Subitizing, magnitude representation, and magnitude retrieval in deaf and hearing adults

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 289-302

  Bull, Rebecca ^a   Blatto Vallee, Gary ^b   Fabich, Megan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CONCEPT FORMATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MATHEMATICS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CONCEPT FORMATION; DEAFNESS; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MATHEMATICS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 33745610048     PISSN: 10814159     EISSN: 14657325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enj038     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Allen, T. E. (1986). Patterns of academic achievement among hearing impaired students: 1974-1983. In A. N. Shildroth & M. A. Karchmer (Eds.), Deaf children in America (pp. 161-206). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
2. Ansari, D., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2002). Atypical trajectories of number development: A neuroconstructivist perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 511-516.
3. Bavelier, D., Tomann, A., Hutton, C., Mitchell, T., Corina, D., Liu, G., et al. (2000). Visual attention to the periphery is enhanced in congenitally deaf individuals. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 1-6.
4. Berch, D. B., Foley, E. J., Hill, R. J., & Ryan, P. M. (1999). Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: Developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 286-308.
5. Bull, R., Marschark, M., & Blatto-Vallee, G. (2005). SNARC hunting: Examining number representation in deaf students. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 223-236.
6. Chamberlain, C., & Mayberry, R. I. (1994). Do the deaf "see: Better? Effects of deafness on visual-spatial skills. Poster presented at TENNET V meetings, Montreal, May.
7. Corina, D. P., Kritchevsky, M., & Bellugi, U. (1992). Linguistic permeability of unilateral neglect: Evidence from American Sign Language. In Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Conference (pp. 384-389). Hillside, NY: Erlbaum.
8. Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1-42.
9. Dehaene, S., & Akhavein, R. (1995). Attention, automaticity and levels of representation in number processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 314-326.
10. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
11. Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J. (1993). Development of elementary numerical abilities: A neuronal model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 390-407.
12. Dehaene, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Cohen, L. (1998). Abstract representation of number in the animal and human brain. Nature Neuroscience, 21, 355-361.
13. Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital: Analogical and symbolic distance effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 626-641.
14. Delazer, M., & Butterworth, B. (1997). A dissociation of number meanings. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 613-636.
15. Duncan, E. M., & McFarland, C. E. (1980). Isolating the effects of symbolic distance and semantic congruity in comparative judgments: An additive-factor analysis. Memory and Cognition, 8, 612-622.
16. Emmorey, K., & Kosslyn, S. (1996). Enhanced image generation abilities in deaf signers. A right hemisphere effect. Brain and Cognition, 32, 28-44.
17. Emmorey, K., Kosslyn, S., & Bellugi, U. (1993). Visual imagery and visual-spatial language: Enhanced imagery abilities in deaf and hearing ASL signers. Cognition, 46, 139-181.
18. Epstein, K. I., Hillegeist, E. G., & Grafman, J. (1994). Number processing in deaf college students. American Annals of the Deaf, 139, 336-347.
19. Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95-110.
20. Fischer, M. H. (2003). Spatial representations in number processing - Evidence from a pointing task. Visual Cognition, 10, 493-508.
21. Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child's understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Girelli, L., Lucangeli, D., & Butterworth, B. (2000). The developmental of automaticity is accessing number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 104-122.
23. Gregory, S. (1998). Mathematics and deaf children. In S. Gregory, P. Knight, W. McCracken, S. Powers, & L. Watson (Eds.), Issues in Deaf Education (pp. 119-128). London: Fulton.
24. Griffin, S., Case, R., & Capodilupo, A. (1995). Teaching for understanding: The importance of central conceptual structure in the elementary mathematics curriculum. In A. McKeough, J. Luppart, & A. Marini (Eds.), Teaching for transfer: Fostering generalization in learning (pp. 123-151). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Ito, Y., & Hatta, T. (2004). Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory and Cognition, 32, 662-673.
26. Iverson, W., Nuerk, H. C., & Willmes, K. (2004). Do signers think differently? The processing of number parity in deaf participants. Cortex, 40, 176-178.
27. Koontz, K. L., & Berch, D. B. (1996). Identifying simple numerical stimuli: Processing inefficiencies exhibited by arithmetic learning disabled children. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 1-23.
