Attacks without consequence? Candidates, parties, groups, and the changing face of negative advertising

American Journal of Political Science

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 19-36

  Dowling, Conor M ^a   Wichowsky, Amber ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

^b Marquette University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921024266     PISSN: 00925853     EISSN: 15405907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12094     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allen, Mike, and Nancy Burrell . 2002. "The Negativity Effect in Political Advertising." In The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice, ed. James Price Dillard and Michael Pfau. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 83-96.
2. Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar . 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertising Shrinks and Polarizes the Electorate. New York: Free Press.
3. Arceneaux, Kevin. 2010. "The Benefits of Experimental Methods for the Study of Campaign Effects." Political Communication 27(2): 199-215.
4. Berinsky, Adam J., Greg A. Huber, and Gabriel S. Lenz . 2012. "Using Mechanical Turk as a Subject Recruitment Tool for Experimental Research." Political Analysis 20(3): 351-68.
5. Blackwell, Matthew. 2013. "A Framework for Dynamic Causal Inference in Political Science." American Journal of Political Science 57(2): 504-19.
6. Brooks, Deborah Jordan, and Michael Murov . 2012. "Assessing Accountability in a Post-Citizens United Era: The Effects of Attack Ad Sponsorship by Unknown Independent Groups." American Politics Research 40(3): 383-418.
7. Buhrmester, Michael D., Tracy Kwang, and Samuel D. Gosling . 2011. "Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?" Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(1): 3-5.
8. Carraro, Luciana, Bertram Gawronski, and Luigi Castelli . 2010. "Losing on All Fronts: The Effects of Negative versus Positive Person-Based Campaigns on Implicit and Explicit Evaluations of Political Candidates." British Journal of Social Psychology 49(3): 453-470.
9. Dowling, Conor M., and Amber Wichowsky . 2013. "Does It Matter Who's Behind the Curtain? Anonymity in Political Advertising and the Effects of Campaign Finance Disclosure." American Politics Research 41(6): 965-96.
10. Fowler, Erika F. 2012. "Outside Group Involvement in GOP Contest Skyrockets Compared to 2008" [Press release, January 30, 2012]. Wesleyan Media Project.
11. Fowler, Erika F., and Travis N. Ridout . 2010. "Advertising Trends in 2010." The Forum 8(4): Article 4.
12. Fowler, Erika F., and Travis N. Ridout . 2012. "Negative, Angry, and Ubiquitous: Political Advertising in 2012." The Forum 10(4): 51-61.
13. Franz, Michael M. 2010. "The Citizens United Election? Or Same As It Ever Was?" The Forum 8(4): Article 7.
14. Franz, Michael M. 2012. "Interest Groups in Electoral Politics: 2012 in Context." The Forum 10(4): 62-79.
15. Fridkin, Kim L., and Patrick J. Kenney . 2004. "Do Negative Messages Work?" American Politics Research 32(5): 570-605.
16. Fridkin, Kim L., and Patrick J. Kenney . 2011. "Variability in Citizens' Reactions to Different Types of Negative Campaigns." American Journal of Political Science 55(2): 307-25.
17. Garramone, Gina M. 1985. "Effects of Negative Political Advertising: The Roles of Sponsor and Rebuttal." Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 29(2): 147-59.
18. Garramone, Gina M., and Sandra J. Smith . 1984. "Reactions to Political Advertising: Clarifying Sponsor Effects." Journalism Quarterly 61(4): 771-75.
19. Geer, John G. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Groenendyk, Eric W., and Nicholas A. Valentino . 2002. "Of Dark Clouds and Silver Linings: Effects of Exposure to Issue versus Candidate Advertising on Persuasion, Information Retention, and Issue Salience." Communication Research 29(3): 295-319.
