The effects of negative political advertisements: A meta-analytic assessment

American Political Science Review

Volumn 93, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 851-875

  Lau, Richard R ^a   Sigelman, Lee ^b   Heldman, Caroline ^a   Babbitt, Paul ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033478803     PISSN: 00030554     EISSN: 15375943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2586117     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. * Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.
2. * Ansolabehere, Stephen, Shanto Iyengar, Adam Simon, and Nicholas Valentino. 1994. "Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?" American Political Science Review 88 (December): 829-38.
3. * Babbitt, Paul R., and Richard R. Lau. 1994. "The Impact of Negative Political Campaigns on Political Knowledge." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta.
4. Barry, Thomas E. 1993. "Comparative Advertising: What Have We Learned in Two Decades?" Journal of Advertising Research 33 (March/April): 19-29.
5. Bartels, Larry M. 1996. "Review of Going Negative, by Stephen Ansolabehere and Shanto Iyengar." Public Opinion Quarterly 60 (Fall): 456-61.
6. * Basil, Michael, Caroline Schooler, and Byron Reeves. 1991. "Positive and Negative Political Advertising: Effectiveness of Ads and Perceptions of Candidates." In Television and Political Advertising, Vol. 1, ed. Frank Biocca. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Pp. 245-62.
7. Becker, Betsy Jane. 1994. "Combining Significance Levels." In The Handbook of Research Synthesis, ed. Harris Cooper and Larry V. Hedges. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Pp. 215-29.
8. Begg, Colin B. 1994. "Publication Bias." In The Handbook of Research Synthesis, ed. Harris Cooper and Larry V. Hedges. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Pp. 399-410.
9. Berelson, Bernard R., Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Brack, Reginald K., Jr. 1994. "How to Clean Up Gutter Politics." New York Times, December 27, A21.
11. * Brians, Craig L., and Martin P. Wattenberg. 1996. "Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience: Comparing Reception from TV Commercials, TV News, and Newspapers." American Journal of Political Science 40 (February): 172-93.
12. Bryce, James. [1888] 1995. The American Commonwealth. 2 vols. London: Macmillan.
13. Budesheim, Thomas L., David A. Houston, and Stephen J. DePaola. 1996. "Persuasiveness of In-Group and Out-Group Political Messages: The Case of Negative Political Campaigning." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (March): 523-34.
14. * Bullock, David A. 1994. The Influence of Political Attack Advertising on Undecided Voters: An Experimental Study of Campaign Message Strategy. Ph.D. diss. University of Arizona.
15. * Capella, Louis, and Ronald D. Taylor. 1992. "An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Negative Political Campaigning." Business and Public Affairs 18 (Spring): 10-7.
16. Chinoy, Ira. 1997. "In Presidential Race, TV Ads Were Biggest '96 Cost By Far." Washington Post, March 31, A19.
17. Cooper, Harris, and Larry V. Hedges, eds. 1994. The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18. Dimock, Michael A., and Gary C. Jacobson. 1995. "Checks and Choices: The House Bank Scandal's Impact on Voters in 1992." Journal of Politics 57 (November): 1143-59.
19. * Finkel, Steven E., and John Geer. 1998. "A Spot Check: Casting Doubt on the Demobilizing Effect of Attack Advertising." American Journal of Political Science 42 (April): 573-95.
20. Fisher, R. A. 1932. Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 4th ed. London: Oliver & Boyd.
21. Fiske, Susan T., and Shelley E. Taylor. 1991. Social Cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. * Freedman, Paul, and Kenneth M. Goldstein. 1999. "Measuring Media Exposure and the Effects of Negative Campaign Ads." American Journal of Political Science 43(October):1189-208.
23. * Garramone, Gina M., Charles T. Atkin, Bruce E. Pinkleton, and Richard T. Cole. 1990. "Effects of Negative Political Advertising on the Political Process." Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 34 (Summer): 299-311.
24. * Geer, John G., and Richard R. Lau. 1998. "A New Way to Model the Effects of Campaigns." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
25. Glass, Gene V., Barry McGaw, and Mary Lee Smith. 1981. Meta-Analysis in Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26. * Goldstein, Kenneth M. 1997. "Political Advertising and Political Persuasion in the 1996 Presidential Campaign." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
27. Gronbeck, Bruce E. 1994. "Negative Political Ads and American Self Images." In Presidential Campaigns & American Self Images, ed. Arthur H. Miller and Bruce E. Gronbeck. Boulder, CO: Westview. Pp. 60-81.
28. * Haddock, Geoffrey, and Mark P. Zanna. 1997. "Impact of Negative Advertising on Evaluations of Political Candidates: The 1993 Canadian Federal Election." Basic and Applied Social Psychology 19 (June): 204-23.
