Auditory expectations for newly acquired structures

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 63, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1646-1664

  Tillmann, Barbara ^a   Poulin Charronnat, Bénédicte ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

Artificial grammar; Auditory expectations; Implicit learning; Priming; Tone sequences

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; STATISTICS; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY; PROCEDURES;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 77954650673     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210903511228     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Altmann, G. T., Dienes, Z., & Goode, A. (1995). Modality independence of implicitly learned grammatical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 899-912.
2. Bausenhart, K. M., Rolke, B., & Ulrich, R. (2007). Knowing when to hear aids what to hear. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1603-1609.
3. Bharucha, J. J., & Stoeckig, K. (1986). Reaction time and musical expectancy: Priming of chords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(4), 403-410.
4. Bigand, E., Madurell, F., Tillmann, B., & Pineau, M. (1999). Effect of global structure and temporal organization on chord processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(1), 184-197.
5. Bigand, E., Poulin, B., Tillmann, B., Madurell, F., & D'Adamo, D. (2003). Cognitive versus sensory com-for Finnish music; and Curtis & Bharucha, ponents in harmonic priming effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 159-171.
6. Buchner, A. (1994). Indirect effects of synthetic grammar learning in an identification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 550-566.
7. Carrion, R. E., & Bly, B. M. (2007). Event-related potential markers of expectation violation in an artificial grammar learning task. Neuroreport, 18, 191-195.
8. Cleeremans, A., & Jiménez, L. (2002). Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamic perspective. In R. M. French & A. Cleeremans (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness (pp. 1-40). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
9. Cleeremans, A., & McClelland, J. L. (1991). Learning the structure of event sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 235-253.
10. Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25, 257-271.
11. Curtis, M. E., & Bharucha, J. J. (2009). Memory and musical expectation for tones in cultural context. Music Perception, 26(4), 365-375.
12. Dennis, N. A., Howard, J. H., & Howard, D. V. (2006). Implicit sequence learning without motor sequencing in young and old adults. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 153-164.
13. Deroost, N., & Soetens, E. (2006). Perceptual or motor learning in SRT tasks with complex sequence structures. Psychological Research, 70, 88-102.
14. Desmet, C., Poulin-Charronnat, B., Lalitte, P., & Perruchet, P. (2009). Implicit learning of nonlocal musical rules: A comment on Kuhn and Dienes (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 299-305.
15. Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 343-350.
16. Dienes, Z. (2008). Subjective measures of unconscious knowledge. Progress in Brain Research, 168, 49-64.
17. Dienes, Z., Broadbent, D., & Berry, D. C. (1991). Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 875-887.
18. Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(3), 458-467.
19. Fletcher, P. C., Zafiris, O., Frith, C. D., Honey, R.A. E., Corlett, P. R., Zilles, K., et al. (2005). On the benefits of not trying: Brain activity and connectivity reflecting the interactions of explicit and implicit sequence learning. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1002-1015.
20. Greenberg, G. Z., & Larkin, W. D. (1968). Frequencyresponse characteristic of auditory observers detecting signals of a single frequency in noise: The probe-signal method. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44(6), 1513-1523.
21. Helman, S., & Berry, D. C. (2003). Effects of divided attention and speeded responding on implicit and explicit retrieval of artificial grammar knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 31, 703-714.
22. Hunt, R. H., & Aslin, R. N. (2001). Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: Access to separable statistical cues by individual learners. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 658-680.
23. Johnstone, T., & Shanks, D. R. (1999). Two mechanisms in implicit artificial grammar learning? Comment on Meulemans and van der Linden (1997). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(2), 524-531.
24. Kinder, A., Shanks, D. R., Cook, J., & Tunney, R. J. (2003). Recollection, fluency, and the explicit/implicit distinction in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 551-565.
25. Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1994). The information acquired during artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(1), 79-91.
26. Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1996). Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 169-181.
27. Krumhansl, C. L. (1990). Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Krumhansl, C. L. (1991). Memory for musical surface. Memory & Cognition, 19(4), 401-411.
