Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives for deaf students' classroom learning

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 421-437

  Marschark, Marc ^a,f   Leigh, Greg ^b   Sapere, Patricia ^a   Burnham, Denis ^c   Convertino, Carol ^a   Stinson, Michael ^a   Knoors, Harry ^d   Vervloed, Mathijs P J ^d   Noble, William ^e  

^a ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMUNICATION AID; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PATIENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SIGN LANGUAGE; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD; COMMUNICATION AIDS FOR DISABLED; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; SIGN LANGUAGE;

EID: 33748775448     PISSN: 10814159     EISSN: 14657325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enl013     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Baker, R. (1985). Subtitling television for deaf children. Media in Education Research Series, 3, 1-46.
2. Elliot, L. B., Foster, S. B., & Stinson, M. S. (2002). Using notes from a speech-to-text system for studying: Research on deaf and hard of hearing high school and college students. Exceptional children, 69, 25-40.
3. Elliot, L. B., Stinson, M. S., McKee, B. G., Everhart, V. S., & Francis, P. J. (2001). College students' perceptions of these C-Print speech-to-text transcription system. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6, 286-298.
4. Fabich, M. (2005). A meta-analysis of demographic characteristics and learning by deaf students. Unpublished master's thesis, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY.
5. Gallaudet Research Institute. (2003, December). Regional and national summary report of data from the 2002-2003 Annual Survey of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children and Youth. Washington, DC: GRI, Gallaudet University.
6. Harrington, F. (2000). Sign language interpreters and access for deaf students to university curricula: The ideal and the reality. In R. P. Roberts, S. E. Carr, D. Abraham, & A. Dufour (Eds.), The critical link 2: Interpreters in the community (pp. 219-273). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
7. Jacobs, L. R. (1977). The efficiency of interpreting input for processing lecture information by deaf college students. Journal of Rehabilitation of the Deaf 11, 10-14.
8. Jelinek Lewis, M. S., & Jackson, D. W. (2001). Television literacy: Comprehension of program content using closed-captions for the deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6, 43-53.
9. Karchmer, M. A., & Mitchell, R. E. (2003). Demographic and achievement characteristics of deaf and hard of hearing students. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 21-37). New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Kidd, D. H., Madsen, A. L., & Lamb, C. S. (1993). Mathematics vocabulary: Performance of residential deaf students. School Science and Mathematics, 93, 418-421.
11. Kiewra, K. A., & DuBois, N. F. (1988). Providing study notes: Comparison of three types of notes for review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 595-597.
12. Kiewra, K. A., & DuBois, N. F. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 240-245.
13. Kluwin, T. N., & Stewart, D. A. (2000, Winter/Spring). Interpreting in schools: A look at research. Odyssey (pp. 15-17). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.
14. Knoors, H. (2005, July). Inclusion of bilingual children: Facing dilemmas. Keynote address at the 20th International Congress on the Education of the Deaf, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
15. Knoors, H. (2006, March). Varying objectives and tricky mixes: Language used in the education of deaf children. Presentation at the conference on Language in Deaf Education: Into the 21st century, Dunblane, Scotland.
16. Koskinen, P., Wilson, R. M., Gambrell, L. B., & Jensema, C. (1986). Using closed captioned television to enhance reading skills of learning disabled students. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 35, 61-65.
17. Koskinen, P. S., Wilson, R. M., & Jensema, C. J. (1986). Using closed-captioned television in the teaching of reading to deaf students. American Annals of the Deaf 131, 43-46.
18. Lang, H. G. (2002). Higher education for deaf students: Research priorities in the new millennium. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7, 267-280.
19. Livingston, S., Singer, B., & Abramson, T (1994). Effectiveness compared: ASL interpreting vs. transliteration. Sign Language Studies, 23, 1-54.
20. Marschark, M. (1993). Psychological development of deaf children. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Marschark, M. (in press). Raising and educating a deaf child (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Marschark, M., Convertino, C., & LaRock, D. (2006). Optimizing academic performance of deaf students: Access, opportunities, and outcomes. In D. F. Moores & D. S. Martin (Eds.), Deaf learners: New developments in curriculum and instruction (pp. 179-200). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
23. Marschark, M., Convertino, C., Macias, G., Monikowski, C. M., Sapere, P., & Seewagen, R. (2006). Understanding communication among deaf students who sign and speak: A trivial pursuit? Manuscript submitted for publication.
24. Marschark, M., Convertino, C., McEvoy, C., & Masteller, A. (2004). Organization and use of the mental lexicon by deaf and hearing individuals. American Annals of the Deaf 149, 51-61.
