Online assessment of strategic reading literacy skills

Computers and Education

Volumn 82, Issue , 2015, Pages 50-59

  Gil, Laura ^a   Martinez, Tomas ^a   Vidal Abarca, Eduardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Online reading; Reading assessment; Reading literacy; Strategies

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; EDUCATION;

CRITICAL VALUE; ONLINE INDICES; ONLINE READINGS; READING ASSESSMENT; READING LITERACIES; RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY; SELF REGULATION; STRATEGIES;

DEREGULATION;

EID: 84911942231     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.026     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. American Psychological Association Guidelines for computer-based tests and interpretations 1986 American Psychological Association Washington, DC
2. ∅. Anmarkrud, M.T. McCrudden, I. Bråten, and H.I. Strømsø Task-oriented reading of multiple documents: online comprehension processes and offline products Instructional Science 41 5 2013 873 894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9263-8
3. R.E. Bennett Inexorable and inevitable: the continuing story of technology and assessment The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment 1 1 2002 1 24
4. R.E. Bennett Online assessment and the comparability of score meaning 2003 Educational Testing Service Princeton, NJ
5. S.M. Bodmann, and D.H. Robinson Speed and performance differences among computer-based and paper-pencil tests Journal of Educational Computing Research 31 1 2004 51 60 10.2190/GRQQ-YT0F-7LKB-F033
6. R. Cerdán, and E. Vidal-Abarca The effects of tasks on integrating information from multiple documents Journal of Educational Psychology 100 1 2008 209 10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.209
7. R. Cerdán, E. Vidal-Abarca, T. Martínez, R. Gilabert, and L. Gil Impact of question-answering tasks on search processes and reading comprehension Learning and Instruction 19 2009 13 27 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.12.003
8. I.C. Choi, K.S. Kim, and J. Boo Comparability of a paper-based language test and a computer-based language test Language Testing 20 3 2003 295 320 10.1191/0265532203lt258oa
9. R. Clariana, and P. Wallace Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: key factors associated with the test mode effect British Journal of Educational Technology 33 2002 593 602 10.1111/1467-8535.00294
10. J. Cohen, P. Cohen, S.G. West, and L.S. Aiken Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences 2003 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ
11. G.B. Duggan, and S.J. Payne Text skimming: the process and effectiveness of foraging through text under time pressure Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 15 2009 228 242
12. L. Gil, I. Bråten, E. Vidal-Abarca, and H.I. Strømsø Summary versus argument tasks when working with multiple documents: which is better for whom? Contemporary Educational Psychology 35 3 2010 157 173 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.11.002
13. F. Goldhammer, J. Naumann, A. Stelter, K. Tóth, H. Rölke, and E. Klieme The time-on-task effect in reading and problem solving is moderated by item difficulty and ability: insights from computer-based large-scale assessment Journal of Educational Psychology 106 2014 608 628 10.1037/a0034716
14. A.C. Graesser, M. Singer, and T. Trabasso Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension Psychological Review 101 3 1994 371 395 10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
15. J. Higgins, M. Russell, and T. Hoffmann Examining the effect of computer-based passage presentation of reading test performance The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment 3 4 2005
16. A. Holzinger, M. Baernthaler, W. Pammer, H. Katz, V. Bjelic-Radisic, and M. Jiefle Investigating paper vs. screen in real-life hospital workflows: performance contradicts perceived superiority of paper in the user experience International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69 9 2011 563 570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.05.002
17. J.K. Kaakinen, and J. Hyönä Perspective effects on expository text comprehension: evidence from Think-aloud protocols, Eye-tracking, and Recall Discourse Processes 40 3 2005 239 257 10.1207/s15326950dp4003-4
18. J.K. Kaakinen, and J. Hyönä Online processing of and memory for perspective relevant and irrelevant text information M.T. McCrudden, J.P. Magliano, G. Schraw, Text relevance and learning from text 2011 Information Age Publishing Greenwich, CT 223 242
19. H. Kim, and J. Kim Reading from an LCD monitor versus paper: teenagers' reading performance International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology (IJRSET) 2 1 2013 1 10
20. W. Kintsch Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition 1998 Cambridge University Press New York
21. A.C. Llorens, L. Gil, E. Vidal-Abarca, T. Martínez, A. Mañá, and R. Gilabert Prueba de Competencia Lectora para Educación Secundaria (CompLEC) Psicothema 23 4 2011 808 817
22. J.P. Magliano, K.K. Millis, I. Levinstein, and C. Boonthum Assessing comprehension during reading with the Reading Strategy Assessment Tool (RSAT) Metacognition and Learning 6 2 2011 131 154
