Modelling the efficiency of codon-tRNA interactions based on codon usage bias

DNA Research

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 511-525

  Renana, Sabi ^a   Tamir, Tuller ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Codon usage bias; Protein levels; Ribosome; TRNA adaptation index; Wobble interactions

Indexed keywords

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; TRANSFER RNA; CODON;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; CODON USAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTION; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL GENOME; GENE EXPRESSION; INTERACTIONS WITH RNA; NONHUMAN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CODON; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENETICS; METABOLISM; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

CODON; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; MODELS, MOLECULAR; RNA, TRANSFER; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84921465265     PISSN: 13402838     EISSN: 17561663     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsu017     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Kimura, M. 1968, Genetic variability maintained in a finite population due to mutational production of neutral and nearly neutral isoalleles, Genet. Res., 11, 247-69.
2. Grantham, R., Gautier, C., Gouy, M., Mercier, R. and Pave, A. 1980, Codon catalog usage and the genome hypothesis, Nucleic Acids Res., 8, 197-.
3. Plotkin, J.B. and Kudla, G. 2010, Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias, Nat. Rev. Genet., 12, 32-42.
4. Behura, S.K. and Severson, D.W. 2013, Codon usage bias: causative factors, quantification methods and genomewide patterns: with emphasis on insect genomes, Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc., 88, 49-61.
5. Behura, S.K. and Severson, D.W. 2011, Coadaptation of isoacceptor tRNA genes and codon usage bias for translation efficiency in Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae, Insect Mol. Biol., 20, 177-87.
6. Behura, S., Stanke, M., Desjardins, C., Werren, J. and Severson, D. 2010, Comparative analysis of nuclear tRNA genes of Nasonia vitripennis and other arthropods, and relationships to codon usage bias, Insect Mol. Biol., 19, 49-58.
7. Stergachis, A.B., Haugen, E., Shafer, A., et al. 2013, Exonic transcription factor binding directs codon choice and affects protein evolution, Science, 342, 1367-72.
8. dos Reis, M., Savva, R. and Wernisch, L. 2004, Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection, Nucleic Acids Res., 32, 5036-44.
9. Tuller, T., Waldman, Y.Y., Kupiec, M. and Ruppin, E. 2010, Translation efficiency is determined by both codon bias and folding energy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 3645-50.
10. Arenas, M. and Posada, D. 2010, Coalescent simulation of intracodon recombination, Genetics, 184, 429-37.
11. Bennetzen, J.L. and Hall, B. 1982, Codonselection in yeast, J. Biol. Chem., 257, 3026-31.
12. Grosjean, H. and Fiers, W. 1982, Preferential codon usage inprokaryoticgenes: theoptimalcodon-anticodoninteraction energyand the selectivecodon usageinefficiently expressed genes, Gene, 18, 199-209.
13. Wright, F. 1990, The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene, Gene, 87, 23-9.
14. Kurland, C. 1991, Codon bias and gene expression, FEBS Lett., 285, 165-9.
15. Stenico, M., Lloyd, A.T. and Sharp, P.M. 1994, Codon usage in Caenorhabditis elegans: delineation of translational selection and mutational biases, Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 2437-46.
16. Sharp, P.M. and Li, W.H. 1987, The codon adaptation index-a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications, Nucleic Acids Res., 15, 1281-95.
17. Ishihama, Y., Schmidt, T., Rappsilber, J., et al. 2008, Protein abundance profiling of the Escherichia coli cytosol, BMC Genomics, 9, 102.
18. Ghaemmaghami, S., Huh, W.K., Bower, K., et al. 2003, Global analysis of protein expression in yeast, Nature, 425, 737-41.
19. Washburn, M.P., Wolters, D. and Yates, J.R. 2001, Largescale analysis of the yeast proteome bymultidimensional protein identification technology, Nat. Biotechnol., 19, 242-7.
20. Drummond, D.A., Bloom, J.D., Adami, C., Wilke, C.O. and Arnold, F.H. 2005, Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 14338-43.
