Seriously: The Blurred Boundaries of Democratic Transition and Consolidation,” Democratization, 8, 4, 2001: 1–22.
185. Schlesinger, Joseph A. Political Parties and the Winning of Office. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press, 1994.
186. Schlesinger, Joseph A. Ambition and Politics. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.
187. Schmitter, Phillippe. “Parties Are Not What They Once Were,” chapter 2 in Larry Diamond and Richard Gunther, eds., Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001, 67–89.
188. Schmitter, Philippe C., and Terry Lynn Karl. “The Conceptual Travels of Transitologists and Consolidologists: How Far to the East Should They Attempt to Go?” Slavic Review, 53, 1, 1994: 173–185.
189. Schumpeter, Joseph A. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. London: Allen and Unwin, 1954.
190. Shevtsova, Lilia. “Russia’s Hybrid Regime,” Journal of Democracy, 12,4, 2001: 65–70.. “Can Electoral Autocracy Survive?” Journal of Democracy, 11, 3, 2000: 36–8.
191. Shvetsova, Olga. “Resolving the Problem of Pre-Election Coordination: The 1999 Parliamentary Election as Elite Presidential ‘Primary,’” in V. Hesli and W. Reisinger, eds., Elections, Parties and the Future of Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
192. Shvetsova, Olga. “A Survey of Post-Communist Electoral Institutions: 1990–1998,” Electoral Studies, 18, 1999: 397–409.
193. Shugart, Matthew Soberg. “The Inverse Relationship Between Party Strength and Executive Strength: A Theory of Politicians’ Constitutional Choices,” British Journal of Political Science, 28, 1, January 1998: 1–29.
194. Shugart, Matthew Soberg. “Executive–Legislative Relations in Post-Communist Europe,” Transition, 2, 25, December 1996: 6–11.
195. Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and John M. Carey. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
196. Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Martin P. Wattenberg, eds. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2001.
197. Smith, Steven S., and Thomas F. Remington. The Politics of Institutional Choice: The Formation of the Russian State Duma. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.
198. Smyth, Regina. “Partisans without Parties,” Comparative Politics, forthcoming.
199. Smyth, Regina. “Building State Capacity from the Inside Out: Parties of Power and the Success of the President’s Reform Agenda in Russia,” Politics and Society, 30, 4, December 2002: 555–578.
200. Stepan, Alfred and Cindy Skach. “Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation: Parliamentarism versus Presidentialism,” World Politics, 46, October 1993: 1–22.
201. Stoner-Weiss, Kathryn. “The Limited Reach of Russia’s Party System: Under-institutionalization in Dual Transitions,” Politics and Society, 29, 3, 2001: 385–414.
202. Taagepera, Rein. “Effective Magnitude and Effective Threshold,” Electoral Studies, 17, 1998: 393–404.
203. Taagepera, Rein, and Matthew Shugart. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.
204. Tarrow, Sidney. “The Italian Party System: Between Crisis and Transition,” American Journal of Political Science, 21, 2, May 1977: 193–223.
205. Thames, Frank C., Jr. “Legislative Voting Behavior in the Russian Duma: Understanding the Effect of Mandate,” Europe-Asia Studies, 53, 6, September 2001: 869–84.
206. Tsygankov, Andrei. “Manifestations of Delegative Democracy in Russian Local Politics: What Does It Mean for the Future of Russia?” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 31, 4, 1998: 329–341.
207. White, Stephen, Richard Rose, and Ian McAllister. How Russia Votes. Chatham, UK: Chatham House, 1997.
208. Yargomskaya, M. “Effect of the Electoral System on the Electoral Strategies of Duma Elections,” in V. Gelman, G. Golosov, and E. Melshkina, eds., The Second Electoral Cycle in Russia, 1999–2000, Moscow: VesMir (in Russian), 2002.
209. Zakharia, Fareed. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy,” Foreign Affairs, 76, November–December 1997: 22–41.