Impressions are changing: Deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 140, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1301-1304

  Christensen, Gordon J ^a,b,c,d,e  

^a Deapartment of Practical Clinical Courses ^*

^b CR Foudation   (United States)

^c Scottsdale Center for Dentistry   (United States)

^d BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73049099464     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0054     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Christensen GJ. The challenge to conventional impressions. JADA 2008;139(3):347-349.
2. Christensen GJ. Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? JADA 2008;139(6):761-763.
3. Cox JR. A clinical study comparing marginal and occlusal accuracy of crowns fabricated from double-arch and complete-arch impressions. Aust Dent J 2005;50(2):90-94.
4. Jamani KD, Harrrington E, Wilson HJ. Rigidity of elastomeric impression materials. J Oral Rehabil 1989;16(3):241-248.
5. Clancy JM, Scandrett FR, Ettinger RL. Long-term dimensional stability of three current elastomers. J Oral Rehabil 1983;10(4):325-333.
6. Endo T, Finger WJ. Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material. Quintessence Int 2006;37(1):47-51.
7. Shafa S, Zaree Z, Mosharraf R. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9(6):49-56.
8. Shetty P, Rodrigues S. Accuracy of elastomeric impression materials on repeated pours. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2006;6(2):68-71.
9. Wostmann B, Rehmann P, Balkenhol M. Accuracy of impressions obtained with dualarch trays. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22(2):158-160.
10. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2008;29(8):494, 496, 498-505.
11. CRA Foundation. Digital impressions challenge conventional impressions. CRA Newsletter 2007;31(11):3-4.
12. Garg AK. Cadent iTero's digital system for dental impressions: the end of trays and putty? Dent Implantol Update 2008;19(1):1-4.
13. Pieper R. Digital impressions: easier than ever. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12(1):47-52.
14. Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136(1):16.el-16.e4.
15. Bindl A. Mörmann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowncopings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32(6):441-447.
16. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204(9):505-511.
17. Christensen GJ. In-office CAD/CAM milling of restorations: the future? JADA 2008;139(1):83-85.
18. Christensen GJ. Successful use of inoffice CAD/CAM in a typical practice. JADA 2008;139(9):1257-1260.
19. Fasbinder DJ, Dennison JB, Heys DR, Lampe K. The clinical performance of CAD/CAM-generated composite inlays. JADA 2005;136(12):1714-1723.
20. Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr, Roberson TM. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays: a four-year study. JADA 1996;127(8):1171-1181.
21. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009;28(1):44-56.
22. Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K. Marginal and internal fit of CEREC 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16(3):244-248.
23. Nakamura T, Tanaka H, Kinuta S, et al. In vitro study on marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Dent Mater J 2005;24(3):456-459.
24. Otto T. Experience with CEREC in a Swiss practice. In: Mörmann WH, ed. CAD/CIM in Aesthetic Dentistry: CEREC 10 Year Anniversary Symposium. Chicago: Quintessence; 1996:601.
25. Otto T, De Nisco S. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15(2):122-128.
26. Reiss B. Clinical results of CEREC inlays in a dental practice over a period of 18 years. Int J Comput Dent 2006;9(1):11-22.
27. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dyken JW. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM manufactured (CEREC) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dualcured resin composite. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17(2):241-246.
28. CR Foundation. Making in-office CAD/CAM work for your practice. Clinicians Rep 2009;2(6):1-3.