Violations of implicit rules elicit an early negativity in the event-related potential

NeuroReport

Volumn 22, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 642-645

  Schankin, Andrea ^a   Hagemann, Dirk ^a   Danner, Daniel ^a   Hager, Marieke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

artificial grammar learning; event related potentials; implicit learning; mismatch negativity; sequence learning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LEARNING;

EID: 80052027912     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: 1473558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328349d146     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Reber AS. Implicit learning of artificial grammars. J Verb Learn Verb Behav 1967; 6:855-863.
2. Squires KC, Wickens C, Squires NK, Donchin E. The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. Science 1976; 193:1142-1146.
3. Donchin E. The P300 component of the event-related brain potentials as an index of information processing. Biol Psychol 1982; 14:1-52. (Pubitemid 12080791)
4. Eimer M, Goschke T, Schlaghecken F, Stürmer B. Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: evidence from event-related brain potentials. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1996; 22:970-987. (Pubitemid 126491341)
5. Baldwin KB, Kutas M. An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning. Psychophysiology 1997; 34:74-86. (Pubitemid 27043815)
6. Näätänen R, Gaillard AWK, Mantysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1978; 42:313-329.
7. Schröger E. Mismatch negativity: a microphone into auditory memory. J Psychophysiol 2007; 21:138-146.
8. Winkler I. Interpreting the mismatch negativity. J Psychophysiol 2007; 21:147-163. (Pubitemid 351516001)
9. Carrión RE, Bly BM. Event-related potential markers of expectation violation in an artificial grammar learning task. Neuroreport 2007; 18: 191-195.
10. Gratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983; 55:468-484. (Pubitemid 13112654)
11. Conrad R. Acoustic confusion in immediate memory. British Journal of Psychology 1964; 55:75-84.
12. Hahne A, Friederici AD. Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: early automatic and late controlled processes. J Cognit Neurosci 1999; 11:194-205. (Pubitemid 29224561)
13. Münte TF, Heinze HJ, Mangun GR. Dissociation of brain activity related to syntactic and semantic aspects of language. J Cognit Neurosci 1993; 5:335-344. (Pubitemid 23225585)
14. De Diego Balaguer R, Toro JM, Rodriguez-Fornells A, Bachoud-Levi AC. Different neurophysiological mechanisms underlying word and rule extraction from speech. PLoS One 2007; 2:1-11.
15. Hahne A, Schröger E, Friederici AD. Segregating early physical and syntactic processes in auditory sentence comprehension. Neuroreport 2002; 13:305-309. (Pubitemid 34183572)
16. Johansson M, Mecklinger A. The late posterior negativity in ERP studies of episodic memory: action monitoring and retrieval of attribute conjunctions. Biol Psychol 2003; 64:91-117. (Pubitemid 37346141)