Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: Is workload another test mode effect?

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 111-113

  Noyes, Jan ^a   Garland, Kate ^b   Robbins, Liz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; EXPERT SYSTEMS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STATISTICAL METHODS; STUDENTS;

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE; COMPUTER-BASED COMPREHENSION;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 1442265806     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2004.00373.x     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. ndAnnual Meeting 24-28 October, Anaheim, CA, 150-154.
2. Clariana R B and Wallace P E (2002) Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: key factors associated with the test mode effect British Journal of Educational Technology 33 (5), 593-602.
3. Hart S G and Staveland L E (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research in Hancock P A and Meshkati N (eds), Human mental workload Elsevier, New York, 5-39.
4. Hill S G, Iavecchia H P, Byers J C, Bittner A C, Zaklad A L and Christ R E (1992) Comparison of four subjective workload rating scales Human Factors 34, 429-439.
5. Mayes D K, Sims V K and Koonce J M (2001) Comprehension and workload differences for VDT and paper-based reading International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 28, 367-378.
6. Noyes J M and Garland K J (2003) VDT versus paper-based text: reply to Mayes, Sims, and Koonce International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 31, 6, 411-423.
7. Tsang P S and Vidulich M A (1994) The roles of immediacy and redundancy in relative subjective workload assessment Human Factors 36, 503-513.