21. Haas, R. Glen. 1981. "Effects of Source Characteristics on Cognitive Responses and Persuasion." In Cognitive Responses in Persuasion, ed. Richard E. Petty, Thomas M. Ostrom, and Timothy C. Brock . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 141-72.
22. Hovland, Carl I., Irving L. Janis, and Harold H. Kelley . 1953. Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23. Hovland, Carl I., and Walter Weiss . 1951. "The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness." Public Opinion Quarterly 15(4): 635-50.
24. Isikoff, Michael 2012. "Romney Super PAC Outpaces Romney Campaign in Iowa Ad Spending." msn.com, January 3, http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/03/9926906-romney-super-pac-outpaces-romney-campaign-in-iowa-ad-spending (accessed March 14, 2012).
25. Iyengar, Shanto, Simon Jackman, and Kyu Hahn . 2008. "Polarization in Less Than 30 Seconds: Continuous Monitoring of Voter Response to Campaign Advertising." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Political Science Association.
26. Jasperson, Amy E., and David P. Fan . 2012. "An Aggregate Examination of the Backlash Effect in Political Advertising: The Case of the 1996 U.S. Senate Race in Minnesota." Journal of Advertising 31(1): 1-12.
27. Johnson, Tyler, Johanna Dunaway, and Christopher R. Weber . 2011. "Consider the Source: Variations in the Effects of Negative Campaign Messages." Journal of Integrated Social Sciences 2(1): 98-127.
28. Krupnikov, Yanna 2011. "When Does Negativity Demobilize? Tracing the Conditional Effect of Negative Campaigning on Voter Turnout." American Journal of Political Science 55(4): 797-813.
29. Lau, Richard R., Lee Sigelman, Caroline Heldman, and Paul Babbitt . 1999. "The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Assessment." American Political Science Review 93(4): 851-75.
30. Lau, Richard R., Lee Sigelman, and Ivy Brown Rovner . 2007. "The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment." Journal of Politics 69(4): 1176-1209.
31. Levitt, Justin. 2010. "Confronting the Impact of Citizens United." Yale Law & Policy Review 29: 217-34.
32. Meirick, Patrick C. 2005. "Political Knowledge and Sponsorship in Backlash from Party- and Candidate-Sponsored Attacks." Communication Reports 18(1-2): 75-84.
33. Meirick, Patrick C., and Gwendelyn S. Nisbett . 2011. "I Approve This Message: Effects of Sponsorship, Ad Tone, and Reactance in 2008 Presidential Advertising." Mass Communication and Society 14(5): 666-89.
34. Pfau, Michael, Michel Haigh, Jeanetta Sims, and Shelley Wigley . 2007. "The Influence of Corporate Front-Group Stealth Campaigns." Communication Research 34(1): 73-99.
35. Pfau, Michael, R. Lance Holbert, Erin Alison Szabo, and Kelly Kaminski . 2002. "Issue-Advocacy versus Candidate Advertising: Effects on Candidate Preferences and Democratic Process." Journal of Communication 52(2): 301-15.
36. Pfau, Michael, David Park, R. Lance Holbert, and Jaeho Cho . 2001. "The Effects of Party- and PAC-Sponsored Issue Advertising and the Potential of Inoculation to Combat Its Impact on the Democratic Process." American Behavioral Scientist 44(12): 2379-97.
37. Pornpitakpan, Chanthika 2004. "The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence." Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32(2): 243-81.
38. Shen, Fuyuan, and H. Denis Wu . 2002. "Effects of Soft-Money Issue Advertisements on Candidate Evaluation and Voting Preference: An Exploration." Mass Communication & Society 5(4): 395-410.
39. Thurber, James A., Candice J. Nelson, and David A. Dulio . 2000. Crowded Airwaves: Campaign Advertising in Elections. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
40. Torres-Spelliscy, Ciara 2011. "Hiding Behind the Tax Code, the Dark Election of 2010 and Why Tax-Exempt Entities Should Be Subject to Robust Federal Campaign Finance Disclosure Laws." Nexus: Chapman's Journal of Law and Policy 16: 57-95.
41. Weber, Christopher, Johanna Dunaway, and Tyler Johnson . 2012. "It's All in the Name: Source Cue Ambiguity and the Persuasive Appeal of Campaign Ads." Political Behavior 34(3): 561-84.