The influence of temporal regularities on the implicit learning of pitch structures

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 67, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 2360-2380

  Selchenkova, Tatiana ^a,b   Jones, Mari Riess ^c,d   Tillmann, Barbara ^a,b  

^a LYON NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial grammar; Implicit learning; Rhythm; Temporal expectations; Tone sequences

Indexed keywords

FRANCE; HEARING; LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME PERCEPTION;

FRANCE; LEARNING; PITCH PERCEPTION; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 84907870568     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.929155     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abla, D., Katahira, K., & Okanoya, K. (2008). On-line assessment of statistical learning by event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(6), 952–964. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20058
2. Altmann, G. T. M., Dienez, Z., & Goode, A. (1995). Modality independence of implicitly learned grammatical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 899–912.
3. Bausenhart, K. M., Rolke, B., & Ulrich, R. (2007). Knowing when to hear aids what to hear. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(12), 1610–1615. doi:10.1080/17470210701536419
4. Boltz, M. (1989). Perceiving the end: Effects of tonal relationships on melodic completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(4), 749–761.
5. Brandon, M., Terry, J., Stevens, C. J., & Tillmann, B. (2012). Incidental learning of temporal structures conforming to a metrical framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 294. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00294
6. Buchner, A. (1994). Indirect effects of synthetic grammar learning in an identification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(3), 550–566. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.20.3.550
7. Cleeremans, A. (1997). Principles for Implicit Learning. In D. Berry (Ed.), How implicit is implicit learning?(pp. 196–234). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A., & Boyer, M. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(10), 406–416. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21227256
9. Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphical system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using macintosh computers. Behavior Methods, Research, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257–271.
10. Correa, A., & Nobre, A. C. (2008). Neural modulation by regularity and passage of time. Journal of Neurophysiology, 100(3), 1649–1655. doi:10.1152/jn.90656.2008
11. De Diego Balaguer, R., Toro, J. M., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Bachoud-Lévi, A.-C. (2007). Different neurophysiological mechanisms underlying word and rule extraction from speech. PloS ONE, 2(11), 1–11. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001175
12. Desmet, C., Poulin-Charronnat, B., Lalitte, P., & Perruchet, P. (2009). Implicit learning of nonlocal musical rules: A comment on Kuhn and Dienes (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 299–305. doi:10.1037/a0014278
13. Deutsch, D. (1983). The generation of two isochronous sequences in parallel. Perception & Psychophysics, 34(4), 331–337. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6657434
14. Doherty, J. R., Rao, A., Mesulam, M. M., & Nobre, A. C. (2005). Synergistic effect of combined temporal and spatial expectations on visual attention. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25(36), 8259–8266. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1821-05.2005
15. Ellis, R. J., & Jones, M. R. (2010). Rhythmic context modulates foreperiod effects. Attention Perception and Psychophysics, 72(8), 2274–2288. doi:10.3758/APP.72.8.2274
16. Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(3), 458–467. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.28.3.458
17. Geiser, E., Notter, M., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2012). A Corticostriatal Neural System Enhances Auditory Perception through Temporal Context Processing. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(18), 6177–6182. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5153-11.2012
18. Grahn, J. A. (2012). Neural Mechanisms of Rhythm Perception: Current Findings and Future Perspectives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 585–606. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01213.x
19. Handel, S. (Ed.). (1993). Listening: An Introduction to the Perception of Auditory Events. The MIT Press.
20. Hunt, R. H., & Aslin, R. N. (2001). Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: Access to separable statistical cues by individual learners. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 658–680.
21. Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, Our Lost Dimension: Toward a New Theory of Perception, Attention, and Memory. Psychological Review, 83(5), 323–355.
22. Jones, M. R. (2009). Musical time. In S. Hallam, I. Cross & M. Thaut (Eds.), Oxford handbook of music psychology (pp. 81–92). Oxford: Oxford University Press
23. Jones, M. R. (2012). Attending to sound patterns and the role of entrainment. In A. Nobre & J. T. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (pp. 316–329). Oxford: Oxford University Press
24. Jones, M. R., & Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review, 96(3), 459–491. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2756068
25. Jones, M. R., Johnston, H. M., & Puente, J. (2006). Effects of auditory pattern structure on anticipatory and reactive attending. Cognitive Psychology, 53(1), 59–96. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.01.003
26. Jones, M. R., Moynihan, H., MacKenzie, N., & Puente, J. (2002). Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays. Psychological Science, 13(4), 313–319. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12137133
