Predicting dynamic signaling network response under unseen perturbations

Bioinformatics

Volumn 30, Issue 19, 2014, Pages 2772-2778

  Zhu, Fan ^a   Guan, Yuanfang ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROCEDURES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOFTWARE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 84911448262     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu382     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aebersold, R. and Mann, M. (2003) Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature, 422, 198-207.
2. Bansal, M. et al. (2007) How to infer gene networks from expression profiles. Mol. Syst. Biol., 3, 78.
3. Barrios-Rodiles, M. et al. (2005) High-throughput mapping of a dynamic signaling network in mammalian cells. Science, 307, 1621-1625.
4. de Jong, H. et al. (2003) Genetic network analyzer: qualitative simulation of genetic regulatory networks. Bioinformatics, 19, 336-344.
5. di Bernardo, D. et al. (2005) Chemogenomic profiling on a genome-wide scale using reverse-engineered gene networks. Nat. Biotechnol., 23, 377-383.
6. Dillon, R. et al. (2007) The phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase signaling network: implications for human breast cancer. Oncogene, 26, 1338-1345.
7. Friedman, N. et al. (1998) Learning the structure of dynamic probabilistic networks. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, San Francisco, CA, pp. 139-147.
8. Gardner, T.S. et al. (2003) Inferring genetic networks and identifying compound mode of action via expression profiling. Science, 301, 102-105.
9. Golub, G.H. and Reinsch, C. (1970) Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions. Numerische Mathematik, 14, 403-420.
10. Hanahan, D. and Weinberg, R.A. (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell, 144, 646-674.
11. Hansen, P.C. (1990) Truncated singular value decomposition solutions to discrete ill-posed problems with ill-determined numerical rank. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., 11, 503-518.
12. Hansen, P.C. (1998) Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems: Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion. SIAM, Philadelphia.
13. Hansen, P.C. et al. (1992) The modified truncated SVD method for regularization in general form. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., 13, 1142-1150.
14. Henry, E. and Hofrichter, J. (2010) Singular value decomposition: application to analysis of experimental data. Essential Num. Comput. Methods, 210, 81-138.
15. Hill, S.M. et al. (2012) Bayesian inference of signaling network topology in a cancer cell line. Bioinformatics, 28, 2804-2810.
16. Hochgrafe, F. et al. (2010) Tyrosine phosphorylation profiling reveals the signaling network characteristics of Basal breast cancer cells. Cancer Res., 70, 9391-9401.
17. Husmeier, D. (2003) Sensitivity and specificity of inferring genetic regulatory interactions from microarray experiments with dynamic Bayesian networks. Bioinformatics, 19, 2271-2282.
18. Luan, D. et al. (2007) Computationally derived points of fragility of a human cascade are consistent with current therapeutic strategies. PLoS Comput. Biol., 3, e142.
19. Maetschke, S.R. et al. (2013) Supervised, semi-supervised and unsupervised inference of gene regulatory networks. Brief. Bioinform., 15, 195-211.
20. Manning, G. et al. (2002) The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science, 298, 1912-1934.
21. Marbach, D. et al. (2010) Revealing strengths and weaknesses of methods for gene network inference. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6286-6291.
22. Meric-Bernstam, F. and Gonzalez-Angulo, A.M. (2009) Targeting the mTOR signaling network for cancer therapy. J. Clin. Oncol., 27, 2278-2287.
23. Molinelli, E.J. et al. (2013) Perturbation biology: inferring signaling networks in cellular systems. PLoS Comput. Biol., 9, e1003290.
24. Morris, M.K. et al. (2011) Training signaling pathway maps to biochemical data with constrained fuzzy logic: quantitative analysis of liver cell responses to inflammatory stimuli. PLoS Comput. Biol., 7, e1001099.
25. Olayioye, M.A. et al. (2000) The ErbB signaling network: receptor heterodimeriza-tion in development and cancer. The EMBO J., 19, 3159-3167.
26. Ong, S.E. and Mann, M. (2005) Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat. Chem. Biol., 1, 252-262.
27. Prill, R.J. et al. (2010) Towards a rigorous assessment of systems biology models: the DREAM3 challenges. PloS One, 5, e9202.
28. Sachs, K. et al. (2005) Causal protein-signaling networks derived from multipara-meter single-cell data. Science, 308, 523-529.
29. Steffen, M. et al. (2002) Automated modelling of signal transduction networks. BMC Bioinformatics, 3, 34.
30. Stolovitzky, G. et al. (2007) Dialogue on reverse engineering assessment and methods. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1115, 1-22.
31. Taylor, I.W. et al. (2009) Dynamic modularity in protein interaction networks predicts breast cancer outcome. Nat. Biotechnol., 27, 199-204.
32. Whisenant, T.C. et al. (2010) Computational prediction and experimental verification of new MAP kinase docking sites and substrates including Gli transcription factors. PLoS Comput. Biol., 6, e1000908.
33. Yu, J. et al. (2004) Advances to Bayesian network inference for generating causal networks from observational biological data. Bioinformatics, 20, 3594-3603.