Understanding DNA-binding specificity by bacteria hybrid selection

Briefings in Functional Genomics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 3-16

  Xu, Denise J ^a,b   Noyes, Marcus B ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bacterial hybrid assay; DNA binding domains; DNA binding specificity; Protein engineering; Protein selection systems; Transcription factor

Indexed keywords

HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; ZINC FINGER PROTEIN; DNA; PROTEIN BINDING; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BACTERIA HYBRID SELECTION; BACTERIAL ONE HYBRID SYSTEM; CELL FUNCTION; DNA LIBRARY; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; BACTERIUM; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; TWO HYBRID SYSTEM;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

BACTERIA; DNA; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TWO-HYBRID SYSTEM TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84922433265     PISSN: 20412649     EISSN: 20412657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elu048     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Shendure J, Lieberman Aiden E. The expanding scope of DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 2012;30: 1084-94.
2. Green MR. Eukaryotic transcription activation: right on target. Mol Cell 2005;18: 399-402.
3. Malik S, Roeder RG. Dynamic regulation of pol II transcription by the mammalian Mediator complex. Trends Biochem Sci 2005;30: 256-63.
4. Conaway JW, Florens L, Sato S, et al. The mammalian mediator complex. FEBS Lett 2005;579: 904-8.
5. Maston GA, Evans SK, Green MR. Transcriptional regulatory elements in the human genome. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet 2006;7: 29-59.
6. Barberis A, Gaudreau L. Recruitment of the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme and its implications in gene regulation. Biol Chem 1998;379: 1397-405.
7. Conaway RC, Sato S, Tomomori-Sato C, et al. The mammalian Mediator complex and its role in transcriptional regulation. Trends Biochem Sci 2005;30: 250-5.
8. Tupler R, Perini G, Green MR. Expressing the human genome. Nature 2001;409: 832-3.
9. Wingender E, Schoeps T, Donitz J. TFClass: an expandable hierarchical classification of human transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41: D165-70.
10. Rohs R, Jin X, West SM, et al. Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem 2010;79: 233-69.
11. Harrison SC. A structural taxonomy of DNA-binding domains. Nature 1991;353: 715-9.
12. Rebar EJ, Pabo CO. Zinc finger phage: affinity selection of fingers with new DNA-binding specificities. Science 1994;263: 671-3.
13. Wolfe SA, Nekludova L, Pabo CO. DNA recognition by Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins. Ann Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2000;29: 183-212.
14. Noyes MB, Christensen RG, Wakabayashi A, et al. Analysis of homeodomain specificities allows the family-wide prediction of preferred recognition sites. Cell 2008;133: 1277-89.
15. Berger MF, Badis G, Gehrke AR, et al. Variation in home-odomain DNA binding revealed by high-resolution analysis of sequence preferences. Cell 2008;133: 1266-76.
16. Grove CA, De Masi F, Barrasa MI, et al. A multiparameter network reveals extensive divergence between C. elegans bHLH transcription factors. Cell 2009;138: 314-27.
17. Nakagawa S, Gisselbrecht SS, Rogers JM, et al. DNA-binding specificity changes in the evolution of forkhead transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110: 12349-54.
18. Pavletich NP, Pabo CO. Zinc finger-DNA recognition: crystal structure of a Zif268-DNA complex at 2.1 A. Science 1991;252: 809-17.
19. Slattery M, Riley T, Liu P, et al. Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins. Cell 2011;147: 1270-82.
20. Tuerk C, Gold L. Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. Science 1990;249: 505-10.
21. Blackwell TK, Weintraub H. Differences and similarities in DNA-binding preferences of MyoD and E2A protein complexes revealed by binding site selection. Science 1990;250: 1104-10.
22. He YY, Stockley PG, Gold L. In vitro evolution of the DNA binding sites of Escherichia coli methionine repressor, MetJ. J Mol Biol 1996;255: 55-66.
23. Fields DS, He Y, Al-Uzri AY, et al. Quantitative specificity of the Mnt repressor. J Mol Biol 1997;271: 178-94.
24. Jolma A, Yan J, Whitington T, et al. DNA-binding specificities of human transcription factors. Cell 2013;152: 327-39.
25. Zhao Y, Granas D, Stormo GD. Inferring binding energies from selected binding sites. PLoS Comput Biol 2009;5: e1000590.
