Metrical presentation boosts implicit learning of artificial grammar

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 11, 2014, Pages

  Selchenkova, Tatiana ^a   François, Clement ^b,c,d   Schön, Daniele ^e,f   Corneyllie, Alexandra ^a   Perrin, Fabien ^a   Tillmann, Barbara ^a  

^a LYON NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER   (France)

^b BELLVITGE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE IDIBELL   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^d HOSPITAL SANT JOAN DE DÉU   (Spain)

^e AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^f INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL GRAMMAR; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PROCESSING DISORDER; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OSCILLATOR; PERCEPTION; PITCH; RESPONSE TIME; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEARING; LANGUAGE; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TEMPORAL LOBE;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; MALE; PITCH PERCEPTION; TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 84910121294     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112233     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Perruchet P (2008) Implicit Learning. Cognitive psychology of memory. Vol.2 of Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference, Ed. J. Byrne. 597-621.
2. Reber AS (1967) Implicit Learning of Artificial Grammars. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav 6: 855-863.
3. Nissen MJ, Bullemer P (1987) Attentional Requirements of Learning: Evidence from Performance Measures. Cogn Psychol 19: 1-32.
4. Saffran JR, Johnson EK, Aslin RN, Newport EL (1999) Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition 70: 27-52. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10193055.
5. Saffran JR, Aslin RN, Newport EL (1996) Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science (802) 274: 1926-1928. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/19489896.
6. Carrión RE, Bly BM (2007) Event-related potential markers of expectation violation in an artificial grammar learning task. Neuroreport 18: 191-195.
7. Francois C, Schön D (2010) Learning of musical and linguistic structures: comparing event-related potentials and behavior. Neuroreport 21: 928-932. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20697301. Accessed 2013 Nov 26.
8. Petersson KM, Hagoort P (2012) The neurobiology of syntax: beyond string sets. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367: 1971-1983. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3367693&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 2013 Sep 24.
9. Petersson KM, Forkstam C, Ingvar M (2004) Artificial syntactic violations activate Broca's region. Cogn Sci 28: 383-407. Available: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1016/j.cogsci.2003.12.003. Accessed 2011 July 18.
10. Uddén J, Folia V, Forkstam C, Ingvar M, Fernandez G, et al. (2008) The inferior frontal cortex in artificial syntax processing: an rTMS study. Brain Res 1224: 69-78. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18617159. Accessed 2012 Nov 13.
11. Baldwin KB, Kutas M (1997) An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning. Psychophysiology 34: 74-86. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/9009811.
12. Ferdinand NK, Mecklinger A, Kray J (2008) Error and deviance processing in implicit and explicit sequence learning. J Cogn Neurosci 20: 629-642. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18052785.
13. François C, Schön D (2011) Musical Expertise Boosts Implicit Learning of Both Musical and Linguistic Structures. Cereb cortex 21: 2357-2365. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21383236. Accessed 2011 Aug 23.
14. Friederici AD, Steinhauer K, Pfeifer E (2002) Brain signatures of artificial language processing: evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis. PNAS 99: 529-534. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=117594&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
15. Schankin A, Hagemann D, Danner D, Hager M (2011) Violations of implicit rules elicit an early negativity in the event-related potential. Neuroreport 22: 642-645. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21817929. Accessed 2013 Jun 20.
16. Eimer M, Goschke T, Schlaghecken F, Stürmer B (1996) Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: evidence from event-related brain potentials. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22: 970-987. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/8708606.
17. Fu Q, Bin G, Dienes Z, Fu X, Gao X (2013) Learning without consciously knowing: evidence from event-related potentials in sequence learning. Conscious Cogn 22: 22-34. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23247079. Accessed 2013 May 24.
18. Geiser E, Notter M, Gabrieli JDE (2012) A Corticostriatal Neural System Enhances Auditory Perception through Temporal Context Processing. J Neurosci 32: 6177-6182. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5153-11.2012.
