Blurring the line between the DNA damage response and transcription: The importance of chromatin dynamics

Experimental Cell Research

Volumn 329, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 148-153

  Adam, Salomé ^a,b   Polo, Sophie E ^a  

^a Université Sorbonne Paris Cité   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Chromatin modifications; DNA damage; Genome integrity; Histone dynamics; Transcription coupled repair; Transcription regulation

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; HISTONE; CHROMATIN;

CELL FATE; CHROMATIN; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; DNA TRANSCRIPTION; GENETIC REGULATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOME; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; ANIMAL; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; GENETICS; HUMAN;

MAMMALIA;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURES; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; HUMANS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84919448721     PISSN: 00144827     EISSN: 10902422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.07.017     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Soria G., Polo S.E., Almouzni G. Prime, repair, restore: the active role of chromatin in the DNA damage response. Mol. Cell. 2012, 46:722-734.
2. Svejstrup J.Q. The interface between transcription and mechanisms maintaining genome integrity. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010, 35:333-338.
3. Fong Y.W., Cattoglio C., Tjian R. The intertwined roles of transcription and repair proteins. Mol. Cell. 2013, 52:291-302.
4. Mayne L.V., Lehmann A.R. Failure of RNA synthesis to recover after UV irradiation: an early defect in cells from individuals with Cockayne's syndrome and xeroderma pigmentosum. Cancer Res. 1982, 42:1473-1478.
5. Moné M.J., Volker M., Nikaido O., Mullenders L.H., van Zeeland A.A., Verschure P.J., et al. Local UV-induced DNA damage in cell nuclei results in local transcription inhibition. EMBO Rep. 2001, 2:1013-1017.
6. Solovjeva L.V., Svetlova M.P., Chagin V.O., Tomilin N.V. Inhibition of transcription at radiation-induced nuclear foci of phosphorylated histone H2AX in mammalian cells. Chromosome Res. 2007, 15:787-797.
7. Iacovoni J.S., Caron P., Lassadi I., Nicolas E., Massip L., Trouche D., et al. High-resolution profiling of gammaH2AX around DNA double strand breaks in the mammalian genome. Embo J. 2010, 29:1446-1457.
8. Shanbhag N.M., Rafalska-Metcalf I.U., Balane-Bolivar C., Janicki S.M., Greenberg R.A. ATM-dependent chromatin changes silence transcription in cis to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 2010, 141:970-981.
9. Pankotai T., Bonhomme C., Chen D., Soutoglou E. DNAPKcs-dependent arrest of RNA polymerase II transcription in the presence of DNA breaks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012, 19:276-282.
10. Kruhlak M., Crouch E.E., Orlov M., Montaño C., Gorski S.A., Nussenzweig A., et al. The ATM repair pathway inhibits RNA polymerase I transcription in response to chromosome breaks. Nature 2007, 447:730-734.
11. Calkins A.S., Iglehart J.D., Lazaro J.-B. DNA damage-induced inhibition of rRNA synthesis by DNA-PK and PARP-1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:7378-7386.
12. Hanawalt P.C., Spivak G. Transcription-coupled DNA repair: two decades of progress and surprises. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:958-970.
13. Vermeulen W., Fousteri M. Mammalian transcription-coupled excision repair. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5:a012625.
14. Chaurasia P., Sen R., Pandita T.K., Bhaumik S.R. Preferential repair of DNA double-strand break at the active gene in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287:36414-36422.
15. Mourgues S., Gautier V., Lagarou A., Bordier C., Mourcet A., Slingerland J., et al. ELL, a novel TFIIH partner, is involved in transcription restart after DNA repair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110:17927-17932.
16. Jensen A., Mullenders L.H.F. Transcription factor IIS impacts UV-inhibited transcription. DNA Repair 2010, 9:1142-1150.
17. Chou D.M., Adamson B., Dephoure N.E., Tan X., Nottke A.C., Hurov K.E., et al. A chromatin localization screen reveals poly (ADP ribose)-regulated recruitment of the repressive polycomb and NuRD complexes to sites of DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:18475-18480.
18. O'hagan H.M., Mohammad H.P., Baylin S.B. Double strand breaks can initiate gene silencing and SIRT1-dependent onset of DNA methylation in an exogenous promoter CpG island. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4:e1000155.
19. O'hagan H.M., Wang W., Sen S., Destefano Shields C., Lee S.S., Zhang Y.W., et al. Oxidative damage targets complexes containing DNA methyltransferases, SIRT1, and polycomb members to promoter CpG Islands. Cancer Cell 2011, 20:606-619.
20. Seiler D.M., Rouquette J., Schmid V.J., Strickfaden H., Ottmann C., Drexler G.A., et al. Double-strand break-induced transcriptional silencing is associated with loss of tri-methylation at H3K4. Chromosome Res. 2011, 19:883-899.
21. Vélez-Cruz R., Zadorin A.S., Coin F., Egly J.-M. Sirt1 suppresses RNA synthesis after UV irradiation in combined xeroderma pigmentosum group D/Cockayne syndrome (XP-D/CS) cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110:E212-20.