23. A. Mañá, E. Vidal-Abarca, C. Domínguez, L. Gil, and R. Cerdán Papel de los procesos metacognitivos en una tarea de pregunta-respuesta con textos escritos. The role of metacognitive processes in a question-answering task with written texts Infancia y Aprendizaje 32 4 2009 553 565 10.1174/021037009789610412
24. T. Martinez, E. Vidal-Abarca, L. Gil, and R. Gilabert On-line assessment of comprehension processes The Spanish Journal of Psychology 12 2009 308 319 10.1017/S1138741600001700
25. T. Martinez, E. Vidal-Abarca, M.P. Sellés, and R. Gilabert Evaluación de las estrategias y los procesos de comprensión: El test de procesos de comprensión (TPC) Infancia y Aprendizaje 31 3 2008 319 332 10.1174/021037008785702956
26. G.H. Maassen, and A.B. Bakker Suppressor variables in path models definitions and interpretations Sociological Methods & Research 30 2 2001 241 270
27. B.J. Mason, M. Patry, and D.J. Berstein An examination of the equivalence between non-adaptive computer-based and traditional testing Journal of Educational Computing Research 24 1 2001 29 40
28. J. Mazzeo, B. Druesne, P.C. Raffield, K.T. Checketts, and A. Muelstein Comparability of computer and paper-and-pencil scores for two CLEP general examinations College Board Report, 91-5. New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED344902) 1991
29. M.T. McCrudden, and G. Schraw Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing Educational Psychology Review 19 2007 113 139 10.1007/s10648-006-9010-7
30. D.S. McNamara, and J. Magliano Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension Psychology of Learning and Motivation 51 2009 297 384 10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51009-2
31. P.K. Murphy, J.F. Long, T.A. Holleran, and E. Esterly Persuasion online or on paper: a new take on an old issue Learning and Instruction 13 5 2003 511 532 10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00041-5
32. T.O. Nelson, L. Narens, and J. Dunlosky A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment Recall and Monitoring (PRAM) Psychological Methods 9 1 2004 53 10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.53
33. J. Noyes, K. Garland, and L. Robbins Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: is workload another test mode effect? British Journal of Educational Technology 35 1 2004 111 113 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2004.00373.x
34. K.J. O'Malley, R. Kirkpatrick, W. Sherwood, H.J. Burdick, M.C. Hsieh, and E.E. Sanford Comparability of a paper based and computer based reading test in early elementary grades AERA Division D Graduate Student Seminar, Montreal, Canada, April 2005 2005
35. OECD Measuring student knowledge and skills: The PISA assessment of reading, mathematical and scientific literacy 2001 OECD Paris
36. OECD PISA 2009: Assessment framework key competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science 2009 OECD Publishing
37. OECD PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science 2010 OECD Publishing
38. OECD Literacy, numeracy and problem solving in technology Rich environments; framework for the OECD survey of adult skills 2012 OECD Publishing
39. L. Olson Legal twists, digital turns: computerized testing feels the impact of "No Child Left Behind" Education Week 12 35 2003 11 14
40. Y. Ozuru, R. Best, C. Bell, A. Witherspoon, and D.S. McNamara Influence of question format and text availability on the assessment of expository text comprehension Cognition and Instruction 25 4 2007 399 438 10.1080/07370000701632371
41. P. Paek Recent trends in comparability studies 2005 Pearson Educational Measurement
42. M. Pomplun, S. Frey, and D.F. Becker The score equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of a speeded test of reading comprehension Educational and Psychological Measurement 62 2 2002 337 354
43. K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research Psychological Bulletin 124 3 1998 372 422
44. J.F. Rouet The skills of document use: From text comprehension to web-based learning 2006 Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
45. M. Russell Testing on computers: a follow-up study comparing performance on computer and on paper Education Policy Analysis Archives 7 1999 20
46. S. Schroeder What readers have and do: effects of students' verbal ability and reading time components on comprehension with and without text availability Journal of Educational Psychology 103 4 2011 877 896 10.1037/a0023731
47. C. Snow RAND Reading Study Group Reading for understanding 2002 Retrieved from: http://www.rand.org
48. E. Vidal-Abarca, A. Mañá, and L. Gil Individual differences for self-regulating task-oriented reading activities Journal of Educational Psychology 102 4 2010 817 826 10.1037/a0020062
49. E. Vidal-Abarca, T. Martinez, L. Salmerón, R. Cerdán, R. Gilabert, and L. Gil Recording online processes in task-oriented reading with Read&Answer Behavior Research Methods 43 1 2011 179 192
50. L. Yujian, and L. Bo A normalized Levenshtein distance metric. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence IEEE Transactions on 29 6 2007 1091 1095