21. Blattner, F.R., Plunkett, G., Bloch, C.A., et al. 1997, The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12, Science, 277, 1453-62.
22. Kimchi-Sarfaty, C., Oh, J.M., Kim, I.W., et al. 2007, A silent' polymorphisminthe MDR1 gene changes substratespecificity, Science, 315, 525-8.
23. Fox, J.M. and Erill, I. 2010, Relative codon adaptation: a generic codon bias index for prediction of gene expression, DNA Res., 17, 185-96.
24. Ikemura, T. 1981, Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system, J. Mol. Biol., 151, 389-409.
25. Ikemura, T. 1985, Codon usage and tRNA content inunicellular and multicellular organisms, Mol. Biol. Evol., 2, 13-34.
26. Seffens, W. and Digby, D. 1999, mRNAs have greater negative folding free energies than shuffled or codon choice randomized sequences, Nucleic Acids Res., 27, 1578-84.
27. Ohama, T., Muto, A. and Osawa, S. 1990, Role of GCbiased mutation pressure on synonymous codon choice in Micrococcus luteus a bacterium with a high genomic GC-content, Nucleic Acids Res., 18, 1565-9.
28. Ikemura, T. 1982, Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes: differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs, J. Mol. Biol., 158, 573-97.
29. Percudani, R., Pavesi, A. and Ottonello, S. 1997, Transfer RNA gene redundancy and translational selection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, J. Mol. Biol., 268, 322-30.
30. Man, O. and Pilpel, Y. 2007, Differential translation efficiency of orthologous genes is involved in phenotypic divergence of yeast species, Nat. Genet., 39, 415-21.
31. Sharp, P.M., Bailes, E., Grocock, R.J., Peden, J.F. and Sockett, R.E. 2005, Variation in the strength of selected codon usage bias among bacteria, Nucleic Acids Res., 33, 1141-53.
32. Chamary, J., Parmley, J.L. and Hurst, L.D. 2006, Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals, Nat. Rev. Genet., 7, 98-108.
33. Shabalina, S.A., Ogurtsov, A.Y. and Spiridonov, N.A. 2006, A periodic pattern of mRNA secondary structure created by the genetic code, Nucleic Acids Res., 34, 2428-37.
34. Tuller, T., Carmi, A., Vestsigian, K., et al. 2010, An evolutionarily conserved mechanism for controlling the efficiency of protein translation, Cell, 141, 344-54.
35. Ingolia, N.T., Lareau, L.F. and Weissman, J.S. 2011, Ribosome profiling of mouse embryonic stem cells revealsthe complexityand dynamicsofmammalian proteomes, Cell, 147, 789-802.
36. Kanaya, S., Yamada, Y., Kudo, Y. and Ikemura, T. 1999, Studies of codon usage and tRNA genes of 18 unicellular organisms and quantification of Bacillus subtilis tRNAs: gene expression level and species-specific diversity of codon usage based on multivariate analysis, Gene, 238, 143-55.
37. Crick, F. 1966, Codon-anticodon pairing: the wobble hypothesis, J. Mol. Biol., 19, 548-55.
38. RajBhandary, U.L. 1988, Genetic code. Modified bases and aminoacylation, Nature, 336, 112.
39. Agris, P. 1991, Wobble position modified nucleosides evolvedtoselecttransferRNAcodonrecognition: amodified-wobble hypothesis, Biochimie, 73, 1345-9.
40. Tsutsumi, S., Sugiura, R., Ma, Y., et al. 2007, Wobble inosine tRNA modification is essential to cell cycle progression in G1/S and G2/M transitions in fission yeast, J. Biol. Chem., 282, 33459-65.
41. Wolf, J., Gerber, A.P.and Keller, W. 2002, tadA, anessential tRNA-specific adenosine deaminasefrom Escherichiacoli, EMBO J., 21, 3841-51.
42. Delannoy, E., Le Ret, M., Faivre-Nitschke, E., et al. 2009, Arabidopsis tRNA adenosine deaminase arginine edits the wobble nucleotide of chloroplast tRNAArg (ACG) and is essential for efficient chloroplast translation, Plant Cell, 21, 2058-71.
43. Maas, S., Gerber, A.P. and Rich, A. 1999, Identification and characterization of a human tRNA-specific adenosine deaminase related to the ADAR family of pre-mRNA editing enzymes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 8895-900.
44. Ikeuchi, Y., Soma, A., Ote, T., Kato, J., Sekine, Y. and Suzuki, T. 2005, Molecular mechanism of lysidine synthesis that determines tRNA identity and codon recognition, Mol. Cell, 19, 235-46.
45. Lim, V.I. and Curran, J.F. 2001, Analysis of codon: anticodon interactions within the ribosome provides new insights into codon reading and the genetic code structure, RNA, 7, 942-57.