22. Vissers J.H.A., van Lohuizen M., Citterio E. The emerging role of polycomb repressors in the response to DNA damage. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125:3939-3948.
23. Ayrapetov M.K., Gursoy-Yuzugullu O., Xu C., Xu Y., Price B.D. DNA double-strand breaks promote methylation of histone H3 on lysine 9 and transient formation of repressive chromatin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111:9169-9174.
24. Oksenych V., Zhovmer A., Ziani S., Mari P.-O., Eberova J., Nardo T., et al. Histone methyltransferase DOT1L drives recovery of gene expression after a genotoxic attack. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003611.
25. Polo S.E. Reshaping chromatin after DNA damage: the choreography of histone proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2014, 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.05.025 (Epub ahead of print).
26. Lans H., Marteijn J.A., Vermeulen W. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling in the DNA-damage response. Epigenetics Chromatin 2012, 5:4.
27. Cho I., Tsai P.-F., Lake R.J., Basheer A., Fan H.-Y. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling by cockayne syndrome protein B and NAP1-like histone chaperones is required for efficient transcription-coupled DNA repair. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003407.
28. Mandemaker I., Vermeulen W., Marteijn J. Role of chromatin remodeling during the transcriptional restart upon DNA damage. Nucleus 2014, 5. (Epub ahead of print).
29. Adam S., Polo S.E., Almouzni G. Transcription recovery after DNA damage requires chromatin priming by the H3.3 histone chaperone HIRA. Cell 2013, 155:94-106.
30. Szenker E., Ray-Gallet D., Almouzni G. The double face of the histone variant H3.3. Cell Res. 2011, 21:421-434.
31. Chen P., Zhao J., Wang Y., Wang M., Long H., Liang D., et al. H3.3 actively marks enhancers and primes gene transcription via opening higher-ordered chromatin. Genes Dev. 2013, 27:2109-2124.
32. Yang X., Li L., Liang J., Shi L., Yang J., Yi X., et al. Histone acetyltransferase 1 promotes homologous recombination in DNA repair by facilitating histone turnover. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288:18271-18282.
33. Chujo M., Tarumoto Y., Miyatake K., Nishida E., Ishikawa F. HIRA, a conserved histone chaperone plays an essential role in low-dose stress response via transcriptional stimulation in fission yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287:23440-23450.
34. Yuen B.T.K., Knoepfler P.S. Histone H3.3 mutations: a variant path to cancer. Cancer Cell. 2013, 24:567-574.
35. Behjati S., Tarpey P.S., Presneau N., Scheipl S., Pillay N., Van Loo P., et al. Distinct H3F3A and H3F3B driver mutations define chondroblastoma and giant cell tumor of bone. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45:1479-1482.
36. Dinant C., Ampatziadis-Michailidis G., Lans H., Tresini M., Lagarou A., Grosbart M., et al. Enhanced chromatin dynamics by FACT promotes transcriptional restart after UV-induced DNA damage. Mol. Cell. 2013, 51:469-479.
37. Oliveira D.V., Kato A., Nakamura K., Ikura T., Okada M., Kobayashi J., et al. Histone chaperone FACT regulates homologous recombination by chromatin remodeling through interaction with RNF20. J. Cell Sci. 2014, 127:763-772.
38. Herrera-Moyano E., Mergui X., García-Rubio M.L., Barroso S., Aguilera A. The yeast and human FACT chromatin-reorganizing complexes solve R-loop-mediated transcription-replication conflicts. Genes Dev. 2014, 28:735-748.
39. Gunn A., Bennardo N., Cheng A., Stark J.M. Correct end use during end joining of multiple chromosomal double strand breaks is influenced by repair protein RAD50, DNA-dependent protein kinase DNA-PKcs, and transcription context. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:42470-42482.
40. Aymard F., Bugler B., Schmidt C.K., Guillou E., Caron P., Briois S., et al. Transcriptionally active chromatin recruits homologous recombination at DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2014, 21:366-374.
41. Pfister S.X., Ahrabi S., Zalmas L.-P., Sarkar S., Aymard F., Bachrati C.Z., Helleday T., Legube G., La Thangue N.B., Porter A.C.G., et al. SETD2-dependent histone H3K36 trimethylation is required for homologous recombination repair and genome stability. Cell Rep. 2014, 7(2014):2006-2018.
42. Pai C.-C., Deegan R.S., Subramanian L., Gal C., Sarkar S., Blaikley E.J., et al. A histone H3K36 chromatin switch coordinates DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:4091.
43. Jha D.K., Strahl B.D. An RNA polymerase II-coupled function for histone H3K36 methylation in checkpoint activation and DSB repair. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:3965.
44. Francia S., Michelini F., Saxena A., Tang D., de Hoon M., Anelli V., et al. Site-specific DICER and DROSHA RNA products control the DNA-damage response. Nature 2012, 488:231-235.
45. Wei W., Ba Z., Gao M., Wu Y., Ma Y., Amiard S., et al. A role for small RNAs in DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 2012, 149:101-112.
46. Michalik K.M., Böttcher R., Förstemann K. A small RNA response at DNA ends in drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:9596-9603.