Deafness, Numerical Cognition, and Mathematics

Deaf Cognition: Foundations and Outcomes

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Bull, Rebecca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Deaf adults; Deaf children; Enumeration; Estimation; Information processing; Learning; Mathematical ability; Number line; Numerical cognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921258892     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195368673.003.0006     Document Type: Chapter

References (130)

1. Allen, T. E. (1986). Patterns of academic achievement among hearing impaired students:1974-1983. In A. N. Shildroth & M. A. Karchmer (Eds.), Deaf children in America (pp. 161-206). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
2. Ansari, D., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2002). Atypical trajectories of number development: A neuroconstructivist perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 511-516.
3. Austin, G. F. (1975). Knowledge of selected concepts obtained by an adolescent deaf population. American Annals of the Deaf, 120, 360-370.
4. Bandurski, M., & Galkowski, T. (2004). The development of analogical reasoning in deaf children and their parents' communication mode. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9, 153-175.
5. Banks, J., Gray, C., & Fyfe, R. (1990). The written recall of printed stories by severely deaf children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 192-206.
6. Barth, H., La Mont, K., Lipton, J., Dehaene, S., Kanwisher, N., & Spelke, E. (2006). Nonsymbolic arithmetic in adults and young children. Cognition, 98, 199-222.
7. Bavelier, D., Tomann, A., Hutton, C., Mitchell, T., Corina, D., Liu, G., & Neville, H. (2000). Visual attention to the periphery is enhanced in congenitally deaf individuals. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 1-6.
8. Berch, D. B. (2005). Making sense of number sense: Implications for children with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 333-339.
9. Berch, D. B., Foley, E. J., Hill, R. J., & Ryan, P. M. (1999). Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: Developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 286-308.
10. Blatto-Vallee, G., Kelly, R. R, Gaustad, M. G., Porter, J., & Fonzi, J. (2007). Spatial-relational representation in mathematical problem-solving by deaf and hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12, 432-448.
11. Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2006). Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. Developmental Psychology, 41, 189-201.
12. Boutla, M., Suppalla, T., Newport, E. L., & Bavelier, D. (2004). Short term memory span:Insights from sign language. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 997-1002.
13. Bull, R., Blatto-Vallee, G., & Fabich, M. (2006). Subitizing, magnitude representation, and magnitude retrieval in deaf and hearing adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11, 289-302.
14. Bull, R., Marschark, M., & Blatto-Vallee, G. (2005). SNARC hunting: Examining number representation in deaf students. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 223-236.
15. Bull, R., Marschark, M., & Convertino, C. (in preparation). Numerical estimation in deaf and hearing adults.
16. Bull, R., & Theodorou, G. (in preparation). Numerical automaticity and enumeration skills in deaf children.
17. Butterworth, B. (1999). The mathematical brain. London: Macmillan.
18. Butterworth, B. (2005). The development of arithmetical abilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 3-18.
19. Chamberlain, C., & Mayberry, R. I. (1994). Do the deaf "see" better? Effects of deafness on visual-spatial skills. Poster presented at TENNET V meetings, Montreal, May.
20. Corina, D. P., Kritchevsky, M., & Bellugi, U. (1992). Linguistic permeability of unilateral neglect: Evidence from American Sign Language. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Conference (pp. 384-389). Hillside, NY: Erlbaum.
21. Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1-42.
22. Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York:Oxford University Press.
23. Dehaene, S., & Akhavein, R. (1995). Attention, automaticity and levels of representation in number processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 314-326.
24. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
25. Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J. (1993). Development of elementary numerical abilities: A neuronal model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 390-407.
26. Dehaene, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Cohen, L. (1998). Abstract representation of number in the animal and human brain. Nature Neuroscience, 21, 355-361.
27. Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital: Analogical and symbolic distance effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 626-641.
28. Dehaene, S., Molko, N., Cohen, L., & Wilson, A. J. (2004). Arithmetic and the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 218-224.
29. Dehaene S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970-974.
30. Delazer, M., & Butterworth, B. (1997). A dissociation of number meanings. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 613-636.
31. Donlan, C. (2007). Mathematical developmental in children with specific language impairments. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 151-172). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
32. Duncan, E. M., & McFarland, C. E. (1980). Isolating the effects of symbolic distance and semantic congruity in comparative judgments: An additive-factor analysis. Memory and Cognition, 8, 612-622.
33. Emmorey, K., & Kosslyn, S. (1996). Enhanced image generation abilities in deaf signers. A right hemisphere effect. Brain and Cognition, 32, 28-44.