29. Hale, Jon F., Jeffrey C. Fox, and Rick Farmer. 1996. "Negative Advertisements in U.S. Senate Campaigns: The Influence of Campaign Context." Social Science Quarterly 77 (June): 329-43.
30. Hale, Scott L. 1998. "Attack Messages and their Effects on Judgments of Political Candidates: A Random-Effects Meta-Analytic Review." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
31. Haskins, Jack B. 1964. "Factual Recall as a Measure of Advertising Effectiveness." Journal of Advertising Research 4 (January/February): 2-8.
32. Henneberger, Melinda. 1994. "As Political Ads Slither Into Negativity, the Real Venom Is Not Found on TV." New York Times, October 30, Sec. 1.
33. * Hill, Ronald P. 1989. "An Exploration of Voter Responses to Political Advertisements." Journal of Advertising 18 (Winter): 14-22.
34. * Hitchon, Jacqueline C., and Chingching Chang. 1995. "Effects of Gender Schematic Processing on the Reception of Political Commercials for Men and Women Candidates." Communication Research 22 (August): 430-58.
35. * Hitchon, Jacqueline C., Chingching Chang, and Rhonda Harris. 1997. "Should Women Emote? Perceptual Bias and Opinion Change in Response to Political Ads for Candidates of Different Genders." Political Communication 14 (January): 49-69.
36. Hunter, John E., and Frank L. Schmidt. 1990. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1992. Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, Paul Waldman, and Susan Sherr. 1998. "Eliminate the Negative? Defining and Refining Categories of Analysis for Political Advertisements." Paper presented at the Conference on Political Advertising in Election Campaigns, Washington, DC.
39. * Kahn, Kim Fridkin and John G. Geer. 1994. "Creating Impressions: An Experimental Investigation of Political Advertising on Television." Political Behavior 16 (March): 93-116.
40. * Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Patrick J. Kenney. 1999. "Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation." American Political Science Review 93 (December): 877-89.
41. * Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Patrick J. Kenney. 1998b. "Negative Advertising and an Informed Electorate: How Negative Campaigning Enhances Knowledge of Senate Elections." Paper presented at the Conference on Political Advertising in Election Campaigns, Washington, DC.
42. Kahneman, Daniel, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky, eds. 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. * Kaid, Lynda Lee. 1997. "Effects of the Television Spots on Images of Dole and Clinton." American Behavioral Scientist 40 (August): 1085-94.
44. * Kaid, Lynda Lee, and John Boydston. 1987. "An Experimental Study of the Effectiveness of Negative Political Advertisements." Communication Quarterly 35 (Spring): 193-201.
45. * Kaid, Lynda Lee, Mike Chanslor, and Mark Hovind. 1992. "The Influence of Program and Commercial Type on Political Advertising Effectiveness." Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 36 (Summer): 303-20.
46. Kaid, Lynda Lee, and Anne Johnston. 1991. "Negative Versus Positive Television Advertising in U.S. Presidential Campaigns, 1960-1988." Journal of Communication 41 (Summer): 53-64.
47. * Kaid, Lynda Lee, Chris M. Leland, and Susan Whitney. 1992. "The Impact of Televised Political Ads: Evoking Viewer Responses in the 1988 Presidential Campaign." Southern Speech Communication Journal 57 (Summer): 285-95.
48. Kamber, Victor. 1997. Poison Politics: Are Negative Campaigns Destroying Democracy? New York: Plenum.
49. Kanetkar, Vinay, Martin G. Evans, Shirley Anne Everell, Diane Irvine, and Zeeva Miliman. 1995. "The Effect of Scale Changes on Meta-Anarysis of Multiplicative and Main Effects Models." Educational and Psychological Measurement 55 (April): 206-24.
50. Karrh, James A., and David H. Halpern. 1997. "Nothing to Lose? Assessing the Impact of Competitive Position on Responses to Negative Political Advertising." Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Academy of Advertising, St. Louis, MO.
51. * King, Erika G., Robert W. Hendersen, and Hong C. Chen. 1998. "Viewer Response to Positive vs. Negative Ads in the 1996 Presidential Campaign." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 23-25 1998.
52. Krauthammer, Charles. 1991. "Why Americans Hate Politicians." Time, December 9, p. 92.
53. Laczniak, Gene R., and Clarke L. Caywood. 1987. "The Case For and Against Televised Political Advertising: Implications for Research and Public Policy." Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 6 (Spring): 16-32.
54. * Lang, Annie. 1991. "Emotion, Formal Features, and Memory for Televised Political Advertisements." In Television and Political Advertising, Vol. 1, ed. Frank Biocca. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Pp. 221-44.
55. Lau, Richard R. 1985. "Two Explanations for Negativity Effects in Political Behavior." American Journal of Political Science 29 (February): 119-38.
