Bone loading caused by different types of misfits of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A three-dimensional finite element analysis based on experimental Results

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 947-952

  Winter, Werner ^a   Möhrle, Stefan ^a   Holst, Stefan ^a   Karl, Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bone loading; Finite element analysis; Implant supported restoration; Misfit; Passive fit

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; JAW; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROSTHESIS FITTING;

EID: 79952045426     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Wee AG, Aquilino SA, Schneider RL. Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: A review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12: 167-178.
2. Tan KB. The clinical significance of distortion in implant prosthodontics: Is there such a thing as passive fit?. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1995; 24: 138-157.
3. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 7-13.
4. Sahin S, Cehreli MC. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: Current status. Implant Dent 2001; 10: 85-92.
5. Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 74-78.
6. Hellden LB, Derand T. Description and evaluation of a simplified method to achieve passive fit between cast titanium frameworks and implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 190-196.
7. Eisenmann E, Mokabberi A, Walter MH, Freesmeyer WB. Improving the fit of implant-supported superstructures using the spark erosion technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 810-818.
8. Natali AN, Pavan PG, Ruggero AL. Evaluation of stress induced in peri-implant bone tissue by misfit in multi-implant prosthesis. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 388-395.
9. Carr AB, Gerard DA, Larsen PE. The response of bone in primates around unloaded dental implants supporting prostheses with different levels of fit. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76: 500-509.
10. Chee W, Felton DA, Johnson PF, Sullivan DY. Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: Which is better? [current issues forum]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 137-141.
11. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: A critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 719-728.
12. Rübeling G. New techniques in spark erosion: The solution to an accurately fitting screw-retained implant restoration. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 38-48.
13. Watanabe F, Uno I, Hata Y, Neuendorff G, Kirsch A. Analyses of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 209-218.
14. Longoni S, Sartori M, Davide R. A simplified method to reduce prosthetic misfit for a screw-retained, implant-supported complete denture using a luting technique and laser welding. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 595-598.
15. Longoni S, Sartori M, Ariello F, Anzani M, Baldoni M. Passive definitive fit of bar-supported implant overdentures. Implant Dent 2006; 15: 129-134.
16. Clelland NL, Carr AB, Gilat A. Comparison of strains transferred to a bone simulant between as-cast and post-soldered implant frameworks for a five-implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthodont 1996; 5: 193-200.
17. Mericske-Stern R. Prosthetic considerations. Aust Dent J 2008; 53(suppl 1): 49-59.
18. Goossens IC, Herbst D. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures. SADJ 2003; 58: 279-285.
19. Karl M, Wichmann MG, Heckmann SM, Krafft T. Strain development in 3-unit implant-supported CAD/CAM restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 648-652.
20. Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 585-598.
21. DeTolla DH, Andreana S, Patra A, Buhite R, Comella B. The role of the finite element model in dental implants. J Oral Implantol 2000; 26: 77-81.
22. Rubo JH, Souza EA. Finite element analysis of stress in bone adjacent to dental implants. J Oral Implantol 2008; 34: 248-255.
23. Kunavisarut C, Lang LA, Stoner BR, Felton DA. Finite element analysis on dental implant-supported prostheses without passive fit. J Prosthodont 2002; 11: 30-40.
24. Karl M, Winter W, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. Fixation of 5-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures and resulting bone loading: A finite element assessment based on in vivo strain measurements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 756-762.
25. Heckmann SM, Karl M, Wichmann MG, Winter W, Graef F, Taylor TD. Loading of bone surrounding implants through three-unit fixed partial denture fixation: A finite-element analysis based on in vitro and in vivo strain measurements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 345-350.