28. Lang, H. G. (2003). Perspectives on the history of deaf education. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 9-20). New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Leybaert, J., & Van Custem, M.-N. (2002). Counting in sign language. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81, 482-501.
30. Lorch, R. F., & Meyers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognition research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157.
31. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
32. Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. J. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 11, 1-22.
33. Marschark, M. (1993). Psychological development of deaf children. New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Marschark, M. (2003). Cognitive functioning in deaf adults and children. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 464-477). New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Marschark, M., Convertino, C., McEvoy, C., & Masteller, A. (2004). Organization and use of the mental lexicon by deaf and hearing individuals. American Annals of the Deaf, 149, 51-61.
36. Marschark, M., De Beni, R., Polazzo, M. G., & Cornoldi, C. (1993). Deaf and hearing-impaired adolescents' memory for concrete and abstract prose: Effects of relational and distinctive information. American Annals of the Deaf, 138, 31-39.
37. Marschark, M., Lang, H., & Albertini, J. (2002). Educating deaf students: From research to practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. McEvoy, C., Marschark, M., & Nelson, D. L. (1999). Comparing the mental lexicons of deaf and hearing individuals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1-9.
39. Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). The time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519-1520.
40. Neville, H. J., & Lawson, D. (1987). Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: An event-related potential and behavioral study. II. Congenitally deaf adults. Brain Research, 405, 268-283.
41. Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (1996). Children doing mathematics. Oxford: Blackwell.
42. Nunes, T., & Moreno, C. (2002). An intervention program for mathematics. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7, 120-133.
43. Ottem, E. (1980). An analysis of the cognitive studies with deaf subjects. American Annals of the Deaf, 125, 564-575.
44. Pansky, A., & Algom, D. (2002). Comparative judgment of numerosity and numerical magnitude: Attention preempts automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 259-274.
45. Peterson, S., & Simon, T. J. (2000). Computational evidence for the subitizing phenomenon as an emergent property of the human cognitive architecture. Cognitive Science, 24, 93-122.
46. Proksch, J., & Bavelier, D. (2002). Changes in the spatial distribution of visual attention after early deafness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 687-701.
47. Rettenback, R., Diller, G., & Sireteaunu, R. (1999). Do deaf people see better? Texture segmentation and visual search compensate in adult but not in juvenile subjects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 560-583.
48. Richardson, J. T. E., McLeod-Gallinger, J., McKenn, B. G., & Long, G. L. (1999). Approaches to studying in deaf and hearing students in higher education. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 156-173.
49. Rubinsten, O., & Henik, A. (2005). Automatic activation of internal magnitudes: A study of developmental dyscalculia. Neuropsychology, 19, 641-648.
50. Rubinsten, O., Henik, A., Berger, A., & Shahar-Shalev, S. (2002). The development of internal representations of magnitude and their association with Arabic numerals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81, 74-92.
51. Schick, B. (2005). Educational interpreting and cognitive development in children: Potential relationships. In E. Winston (Ed.), Educational interpreting: The questions we should be asking (pp. 73-87). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
52. Swanwick, R., Oddy, A., & Roper, T. (2005). Mathematics and deaf children: An exploration of barriers to success. Deafness and Education International, 7, 1-21.
53. Swisher, M. V. (1993). Perceptual and cognitive aspects of recognition of signs in peripheral vision. In M. Marschark & M. D. Clark (Eds.), Psychological perspectives of deafness (pp. 229-265). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
54. Talbot, K. F., & Haude, R. H. (1993). The relationship between sign language skill and spatial visualizations ability: Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 1387-1391.
55. Tharpe, A., Ashmead, D., & Rothpletz, A. (2002). Visual attention in children with normal hearing, children with hearing aids, and children with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Hearing and Language Research, 45, 403-413.
56. Todman, J., & Seedhouse, E. (1994). Visual-action code processing by deaf and hearing children. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 129-141.
57. Traxler, C. B. (2000). Measuring up to performance standards in reading and mathematics: Achievement of selected deaf and hard-of-hearing students in the national norming of the 9th edition Stanford Achievement Test. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 337-348.
58. Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 331-351.
59. Tzelgov, J., Meyer, J., & Henik, A. (1992). Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 166-179.
60. Zarfaty, Y., Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2004). The performance of young deaf children in spatial and temporal number tasks. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9, 315-326.