56. Lau, Richard R., Gerald Pomper, and Erlinda Mazeika. 1995. "The Effects of Negative Campaigning." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
57. * Lau, Richard R., Gerald Pomper, and Grace A. Mumoli. 1998. "Effects of Negative Campaigning on Senate Election Outcomes: 1988, 1990, 1994, and 1996." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 23-26, Chicago.
58. Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard R. Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1948. The People's Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.
59. * Lemert, James B., William R. Elliot, James M. Bernstein, William L. Rosenberg, and Karl J. Nestvold. 1991. News Verdicts, the Debates, and Presidential Campaigns. New York: Praeger.
60. Lin, Yang. 1996. "Empirical Studies of Negative Political Advertising: A Quantitative Review Using a Method of Combined Citation and Content Analysis." Scientometrics 37 (September): 385-99.
61. * Luskin, Robert C., and Christopher Bratcher. 1994. "Negative Campaigning, Partisanship, and Turnout." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
62. * Martinez, Michael D., and Tad Delegal. 1990. "The Irrelevance of Negative Campaigns to Political Trust: Experimental and Survey Results." Political Communication and Persuasion 7 (January/ March): 25-40.
63. * Mathews, Douglas, and Beth Dietz-Uhler. 1998. "The Black-Sheep Effect: How Positive and Negative Advertisements Affect Voters' Perceptions of the Sponsor of the Advertisement." Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28 (October 16): 1903-15.
64. Mayer, William G. 1996. "In Defense of Negative Campaigning." Political Science Quarterly 111 (Fall): 437-455.
65. * McBride, Allan, Robert Toburen, and Dan Thomas. 1993 "Does Negative Campaign Advertising Depress Voter Turnout? Evidence from Two Election Campaigns." Gambling State University. Typescript.
66. McCombs, Maxwell E., and Donald L. Shaw. 1972. "The Agenda-Setting Function of the Mass Media." Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (Summer): 176-87.
67. * Merritt, Sharyne. 1984. "Negative Political Advertising: Some Empirical Findings." Journal of Advertising 13 (Fall): 27-38.
68. Mittal, Banwari. 1994. "Public Assessment of TV Advertising: Faint Praise and Harsh Criticism." Journal of Advertising Research 34 (January/February): 35-53.
69. Mosteller, Fred, and R. R. Bush. 1954. "Selected Quantitative Techniques." In Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1, ed. Gardner Lindzey. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley. Pp. 289-334.
70. Muehling, Darrel D., Jeffrey J. Stoltman, and Sanford Grossbart. 1990. "The Impact of Comparative Advertising on Levels of Message Involvement." Journal of Advertising 19 (Winter): 41-50.
71. "Negative Spots Likely to Return in Election '88." 1987. Advertising Age, September 14, Pp. 3, 70-8.
72. * Newhagen, John E., and Byron Reeves. 1991. "Emotion and Memory Responses for Negative Political Advertising: A Study of Television Commercials Used in the 1988 Presidential Election." In Television and Political Advertising, Vol. 1, ed. Frank Biocca. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Pp. 197-220.
73. Orwin, Robert G. 1983. "A Fail-Safe N for Effect Size." Journal of Educational Statistics 8 (Summer): 157-9.
74. Perloff, Richard M., and Dennis Kinsey. 1992. "Political Advertising as Seen by Consultants and Journalists." Journal of Advertising Research 32 (May/June): 53-60.
75. * Pfau, Michael, Henry C. Kenski, Michael Nitz, and John Sorenson. 1989. "Use of the Attack Message Strategy in Political Campaign Communication." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Francisco.
76. Phillips, Joseph M., and Ernest P. Goss. 1995. "The Effect of State and Local Taxes on Economic Development: A Meta-Analysis." Southern Economic Journal 62 (October): 320-33.
77. * Pinkleton, Bruce. 1997. "The Effects of Negative Comparative Political Advertising on Candidate Evaluations and Advertising Evaluations: An Exploration." Journal of Advertising 26 (Spring): 19-29.
78. * Pinkleton, Bruce E. 1998. "Effects of Print Comparative Political Advertising on Political Decision-Making and Participation." Journal of Communications 48 (Autumn): 24-36.
79. * Pinkleton, Bruce E., and Gina M. Garramone. 1992. "A Survey of Responses to Negative Political Advertising: Voter Cognition, Affect, and Behavior." Proceedings of the 1992 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, pp. 127-33.
80. Purdum, Todd S. 1998. "Money Politics Wasn't Defeated in California." New York Tunes June 7, Section 4, pp. 1, 4.
81. Putrevu, Sanjay, and Kenneth R. Lord. 1994. "Comparative and Noncomparative Advertising: Attitudinal Effects under Cognitive and Affective Involvement Conditions." Journal of Advertising 23 (June): 77-91.