34. Emmorey, K., Kosslyn, S., & Bellugi, U. (1993). Visual imagery and visual-spatial language:Enhanced imagery abilities in deaf and hearing ASL signers. Cognition, 46, 139-181.
35. Epstein, K. I., Hillegeist, E. G., & Grafman, J. (1994). Number processing in deaf college students. American Annals of the Deaf, 139, 336-347.
36. Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307-314.
37. Fischer, M. H. (2003). Spatial representations in number processing-evidence from a pointing task. Visual Cognition, 10, 493-508.
38. Frostad, P., & Ahlberg, A. (1999). Solving story-based arithmetic problems: Achievement of children with hearing impairment and their interpretation of meaning. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4(4), 283-293.
39. Geary, D. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 4-15.
40. Geary, D. C. (2005). Role of cognitive theory in the study of learning disability in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 305-307.
41. Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., Nugent, L., & Numtee, C. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Development, 78, 1343-1359.
42. Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Bryd-Craven, J. (2007a). Strategy use, longterm memory, and working memory capacity. In D. B. Berch & M.M.M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 83-105). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
43. Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Bryd-Craven, J. (2007b). Development of number line representations in children with mathematical learning disability. Developmental Neuropsychology.
44. Geary, D. C., & Widaman, K. F. (1992). Numerical cognition: On the convergence of componential and psychometric models. Intelligence, 16, 47-80.
45. Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Bryd-Craven, J., & DeSoto, C. M. (2004). Strategy choices in simple and complex addition. Contributions of working memory and counting knowledge for children with mathematical disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 121-151.
46. Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child's understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematical difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 293-304.
48. Girelli, L., Lucangeli, D., & Butterworth, B. (2000). The developmental of automaticity is accessing number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 104-122.
49. Gregory, S. (1998). Mathematics and deaf children. In S. Gregory, P. Knight, W. McCracken, S. Powers, & L. Watson (Eds.), Issues in Deaf Education (pp. 119-128). London: Fulton.
50. Griffin, S., Case, R., & Capodilupo, A. (1995). Teaching for understanding: The importance of central conceptual structure in the elementary mathematics curriculum. In A. McKeough, J. Luppart, & A. Marini (Eds.), Teaching for transfer: Fostering generalization in learning (pp. 123-151). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Hauser, P. C., Dye, M.W.G., Boutla, M., Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2007). Deafness and visual enumeration: Not all aspects of attention are modified by deafness. Brain Research, 1153, 178-187.
52. Hegarty, M. & Koshevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representation and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 684-689.
53. Hine, W. D. (1970). The attainment of children with partial hearing. Journal of the British Association of Teachers of the Deaf, 68, 129-135.
54. Hitch, G. J., Arnold, P., & Phillips, L. J. (1983). Counting processes in deaf children's arithmetic. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 429-437.
55. Hyde, M., Zevenbergen, R., & Power, D. (2003). Deaf and hard of hearing students' performance on arithmetic word problems. American Annals of the Deaf, 148(1), 56-64.
56. Iverson, W., Nuerk, H. C., & Willmes, K. (2004). Do signers think differently? The processing of number parity in deaf participants. Cortex, 40, 176-178.
57. Jordan, N. C., Hanich, L. B., & Kaplan, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of mathematical competencies in children with specific math difficulties versus children with comorbid mathematics and reading difficulties. Child Development, 74, 834-850.
58. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Olah, L. N., & Locuniak, M. N. (2006). Number sense growth in kindergarten: A longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. Child Development, 77, 153-175.
59. Kelly, R. R., Lang, H. G., Mousley, K., & Davis, S. M. (2003). Deaf college students' comprehension of relational language in arithmetic compare problems. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8, 120-132.
60. Kelly, R. R., Lang, H. G., & Pagliaro, C. M. (2003). Mathematics word problem solving for deaf students: A survey of practices in Grades 6-12. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8, 104-119.
61. Kelly, R. R., & Mousley, K. (2001). Solving word problems: More than reading issues for deaf students. American Annals of the Deaf, 146(3), 253-264.
62. Koontz, K. L. & Berch, D. B. (1996). Identifying simple numerical stimuli: Processing inefficiencies exhibited by arithmetic learning disabled children. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 1-23.
63. Landerl, K., Bevan, A., & Butterworth, B. (2004). Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: A study of 8-9 year old students. Cognition, 93, 99-125.
64. Lang, H. G. (2003). Perspectives on the history of deaf education. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 9-20). New York: Oxford University Press.
65. LeFevre, J. A., Greenham, S. L., & Waheed, N. (1993). The development of procedural and conceptual knowledge in computational estimation. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 95-132
66. Leybaert, J., & Van Custem, M-N. (2002). Counting in sign language. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81, 482-501.