26. Bulyk ML, Huang X, Choo Y, et al. Exploring the DNA-binding specificities of zinc fingers with DNA microarrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98: 7158-63.
27. De Silva EK, Gehrke AR, Olszewski K, et al. Specific DNA-binding by apicomplexan AP2 transcription factorsional. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105: 8393-8.
28. Badis G, Berger MF, Philippakis AA, et al. Diversity and complexity in DNA recognition by transcription factors. Science 2009;324: 1720-3.
29. Valouev A, Johnson DS, Sundquist A, et al. Genome-wide analysis of transcription factor binding sites based on ChIP-Seq data. Nat Methods 2008;5: 829-34.
30. Harbison CT, Gordon DB, Lee TI, et al. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 2004;431: 99-104.
31. Johnson DS, Mortazavi A, Myers RM, et al. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein-DNA interactions. Science 2007;316: 1497-502.
32. Liu X, Noll DM, Lieb JD, et al. DIP-chip: rapid and accurate determination of DNA-binding specificity. Genome Res 2005;15: 421-7.
33. Lickwar CR, Mueller F, Hanlon SE, et al. Genome-wide protein-DNA binding dynamics suggest a molecular clutch for transcription factor function. Nature 2012;484: 251-5.
34. Fields S, Song O. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature 1989;340: 245-6.
35. Deplancke B, Dupuy D, Vidal M, et al. A gateway-compatible yeast one-hybrid system. Genome Res 2004;14: 2093-101.
36. Deplancke B, Mukhopadhyay A, Ao W, et al. A gene-centered C. elegans protein-DNA interaction network. Cell 2006;125: 1193-205.
37. Dove SL, Joung JK, Hochschild A. Activation of prokaryotic transcription through arbitrary protein-protein contacts. Nature 1997;386: 627-30.
38. Joung JK, Koepp DM, Hochschild A. Synergistic activation of transcription by bacteriophage lambda cI protein and E. coli cAMP receptor protein. Science 1994;265: 1863-6.
39. Joung JK, Ramm EI, Pabo CO. A bacterial two-hybrid selection system for studying protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97: 7382-7.
40. Meng X, Brodsky MH, Wolfe SA. A bacterial one-hybrid system for determining the DNA-binding specificity of transcription factors. Nat Biotechnol 2005;23: 988-94.
41. Ma J, Ptashne M. The carboxy-terminal 30 amino acids of GAL4 are recognized by GAL80. Cell 1987;50: 137-42.
42. Ma J, Ptashne M. Deletion analysis of GAL4 defines two transcriptional activating segments. Cell 1987;48: 847-53.
43. Keegan L, Gill G, Ptashne M. Separation of DNA binding from the transcription-activating function of a eukaryotic regulatory protein. Science 1986;231: 699-704.
44. Silver PA, Keegan LP, Ptashne M. Amino terminus of the yeast GAL4 gene product is sufficient for nuclear localization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984;81: 5951-5.
45. Gill G, Ptashne M. Mutants of GAL4 protein altered in an activation function. Cell 1987;51: 121-6.
46. Ma J, Ptashne M. A new class of yeast transcriptional activators. Cell 1987;51: 113-19.
47. Chien CT, Bartel PL, Sternglanz R, et al. The two-hybrid system: a method to identify and clone genes for proteins that interact with a protein of interest. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991;88: 9578-82.
48. Chevray PM, Nathans D. Protein interaction cloning in yeast: identification of mammalian proteins that react with the leucine zipper of Jun. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89: 5789-93.
49. Germino FJ, Wang ZX, Weissman SM. Screening for in vivo protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90: 933-7.
50. Pi H, Chien CT, Fields S. Transcriptional activation upon pheromone stimulation mediated by a small domain of Saccharomycescerevisiae Ste12p. MolCellBiol 1997;17: 6410-18.
51. Joung JK, Le LU, Hochschild A. Synergistic activation of transcription by Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90: 3083-7.
52. Hochschild A, Dove SL. Protein-protein contacts that activate and repress prokaryotic transcription. Cell 1998;92: 597-600.
53. Dove SL, Hochschild A. Conversion of the omega subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase into a transcriptional activator or an activation target. Genes Dev 1998;12: 745-54.
54. Meng X, Wolfe SA. Identifying DNA sequences recognized by a transcription factor using a bacterial one-hybrid system. Nat Protoc 2006;1: 30-45.
