The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic training using the lapmentor II

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 99-102

  Salkini, Mohamad W ^a,b   Doarn, Charles R ^a   Kiehl, Nicholai ^a   Broderick, Timothy J ^a   Donovan, James F ^a   Gaitonde, Krishnanath ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GALLBLADDER; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LIVER; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECREATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VELOCITY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ADULT; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; TOUCH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEO GAMES;

EID: 75149184118     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0307     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bridges M, Diamond DL. The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg 1989;210:118-121.
2. Figert PL, Park AE, Witzke DB, Schwartz RW. Transfer of training in acquiring laparoscopic skills. J Am Coll Surg 2001;193:533-537.
3. Schijven M, Jakimowicz J. Virtual reality surgical laparoscopic simulators: How to choose. Surg Endosc 2003;17: 1943-1950.
4. Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR Jr., Sierra R, et al. Skill retention following proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training. Surgery 2005;138:165-170.
5. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Surgery. Available at www.acgme.org=ac., accessed 2007.
6. Ayodeji ID, Schijven M, Jakimowicz J, Greve JW. Face validation of the Simbionix LAP Mentor virtual reality training module and its applicability in the surgical curriculum. Surg Endosc 2007;21:1641-1649.
7. McDougall EM, Corica FA, Boker JR, Sala LG, Callery M, Borin JF, et al. Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgical simulator. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:779-787.
8. Zhang A, Hünerbein M, Dai Y, Schlag PM, Beller S. Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgery simulator (Lap Mentor): Evaluation of surgical skill with a virtual laparoscopic training simulator. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1440-1444.
9. Liu A, Tendick F, Cleary K, Kaufmann C. A survey of surgical simulation: Applications, technology, and education. Presence 2003;12:599-614.
10. Lamata P, Gómez EJ, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Lamata F, del Pozo F, Usón J. Tissue consistency perception in laparoscopy to define the level of fidelity in virtual reality simulation. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1368-1375.
11. Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR, Reznick RK, Matsumoto ED, Sidhu RS, Jarvi KA. The educational impact of bench model fidelity on the acquisition of technical skill: The use of clinically relevant outcome measures. Ann Surg 2004;240:374-381.
12. Kanumuri P, Ganai S, Wohaibi EM, Bush RW, Grow DR, Seymour NE. Virtual reality and computer-enhanced training devices equally improve laparoscopic surgical skill in novices. JSLS 2008;12:219-226.
13. Rosser JC Jr., Lynch PJ, Cuddihy L, Gentile DA, Klonsky J, Merrell R. The impact of video games on training surgeons in the 21st century. Arch Surg 2007;142:181-186.
14. Rosenberg BH, Landsittel D, Averch TD. Can video games be used to predict or improve laparoscopic skills? J Endourol 2005;19:372-376.