82. * Rahn, Wendy M., and Rebecca Hirshorn. 1995. "Political Advertising and Public Mood: An Experimental Study of Children's Political Orientations." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
83. Raju, Nambury S., Sharon Pappas, and Charmon Parker Williams. 1989. "An Empirical Monte Carlo Test of the Accuracy of the Correlation, Covariance, and Regression Slope Models for Assessing Validity Generalization." Journal of Applied Psychology 74 (December): 901-11.
84. Riker, William H. 1997. The Strategy of Rhetoric: Campaigning for the American Constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press.
85. * Roberts, Marilyn S. 1995. "Political Advertising: Strategies for Influence." In Presidential Campaign Discourse: Strategic Communication Problems, ed. Kathleen E. Kendall. Albany: SUNY Press. Pp. 179-99.
86. * Roddy, Brian L., and Gina M. Garramone. 1988. "Appeals and Strategies of Negative Political Advertising." Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 32 (Fall): 415-27.
87. Roese, Neal J., and Gerald N. Sande. 1993. "Backlash Effects in Attack Politics." Journal of Applied Social Psychology 23 (August): 632-53.
88. Rogers, John C., and Terrell G. Williams. 1989. "Comparative Advertising Effectiveness: Practitioners' Perceptions Versus Academic Research Findings." Journal of Advertising Research 29 (October/November): 22-36.
89. Rosenthal, Robert. 1979. "The 'File Drawer' Problem and Tolerance for Null Results." Psychological Bulletin 86 (May): 638-41.
90. * Schultz, Cindy, and S. Mark Pancer. 1997. "Character Attacks and Their Effects on Perceptions of Male and Female Political Candidates." Political Psychology 18 (March): 93-102.
91. * Shapiro, Michael A., and Robert H. Rieger. 1992. "Comparing Positive and Negative Political Advertising on Radio." Journalism Quarterly 69 (Spring): 135-45.
92. Skaperdas, Stergios, and Bernard Grofman. 1995. "Modeling Negative Campaigning." American Political Science Review 89 (March): 49-61.
93. Stanley, T. D., and Stephen B. Jarrell. "Meta-Regression Analysis: A Quantitative Method of Literature Surveys." Journal of Economic Surveys 3 (April): 161-70.
94. * Sulfaro, Valerie A. 1998. "Political Sophistication and the Presidential Campaign: Citizen Reactions to Campaign Advertisements." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
95. * Thorson, Esther, William G. Christ, and Clarke Caywood. 1991. "Selling Candidates Like Tubes of Toothpaste: Is the Comparison Apt?" In Television and Political Advertising, Vol. 1, ed. Frank Biocca. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Pp. 145-72.
96. * Thorson, Esther, Ekaterina Ognianova, James Coyle, and Frank Denton. 1996. "Negative Political Ads and Negative Citizen Orientations Toward Politics." University of Missouri. Typescript.
97. * Tinkham, Spencer F., and Ruth Ann Weaver-Lariscy. 1991. "Advertising Message Strategy in U.S. Congressional Campaigns: Its Impact on Election Outcome." Current Issues and Research in Advertising 13 (Spring-Summer): 207-26.
98. * Tinkham, Spencer F., and Ruth Ann Weaver-Lariscy. 1993. "A Diagnostic Approach to Assessing the Impact of Negative Political Television Commercials." Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 37 (Fall): 377-400.
99. * Tinkham, Spencer F., and Ruth Ann Weaver-Lariscy. 1994. "Ethical Judgments of Political Television Commercials as Predictors of Attitude Toward the Ad." Journal of Advertising 23 (September): 43-57.
100. * Wadsworth, Anne Johnston, Philip Patterson, Lynda Lee Kaid, Ginger Cullers, Drew Malcomb, and Linda Lamirand. 1987. " 'Masculine' vs. 'Feminine' Strategies in Political Ads: Implications for Female Candidates." Journal of Applied Communication 15 (Spring and Fall): 77-94.
101. * Wattenberg, Martin P., and Craig L. Brians. 1999. "Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer?" American Political Science Review 93 (December): 891-9.
102. * Weaver-Lariscy, Ruth Ann, and Spencer F. Tinkham. 1996. "Advertising Message Strategies in U.S. Congressional Campaigns: 1982, 1990." Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 18 (Spring): 53-66.
103. * Weigold, Michael F. 1992. "Negative Political Advertising: Individual Differences in Responses to Issue vs. Image Ads." Proceedings of the 1992 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, pp. 145-9.
104. Welch, Susan, and John R. Hibbing. 1997. "The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections, 1982-1990." Journal of Politics 59 (February): 226-39.
105. West, Darrell M. 1993. Air Wars: Television Advertising in Election Campaigns, 1952-1992. Washington, DC: CO Press.
106. Will, George F. 1994. "Fingernails Across the Blackboard." Newsweek, October 31, p. 72.