Operator performance in surgical telemanipulation

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 495-510

  Kazi, Arif ^a  

^a KUKA Laboratories GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039842187     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/105474601753132678     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. -th Annual Conference on Manual Control.
2. Ben-Porat, O., Shoham, M., & Meyer, J. (2000). Control design and task performance in endoscopic teleoperation. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(3), 256-267.
3. Breitwieser, H. (1991). DISTEL: Digitales Steuerungssystem für Telemanipulatoren. Robotersysteme 7, 73-78 (in German).
4. Brooks, T. L., & Bejczy, A. K. (1985). Hand controllers for teleoperation: A state of the art technology survey and evaluation (JPL Publication 85-11). Pasadena, CA: California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
5. Chapel, J. D. (1989). Performance limitations of bilateral force reflection imposed by operator dynamic characteristics. In G. Rodriguez & H. Seraji (Eds.), Man-Machine Collaboration in Space/Proceedings of the NASA Conference on Space Telerobotics (p. 91-100). Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
6. Chapel, J. D., & Lawrence, D. A. (1987). Stability analysis for alternative force control schemes as applied to remote space teleoperation. Proceedings of the 10th Annual AAS Guidance and Control Conference, p. 399-415.
7. Daniel, R. W., & McAree, P. R. (1998). Fundamental limits of performance for force reflecting teleoperation. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 17(8), 811-830.
8. Das, H., Zak, H., Kim, W. S., Bejczy, A. K., & Schenker, P. S. (1992). Operator performance with alternative manual control modes in teleoperation. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(2), 201-217.
9. Draper, J. V. (1993). Human factors in telemanipulation: Perspectives from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Experience. In W. S. Kim (ed.), Telemanipulator Technology and Space Telerobotics/Proceedings of the SPIE 2057, 162-174. Bellingham, WA: The International Society for Optical Engineering.
10. th Conference on Remote Systems Technology, p. 154-164.
11. Goertz, R. C., & Thompson, W. M. (1954). Electronically controlled manipulator. Nucleonics, 12(11), 46-47.
12. th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, p. 1197-1205.
13. Hannaford, B. (1989). A design framework for teleoperators with kinesthetic feedback. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 5(4), 426-434.
14. Hannaford, B., & Anderson, R. J. (1988). Experimental and simulation studies of hard contact in Force reflecting teleoperation. Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, p. 584-589.
15. Hashtrudi-Zaad, K., & Salcudean, S. E. (2000). Analysis and evaluation of stability and performance for teleoperation control architectures. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, p. 3017-3113.
16. Hill, J. W., & Jensen, J. F. (1998). Telepresence technology in medicine: Principles and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(3), 569-580.
17. Kazi, A. (1999). Feinfühlige Telemanipulation in der minimal invasiven Chirurgie. Düsseldorf: VDI Verlag (in German).
18. Kim, W. S. (1992). Developments of new force reflecting control schemes and an application to a teleoperation training simulator. Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, p. 1412-1419.
19. Krupa, A., Doignon, C., Gangloff, J., de Mathelin, M., Soler, L., & Morel, G. (2000). Towards semi-autonomy in laparoscopic surgery through vision and force feedback control. Proceedings of the 2000 International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, p. 191-201.
20. Madhani, A. J., Niemeyer, G., & Salisbury, J. K. (1998). The Black Falcon: A teleoperated surgical instrument for minimally invasive surgery. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, p. 936-944.
21. Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., Hogan, N., & Bizzi, E. (1985). Neural, mechanical and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 5(10), 2732-2743.
22. Ortmaier, T., Reintsema, D., Seibold, U., Hagn, U., & Hirzinger, G. (2001). The DLR minimally invasive robotics surgery scenario. In G. Färber & J. Hoogen (Eds.), Advances in Interactive Multimodal Telepresence Systems (pp. 135-147). Munich, Germany: Technical University of Munich, Collaborative Research Center SFB 453.
23. Otsuka, M., Matsumoto, N., Idogaki, T., Kosuge, K., & Itoh, T. (1995). Bilateral telemanipulator system with communication time delay based on force-sum driven virtual internal models. Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, p. 344-350.
24. Raju, G. J., & Sheridan, T. B. (1990). An experiment in bilateral telemanipulation with adjustable impedances. Proceedings of the Japan-USA Symposium on Flexible Automation. York, NY: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
25. nd ed.). New York: Springer Publications.
26. Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. nd IARP Workshop on Medical Robotics, p. 137-148.
28. Yokokohji, Y., Hosotani, N., & Yoshikawa, T. (1994). Analysis of maneuverability and stability of micro-teleoperation systems. Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, 237-243.