27. Jonides, J., & Mack, R. (1984). On the cost and benefit of cost and benefit. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 29–44.
28. Kinder, A., Shanks, D. R., Cock, J., & Tunney, R. J. (2003). Recollection, fluency, and the explicit/implicit distinction in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(4), 551–565. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.551
29. Klein, J. M., & Jones, M. R. (1996). Effects of attentional set and rhythmic complexity on attending. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(1), 34–46. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8668518
30. Kuhn, G., & Dienes, Z. (2005). Implicit learning of nonlocal musical rules: Implicitly learning more than chunks. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1417–1432. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1417
31. Lange, K. (2009). Brain correlates of early auditory processing are attenuated by expectations for time and pitch. Brain and Cognition, 69(1), 127–137. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2008.06.004
32. Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The Dynamics of Attending: How people Track Time-Varying Events. Psychological Review, 106(1), 119–159.
33. Loui, P. (2012). Learning and liking of melody and harmony: Further studies in artificial grammar learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 554–567. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01208.x
34. Loui, P., & Wessel, D. (2008). Learning and liking an artificial musical system: Effects of set size and repeated exposure. Musicae Scientiae: The Journal of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music, 12(2), 207–230. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2819428&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
35. Loui, P., Wessel, D. L., & Hudson Kam, C. L. (2010). Humans rapidly learn grammatical structure in a new musical scale. Music Perception, 27(5), 377–388.
36. Marmel, F., Tillmann, B., & Dowling, W. J. (2008). Tonal expectations influence pitch perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(5), 841–852. doi:10.3758/PP
37. McAuley, J. D., & Semple, P. (1999). The Effect of Tempo and Musical Experience on Perceived Beat. Australian Journal of Psychology, 51(3), 176–187. doi:10.1080/00049539908255355
38. Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional Requirements of Learning: Evidence from Performance Measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1–32.
39. Perruchet, P. (2008). Implicit learning. In J. Byrne (Ed.), Cognitive psychology of memory. Vol. 2 of learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (pp. 597–621). Oxford: Elsevier
40. Perruchet, P., & Tillmann, B. (2010). Exploiting multiple sources of information in learning an artificial language: Human data and modeling. Cognitive Science, 34(2), 255–285. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01074.x
41. Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (1998). PARSER: A Model for Word Segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(2), 246–263. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2576
42. Povel, D.-J., & Essens, P. (1985). Perception of Temporal Patterns. Music Perception, 2(4), 411–440.
43. Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit Learning of Artificial Grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855–863.
44. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926–1928. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19489896
45. Saffran, J. R., Johnson, E. K., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1999). Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70(1), 27–52. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10193055
46. Salidis, J. (2001). Nonconscious temporal cognition: Learning rhythms implicitly. Memory & Cognition, 29(8), 1111–1119. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11913747
47. Schmidt-Kassow, M., Schubotz, R. I., & Kotz, S. A. (2009). Attention and entrainment: P3b varies as a function of temporal predictability. Neuroreport, 20(1), 31–36. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e32831b4287
48. Schwartze, M., Rothermich, K., Schmidt-Kassow, M., & Kotz, S. A. (2011). Temporal regularity effects on pre-attentive and attentive processing of deviance. Biological Psychology, 87(1), 146–151. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.021
49. Selchenkova, T., François, C., Schön, D., Corneyllie, A., Perrin, F., Tillmann, B. (2014). Metrical presentation boosts implicit learning of pitch structures. Manuscript submitted for publication.
50. Tillmann, B., Janata, P., Birk, J., & Bharucha, J. J. (2003). The costs and benefits of tonal centers for chord processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 470–482. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.470
51. Tillmann, B., & McAdams, S. (2004). Implicit learning of musical timbre sequences: Statistical regularities confronted with acoustical (dis)similarities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(5), 1131–1142. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.1131
52. Tillmann, B., & Poulin-Charronnat, B. (2010). Auditory expectations for newly acquired structures. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(8), 1646–1664. doi:10.1080/17470210903511228
53. Tillmann, B., Stevens, C., & Keller, P. E. (2011). Learning of timing patterns and the development of temporal expectations. Psychological Research, 75(3), 243–258. doi:10.1007/s00426-010-0302-7
54. Vinter, A., & Perruchet, P. (1999). Isolating unconscious influences: The neutral parameter procedure. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52(4), 857–875. doi:10.1080/713755857
55. Vinter, A., & Perruchet, P. (2000). Implicit learning in children is not related to age: Evidence from drawing behavior. Child Development, 71(5), 1223–1240. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11108093