19. Jones MR, Moynihan H, MacKenzie N, Puente J (2002) Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays. Psychol Sci 13: 313-319. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12137133.
20. Lange K (2009) Brain correlates of early auditory processing are attenuated by expectations for time and pitch. Brain Cogn 69: 127-137. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18644669. Accessed 2011 Sep 28.
21. Schmidt-Kassow M, Kotz SA (2008) Entrainment of syntactic processing? ERP-responses to predictable time intervals during syntactic reanalysis. Brain Res 1226: 144-155. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18598675. Accessed 2010 Oct 7.
22. Schmidt-Kassow M, Schubotz RI, Kotz SA (2009) Attention and entrainment: P3b varies as a function of temporal predictability. Neuroreport 20: 31-36. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18987559.
23. Schwartze M, Rothermich K, Schmidt-Kassow M, Kotz SA (2011) Temporal regularity effects on pre-attentive and attentive processing of deviance. Biol Psychol 87: 146-151. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21382437. Accessed 2012 Mar 12.
24. Hoch L, Tyler MD, Tillmann B (2013) Regularity of unit length boosts statistical learning in verbal and nonverbal artificial languages. Psychon Bull Rev 20: 142-147. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22890871. Accessed 2013 Jun 1.
25. Selchenkova T, Jones MR, Tillmann B (2014) The influence of temporal regularities on the implicit learning of pitch structures. Q J Exp Psychol. In press.
26. Jones MR (1976) Time, Our Lost Dimension: Toward a New Theory of Perception, Attention, and Memory. Psychol Rev 83: 323-355.
27. Jones MR, Boltz M (1989) Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychol Rev 96: 459-491. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2756068.
28. Jones MR (2009) Musical time. Oxford Handbook of Music Psychology, Ed. Susan Hallam, Ian Cross, Michael Thaut. 81-92.
29. Tillmann B, Poulin-Charronnat B (2010) Auditory expectations for newly acquired structures. Q J Exp Psychol 63: 1646-1664. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20175025. Accessed 2010 Dec 20.
30. Altmann GTM, Dienez Z, Goode A (1995) Modality Independence of Implicitly Learned Grammatical Knowledge. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 21: 899-912.
31. Povel D-J, Essens P (1985) Perception of Temporal Patterns. Music Percept 2: 411-440.
32. Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134: 9-21.
33. Rüsseler J, Rösler F (2000) Implicit and explicit learning of event sequences: evidence for distinct coding of perceptual and motor representations. Acta Psychol (Amst) 104: 45-67. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10769939.
34. Schön D, Besson M (2005) Visually induced auditory expectancy in music reading: a behavioral and electrophysiological study. J Cogn Neurosci 17: 694-705. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15829088.
35. Koelsch S, Gunter T, Friederici AD, Schröger E (2000) Brain indices of music processing: "nonmusicians" are musical. J Cogn Neurosci 12: 520-541. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10931776.
36. Patel AD, Gibson E, Ratner J, Besson M, Holcomb PJ (1998) Processing syntactic relations in language and music: an event-related potential study. J Cogn Neurosci 10: 717-733. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9831740.
37. Sams M, Alho K, Näätänen R (1983) Sequential effects on the ERP in discrimination two stimuli. Biol Psychol 17: 41-58.
38. Brochard R, Abecasis D, Potter D, Ragot R, Drake C (2003) THE "TICKTOCK" OF OUR INTERNAL CLOCK: Direct Brain Evidence of Subjective Accents in Isochronous Sequences. Psychol Sci 14: 362-366.
39. Marmel F, Perrin F, Tillmann B (2011) Tonal expectations influence early pitch processing. J Cogn Neurosci 23: 3095-3104. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pubmed/21265601.
40. Schön D, Magne C, Besson M (2004) The music of speech: music training facilitates pitch processing in both music and language. Psychophysiology 41: 341-349. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15102118. Accessed 2013 May 28.
41. Polich J (2007) Updating P300: An Integrative Theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 118: 2128-2148. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019.Updating.
42. Kotz SA, Schwartze M (2010) Cortical speech processing unplugged: a timely subcortico-cortical framework. Trends Cogn Sci 14: 392-399. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20655802. Accessed 2013 Sep 19.
43. Christiansen MH, Louise Kelly M, Shillcock RC, Greenfield K (2010) Impaired artificial grammar learning in agrammatism. Cognition 116: 382-393. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20605017. Accessed 2010 Aug 12.
44. Goschke T, Friederichi A, Kotz S, van Kampen A (2001) Procedural learning in Broca's Aphasia: Dissociation between the implicit acquisition of spatio-motor and phoneme sequences. J Cogn Neurosci 13: 370-388.