Access to postsecondary education through sign language interpreting

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 38-50

  Marschark, Marc ^a,b   Sapere, Patricia ^a   Convertino, Carol ^a   Seewagen, Rosemarie ^a  

^a ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; MALE; PATIENT; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; SIGN LANGUAGE; STANDARD; UNIVERSITY;

COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; SIGN LANGUAGE; TRANSLATING; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 21644486788     PISSN: 10814159     EISSN: 14657325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/deafed/eni002     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baily, J., & Straub, S. (1992). Interpreting services. ASHA, 34, 51-53.
2. Caccamise, F., Blaisdell, R., & Meath-Lang, B. (1977). Hearing impaired persons' simultaneous reception of information under live and two visual motion media conditions. American Annals of the Deaf, 122, 339-343.
3. Cokely, D. (1990). The effectiveness of three means of communication in the college classroom. Sign Language Studies, 69, 415-439.
4. Everhart, V. S., Stinson, M. S., McKee, B. G., & Giles, P. (1996, April). Evaluation of a speech-to-print transcription system as a resource for mainstreamed deaf students. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
5. Fleischer, L. R. (1975). Language interpretation under four interpreting conditions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University.
6. Frishberg, N. (1986). Interpreting: An introduction. Silver Spring, MD: Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf.
7. Geers, A. E. (in press). Spoken language in children with cochlear implants. In P. E. Spencer & M. Marschark (Eds.), Advances in the spoken language development of deaf and hard-of-hearing children. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Harrington, F. (2000). Sign language interpreters and access for deaf students to university curricula: The ideal and the reality. In R. P. Roberts, S. E. Carr, D. Abraham, & A. Dufour (Eds.), The critical link 2: Interpreters in the community. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
9. Jelinek Lewis, M. S., & Jackson, D. W. (2001). Television literacy: Comprehension of program content using closed-captions for the deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6, 43-53.
10. Jacobs, L. R. (1977). The efficiency of interpreting input for processing lecture information by deaf college students. Journal of Rehabilitation of the Deaf, 11, 10-14.
11. Jones, B. E. (in press). Competencies of K-12 educational interpreters: What we need versus what we have. In EA. Winston (Ed.), Interpreted education: How it can succeed. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
12. Jones, B. E., Clark, G., & Soltz, D. (1997). Characteristics and practices of sign language interpreters in inclusive education programs. Exceptional Children, 63(2), 257-268.
13. Karchmer, M. A., & Mitchell, R. E. (2003). Demographic and achievement characteristics of deaf and hard-of-hearing students. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 21-37). New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Kurz, K. (2004). A comparison of deaf children's comprehension in direct communication and interpreted communication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Special Education, University of Kansas.
15. Lane, H. (1992). The mask of benevolence. New York: Vintage Books.
16. Livingston, S., Singer, B., & Abramson, T. (1994). A study to determine the effectiveness of two different kinds of interpreting. Proceedings of the Tenth National Convention of the Conference of Interpreter Trainers - Mapping our course: A collaborative venture, pp. 175-197. CIT.
17. Marschark, M. (in press). Developing deaf children or deaf children developing? In D. Power & G. Leigh (Eds.), Educating deaf students: Global perspectives. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
18. Marschark, M., Convertino, C., & LaRock, D. (in press). Optimizing academic performance of deaf students: Access, opportunities, and outcomes. In D. F. Moores & D. S. Martin (Eds.), Deaf learners: New developments in curriculum and instruction. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
19. Marschark, M., Sapere, P., Convertino, C., & Seewagen, R., (2005). Educational interpreting: Access and outcomes. In M. Marschark, R. Peterson, & E. A. Winston (Eds.), Sign language interpreting and interpreter education: Directions for research and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Marschark, M., Sapere, P., Convertino, C., Seewagen, R., & Maltzen, H. (2004). Comprehension of sign language interpreting: Deciphering a complex task situation. Sign Language Studies, 4, 345-367.
21. Mitchell, R. E., & Karchmer, M. A. (2004). Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies, 4, 138-163.
22. Murphy, H. J., & Fleischer, L. R. (1977). The effects of Ameslan versus Siglish upon test scores. Journal of Rehabilitation of the Deaf, 11 15-18.
23. Napier, J., & Barker, R. (2004). Access to university interpreting: Expectations and preferences of deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9, 228-238.
24. National Center for Education Statistics (2002a). Digest of Education Statistics, 2002. Retrieved March 1, 2004, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d02
25. National Center for Education Statistics (2002b). Profile of undergraduates in US. postsecondary institutions: 1999-2000, (NCES-2002-168). Washington, DC: US. Department of Education. Retrieved March 3, 2004, from Fastfacts, http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/ display.asp?id=60)
26. Newell, W. (1978). A study of the ability of day-class deaf adolescents to compare factual information using four communication modalities. American Annals of the Deaf, 123, 558-562.
27. Redden, M. R., Davis, C. A., & Brown, J. W. (1978). Science for handicapped students in higher education: Barriers, solutions, and recommendations. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
28. Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf (2004). Explanation of certificates. Retrieved January 21, 2004, from http://www.rid.org/expl.html
29. Richardson, J. T. E., Long, G. L., & Woodley, A. (2004). Students with an undisclosed hearing loss: A challenge for academic access, progress, and success? Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9, 427-441.
30. Schick, B. (in press). How might learning through an educational interpreter influence cognitive development? In E. A. Winston (Ed.), Educational interpreting: How it can succeed. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
31. Schick, B., Williams, K., & Bolster, L. (1999). Skill levels of educational interpreters working in public schools. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4, 144-155.
32. Stewart, D. A., & Kluwin, T. N. (1996). The gap between guidelines, practice, and knowledge in interpreting services for deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1, 29-39.
33. Stinson, M. S., Kelly, R., Elliot, L., Colwell, J., Liu, Y., & Stinson, S. (2000, April). C-Print, interpreting and notes, and memory of lectures. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
34. Stinson, M. S., & Kluwin, T. N. (2003). Educational consequences of alternative school placements. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 52-64). New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Traxler, C. B. (2000). Measuring up to performance standards in reading and mathematics: Achievement of selected deaf and hard-of-hearing students in the national norming of the 9th Edition Stanford Achievement Test. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 337-348.
36. US Department of Education (1999). To assure the free appropriate public education of all children with disabilities: Twenty-first annual report to Congress on the implementing of the Individuals with Disabilities Act. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
37. Winston, E. A. (1994). An interpreted education: Inclusion or exclusion? In RC. Johnson & OP. Cohen (Eds.), Implications and complications for deaf students of the full inclusion movement (pp. 55-62). Gallaudet Research Institute Occasional Paper 94-2. Washington DC: Gallaudet University.
38. Winston, E. A. (in press). Interpretability and accessibility of mainstream classroom. In E. A. Winston (Ed.), Educational interpreting: How it can succeed. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.