Event-related potential markers of expectation violation in an artificial grammar learning task

NeuroReport

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 191-195

  Carrión, Ricardo Estevan ^a,b   Bly, Benjamin Martin ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial grammar learning; Event related potentials; Expectancy; Implicit learning; N2; P3; Sequence learning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COGNITION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 33847065087     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328011b8ae     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Reber AS. Transfer of syntactic structure in synthetic languages. J Exp Psychol Gen 1969; 81:115-119.
2. Eimer M, Goschke T, Schlaghecken F, Stürmer B. Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: evidence from event-related brain potentials. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1996; 22:970-987.
3. Baldwin K, Kutas M. An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning. Psychophysiology 1997; 34:74-86.
4. Lang S, Kotchoubey B. Learning effects on event-related potentials. Neuroreport 2000; 11:3327-3331.
5. Rüsseler J, Rösler F. Implicit and explicit learning of event sequences: evidence for distinct coding of perceptual and motor representations. Acta Psychol 2000; 104:45-67.
6. Schlaghecken F, Stürmer B, Eimer M. Chunking processes in the learning of event sequences: electrophysiological indicators. Mem Cogn 2000; 28:821-831.
7. Rüsseler J, Hennighausen E, Münte TF, Rösler F. Differences in incidental and intentional learning of sensorimotor sequences as revealed by event-related potentials. Cogn Brain Res 2003; 15:116-126.
8. Rüsseler J, Kuhlicke D, Münte TF. Human error monitoring during implicit and explicit learning of a sensorimotor sequence. Neurosci Res 2003; 47:233-240.
9. Miyawaki K, Sato A, Yasuda A, Kumano H, Kuboki T. Explicit knowledge and intention to learn in sequence learning: an event related potential study. Neuroreport 2005; 16:705-708.
10. Opitz B, Friederici AD. Brain correlates of language learning: the neuronal dissociation of rule-based versus similarity-based learning. J Neurosci 2004; 24:8436-8440.
11. Lieberman MD, Chang GY, Chiao J, Bookheimer SY, Knowlton BJ. An event-related fMRI study of artificial grammar learning in a balanced chunk strength design. J Cogn Neurosci 2004; 16:427-438.
12. Dienes Z, Altmann GT. Measuring learning using an untrained control group: comments on R. Reber and P. Perruchet. Q J Exp Psychol A 2003; 56:117-123.
13. Gratton G, Coles M, Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983; 55:468-484.
14. McCarthy G, Wood CC. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 62:203-208.
15. Patel SH, Azzam PN. Characterization of N200 and P300: selected studies of the event-related potential. Int J Med Sci 2005; 2:147-154.
16. Renault B, Lesévre N. Topographical study of the emitted potential obtained after the omission of an expected visual stimulus. In: Otto D, editor. Multidisciplinary perspectives in event-related brain potential research. Washington, District Columbia: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1978. pp. 202-208.
17. Renault B, Lesévre N. A trial-by-trial study of the visual omission response in reaction time situations. In: Lehman D, Callaway E, editors. Human evoked potentials. New York, New York: Plenum Press; 1979. pp. 317-329.
18. Näätänen R, Picton TW. N2 and automatic versus controlled processes. In: McCallum WC, Zappoli R, Denoth F, editors. Cerebral psychophysiology: Studies in event-related potentials. New York, New York: Elsevier; 1986. pp. 169-186.
19. Saffran JR, Thiessen ED. Pattern induction by infant language learners. Dev Psychol 2003; 39:484-494.
20. Gómez RL. Transfer and complexity in artificial grammar learning. Cogn Psychol 1997; 33:154-207.
21. Johnson R. A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology 1986; 23:367-384.
22. Hoffman JE. Event-related potentials and automatic and controlled processes. In: Rohrbaugh JW, Parasuraman R, Johnson R, editors. Event related brain potentials. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. 1990. pp. 145-157.
23. Donchin E, Coles M. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav Brain Sci 1988; 11:357-374.