25. Marschark, M., Convertino, C., Sapere, P., Pelz, J., & Aslin, R. (2006). Effects of prior knowledge and preparation on learning via sign language interpreting. Manuscript in preparation.
26. Marschark, M., Pelz, J., Convertino, C., Sapere, P., Arndt, M. E., & Seewagen, R. (2005). Classroom interpreting and visual information processing in mainstream education for deaf students: Live or Memorex®? American Educational Research Journal, 42, 727-762.
27. Marschark, M., Sapere, P., Convertino, C., & Seewagen, R. (2005a). Educational interpreting: Access and outcomes. In M. Marschark, R. Peterson, & E. A. Winston (Eds.), Interpreting and interpreter education: Directions for research and practice (pp. 57-83). New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Marschark, M., Sapere, P., Convertino, C., & Seewagen, R. (2005b). Access to postsecondary education through sign language interpreting. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10, 38-50.
29. Marschark, M., Sapere, P., Convertino, C., Seewagen, R., & Maltzan, H. (2004). Comprehension of sign language interpreting: Deciphering a complex task situation. Sign Language Studies, 4, 345-368.
30. Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187-198.
31. Mayer, R. E., & Morena, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312-320.
32. McEvoy, C., Marschark, M., & Nelson, D. L. (1999). Comparing the mental lexicons of deaf and hearing individuals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1-9.
33. Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 319-334.
34. Murphy, H. J., & Fleischer, L. R. (1977). The effects of Ameslan versus Siglish upon test scores. Journal of Rehabilitation of the Deaf 11, 15-18.
35. Napier, J., & Barker, R. (2004). Access to university interpreting: Expectations and preferences of deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9, 228-238.
36. Nelson, K. E., Loncke, F., & Camarata, S. (1993). Implications of research on deaf and hearing children's language learning. In M. Marschark & D. Clark (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on deafness (pp. 123-152). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Neuman, S. B., & Koskinen, P. (1992). Captioned television as comprehensible input: Effects of incidental word learning from context for language minority students. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 95-106.
38. Osguthorpe, R., Long, G., & Ellsworth, R. G. (1980). The effects of reviewing class notes for deaf and hearing students. American Annals of the Deaf 125, 554-558.
39. Preminger, J. E., & Levitt, H. (1997). Computer-assisted remote transcription (CART): A tool to aid people who are deaf or hard of hearing in the workplace. Volta Review, 99, 219-230.
40. Schley, S. (2005, December). Deaf children and hearing siblings in the NLSY: Developmental and educational outcomes to age 14. Poster presented at National Science Foundation REC Primary Investigators meeting, Washington, DC.
41. Steinfeld, A. (1998). The benefit of real-time captioning and a mainstream classroom as measured by working memory. Volta Review, 100, 29-44.
42. Steinfeld, A. (2001). The case for realtime captioning in classrooms. Journal of Court Reporting, 63, 76-79.
43. Stewart, D. A., & Kluwin, T. N. (1996). The gap between guidelines, practice, and knowledge in interpreting services for deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1, 29-39.
44. Stinson, M. S., Eisenberg, S., Horn, C., Larson, J., Levitt, H., & Stuckless, E. R. (1999). Real-time speech-to-text services. In R. Stuckless (Ed.), Reports of the National Task Force on Quality Services in Postsecondary Education of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students. Rochester, NY: Northeast Technical Assistance Center, Rochester Institute of Technology.
45. Stinson, M. S., Elliot, L., Kelly, R., & Liu, Y. (2006). Deaf and hard-of-hearing students' memory of lectures with speech-to-text and interpreting/note taking services. Manuscript submitted for publication.
46. Stinson, M. S., & Kluwin, T. (2003). Educational consequences of alternative school placements. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 52-64). New York: Oxford University Press.
47. Stinson, M. S., Meath-Lang, B., & MacLeod, J. (1981). Recall of different segments of an interpreted lecture by deaf students. American Annals of the Deaf 126, 819-824.
48. Stinson, M. S., & Ng., P. (1983, April). Relations between communication skills and comprehension of an interpreted lecture by hearing-impaired college students. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
49. Stinson, M. S., Stuckless, E. R., Henderson, J. B., & Miller, L. (1988). Perceptions of hearing impaired college students toward real-time speech-to-print: RTGD and other support services. Volta Review, 90, 336-338.
50. Strassman, B. (1997). Metacognition and reading in children who are deaf. A review of the research. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2, 140-149.
51. Stuckless, E. R. (1983). Real-time transliteration of speech into print for hearing-impaired students in regular classes. American Annals of the Deaf 128, 619-624.
52. Traxler, C. B. (2000). Measuring up to performance standards in reading and mathematics: Achievement of selected deaf and hard-of hearing students in the national norming of the 9th Edition Stanford Achievement Test. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 337-348.
53. Viable Technologies, Inc. (2002). Viable realtime translation. Retrieved August 2, 2004, from http://www.viabletechnologies.com