29. Krumhansl, C. L., Toivanen, P., Eerola, T., Jarvinen, T., & Louhiviori, J. (2000). Cross-cultural music cognition: Cognitive methodology applied to North Sami yoiks. Cognition, 76(1), 13-58.
30. Kuhn, G., & Dienes, Z. (2005). Implicit learning of nonlocal musical rules: Implicitly learning more than chunks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1417-1432.
31. Loui, P., & Wessel, D. L. (2008). Learning and liking an artificial musical system: Effects of set size and repeated exposure. Musicae Scientae, 12(2), 207-230.
32. Loui, P., Wu, E. H., Wessel, D. L., & Knight, R. T. (2009). A generalized mechanism for perception of pitch patterns. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(2), 454-459.
33. Marmel, F., Tillmann, B., & Dowling, W. J. (2008). Tonal expectations influence pitch perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 841-852.
34. McMullen, E., & Saffran, J. R. (2004). Music and language: A developmental comparison. Music Perception, 21(3), 289-311.
35. McNamara, T. P. (2005). Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word recognition. New York: Psychology Press.
36. Meulemans, T., & van der Linden, M. (1997). Associative chunk strength in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 1007-1028.
37. Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90(2), 227-234.
38. Niessen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-32.
39. Pearce, M. T., Ruiz, M. H., Kapasi, S., Wiggins, G. A., & Bhattacharya, J. (2009, August). Unsupervised statistical learning in melodic expectation: Behavioural and electrophysiological support for a computational model. Paper presented at the 7th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
40. Pearce, M. T., & Wiggins, G. A. (2006). Expectation in melody: The influence of context and learning. Music Perception, 23(5), 377-405.
41. Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 264-275.
42. Petersson, K. M., & Forkstam, C. (2004). Artificial syntactic violations activate Broca's region. Cognitive Science, 28, 383-407.
43. Pothos, E. M. (2007). Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 227-244.
44. Poulin-Charronnat, B., Tillmann, B., Perruchet, P., & Molin, P. (2009). Implicit learning of artificial grammar of tones: What influences direct and indirect judgments. Manuscript in preparation.
45. Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855-863.
46. Reber, A. S., & Lewis, S. (1977). Implicit learning: An analysis of the form and structure of a body of tacit knowledge. Cognition, 5, 333-361.
47. Reber, R., & Perruchet, P. (2003). The use of control groups in artificial grammar learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 97-115.
48. Reed, J.,&Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 585-594.
49. Remillard, G. (2003). Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 581-597.
50. Saffran, J. R. (2003). Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 12(4), 110-114.
51. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926-1928.
52. Saffran, J. R., Johnson, E. K., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1999). Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70(1), 27-52.
53. Schacter, D. L., & Buckner, R. L. (1998). Priming and the brain. Neuron, 20(2), 185-195.
54. Schön, D., Boyer, M., Moreno, S., Besson, M., Peretz, I., & Kolinsky, R. (2008). Songs as aid for language acquisition. Cognition, 106, 975-983.
55. Schvaneveldt, R. W.,&Gomez, R. L. (1998). Attention and probabilistic sequence learning. Psychological Research, 61, 175-190.
56. Shanks, D. R., Wilkinson, L., & Channer, S. (2003). Relationship between priming and recognition in deterministic and probabilistic sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 248-261.
57. Smith, K. H., & Mathews, V. (1969). Learnability of melodies generated by a simple Markov process. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 45(1), 314.
58. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1979). Mechanisms of sentence context effects in reading: Automatic activation and conscious attention. Memory & Cognition, 7, 77-85.
59. Tillmann, B. (2005). Implicit investigations of tonal knowledge in nonmusician listeners. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1060, 100-110.
60. Tillmann, B., Bharucha, J. J., & Bigand, E. (2000). Implicit learning of tonality: A self-organizing approach. Psychological Review, 107(4), 885-913.
61. Tillmann, B., & Lebrun-Guillaud, G. (2006). Influence of tonal and temporal expectations on chord processing and on completion judgments of chord sequences. Psychological Research, 70, 345-358.
62. Tillmann, B., & Marmel, F. (2009). Musical expectations within chord sequences: Facilitation due to tonal stability without final wrap-up processes. Manuscript in preparation.
63. Tillmann, B., & McAdams, S. (2004). Implicit learning of musical timbre sequences: Statistical regularities confronted with acoustical (dis)similarities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(5), 1131-1142.
64. Vinter, A., & Perruchet, P. (1999). Isolating unconscious influences: The neutral parameter procedure. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 857-875.
65. Warrier, C. M., & Zatorre, R. J. (2002). Influence of tonal context and timbral variation on perception of pitch. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(2), 198-207.