67. Lipton, J. S., & Spelke, E. S. (2003). Origins of number sense: Large number discrimination in human infants. Psychological Science, 14, 396-401.
68. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
69. Maki, R. H. (1995). Accuracy of metacomprehension judgments for questions of varying importance levels. American Journal of Psychology, 108, 327-344.
70. Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. J. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 11, 1-22.
71. Marschark, M. (2003). Cognitive functioning in deaf adults and children. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 464-477). New York: Oxford University Press.
72. Marschark, M., Convertino, C., McEvoy, C., & Masteller, A. (2004). Organization and use of the mental lexicon by deaf and hearing individuals. American Annals of the Deaf, 149, 51-61.
73. Marschark, M., & Everhart, V.S. (1999). Problem solving by deaf and hearing children:Twenty questions. Deafness and Education International, 1, 63-79.
74. Marschark, M., Lang, H., & Albertini, J. (2002). Educating deaf students: From research to practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
75. Marschark, M., Leigh, G., Sapere, P., Burnham, D., Convertino, C., Stinson, M., Knoors, H., Vervloed, M.P.J., & Noble, W. (2006). Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives to classroom learning by deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11, 421-437.
76. Marschark, M., & Mayer, T. S. (1998). Interactions of language and memory in deaf children and adults. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39, 145-148.
77. Marschark, M., Sapere, P., Convertino, C., & Seewagen, R. (2005a). Access to postsecondary education through sign language interpreting. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10, 38-50.
78. Marschark, M., Sapere, P., Convertino, C., & Seewagen, R. (2005b). Educational interpreting: Access and outcomes. In M. Marschark, R. Peterson, & E. A. Winston (Eds.), Interpreting and interpreter education: Directions for research and practice (pp. 57-83). New York: Oxford University Press.
79. Marschark, M., Sapere, P., Convertino, C., Seewagen, R., & Maltzan, H. (2004). Comprehension of sign language interpreting: Deciphering a complex task situation. Sign Language Studies, 4, 345-368.
80. Masataka, N. (2006). Differences in arithmetical subtraction of nonsymbolic numerosities by deaf and hearing adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11, 139-143.
81. Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2005). Challenges in identifying target skills for math disability screening and intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 318-323.
82. Mazzocco, M. M. M., Murphy, M. M., & McCloskey, M. (2007). The contribution of syndrome research understanding mathematical learning disability: The case of Fragile X and Turner Syndromes. In D. B. Berch & M.M.M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 173-193). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
83. McCloskey, M. (2007). Quantitative literacy and developmental dyscalculias. In D. B. Berch & M.M.M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 415-429). Baltimore:Paul H. Brookes.
84. McEvoy, C., Marschark, M., & Nelson, D. L. (1999). Comparing the mental lexicons of deaf and hearing individuals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1-9.
85. Meltzer, L. J., Roditi, B., Houser, R. F., & Perlman, M. (1998). Perceptions of academic strategies and competence in students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 437-451.
86. Mousley, K., & Kelly, R. R. (1998). Problem-solving strategies for teaching mathematics to deaf students. American Annals of the Deaf, 143, 325-336.
87. Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). The time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519-1520.
88. Neville, H. J., & Lawson, D. (1987). Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: An event-related potential and behavioral study. II. Congenitally deaf adults. Brain Research, 405, 268-283.
89. Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (1996). Children doing mathematics. Oxford: Blackwell.
90. Nunes, T., & Moreno, C. (1998). Is hearing impairment a cause of difficulties in learning mathematics? In C. Donlan (Ed.), The development of mathematical skills (pp. 227-254). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
91. Nunes, T., & Moreno, C. (1997). Solving word problems with different ways of representing the task: How do deaf children perform? Equals. Mathematics and Special Educational Needs, 3, 15-17.
92. Nunes, T., & Moreno, C. (2002). An intervention program to promote deaf pupil's achievement in mathematics. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7, 120-133.
93. Ottem, E. (1980). An analysis of the cognitive studies with deaf subjects. American Annals of the Deaf, 125, 654-575.
94. Panaoura, A., & Philippou, G. (2007). The developmental change of young pupils' metacognitive ability in mathematics in relation to their cognitive abilities. Cognitive Development, 22, 149-164.
95. Peterson, S., & Simon, T. J. (2000). Computational evidence for the subitizing phenomenon as an emergent property of the human cognitive architecture. Cognitive Science, 24, 93-122.
96. Petitto, A. L. (1990). Development of numberline and measurement concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 55-78.
