Temporal regularity effects on pre-attentive and attentive processing of deviance

Biological Psychology

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 146-151

  Schwartze, Michael ^a   Rothermich, Kathrin ^a   Schmidt Kassow, Maren ^b   Kotz, Sonja A ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; ERP; Oddball; Regularity; Timing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PITCH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79953308354     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.021     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adams J.C. Neuroanatomical considerations of speech processing. Listening to Speech: An Auditory Perspective 2006, 79-90. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah. S. Greenberg, W. Ainsworth (Eds.).
2. Barnes R., Jones M.R. Expectancy, attention, and time. Cognitive Psychology 2000, 41:254-311.
3. Bolton T.L. Rhythm. Journal of Psychology 1894, 6:145-238.
4. Buhusi C.V., Meck W.H. What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2005, 6:755-765.
5. Buonomano D.V. The biology of time across different scales. Nature Chemical Biology 2007, 3:594-597.
6. Coull J.T., Nobre A.C. Dissociating explicit timing from temporal expectation with fMRI. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2008, 18:137-144.
7. Drake C., Botte M.C. Tempo sensitivity in auditory sequences: evidence for a multiple-look model. Perception & Psychophysics 1993, 54:277-286.
8. Escera C., Corral M.J. Role of mismatch negativity and novelty-P3 in involuntary auditory attention. Journal of Psychophysiology 2007, 21:251-264.
9. Essens P.J. Hierarchical organization of temporal patterns. Perception & Psychophysics 1986, 40:69-73.
10. Folstein J.R., van Petten C. Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:152-170.
11. Fraisse P. Rhythm and tempo. The Psychology of Music 1982, 149-180. Academic Press, New York. D. Deutsch (Ed.).
12. Fraisse P. The Psychology of Time 1963, Harper & Row, New York.
13. Fuster J.M. The prefrontal cortex-an update: time is of the essence. Neuron 2001, 30:319-333.
14. Garrido M.I., Kilner J.M., Stephan K.E., Friston K.J. The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms. Clinical Neurophysiology 2009, 120:453-463.
15. Glass L. Synchronization and rhythmic processes in physiology. Nature 2001, 410:277-284.
16. Grondin S. From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. Psychological Bulletin 2001, 127:22-44.
17. Horváth J., Winkler I., Bendixen A. Do N1/MMN P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction?. Biological Psychology 2008, 79:139-147.
18. Imada T., Loveless H.N., McEvoy L., Sams M. Determinants of the auditory mismatch response. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1993, 87:144-153.
19. Ivry R.B. The representation of temporal information in perception and motor control. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1996, 6:851-857.
20. Ivry R.B., Schlerf J.E. Dedicated and intrinsic models of time perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12:273-280.
21. Jones M.R., Boltz M. Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review 1989, 96:459-491.
22. Jones M.R., Moynihan H., MacKenzie N., Puente J. Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays. Psychological Science 2002, 13:313-319.
23. Kotz S.A., Schwartze M. Cortical speech processing unplugged: a timely subcortico-cortical framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2010, 14:392-399.
24. Large E.W., Jones M.R. The dynamics of attending: how people track time-varying events. Psychological Review 1999, 106:119-159.
25. Lewis P.A., Miall R.C. Distinct systems for automatic and cognitively controlled time measurement: evidence from neuroimaging. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2003, 13:250-255.
26. Lewis P.A., Miall R.C. Remembering the time: a continuous clock. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:401-406.
27. Linden D.E.J. The P300: where in the brain is it produced and what does it tell us?. The Neuroscientist 2005, 11:563-576.
28. Lustig C., Matell M.S., Meck W.H. Not " just" a coincidence: frontal-striatal interactions in working memory and interval timing. Memory 2005, 13:441-448.
29. Martin X.P., Delterne P., Hoonhorst I., Markessis E., Rossion B., Colin C. Perceptual biases for rhythm: the mismatch negativity latency indexes the privileged status of binary vs non-binary interval ratios. Clinical Neuropsychology 2007, 118:2709-2715.
30. McAuley J.D., Miller N.S. Picking up the pace: effects of global temporal context on sensitivity to the tempo of auditory sequences. Perception & Psychophysics 2007, 69:709-718.
31. Meck W.H., Penney T.B., Pouthas V. Cortico-striatal representation of time in animals and humans. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2008, 18:145-152.
32. Moberget T., Karns C.M., Deouell L.Y., Lindgren M., Knight R.T., Ivry R.B. Detecting violations of sensory expectancies following cerebellar degeneration: a mismatch negativity study. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:2569-2579.
33. Näätänen R., Gaillard A.W.K., Mäntysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica 1978, 42:313-329.
34. Näätänen R., Tervaniemi M., Sussmann E., Paavilainen P., Winkler I. 'Primitive intelligence' in the auditory cortex. Trends in Neurosciences 2001, 24:283-288.
35. Näätänen R., Syssoeva O., Takegata R. Automatic time perception in the human brain for intervals ranging from milliseconds to seconds. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:660-663.
36. Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., Rinne T., Alho K. The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118:2544-2590.
37. Nobre A.C., Correa A., Coull J.T. The hazards of time. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2007, 17:465-470.
38. Petacchi A., Laird A.R., Fox P.T., Bower J.M. Cerebellum and auditory function: an ALE meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping 2005, 25:118-128.
39. Polich J., Criado J.R. Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2006, 60:172-185.
40. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118:2128-2148.
41. Schröger E., Wolff C. Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. Neuroreport 1998, 9:3355-3358.
42. Schmidt-Kassow M., Schubotz R.I., Kotz S.A. Attention and entrainment: P3b varies as a function of temporal predictability. Neuroreport 2009, 20:31-36.
43. Spencer R.M.C., Zelaznik H.N., Diedrichsen J., Ivry R.B. Disrupted timing of discontinuous but not continuous movements by cerebellar lesions. Science 2003, 300:1437-1439.
44. Takegata R., Morotomi T. Integrated neural representation of sound and temporal features in human auditory sensory memory: an event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters 1999, 274:207-210.
45. Takegata R., Syssoeva O., Winkler I., Paavilainen P., Näätänen R. Common neural mechanism for processing onset-to-onset intervals and silent gaps in sound sequences. Neuroreport 2001, 12:1783-1787.
46. Volpe U., Mucci A., Bucci P., Merlotti E., Galderisi S., Maj M. The cortical generators of P3a and P3b: a LORETA study. Brain Research Bulletin 2007, 73:220-230.
47. Wiener M., Turkeltaub P.E., Coslett H.B. Implicit timing activates the left inferior parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:3967-3971.
48. Winkler I., Denham S.L., Nelken I. Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:532-540.