The effects of force feedback on surgical task performance: A meta-analytical integration

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8619, Issue , 2014, Pages 150-157

  Weber, Bernhard ^a   Schneider, Sonja ^a  

^a GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

Author keywords

3D vision; Depth information; Force feedback; Haptics; Minimally invasive surgery; Stereoscopy; Surgical robots; Telesurgery

Indexed keywords

NEUROLOGY; STEREO IMAGE PROCESSING; SURGERY; TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

3-D VISION; DEPTH INFORMATION; FORCE FEEDBACK; HAPTICS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; STEREOSCOPY; SURGICAL ROBOTS; TELESURGERY;

SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

EID: 84910113655     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44196-1_19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Arata, J., Takahashi, H., Yasunaka, S., Onda, K., Tanaka, K., Sugita, N., Hashizume, M., et al.: Impact of network time-delay and force feedback on tele-surgery. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 3(3–4), 371–378 (2008)
2. Bauernschmitt, R., Gaertner, C., Braun, E.U., Mayer, H., Knoll, A., Schreiber, U. Lange, R.: Improving the quality of robotic heart surgery: Evaluation in a new experimental system. In: Proceedings of the 4th Russian-Bavarian Conference on Biomedical Engineering at Moscow Institute of Electronic Technology, pp. 137–140. Technical University, Zelenograd, Moscow, Russia, 8/9 July 2008
3. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P., Rothstein, H.R.: Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)
4. Braun, E.U., Mayer, H., Knoll, A., Lange, R., Bauernschmitt, R.: The must-have in robotic heart surgery: haptic feedback. In: Medical Robotics, pp. 9–20. I-Tech Education and Publishing, Vienna, Austria (2008)
5. Braun, E.U., Gaertner, C., Mayer, H., Knoll, A., Lange, R., Bauernschmitt, R.: Haptic Aided Roboting for Heart Surgeons. In: Proceedings of the 4th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering, pp. 1695–1696. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2009)
6. Cadiere, G.B., Himpens, J., Germay, O., Izizaw, R., Degueldre, M., Vandromme, J., et al.: Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J. Surg. 25(11), 1467–1477 (2001)
7. Cohen, J.: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (1988)
8. Debus, T., Becker, T., Dupont, P., Jang, T.J., Howe, R.: Multichannel vibrotactile display for sensory substitution during teleoperation. In: Proceedings of SPIE–The International Society for Optical Engineering, Vol. 4570, pp. 42–49 (2001)
9. Deml, B.: Telepräsenzsysteme - Gestaltung der Mensch-System Schnittstelle, Dissertation thesis, University of the Armed Forces. http://edok01.tib.uni-hannover.de/edoks/e01dd01/ 482342803l.pdf (2004). Accessed 16 Jan 2014
10. Gerovich, O., Marayong, P., Okamura, A.M.: The effect of visual and haptic feedback on computer-assisted needle insertion. Comput. Aided Surg. 9(6), 243–249 (2004)
11. Gwilliam, J.C., Mahvash, M., Vagvolgyi, B., Vacharat, A., Yuh, D.D., Okamura, A.M.: Effects of haptic and graphical force feedback on teleoperated palpation. In: ICRA’09. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2009, pp. 677–682. IEEE (2009)
12. Hagen, M.E., Meehan, J.J., Inan, I., Morel, P.: Visual clues act as a substitute for haptic feedback in robotic surgery. Surg. Endosc. 22(6), 1505–1508 (2008)
13. Hedges, L., Olkin, I.: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Academic Press, San Diego (1985)
14. Kazi, A.: Operator performance in surgical telemanipulation. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 10(5), 495–510 (2001)
15. Mahvash, M., Gwilliam, J., Agarwal, R., Vagvolgyi, B., Su, L. M., Yuh, D. D., Okamura, A. M.: Force-feedback surgical teleoperator: Controller design and palpation experiments. In: Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Haptics 2008, pp. 465–471. IEEE (2008)
16. Mohr, F.W., Falk, V., Diegeler, A., Walther, T., et al.: Computer-enhanced ‘robotic’ cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 121, 842–853 (2001)
17. Moody, L., Baber, C., Arvanitis, T.N.: Objective surgical performance evaluation based on haptic feedback. Stud. Health Technol. Inf. 85, 304–310 (2002)
18. Nitsch, V., Färber, B.: A meta-analysis of the effects of haptic interfaces on task performance with teleoperation systems. IEEE Trans. Hapt. 6(4), 387–398 (2012)
19. Okamura, A.M.: Methods for haptic feedback in teleoperated robot-assisted surgery. Ind. Rob. Int. J. 31(6), 499–508 (2004)
20. Panait, L., Akkary, E., Bell, R.L., Roberts, K.E., Dudrick, S.J., Duffy, A.J.: The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. J. Surg. Res. 156(2), 312–316 (2009)
21. Paul, L., Cartiaux, O., Docquier, P.L., Banse, X.: Ergonomic evaluation of 3D plane positioning using a mouse and a haptic device. Int. J. Med. Rob. Comput. Assist. Surg. 5(4), 435–443 (2009)
22. Santos-Carreras, L., Beira, R., Sengül, A., Gassert, R., Bleuler, H.: Influence of force and torque feedback on operator performance in a VR-based suturing task. Appl. Bion. Biomech. 7(3), 217–230 (2010)
23. Salkini, M.W., Doarn, C.R., Kiehl, N., Broderick, T.J., Donovan, J.F., Gaitonde, K.: The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic training using the LapMentor II. J. Endourol. 24(1), 99–102 (2010)
24. Seibold, U.: An advanced force feedback tool design for minimally invasive robotic surgery. Dissertation Thesis, Technical University Munich (2013)
25. Talasaz, A., Trejos, A. L., Patel, R.V.: Effect of force feedback on performance of roboticsassisted suturing. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), pp. 823–828. IEEE (2012)
26. Tholey, G.: A teleoperative haptic feedback framework for computer-aided minimally invasive surgery. Doctoral Dissertation, Drexel University (2007)
27. Van der Meijden, O.A.J., Schijven, M.P.: The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review. Surg. Endosc. 23(6), 1180–1190 (2009)
28. Wagner, C.R., Howe, R.D.: Force feedback benefit depends on experience in multiple degree of freedom robotic surgery task. IEEE Trans. Rob. 23(6), 1235–1240 (2007)
29. Wagner, C.R., Stylopoulos, N., Howe, R.D.: The role of force feedback in surgery: analysis of blunt dissection. In: Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, pp. 73–79 (2002)
30. Westebring-van der Putten, E.P., Goossens, R.H.M., Jakimowicz, J.J., Dankelman, J.: Haptics in minimally invasive surgery-a review. Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Technol. 17 (1), 3–16 (2008)
31. Yiasemidou, M., Glassman, D., Vasas, P., Badiani, S., Patel, B.: Faster simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomy with haptic feedback technology. Open Access Surg. 4, 39–44 (2011)
32. Zhou, M., Perreault, J., Schwaitzberg, S.D., Cao, C.G.L.: Effects of experience on force perception threshold in minimally invasive surgery. Surg. Endosc. 22(2), 510–515 (2008)