97. Proksch, J., & Bavelier, D. (2002). Changes in the spatial distribution of visual attention after early deafness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 687-701.
98. Richardson, J. T. E., McLeod-Gallinger, J., McKenn, B. G., & Long, G. L. (2000). Approaches to studying in deaf and hearing students in higher education. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 156-173.
99. Rettenback, R., Diller, G., & Sireteaunu, R. (1999). Do deaf people see better? Texture segmentation and visual search compensate in adult but not in juvenile subjects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 560-583.
100. Rouselle, L., & Noel, M-P. (2007). Basic numerical skills in children with mathematical learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing. Cognition, 102, 361-395.
101. Rubinsten, O., & Henik, A. (2005). Automatic activation of internal magnitudes: A study of developmental dyscalculia. Neuropsychology, 19, 641-648.
102. Rubinsten, O., Henik, A., Berger, A., & Shahar-Shalev, S. (2002). The development of internal representations of magnitude and their association with Arabic numerals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81, 74-92.
103. Schick, B. (2005). Educational interpreting and cognitive development in children: Potential relationships. In E. Winston (Ed.), Educational interpreting: The questions we should be asking (pp. 73-87). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
104. Serrano Pau, C. (1995). The deaf child and solving problems in arithmetic: The importance of comprehensive reading. American Annals of the Deaf, 14, 287-291.
105. Shalev, R. S. (2007). Prevalence of developmental dyscalculia. In D.B. Berch and M.M.M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 49-63). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
106. Siegler, R. S. (1988). Strategy choice procedures and the development of multiplication skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 258-275.
107. Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
108. Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. (2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Development, 75, 428-444.
109. Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. E. (2003). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14, 237-243.
110. Siegler, R. S., & Sharger, J. (1984). Strategy choice in addition and subtraction: How do children know what to do? In C. Sophian (Ed.), Origins of cognitive skills (pp. 229-293). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
111. Starkey, P., & Cooper, R. G. (1980). Perception of numbers by human infants. Science, 210, 1033-1035.
112. Stevens, C., & Neville, H. (2006). Neuroplasticity as a double-edged sword: Deaf enhancements and dyslexic deficits in motion processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 710-714.
113. Strassman, B. (1997). Metacognition and reading in children who are deaf: A review of the research. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2, 140-149.
114. Swanwick, R., Oddy, A., & Roper, T. (2005). Mathematics and deaf children: An exploration of barriers to success. Deafness and Education International, 7, 1-21.
115. Swisher, M. V. (1993). Perceptual and cognitive aspects of recognition of signs in peripheral vision. In M. Marschark & M. D. Clark (Eds.), Psychological perspectives of deafness (pp. 229-265). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
116. Talbot, K. F., & Haude, R. H. (1993). The relationship between sign language skill and spatial visualizations ability: Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 1387-1391.
117. Tharpe, A., Ashmead, D., & Rothpletz, A. (2002). Visual attention in children with normal hearing, children with hearing aids, and children with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Hearing and Language Research, 45, 403-413.
118. Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M.C.M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of the cognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66-73.
119. Titus, J. C. (1995). The concept of fraction number among deaf and hard of hearing students. American Annals of the Deaf, 140, 255-263.
120. Traxler, C. B. (2000). Measuring up to performance standards in reading and mathematics: Achievement of selected deaf and hard-of-hearing students in the national norming of the 9th Edition Stanford Achievement Test. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 337-348.
121. Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 331-351.
122. Tzelgov, J., Meyer, J., & Henik, A. (1992). Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 166-179.
123. Whyte, J. C., & Bull, R. (2008). Number games, magnitude representation, and basic number skills in preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 44, 588-596.
124. Wiese, H. (2003). Iconic and non-iconic stages in number development: The role of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 385-390.
125. Wollman, D. C. (1965). The attainments in English and arithmetic of secondary school pupils with impaired hearing. The Teacher of the Deaf, 159, 121-129.
126. Wood, D., Wood, H., & Howarth, P. (1983). Mathematics abilities of deaf school leavers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 67-73.
127. Wood, H., Wood, D., Kingsmill, M. C., French, J.R.W., & Howarth, S. P. (1984). The mathematical achievement of deaf children from different educational environments. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 254-264.
128. Zamarian, L., Lopez-Rolon, A., & Delazer, M. (2007). Neuropsychological case studies on arithmetical processing. In D. B. Berch and M.M.M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 245-263). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
129. Zarfaty, Y., Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2004). The performance of young deaf children in spatial and temporal number tasks. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9, 315-326.
130. Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., & Umilta, C. (2002). Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 417, 138-139.