55. Noyes MB, Meng X, Wakabayashi A, et al. A systematic characterization of factors that regulate Drosophila segmentation via a bacterial one-hybrid system. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36: 2547-60.
56. Noyes MB. Analysis of specific protein-DNA interactions by bacterial one-hybrid assay. Methods Mol Biol 2012;786: 79-95.
57. Christensen RG, Gupta A, Zuo Z, et al. A modified bacterial one-hybrid system yields improved quantitative models of transcription factor specificity. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39:e83, 1-15.
58. Gupta A, Christensen RG, Bell HA, et al. An improved predictive recognition model for Cys(2)-His(2) zinc finger proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42: 4800-12.
59. Enuameh MS, Asriyan Y, Richards A, et al. Global analysis of Drosophila Cys(2)-His(2) zinc finger proteins reveals a multitude of novel recognition motifs and binding determinants. Genome Res 2013;23: 928-40.
60. Christensen RG, Enuameh MS, Noyes MB, et al. Recognition models to predict DNA-binding specificities of homeodomain proteins. Bioinformatics 2012;28: 184-9.
61. Bailey TL, Elkan C. Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 1994;2: 28-36.
62. Gupta A, Christensen RG, Rayla AL, et al. An optimized two-finger archive for ZFN-mediated gene targeting. Nat Methods 2012;9: 588-90.
63. Zhu C, Gupta A, Hall VL, et al. Using defined finger-finger interfaces as units of assembly for constructing zinc-finger nucleases. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41: 2455-65.
64. Chu SW, Noyes MB, Christensen RG, et al. Exploring the DNA-recognition potential of homeodomains. Genome Res 2012;22: 1889-98.
65. Meng X, Noyes MB, Zhu LJ, et al. Targeted gene inactivation in zebrafish using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 2008;26: 695-701.
66. Persikov AV, Rowland EF, Oakes BL, et al. Deep sequencing of large library selections allows computational discovery of diverse sets of zinc fingers that bind common targets. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42: 1497-508.
67. Hurt JA, Thibodeau SA, Hirsh AS, et al. Highly specific zinc finger proteins obtained by directed domain shuffling and cell-based selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100: 12271-6.
68. Maeder ML, Thibodeau-Beganny S, Osiak A, et al. Rapid "open-source" engineering of customized zinc-finger nucleases for highly efficient gene modification. Mol Cell 2008;31: 294-301.
69. Sander JD, Dahlborg EJ, Goodwin MJ, et al. Selection-free zinc-finger-nuclease engineering by context-dependent assembly (CoDA). Nat Methods 2011;8: 67-9.
70. Murakami KS, Masuda S, Campbell EA, et al. Structural basis of transcription initiation: an RNA polymerase holo-enzyme-DNA complex. Science 2002;296: 1285-90.
71. Gentry DR, Burgess RR. The cloning and sequence of the gene encoding the omega subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Gene 1986;48: 33-40.
72. Gentry DR, Burgess RR. rpoZ, encoding the omega subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase, is in the same operon as spoT. J Bacteriol 1989;171: 1271-7.
73. Gentry D, Xiao H, Burgess R, et al. The omega subunit of Escherichia coli K-12 RNA polymerase is not required for stringent RNA control in vivo. J Bacteriol 1991;173: 3901-3.
74. Zhu LJ, Christensen RG, Kazemian M, et al. FlyFactorSurvey: a database of Drosophila transcription factor binding specificities determined using the bacterial one-hybrid system. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39: D111-17.
75. Shazman S, Lee H, Socol Y, et al. OnTheFly: a database of Drosophila melanogaster transcription factors and their binding sites. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42: D167-71.
76. Anderson DM, George R, Noyes MB, et al. Characterization of the DNA-binding properties of the Mohawk homeobox transcription factor. J Biol Chem 2012;287: 35351-9.
77. Chen H, Xu Z, Mei C, et al. A system of repressor gradients spatially organizes the boundaries of Bicoid-dependent target genes. Cell 2012;149: 618-29.
78. Struffi P, Corado M, Kaplan L, et al. Combinatorial activation and concentration-dependent repression of the Drosophila even skipped stripe 3+7 enhancer. Development 2011;138: 4291-9.
79. Ribeiro TC, Ventrice G, Machado-Lima A, et al. Investigating giant (Gt) repression in the formation of partially overlapping pair-rule stripes. Dev Dyn 2010;239: 2989-99.
