An examination of the equivalence between non-adaptive computer-based and traditional testing

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 29-39

  Mason, B Jean ^a   Patry, Marc ^a   Bernstein, Daniel J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035650363     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/9EPM-B14R-XQWT-WVNL     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. C. V. Bunderson, D. K. Inouye, and J. B. Olsen, The Four Generations of Computerized Educational Measurement, in Educational Measurement (3rd Ed.), R.L. Linn (ed.), American Council on Education-Macmillan, New York, pp. 367-407, 1989.
2. B. F. Green, Construct Validity of Computer-Based Tests, in Test Validity, H. Wainer and H. I. Braun (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 77-86, 1988.
3. S. L. Wise and B. S. Plake, Computer-Based Testing in Higher Education, Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 23, pp. 3-10, 1990.
4. A. C. Bugbee, The Equivalence of Paper-and-Pencil and Computer-Based Testing. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28:3, pp. 282-299, 1996.
5. A. C. Bugbee, Examination on Demand: Findings in Ten Years of Testing by Computer 1982-1991, TRO Learning, Edina, Minnesota, 1992.
6. A. C. Bugbee and F. M. Bernt, Testing by Computer: Findings in Six Years of Use 1982-1988, Journal of Research on Computing in Education 23:1, pp. 87-100, 1990.
7. B. F. Green, Computer-Based Adaptive Testing in 1991, Psychology & Marketing, 8:4, pp. 243-257, 1991.
8. R. K. Hambleton and H. Swaminathan, Item Response Theory, Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, Boston, Massachusetts, 1985.
9. J. Mazzeo and A. L. Harvey, The Equivalence of Scores from Automated and Conventional Educational and Psychological Tests, College Board Report No. 88-8, College Entrance Examination Board, New York, 1988.
10. R. J. Gigliotti, V. L. Smerglia, R. F. Falk, and N. Neiswander, Computer-Based Testing in Sociology: A Description and Evaluation, Teaching Sociology, 22, pp. 32-39, 1994.
11. G. S. Sloss, Comment: Is Computer-Based Testing a Solution to Students' Cheating? Teaching Sociology, 23, pp. 58-59, 1995.
12. A. L. Harvey, Difference in Response Behavior for High and Low Scorers as a Function of Item Presentation on a Computer-Assisted Task, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, 1987.
13. Educational Testing Service, Computer Illiteracy Doesn't Penalize Test Takers, Report on Education Research, 25:6, p. 3, 1993.
14. T. J. Ward, S. R. Hooper, and K. M. Hannafin, The Effect of Computerized Tests on the Performance and Attitudes of College Students, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5:3, pp. 327-333, 1989.
15. American Psychological Association, Guidelines for Computer-Based Tests and Interpretations, Author, Washington DC, 1986.
16. J. L. Orr, eGrade On-Line Assessment System, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000.
17. V. Ramalingam and S. Wiedenbeck, Development and Validation of Scores on a Computer Self-Efficacy Scale and Group Analyses of Novice Self-Efficacy, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19, pp. 367-381, 1998.
18. S. Wiedenbeck, Computer Anxiety Scale, unpublished measure under development, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, 1998.
19. J. Lee, K. E. Moreno, and J. B. Sympson, The Effects of Mode of Test Administration on Test Performance, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, pp. 467-473, 1986.
20. J. D. Sachar and J. D. Fletcher, Administering Paper-and-Pencil Tests by Computer, or the Medium is Not Always the Message, in Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference, D.J. Weiss (ed.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, pp. 403-419, 1978.