The invention Lab: Using a hybrid of model tracing and constraint-based modeling to offer intelligent support in inquiry environments

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6094 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2010, Pages 115-124

  Roll, Ido ^a   Aleven, Vincent ^b   Koedinger, Kenneth R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

Constraint based modeling; Exploratory learning environments; Intelligent tutoring systems; Invention as preparation for learning; Model tracing

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SUPPORT; CONSTRAINT-BASED MODELING; DOMAIN LEVELS; EVALUATION STUDY; EXPLORATORY LEARNING; EXPLORATORY LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; INTELLIGENT SUPPORT; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; INVENTION AS PREPARATION FOR LEARNING; MODELING TECHNIQUE; REAL TIME; SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY; SYSTEM USE;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; LABORATORIES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 79957466399     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6_16     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. de Jong, T., van Joolingen, W.R.: Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Rev. of Ed. Res. 68, 179-201 (1998).
2. Duffy, T.M., Cunningham, D.J.: Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In: Jonassen, D.H. (ed.) Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, pp. 170-198. Macmillan, New York (1996).
3. VanLehn, K.: The Behavior of Tutoring Systems. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 16(3), 227-265 (2006).
4. Roll, I., Aleven, V., Koedinger, K.R.: Helping students know 'further' - increasing the flexibility of students' knowledge using symbolic invention tasks. In: The 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1169-1174. Cognitive Science Society, Austin (2009).
5. Shute, V.J., Glaser, R.: A Large-Scale Evaluation of an Intelligent Discovery World: Smithtown. Interactive Learning Environments 1, 51-77 (1990).
6. Veermans, K., de Jong, T., van Joolingen, W.R.: Promoting Self-Directed Learning in Simulation-Based Discovery Learning Environments Through Intelligent Support. Interact. Learn. Envir. 8(3), 229-255 (2000).
7. Mulder, Y.G., Lazonder, A.W., de Jong, T.: Finding out how they find it Oout: An empirical analysis of inquiry learners' need for support. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 1-21 (2009).
8. Jonassen, D.: Designing constructivist learning environments. In: Reigeluth, C.M. (ed.) Instructional- design theories and models, pp. 215-239. Routledge, Hillsdale (1999).
9. Woolf, B.P., Marshall, D., Mattingly, M., Lewis, J., Wright, S., et al.: Tracking student propositions in an inquiry system. In: The 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 21-28. IOS Press, Sydney (2003).
10. Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M., Koedinger, K.R.: Designing for metacognition - applying cognitive tutor principles to the tutoring of help seeking. Metacognition and Learning 2(2), 125-140 (2007).
11. Koedinger, K.R., Suthers, D.D., Forbus, K.D.: Component-Based construction of a science learning space. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 10, 292-313 (1999).
12. Bunt, A., Conati, C.: Probabilistic student modelling to improve exploratory behaviour. User Model. User-Adap. 13(3), 269-309 (2003).
13. Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.T.: Cognitive tutors: Technology bringing learning science to the classroom. In: Sawyer, K. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 61-78. Cambridge University Press, New York (2006).
14. Luckin, R., du Boulay, B.: Ecolab: The development and evaluation of a vygotskian design framework. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 10(2), 198-220 (1999).
15. Schwartz, D.L., Martin, T.: Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition Instruct. 22(2), 129-184 (2004). (Pubitemid 38808943)
16. Kapur, M.: Productive failure. Cognition Instruct. 26(3), 379-424 (2008).
17. Mathan, S.A., Koedinger, K.R.: Fostering the intelligent novice: Learning from errors with metacognitive tutoring. Educ. Psychol. 40(4), 257-265 (2005). (Pubitemid 43266594)
18. Mitrovic, A., Koedinger, K.R., Martin, B.: A comparative analysis of cognitive tutoring and constraint-based modeling. In: Brusilovsky, P., Corbett, A.T., de Rosis, F. (eds.) UM 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2702, pp. 313-322. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). (Pubitemid 36768581)
19. Mitrovic, A., Weerasinghe, A.: Revisiting ill-definedness and the consequences for ITSs. In: The 14th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 375-382. IOS Press, Marina Del Ray (2009).
20. Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M., Sewall, J., Koedinger, K.R.: The Cognitive Tutor Authoring Tools (CTAT): Preliminary evaluation of efficiency gains. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 61-70. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). (Pubitemid 44117579)