80. Kaplan T, Li XY, Sabo PJ, et al. Quantitative models of the mechanisms that control genome-wide patterns of transcription factor binding during early Drosophila development. PLoS Genet 2011;7: e1001290.
81. Slattery M, Ma L, Negre N, et al. Genome-wide tissue-specific occupancy of the Hox protein Ultrabithorax and Hox cofactor Homothorax in Drosophila. PloS One 2011;6: e14686.
82. Andrioli LP, Digiampietri LA, de Barros LP, et al. Huckebein is part of a combinatorial repression code in the anterior blastoderm. Dev Biol 2012;361: 177-85.
83. Kazemian M, Blatti C, Richards A, et al. Quantitative analysis of the Drosophila segmentation regulatory network using pattern generating potentials. PLoS Biol 2010;8: e1000456.
84. Cheng Q, Kazemian M, Pham H, et al. Computational identification of diverse mechanisms underlying transcription factor-DNA occupancy. PLoS Genet 2013;9: e1003571.
85. Kazemian M, Pham H, Wolfe SA, et al. Widespread evidence of cooperative DNA binding by transcription factors in Drosophila development. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41: 8237-52.
86. Siggers T, Reddy J, Barron B, et al. Diversification of transcription factor paralogs via noncanonical modularity in C2H2 zinc finger DNA binding. Mol Cell 2014;55: 640-8.
87. Wei GH, Badis G, Berger MF, et al. Genome-wide analysis of ETS-family DNA-binding in vitro and in vivo. EMBO J 2010;29: 2147-60.
88. 2 zinc finger DNA-binding Landscape. Nucleic Acids Res 2014. In press.
89. Klug A. The discovery of zinc fingers and their applications in gene regulation and genome manipulation. Annu Rev Biochem 2010;79: 213-31.
90. Siekmann AF, Standley C, Fogarty KE, et al. Chemokine signaling guides regional patterning of the first embryonic artery. Genes Dev 2009;23: 2272-7.
91. Gupta A, Meng X, Zhu LJ, et al. Zinc finger protein-dependent and -independent contributions to the in vivo off-target activity of zinc finger nucleases. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39: 381-92.
92. Zhu C, Smith T, McNulty J, et al. Evaluation and application of modularly assembled zinc-finger nucleases in zebra-fish. Development 2011;138: 4555-64.
93. Pelham HR, Brown DD. A specific transcription factor that can bind either the 5S RNA gene or 5S RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1980;77: 4170-4.
94. Brayer KJ, Segal DJ. Keep your fingers off my DNA: protein-protein interactions mediated by C2H2 zinc finger domains. Cell Biochem Biophys 2008;50: 111-31.
95. Persikov AV, Singh M. De novo prediction of DNA-binding specificities for Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42: 97-108.
96. Geertz M, Shore D, Maerkl SJ. Massively parallel measurements of molecular interaction kinetics on a microfluidic platform. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109: 16540-5.
97. Maerkl SJ, Quake SR. A systems approach to measuring the binding energy landscapes of transcription factors. Science 2007;315: 233-7.
98. Robertson G, Hirst M, Bainbridge M, et al. Genome-wide profiles of STAT1 DNA association using chromatin immunoprecipitation and massively parallel sequencing. Nat Methods 2007;4: 651-7.
99. Jothi R, Cuddapah S, Barski A, et al. Genome-wide identification of in vivo protein-DNA binding sites from ChIP-Seq data. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36: 5221-31.
100. Schmid CD, Bucher P. ChIP-Seq data reveal nucleosome architecture of human promoters. Cell 2007;131:831-2; author reply 832-3.
101. Miller JC, Tan S, Qiao G, et al. A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing. Nat Biotechnol 2011;29: 143-8.
102. Hockemeyer D, Wang H, Kiani S, et al. Genetic engineering of human pluripotent cells using TALE nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 2011;29: 731-4.
103. Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 2012;337: 816-21.
104. Hwang WY, Fu Y, Reyon D, et al. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol 2013;31: 227-9.
105. Friedland AE, Tzur YB, Esvelt KM, et al. Heritable genome editing in C. elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Methods 2013;10: 741-3.
106. Giesecke AV, Fang R, Joung JK. Synthetic protein-protein interaction domains created by shuffling Cys2His2 zinc-fingers. Mol Syst Biol 2006;2: 2006.2011.