46. dos Reis, M., Wernisch, L. and Savva, R. 2003, Unexpected correlations between gene expression and codon usage bias from microarray data for the whole Escherichia coli K-12 genome, Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 6976-85.
47. Roymondal, U., Das, S. and Sahoo, S. 2009, Predicting gene expression level from relative codon usage bias: an application to Escherichia coli genome, DNA Res., 16, 13-30.
48. Nelder, J.A. and Mead, R. 1965, A simplex method for function minimization, Comput. J., 7, 308-13.
49. Tuller, T., Birin, H., Gophna, U., Kupiec, M. and Ruppin, E. 2010, Reconstructing ancestral gene content by coevolution, Genome Res., 20, 122-32.
50. Schmidt, M.W., Houseman, A., Ivanov, A.R. and Wolf, D.A. 2007, Comparative proteomic and transcriptomic profiling of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Mol. Syst. Biol., 3, 79.
51. Mahlab, S., Tuller, T. and Linial, M. 2012, Conservation of the relative tRNA composition in healthy and cancerous tissues, RNA, 18, 640-52.
52. Tuller, T., Kupiec, M. and Ruppin, E. 2007, Determinants of protein abundance and translation efficiency in S. cerevisiae, PLoS Comput. Biol., 3, e248.
53. Lu, P., Vogel, C., Wang, R., Yao, X. and Marcotte, E.M. 2006, Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation, Nat. Biotechnol., 25, 117-24.
54. Zur, H. and Tuller, T. 2013, Transcript features alone enable accurate prediction and understanding of gene expression evolution in S. cerevisiae, BMC Bioinfomatics, 14 (Suppl 15), S1.
55. Futcher, B., Latter, G., Monardo, P., McLaughlin, C. and Garrels, J. 1999, A sampling of the yeast proteome, Mol. Cell. Biol., 19, 7357-68.
56. Duret, L. and Mouchiroud, D. 1999, Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 96, 4482-7.
57. Coghlan, A. and Wolfe, K.H. 2000, Relationship of codon bias to mRNA concentration and protein length in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Yeast, 16, 1131-45.
58. Greenbaum, D., Colangelo, C., Williams, K. and Gerstein, M. 2003, Comparing protein abundance and mRNA expression levels on a genomic scale, Genome Biol., 4, 117.
59. de Sousa Abreu, R., Penalva, L.O., Marcotte, E.M. and Vogel, C. 2009, Global signatures of protein and mRNA expression levels, Mol. BioSyst., 5, 1512-26.
60. MacQueen, J. 1967, Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, Vol. 1, 281-97.
61. Rocha, E.P. 2004, Codon usage bias from tRNA's point of view: redundancy, specialization, and efficient decoding for translation optimization, Genome Res., 14, 2279-86.
62. Qian, W., Yang, J.-R., Pearson, N.M., Maclean, C. and Zhang, J. 2012, Balanced codon usage optimizes eukaryotic translational efficiency, PLoS Genet., 8, e1002603.
63. Murphy, F.V. and Ramakrishnan, V. 2004, Structure of a purine-purine wobble base pair in the decoding center of the ribosome, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 11, 1251-2.
64. Mandal, D., Köhrer, C., Su, D., et al. 2010, Agmatidine, a modified cytidine in the anticodon of archaeal tRNAIle, base pairs with adenosine but not with guanosine, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 107, 2872-7.
65. Albertsen, M., Hugenholtz, P., Skarshewski, A., Nielsen, K.L., Tyson, G.W. and Nielsen, P.H. 2013, Genome sequences of rare, unculturedbacteriaobtainedbydifferential coverage binning of multiple metagenomes, Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 533-8.
66. Hardesty, B. and Kramer, G., Structure, function, and genetics of ribosomes, Springer: NY, 1986.
67. Melnikov, S., Ben-Shem, A., de Loubresse, N.G., Jenner, L., Yusupova, G. and Yusupov, M. 2012, One core, two shells: bacterial and eukaryotic ribosomes, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 19, 560-7.
68. Novoa, E.M., Pavon-Eternod, M., Pan, T. and Ribas de Pouplana, L. 2012, A role for tRNA modifications in genome structure and codon usage, Cell, 149, 202-13.
69. Frenkel-Morgenstern, M., Danon, T., Christian, T., et al. 2012, Genes adopt non-optimal codon usage to generate cell cycledependent oscillations in protein levels, Mol. Syst. Biol., 8, 572.
70. Kudla, G., Murray, A.W., Tollervey, D. and Plotkin, J.B. 2009, Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli, Science, 324, 255-8.
71. Supek, F. and Smuc, T. 2010, On relevance of codon usage to expression of synthetic and natural genesin Escherichia coli, Genetics, 185, 1129-34.