Teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning

Instructional Science

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 173-179

  Kali, Yael ^a   McKenney, Susan ^a,b,c   Sagy, Ornit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Co design; Customization; Design; Learning environments; Participatory design; Professional development; Teacher learning; Technology enhanced learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922799351     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: 15731952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-014-9343-4     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher-curriculum encounter. Albany: State University of New York Press.
2. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & I. van Merriénboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 55–68). Oxford: Pregamon.
3. Boschman, F., McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2014). Understanding decision making in teachers’ curriculum design approaches. Educational Technology Research and Development,62, 393–416.
4. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners (pp. 229–270)., Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice Cambridge: MIT Press.
5. Carl, A. (2009). Teacher empowerment through curriculum development: Theory into practice (3rd ed.). Kenwyn, RSA: Juta.
6. Corcoran, T., & Silander, M. (2009). Instruction in high schools: The evidence and the challenge. The Future of Children,19(1), 157–183.
7. Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. New York: Berg.
8. Cviko, A., McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2014a). Teachers as co-designers of a technology-rich learning activities for emergent literacy. Technology, Pedagogy and Education,. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2014.953197.
9. Cviko, A., McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2014b). Teacher roles in designing technology-rich learning activities for early literacy. Computers & Education,72, 68–79.
10. Davis, E. A., Beyer, C., Forbes, C. T., & Stevens, S. (2011). Understanding pedagogical design capacity through teachers’ narratives. Teaching and Teacher Education,27(4), 797–810.
11. Davis, E. A., & Varma, K. (2008). Supporting teachers in productive adaptation. In Y. Kali, M. C. Linn, M. Koppal, & J. E. Roseman (Eds.), Designing coherent science education: Implications for curriculum, instruction, and policy (pp. 94–122). N.Y.: Teachers College Press.
12. De Koster, S., Kuiper, E., & Volman, M. (2012). Concept-guided development of ICT use in ‘traditional’ and ‘innovative’ primary schools: what types of ICT use do schools develop? Journal of Computer Assisted learning,28(5), 454–464.
13. Druin, A. (2002). The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology,21(1), 1–25.
14. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
15. Ertmer, P., Stepich, D., Flanagan, F., Kocaman-Karoglu, A., Reiner, C., Reyes, L., et al. (2009). Impact of guidance on the problem-solving efforts of instructional design novices. Performance Improvement Quarterly,21, 117–132.
16. Ertmer, P., Stepich, D., York, C., Stickman, A., Wu, X., Zurek, S., & Goktas, Y. (2008). How instructional design experts use knowledge and experience to solve ill-structured problems. Performance Improvement Quarterly,21, 17–42.
17. Gerard, L. F., Spitulnik, M., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Teacher use of evidence to customize inquiry science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,47(9), 1037–1063.
18. Gerard, L. F., Varma, K., Corliss, S. B., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Professional development for technology-enhanced inquiry science. Review of Educational Research,81(3), 408–448.
19. Greeno, J. G., & Middle School Mathematics through Applications Project Group. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist,53(1), 5–26.
20. Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2008). Curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teacher learning? Teaching and Teacher Education,24, 2014–2026.
21. Harel, I. E., & Papert, S. E. (1991). Constructionism. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.
22. Huizinga, T., Handelzalts, A., Nieveen, N., & Voogt, J. (2014). Teacher involvement in curriculum design: Need for support to enhance teachers’ design expertise. Journal of Curriculum Studies,46(1), 33–57.
23. Kafyulilo, A. C. (2013). Collaborative design in teams to develop science and mathematics teachers’technology integration knowledge and skills. Doctoral Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede.
24. Kali, Y., Markauskaite, L., Goodyear, P., & Ward, M-H. (2011). Bridging multiple expertise in collaborative design for technology-enhanced learning. Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) conference (pp. 831–835). New York: ISLS.
25. Kali, Y., & Ronen-Fuhrmann, T. (2011). Teaching to design educational technologies. The International Journal of Learning Technology (IJLT),6(1), 4–23.
26. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research,32(2), 131–152.
27. Kolodner, J. L., Crismond, P. J., Fasse, D., Gray, B., Holbrook, J., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design (tm) into practice. The journal of the learning sciences,12(4), 495–547.
28. Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2007). Teachers’ perspectives on innovations: Implications for educational design. Teaching and Teacher Education,23(6), 985.
29. Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2011). Participatory instructional redesign by students and teachers in secondary education: Effects on perceptions of instruction. Instructional Science,39, 737–762.
30. Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. London: Routledge.
31. McKenney, S. (2005). Technology for curriculum and teacher development: Software to help educators learn while designing teacher guides. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,38(2), 167–190.
32. Nihuka, K. A., & Voogt, J. (2012). Collaborative e-learning course design: Impacts on instructors. Australiasian Journal of Educational Technology,28(2), 232–248.
33. Penuel, W., Roschelle, J., & Shechtman, N. (2007). Designing formative assessment software with teachers: An analysis of the co-design process. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning,2(1), 51–74.
34. Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers’ curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry,19(3), 315–342.
35. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research,75(2), 211–246.
36. Sagy, O., McKenney, S. & Kali, Y. (2012). Teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning. Symposium presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. 16–20, April.
37. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. Liberal education in a knowledge society,97, 67–98.
38. Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (Eds.). (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
39. Voogt, J., Almekinders, M., van den Akker, J., & Moonen, B. (2005). A blended in-service arrangement for classroom technology integration: impacts on teachers and students. Computers in Human Behavior,21(3), 523–539.
40. Voogt, J., McKenney, S., & Kali, Y., Breleux, A., Cober, R., Eylon, B-S., Itow, R., Könings, K., Laferrière, T., Linn, M. C., Markauskaite, L., Matuk, C., Reeve, R., Sagy, O., Slotta, J., So, H-J., Svihla, V. & Tan, E., (2014). Teachers as designers. Presentation during an invited session. In J. L. Polman, E. A. Kyza, D. K. O’Neill, I. Tabak, W. R. Penuel, A. S. Jurow, K. O’Connor, T. Lee, & L. D’Amico (Eds.) Learning and becoming in practice: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2014 (vol 1, p. 14). Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.